**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Oct 16 03:00:01 2012 Oct 16 12:57:47 i added libusb as a dependency to my own image recipe, but i get an error saying it doesn't exist. also "bitbake libusb" works fine Oct 16 13:05:28 JViz: in the former case that's a runtime (package) name, in the latter case it's a build-time target (i.e. a recipe or PROVIDES) Oct 16 13:05:38 two different things Oct 16 13:18:04 ah Oct 16 13:18:14 thank you Oct 16 13:24:26 so i'm looking for ANGSTROM_EXTRA_INSTALL += ? Oct 16 13:25:48 that's a variable that angstrom images use to extend the list of packages to be installed, yes Oct 16 13:26:00 sweet Oct 16 13:26:31 there are a couple "the correct way to do things" pages that aren't actually the correct way Oct 16 13:26:51 if you mean on the OE website, most of it is catastrophically out of date Oct 16 13:27:02 something we hope to fix fairly soon Oct 16 13:28:11 nah, just high google hits for "make your own angstrom image" and such Oct 16 13:28:20 br Oct 16 13:28:21 brb Oct 16 22:30:08 this is like, the most frustrating thing ever Oct 16 22:30:39 ok, maybe not, but it feels like it Oct 16 22:31:34 JViz: what's up? Oct 16 22:31:44 i'm trying to get spidev working Oct 16 22:32:40 when i bitbake virtual/kernel, by default it gives me kernel version 3.2.23 and spidev as a module, but not spidev module in the modules tar Oct 16 22:32:58 so i opkg'd kernel-module-spidev Oct 16 22:33:08 that didn't work Oct 16 22:33:23 i noticed it downloaded a module for kernel 3.2.30, but i don't know if that matters Oct 16 22:33:54 i edited the defconfig in the sources to make spidev=y, so it wouldn't be a module Oct 16 22:34:00 still no spidev in /dev Oct 16 22:34:43 it's not under /sys anywhere either Oct 16 22:35:03 it's kind of like the kernel regressed from where i saw it last, because it used to work Oct 16 22:35:19 oh, let me load up my old image and see what kernel version it was Oct 16 22:37:10 well, it's not older than the last image i was using Oct 16 22:37:36 but i can't remember if i had to modify the board support files or not... Oct 16 22:39:04 it's /supposed/ to have spidev support now, that's what the guy who wrote the tut for editing the board support files said on the page Oct 16 22:39:51 i used to have to do this: http://communistcode.co.uk/blog/blogPost.php?blogPostID=1 Oct 16 22:40:13 i'm not supposed to have to do that anymore, but spidev isn't showing up Oct 16 22:40:28 spi support is showing up Oct 16 22:40:32 just no spidev Oct 16 22:43:00 i think i should change the kernel version to 3.2.30, how do i do that? Oct 16 22:43:24 if it's going to install modules for 3.2.30, i need the version to match, don't i? Oct 16 22:43:52 why would it install modules for a different kernel than the one it installs by default? Oct 16 22:48:15 opkg is out of sync with bitbake? Oct 16 22:56:23 OH Oct 16 22:56:25 I SEE Oct 16 23:02:16 erm, nope Oct 16 23:04:08 yeah Oct 16 23:04:10 i see it now Oct 16 23:04:13 damnit Oct 16 23:10:29 i found the problem and it has nothing to do with angstrom **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Oct 17 03:00:01 2012