**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jan 18 02:59:56 2010
Jan 18 03:12:45 <jancona> I haven't looked at the installer stuff much.
Jan 18 03:21:18 <Serdar> hmm
Jan 18 03:21:33 <Serdar> there is something in bionic/libc/include
Jan 18 03:21:44 <Serdar> but this is the wrong branch...
Jan 18 03:24:52 <Serdar> shoot.
Jan 18 03:25:07 <Serdar> git clone git://gitorious.org/android-on-freerunner/platform_bionic.git/libc/include does not work :(
Jan 18 03:28:54 <jancona> What are you trying to do?
Jan 18 03:29:07 <Serdar> compile mtd-utils
Jan 18 03:29:29 <Serdar> if I use my make it says stdio.h: No such file or directory
Jan 18 03:30:10 <Serdar> http://pastebin.com/m1d9b8cf2
Jan 18 03:30:19 <Serdar> the only thing working properly is kernel
Jan 18 03:30:28 <Serdar> the others are some kind of broken.
Jan 18 03:31:03 <Serdar> or better to say it's fixed to the envoirement of someone, I guess m2
Jan 18 03:32:31 <jancona> Probably
Jan 18 03:32:48 <Serdar> aah
Jan 18 03:33:07 <Serdar> I add CPPFLAGS = -I /usr/include and export CPPFLAGS
Jan 18 03:33:14 <Serdar> but I am not sure
Jan 18 03:33:18 <jancona> You may need to point INCLUDE LIB etc to the cross compiler
Jan 18 03:33:33 <Serdar> I think so...
Jan 18 03:33:53 <jancona> You should point that to the include in the toolchain, not /usr/include
Jan 18 03:34:38 <jancona> You tried it before you changed anything?
Jan 18 03:34:42 <Serdar> the toolchain is on prebuilt/$ARCH/toolchain/arm-eabi-$VERSION
Jan 18 03:34:52 <Serdar> yes, didn't work.
Jan 18 03:37:56 <Serdar> but there isn't much include files.
Jan 18 03:45:05 <jancona> Well I'm off to bed. Good night!
Jan 18 03:45:10 <Serdar> night?
Jan 18 03:45:16 <Serdar> nothing's left I guess.
Jan 18 03:45:27 <Serdar> but good night to you.
Jan 18 03:45:27 <jancona> Still night here!
Jan 18 03:45:32 <jancona> bye
Jan 18 08:10:33 <mvzaanen> Morning, all.
Jan 18 08:16:23 <ecraven> morning ;)
Jan 18 08:16:35 <ecraven> Serdar: thanks again for pointing me here
Jan 18 08:16:41 <ecraven> i was wondering what happened to koolu ;)
Jan 18 08:17:05 <ecraven> at the moment i'm not using my freerunner at all, do you guys have a stable cupcake image?
Jan 18 08:45:41 <mvzaanen> cupcake is pretty stable
Jan 18 08:45:45 <mvzaanen> you can get it from the google pages
Jan 18 11:01:38 <ecraven> mvzaanen: great, i'll try tonight/tomorrow
Jan 18 11:01:52 <ecraven> is there a modified gui frontend for android, that uses fewer resources / is faster?
Jan 18 11:05:27 <mvzaanen> I don't know
Jan 18 12:40:22 <ecraven> i have fixed the emulator files, how can i submit them to the google group?
Jan 18 12:40:30 <ecraven> s/files/skin files/
Jan 18 13:08:46 <Serdar> ecraven, open an issue.
Jan 18 13:09:24 <Serdar> or write a meail to our group, you must to be register.
Jan 18 13:17:06 <ecraven> Serdar: will do, thanks ;)
Jan 18 13:17:13 <ecraven> is there active work going on on android-on-freerunner?
Jan 18 13:18:41 <Serdar> yes.
Jan 18 13:20:04 <ecraven> great ;)
Jan 18 13:20:09 <ecraven> i'll try to flash my FR tonight
Jan 18 14:13:45 <Serdar> larlin, did you get my point yesterday?
