**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jul 12 03:00:02 2018
Jul 12 04:33:56 <Wormo> muneeb17[m]: are you back yet?
Jul 12 04:36:51 <vaishnav98_> jkridner: yes I have noticed the way you tried to do it, can we also make use of flow control libraries like async.js to help us make  this implementation more manageable? , I don't think the submodule based approach will allow us for a single implementation
Jul 12 06:15:28 <zeekhuge> muneeb17: Ping me when you are back !
Jul 12 06:32:59 <muneeb17[m]> Wormo: zeekhuge  abhishek_ : I'm back
Jul 12 06:36:13 <zeekhuge> muneeb17: Hey ! read your email. How is he doing now ? I hope he completely recovers quickly ..
Jul 12 06:36:46 <muneeb17[m]> He is doing well now, thanks
Jul 12 06:39:33 <zeekhuge> muneeb17: Good !
Jul 12 06:39:35 <zeekhuge> back to work now.
Jul 12 06:39:45 <zeekhuge> So, where are you on the last task ?
Jul 12 06:40:06 <zeekhuge> implementation of the Log_printf()
Jul 12 06:42:10 <muneeb17[m]> I have worked on the kernel interrupt driver and exposing the data to userspace part. Still stuck on the strings part as I have mentioned in the follow up mail. I was trying Wormo 's suggestion now, but I dont think that works for the TI C compiler
Jul 12 06:42:26 <muneeb17[m]> zeekhuge: ^
Jul 12 06:45:20 <muneeb17[m]> Please see this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6447463/forcing-certain-compiler-generated-variables-into-specific-elf-sections-with-gc
Jul 12 06:46:56 <muneeb17[m]> For me the problem is that the attribute section doesn't work at all, be it char[] or char*
Jul 12 06:50:19 <zeekhuge> Can you provide a link to your code ? all of it .. ?
Jul 12 06:50:31 <zeekhuge> is it there in a WIP branch or something ?
Jul 12 06:55:24 <muneeb17[m]> zeekhuge:  Didn't organize the code much. Mostly testing code. But sure, I'll clean it a bit, make a wip branch and push it
Jul 12 06:57:35 <zeekhuge> muneeb17:  ASAP
Jul 12 14:41:25 <ravikp7> jkridner, abhishek_: I think, we should just put the ethernet packet received from the board after replacing source ip with some ip available in the subnet of the host system
Jul 12 14:42:08 <ravikp7> we need to capture all packets of the host network interface at layer 2
Jul 12 14:43:52 <ravikp7> we'll connect board through our application to the network like a hub connects two systems to a network
Jul 12 14:43:57 <abhishek_[m]> muneeb17: Did you post your code?
Jul 12 14:45:17 <ravikp7> also we need a way to put ethernet packets to the network stack
Jul 12 14:45:26 <abhishek_[m]> ravikp7: looks like you'll have to access some low level API for that
Jul 12 14:46:05 <abhishek_[m]> I'm not sure if that API even exists
Jul 12 14:46:50 <ravikp7> abhishek_: raw sockets at layer 2 re possible, that's all we need I guess
Jul 12 14:47:08 <ravikp7> *are
Jul 12 14:47:43 <ravikp7> abhishek_: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14774668/what-is-raw-socket-in-socket-programming
Jul 12 14:48:25 <ravikp7> we can use api to make layer 2 sockets with ethernet header and payload
Jul 12 14:48:56 <abhishek_[m]> Yeah, looks good
Jul 12 14:50:23 <ravikp7> abhishek_: for capturing all packets https://github.com/node-pcap/node_pcap
Jul 12 14:51:54 <abhishek_[m]> Would you need root for that?
Jul 12 14:52:57 <ravikp7> abhishek_: yes, also libcab libraries need to be installed
Jul 12 14:53:05 <ravikp7> *libcap
Jul 12 14:55:53 <abhishek_[m]> Hmm, shouldn't have to install libraries to make this happen.
Jul 12 14:58:51 <ravikp7> abhishek_: guess, we need to figure out way to capture traffic using raw sockets
**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jul 12 15:34:36 2018
Jul 12 17:11:22 <zeekhuge> muneeb17: WIP code ?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jul 13 03:00:01 2018