**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Feb 17 02:59:57 2013 Feb 17 08:26:12 Is there anyone here i can annoy with some questions about building the 2011.03 release? Feb 17 16:22:59 en4rab: your better off just asking more specific questions publicly right here then asking someone specific Feb 17 16:26:00 Should i be building with the 2011.03-maintenance branch rather than the master, I have come across some broken stuff trying to build the main branch Feb 17 16:28:57 well, im no official voice here by FAR, i kinda just idle here... id personally say angstrom will have a few broken things based on how little chatting happens in here in comparison to more active projects Feb 17 16:30:10 its only a few niggles and i think if got it sorted well enough for me though, stuff like uclibc didnt have NTFW enabled which broke a couple of things, and opie_16mb image has a dependancy on a package that doesnt seem exist Feb 17 16:31:23 lol Feb 17 16:31:25 fun Feb 17 16:31:34 and opkg_utils doesnt work on python2.6 Feb 17 16:32:19 i long ago sold the device i was trying anstrom on so i havent tried it in a few years. but back then compiling it myself was a painfull task. i managed to compile a image after 10 or so trys, but it didnt boot lol Feb 17 16:32:51 s/anstrom/angstrom/ Feb 17 16:32:53 I have booted a kernel but i was trying to build a usefull image Feb 17 16:32:59 en4rab, that is more properly a question for #oe Feb 17 16:33:23 well your already beyond where i got to Feb 17 16:33:26 :) Feb 17 17:58:57 en4rab: which is the nonexistent package? Feb 17 18:02:52 task-opie-16mb has an rdepends for opie-taskbar-images-320x240 (i think thts the res) this package doesnt build that res as there is no images that size in the file it downloads Feb 17 18:07:35 hmm ok Feb 17 18:07:42 I'll try to fix that Feb 17 18:07:44 thanks Feb 17 18:10:53 also by default the angstrom recipe seems to choose an older version of uclibc that i dont think has 'NFTW' the latest version (not the git) supports it but it isnt enabled in the config Feb 17 18:16:39 in recipes/uclibc/uclibc-0.9.31/uclibc-0.9.31/uClibc.distro i had to add "UCLIBC_HAS_NFTW=y" to get a couple of packages to compile Feb 17 18:18:08 thats what made me come here to ask if i should be building with the head branch or the 2011.03-maintenance branch Feb 17 18:25:58 en4rab: 2011.03-maintenance is ancient by now **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Feb 18 02:59:58 2013