Jan 18 14:14:22 <larlin> nope not sure I realised you talked to me?
Jan 18 14:16:29 <Serdar> okay, I was saying, that there is a big difference of the installer component and the installer branch.
Jan 18 14:17:35 <Serdar> if someone has problems with the installing component of our releases he should take Android-$Branch installer-component
Jan 18 14:18:01 <larlin> yeah but I see that as a small problem that developers can understand rather then users need to understand that issues are in the installer branch
Jan 18 14:18:09 <Serdar> if he has problems with the installer branch, so I do the last days, he should use installer branch
Jan 18 14:18:33 <larlin> and we could get problems that relates to installer and a certain version also
Jan 18 14:18:44 <Serdar> the issue tracker IS for developer from users/developers.
Jan 18 14:19:18 <larlin> the issue tracker is most for users, if users don't understand or can provide correct information then it is useless
Jan 18 14:19:22 <Serdar> args. I am trying to build a new installer. it has nothing to do with a version it's independent.
Jan 18 14:19:51 <Serdar> you can add it to a certain version _after_ building it.
Jan 18 14:20:20 <larlin> yeah and then they can put a bug with component installer and you can look at the bug what is the problem?
Jan 18 14:21:10 <Serdar> if I see component-installer is releated to eclair, why I should think he mean the installer branch?
Jan 18 14:21:17 <Serdar> he means
Jan 18 14:24:06 <larlin> because the installer code is in the installer branch???
Jan 18 14:24:06 <Serdar> maybe you should sync the installer branch to see.
Jan 18 14:24:12 <Serdar> yes.
Jan 18 14:24:25 <Serdar> there is no installer code in the other branches.
Jan 18 14:25:32 <larlin> yeah but the version gives a hint of which installer code the user is running the user have no idea of what version the installer is but with weekly+androidVersion we get the best information we can have
Jan 18 14:26:14 <Serdar> no the installer component has never changed since october.
Jan 18 14:26:25 <Serdar> it's allways the same
Jan 18 14:26:37 <Serdar> that's why I asked jancona to set up the installer branch
Jan 18 14:26:41 <larlin> yeah but in the future now when you are looking into making new versions it will change
Jan 18 14:27:16 <Serdar> yeah tha't correct and the installer component ins needed vor versions, but we need ALSO the branch.
Jan 18 14:27:22 <Serdar> s/vor/for
Jan 18 14:27:55 <Serdar> the problem I sent to the mailing list was supposed to be added as an issue to the issue tracker
Jan 18 14:28:28 <Serdar> jancona, your isp is broken, like mine :>
Jan 18 14:29:25 <larlin> which mail was that?
Jan 18 14:31:41 <larlin> when I think about what to add to the issue tracker I try to think about what information I know that the user reporting the issue have if we have a lot of fields the user have no possibliety of knowing the values for we will never get any information in them anyway
Jan 18 14:43:56 <Serdar> you must think about us aswell.
Jan 18 14:50:09 <larlin> well empty fields dosen't help you anything or?
Jan 18 14:52:56 <Serdar> that's it, so therefore I need installer branch.
Jan 18 14:59:29 <larlin> now I really don't understand who would be able to put anything into such a field??
Jan 18 15:00:16 <Serdar> developers, who else? no one else is inerested in source code and how it is worked then developers.
Jan 18 15:00:27 <Serdar> than
Jan 18 15:01:56 <d1b> morning
Jan 18 15:04:11 <Serdar> hi
Jan 18 15:04:59 <larlin> delevlopers can fix the problem then if they know what it is?
Jan 18 15:06:37 <Serdar> I don't know how to fix.
Jan 18 15:06:47 <Serdar> I am trying to but couldn't solve.
Jan 18 15:06:54 <Serdar> but can't add it to the issue tracker.
Jan 18 15:08:35 <larlin> well and adding it as component-installer must be a very good sign on exatly what code has the problem right?
Jan 18 15:10:04 <Serdar> nope it has nothing to do with any eclair/cupckae version.
Jan 18 15:10:23 <Serdar> doesn't matter I will post them to mailing list.
Jan 18 15:11:39 <larlin> so don't enter a eclair/cupcake version it dosen't have to be there
Jan 18 15:12:25 <Serdar> no one knows what it is meaning then.
Jan 18 15:12:41 <Serdar> but doesn't matter I will use the mailing list like I did before.
Jan 18 15:12:49 <larlin> what ever
Jan 18 15:33:39 <sanvy> hi all
Jan 18 15:33:43 <sanvy> hi Serdar
Jan 18 15:33:57 <Serdar> hi sanvy
Jan 18 15:34:25 <sanvy> Serdar, sorry, can you give me some information about aof repos please?
Jan 18 15:34:50 <sanvy> because when I downloaded my repo i used an android guide that now is not online
Jan 18 15:34:59 <sanvy> and I need to download your git
Jan 18 15:35:03 <Serdar> http://gitorious.org/android-on-freerunner there they are
Jan 18 15:36:37 <sanvy> ok thanks
Jan 18 15:37:16 <sanvy> and... in order to download them? git http://link/android-on-freerunner -b cupcake ??
Jan 18 15:41:15 <sanvy> found ;)
Jan 18 15:44:16 <Serdar> repo not git
Jan 18 15:44:24 <Serdar> it says all above what to do.
Jan 18 15:48:09 <sanvy> okk
Jan 18 15:48:12 <sanvy> thanks lot
Jan 18 15:48:14 <sanvy> it works
Jan 18 15:48:32 <sanvy> so... today I update, next time i'll work on it :P
Jan 18 15:48:39 <sanvy> thanks Serdar see you next time
Jan 18 16:04:58 <ecraven> hm.. hanging at boot after install :( rebooting
Jan 18 16:19:34 <ecraven> what has changed since 0.1.1?
Jan 18 16:35:29 <Serdar> many.
Jan 18 16:35:44 <Serdar> 0.1.1 is from october please use weekly
Jan 18 16:41:04 <ecraven> hm.. neither the weekly from this week nor 0.1.1 boot after installation.. i just see the round aof logo
Jan 18 16:41:46 <ecraven> i have one 3g fat32, and one 1gb ext3 partition, i unpack the tgz onto the fat32 partition, and boot from it
Jan 18 16:47:49 <Serdar> boot from disk right?
Jan 18 16:48:18 <ecraven> yes, first time i get an error about mmfatload 1:1 not working, then it boots, installs qi, reboots, installs everything, then hangs
Jan 18 16:48:38 <Serdar> hmm wich revision do you hav?
Jan 18 16:48:49 <Serdar> have
Jan 18 16:50:24 <ecraven> freerunner? not sure :) my bootloader is from 9th may 2008
Jan 18 16:50:47 <Serdar> when did you bought your freerunner?
Jan 18 16:51:28 <Serdar> did you made some gsm updates?
Jan 18 16:51:33 <Serdar> moko11
Jan 18 16:52:49 <ecraven> i think i did, about 6 months ago
Jan 18 16:53:56 <Serdar> huh?
Jan 18 16:54:28 <Serdar> new or used?
Jan 18 16:57:54 <Serdar> err forget it, I misunderstood you.
Jan 18 16:58:13 <Serdar> okay which version of bootloader did you flashed then qi or uboot?
Jan 18 16:58:42 <ecraven> i flashed qi some time ago, but that should be overwritten, right?
Jan 18 17:00:18 <Serdar> so you was useing qi before installing android, that's good.
Jan 18 17:00:20 <ecraven> i'll reflash moko11 according to the wiki
Jan 18 17:00:33 <Serdar> you didn't flash moko11 then?
Jan 18 17:00:51 <ecraven> not sure :) i'll flash it now, no harm in doing it twice, right?
Jan 18 17:01:05 <Serdar> think not.
Jan 18 17:01:32 <ran000> Hi
Jan 18 17:01:42 <Serdar> hi
Jan 18 17:02:07 <ecraven> hey
Jan 18 17:03:02 <ran000> ecraven: what means - hang? After installation screen may be black and locked. Press 3 time power button, please
Jan 18 17:03:50 <ecraven> not black, i see the logo
Jan 18 17:04:07 <ecraven> i'll flash moko11-2, then i'll try the newest weekly image again :
Jan 18 17:05:26 <ran000> At first logo, than flashed android string and than ( my be 5 min , no more 10) black and locked
Jan 18 17:07:00 <ecraven> i see the logo, then the logo, and then the logo :) tried for 20 minutes
Jan 18 17:09:52 <ran000> So you did not seen any flashed "android" string???
Jan 18 17:11:23 <ecraven> no
Jan 18 17:11:35 <ecraven> i know what it looks like from the emulator, but it never appeared
Jan 18 17:13:16 <ran000_> My irc very bad. Connection breaks any times Looks at you mail, please
Jan 18 17:16:22 <Serdar> oO
Jan 18 17:16:32 <Serdar> bad client.
Jan 18 17:19:26 <ecraven> what is the pcf50633 error about irq5 and wake-up?
Jan 18 17:20:44 <Serdar> huh
Jan 18 17:20:50 <Serdar> when did you get that?
Jan 18 17:20:53 <ecraven> i get that upon booting
Jan 18 17:21:03 <Serdar> hmm
Jan 18 17:21:21 <ecraven> can i flash the kernel and rootfs by hand?
Jan 18 17:21:24 <ecraven> via dfu-util?
Jan 18 17:21:25 <Serdar> where is it? right above the android text?
Jan 18 17:21:31 <Serdar> yes you can.
Jan 18 17:21:32 <ecraven> there is no android text
Jan 18 17:21:40 <Serdar> kernel.img and system.img
Jan 18 17:21:44 <Serdar> hm
Jan 18 17:22:03 <Serdar> are you be able to make some pictures?
Jan 18 17:22:28 <ecraven> do the partitions on the sd card need special names?
Jan 18 17:25:18 <Serdar> I don't think so.
Jan 18 17:25:41 <Serdar> I mean I needed to name it before but you don't need do it now.
Jan 18 17:25:41 <ecraven> how long should the aof logo stay on? when should it change to the flashing android text?
Jan 18 17:25:43 <Serdar> jancona, there?
Jan 18 17:26:05 <Serdar> there are 3 logos
Jan 18 17:26:12 <Serdar> first the text sign android
Jan 18 17:26:15 <Serdar> then our logo
Jan 18 17:26:21 <Serdar> than the Android logo
Jan 18 17:26:21 <ecraven> i never see the text sign android :)
Jan 18 17:26:26 <ecraven> just the logo
Jan 18 17:26:34 <ecraven> but maybe that's because installation never finishes
Jan 18 17:26:43 <Serdar> hmm
Jan 18 17:26:52 <ecraven> i'll try flashing the kernel and system manually
Jan 18 17:26:57 <Serdar> yes.
Jan 18 17:27:02 <Serdar> also qi
Jan 18 17:29:23 <ecraven> qi should be on it already
Jan 18 17:29:31 <ecraven> how do i make qi not boot from sd, but from nand?
Jan 18 17:31:11 <Serdar> it do that on its own.
Jan 18 17:31:25 <Serdar> it does that on its own.
Jan 18 17:31:39 <ecraven> wait, i have to put the tar.gz contents on the fat or on the ext2 partition??
Jan 18 17:34:56 <Serdar> nope
Jan 18 17:35:18 <Serdar> for flashing with dfu-util you don't need to do that
Jan 18 17:35:33 <Serdar> but for the installer it must to be vfat
Jan 18 17:35:33 <ecraven> i mean, on which partition do i extract them? ran just sent me an email telling me to put the images on the *second* partition, so far i always tried the *first*
Jan 18 17:47:21 <ecraven> no luck :(
Jan 18 17:54:40 <Serdar1> blubb
Jan 18 17:55:06 <ecraven> :)
Jan 18 17:55:23 <Serdar1> "no luck :(" with what?
Jan 18 17:55:27 <ecraven> booting
Jan 18 17:55:36 <Serdar1> dfu-util?
Jan 18 17:55:37 <ecraven> i still only see the aof logo (android head)
Jan 18 17:55:41 <ecraven> yes, flashing worked fine
Jan 18 17:55:48 <ecraven> i flashed uboot, kernel and rootfs
Jan 18 17:56:03 <ecraven> sd has 3gb fat32 and 1gb ext3, both empty
Jan 18 17:56:09 <ecraven> no sim card inserted
Jan 18 17:56:18 <Serdar1> hm
Jan 18 17:57:32 <jancona> ecraven: In general I've had better luck with smaller SD cards
Jan 18 17:58:10 <ecraven> jancona: would 512+512 be big enough?
Jan 18 17:58:19 <ecraven> ie. a 1gb card? i might have one of those around somewhere
Jan 18 17:59:49 <Serdar1> I have 1:1 gb and works nice.
Jan 18 18:00:31 <Serdar1> it could be, that you can't use more than 3gb with fat32
Jan 18 18:00:42 <ecraven> hm.. nope, that one is 4gb too..
Jan 18 18:00:46 <ecraven> i'll try 1gb 3gb then :)
Jan 18 18:01:55 <ecraven> what file system type should the boot sector have? 0C (w95 fat32 lba?)
Jan 18 18:02:11 <Serdar1> vfat
Jan 18 18:02:33 <Serdar1> or if you don't have, than fat32
Jan 18 18:02:56 <ecraven> neither fdisk nor cfdisk know a type for vfat, i think there is none
Jan 18 18:03:42 <Serdar1> take fat32 then.
Jan 18 18:06:24 <ecraven> nope, no luck either :(
Jan 18 18:06:43 <ecraven> i'll try to create 2 1gb partitions, and reinstall from the first again
Jan 18 18:23:29 <ecraven> :( i think i'll give up for now
Jan 18 18:24:57 <Serdar1> do not give up!
Jan 18 18:35:35 <ecraven> :) any other suggestions?
Jan 18 18:38:48 <Serdar> we need to figure out what your problem really is.
Jan 18 18:38:55 <Serdar> did you have other sd cards to test?
Jan 18 18:39:41 <ecraven> nope, only another 4gb card, same model as the one i'm using
Jan 18 18:40:01 <ecraven> i am trying to download a tgz from rapidshare that ran sent me, but stupid rapidshare says it's overloaded
Jan 18 18:40:12 <ecraven> that tgz should work off the sd card, no installation to nand
Jan 18 18:42:09 <Serdar> rapidshare??
Jan 18 18:42:11 <Serdar> huh
Jan 18 18:44:34 <ecraven> he uploaded it there
Jan 18 18:44:38 <ecraven> no way to boot without sd, right?
Jan 18 18:49:05 <Serdar> huh
Jan 18 18:49:11 <Serdar> why don't you download from google?
Jan 18 18:49:37 <Serdar> and who is he?
Jan 18 18:50:48 <ecraven> the guy who was here, ran000
Jan 18 18:50:59 <Serdar> pres /topic
Jan 18 18:51:24 <Serdar> use the links I mentioned on the topic
Jan 18 18:51:54 <Serdar> my dailies on my homepage or my weeklies on the googlecode home page.
Jan 18 18:52:22 <ecraven> i'll try the daily from today
Jan 18 18:53:03 <ecraven> well, yesterday :)
Jan 18 19:33:15 <Serdar> have you tried now?
Jan 18 19:37:43 <Serdar> hi jancona
Jan 18 19:37:50 <Serdar> got some minutes?
Jan 18 19:38:28 <jancona> Not right now
Jan 18 19:38:38 <Serdar> okay.
Jan 18 19:38:54 <ecraven> yes, no change, still the aof logo, nothing else
Jan 18 19:41:11 <Serdar> hm
Jan 18 22:21:29 <m0nt0> hi all
Jan 18 22:22:28 <m0nt0> just an info, is the actual weekly supposed to work with a wpa2 wifi?
Jan 18 22:26:05 <Serdar> I guess so.
Jan 18 22:26:12 <Serdar> never tried it.
Jan 18 22:26:26 <Serdar> why do you have problems with wpa2?
Jan 18 22:27:10 <Serdar> jancona, got now few minutes?
Jan 18 22:31:33 <m0nt0> Serdar, yes, it isn't working
Jan 18 22:31:42 <jancona> A few
Jan 18 22:31:53 <Serdar> any errors logs or kinda thing?
Jan 18 22:32:20 <m0nt0> and no problems with it it seems, just scanning => associating => scanning
Jan 18 22:32:39 <Serdar> jancona, I these two: kernel and qi aren't correctly linked to openmoko.org didn't they?
Jan 18 22:32:55 <Serdar> it seems that we don't get the commits they do.
Jan 18 22:33:00 <jancona> I don't understand the question
Jan 18 22:33:55 <jancona> Ok. That's not how Git works. It's distributed, so you have to pull commits if you want them.
Jan 18 22:34:10 <Serdar> the manifest of installer says this:http://pastebin.com/m11c503cc
Jan 18 22:34:31 <jancona> Michael has been managing merges with the kernel.
Jan 18 22:35:04 <Serdar> git log of kernel gives me something from june 2009
Jan 18 22:35:12 <Serdar> Date:   Mon Jun 15 23:52:00 2009 +0000
Jan 18 22:35:31 <jancona> I don't know what the status of Qi is. You can try merging changes there if you want, but I'd wait until you have it buuilding before you try
Jan 18 22:36:04 <Serdar> building kernel works fine with the installer
Jan 18 22:36:25 <Serdar> there are problems with qi, mtd-utils and busybox.
Jan 18 22:36:29 <m0nt0> Serdar, http://nopaste.info/0e11d94c92.html if it's useful or i'm doing something wrong
Jan 18 22:37:41 <Serdar> m0nt0, not for me. I am not a developer, just messing around with things. Sometimes I get things working.
Jan 18 22:38:02 <m0nt0> Serdar, :D
Jan 18 22:38:30 <Serdar> jancona, how can I can merge qi? it's possible that the toolchain is too new for our version of qi.
Jan 18 22:38:58 <jancona> Serdar, I really doubt it
Jan 18 22:39:03 <Serdar> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mlong-calls"
Jan 18 22:39:03 <Serdar> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-mno-thumb-interwork"
Jan 18 22:39:03 <Serdar> cc1: error: bad value (armv4t) for -march= switch
Jan 18 22:39:03 <Serdar> cc1: error: bad value (armv4t) for -mtune= switch
Jan 18 22:40:00 <jancona> Are you sure you are using the toolchain and not your platform's compiler
Jan 18 22:40:09 <Serdar> I am.
Jan 18 22:46:36 <jancona> When I compile master the compile command includes "-march=armv4t ", so I know that works with the toolchain
Jan 18 22:46:56 <jancona> It wouldn't work with and x86 compiler
Jan 18 22:47:17 <Serdar> I guess I know the problem
Jan 18 22:47:47 <Serdar> $root/Makefile is calling the AoF.mk of bootloader
Jan 18 22:48:00 <Serdar> which is calling $root/bootloader/Makefile
Jan 18 22:48:07 <jancona> ok
Jan 18 22:48:07 <Serdar> which is includeing config.mk
Jan 18 22:48:15 <Serdar> where is CROSS_COMPILE defined
Jan 18 22:48:43 <Serdar> it looks like, that CROSS_COMPILE=$(AOF_CROSS_COMPILE) don't work there
Jan 18 22:49:05 <Serdar> AOF_CROSS_COMPILE is exportet in $root/Makefile
Jan 18 22:49:16 <Serdar> but config.mk doesn'T know it or something like that.
Jan 18 22:50:23 <jancona> I see KOOLU_CROSS_COMPILE. Did you rename it?
Jan 18 22:50:44 <Serdar> it's the same, yes.
Jan 18 22:51:15 <Serdar> the problem is, that CROSS_COMPILE is redefined in config.mk
Jan 18 22:51:27 <Serdar> there is CROSS_PATH=/path
Jan 18 22:51:57 <Serdar> CROSS_COMPILE=/$(CROSS_PATH)/...arm-eabi-
Jan 18 22:52:17 <Serdar> but this stuff is done in $root/Makefile before.
Jan 18 22:52:25 <Serdar> so I wanted to _reuse_ it.
Jan 18 22:52:31 <Serdar> could I make me clear?
Jan 18 22:54:45 <Serdar> okay I got it.
Jan 18 22:57:36 <jancona> I'm not sure, but usually when I'm dealing with something like this, first I try to make it work, then I try to make it pretty
Jan 18 22:57:59 <jancona> So I'd hack it anyway you can to get it to work.
Jan 18 22:58:39 <jancona> Then you'll probably understand what it's doing better and you can make it right
Jan 18 22:59:26 <jancona> One advantage of doing it that way is if you have it working, you can figure out exactly which change broke it
Jan 18 23:00:06 <jancona> While if you make a bunch of changes to clena it up first, you don't know which one is keeping it from working
Jan 18 23:00:09 <Serdar> hacking is not my style. If I do things from beginning I design it first. If I need to get know/work something I didn't wrote there is try and error.
Jan 18 23:00:30 <jancona> Anyway, I've got to head home from work now
Jan 18 23:00:38 <Serdar> adios.
Jan 18 23:00:40 <jancona> I'll probably be online later
Jan 18 23:00:49 <jancona> Good luck!
Jan 19 00:32:53 <Serdar> wb jancona
Jan 19 00:55:05 <jancona> Hi serdar
Jan 19 00:57:53 <Serdar> don't we have a development git repository?
Jan 19 01:11:08 <jancona> What do you mean by a development git repository?
Jan 19 01:12:16 <Serdar> master/development
Jan 19 01:12:37 <Serdar> there are some header in ndk
Jan 19 01:13:56 <jancona> I don't understand
Jan 19 01:14:07 <Serdar> better to say it is ../master/development/ndk/build/platforms/android-[3-5]/arch-arm/usr/include/
Jan 19 01:14:35 <Serdar> for example master/development/ndk/build/platforms/android-5/arch-arm/usr/include/
Jan 19 01:16:03 <jancona> I still don't understand. What is the question??
Jan 19 01:16:24 <Serdar> why don't we have a development.git
Jan 19 01:16:42 <Serdar> so I can clone that one to my installer dir.
Jan 19 01:17:15 <jancona> What do you think should be in the development.git?
Jan 19 01:17:37 <Serdar> the development directory
Jan 19 01:18:10 <Serdar> like prebuild is in plattform_prebuild.git
Jan 19 01:18:15 <Serdar> prebuilt
Jan 19 01:19:50 <Serdar> or better to say, I need a complete toolchain. this one in prebuild is half of it.
Jan 19 01:20:59 <jancona> We just pull development from korg. Look at the manifest for cupcake or master
Jan 19 01:23:57 <Serdar> git://android.git.kernel.org/platform/development.git right?
Jan 19 01:25:38 <jancona> right
Jan 19 01:29:43 <Serdar> do you know in which FLAG I need to add -L /path/to/lib?
Jan 19 01:32:31 <jancona> no
Jan 19 01:33:13 <Serdar> I add them to LIBS now but useing development header made a huge mess.
Jan 19 01:40:49 <Serdar> hmm I give up.
Jan 19 01:44:32 <Serdar> hmm
Jan 19 01:49:06 <Serdar> I leave this for people who understand it.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jan 19 02:59:57 2010