**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Oct 01 03:00:00 2014
Oct 01 03:21:00 * sugardave looks at the data caching algorithm he is supposed to implement.  "This is way too complicated for what it's trying to 'solve.'"
Oct 01 03:39:34 <summatusmentis> the best cache is /dev/null
Oct 01 03:39:37 <summatusmentis> obviously
Oct 01 03:39:45 <summatusmentis> it literally never fails
Oct 01 14:00:23 <GodGinrai> hey trex0051
Oct 01 15:36:11 <trex0051> Hello GodGinrai!
Oct 01 16:54:37 <Roy__> I wish I understood why my nick keeps getting bloked.
Oct 01 16:54:42 <Roy__> s/bloked/blocked/
Oct 01 16:54:42 <synergybot> Roy__ meant: I wish I understood why my nick keeps getting blocked.
Oct 01 16:54:57 <Roy__> I have it registered and protection turned on.
Oct 01 17:13:38 <dmanderson> Morning enyos
Oct 01 17:13:55 <trex005> Good day dmanderson
Oct 01 17:46:18 <GodGinrai> good morning dmanderson
Oct 01 17:46:33 <dmanderson> Hey trex005 and GodGinrai!
Oct 01 17:46:47 <GodGinrai> Roy__: It obviously means that someone keeps trying to take your nick
Oct 01 17:47:35 <Roy__> :(
Oct 01 18:36:33 <trex005> Alright guys, I'd like to make a simple enyo game that I can package and sell for 99¢ .... who's got an idea?
Oct 01 18:37:39 <sugardave> Simon
Oct 01 18:38:25 <GodGinrai> ^ that was a game suggestion
Oct 01 18:41:13 <sugardave> yes :D
Oct 01 18:41:35 <sugardave> I started making one in Mojo a long time ago, but never put it out
Oct 01 18:43:56 <GodGinrai> lol
Oct 01 18:44:39 <GodGinrai> trex005: Any simple game could work as long as you polish it so that it is enjoyable to play
Oct 01 18:45:15 <GodGinrai> You could make a Mille Bornes game
Oct 01 18:45:45 <GodGinrai> *Borne
Oct 01 18:47:31 <GodGinrai> I played the shit out of sdlMille on my Pre 3 before I switched to my new phone
Oct 01 18:47:48 <sugardave> I had that card game when I was a kid but never played it
Oct 01 18:48:09 <GodGinrai> It's very fun
Oct 01 18:49:35 <GodGinrai> trex005: you could also do backgammon, yahtzee, euchre, etc.
Oct 01 18:51:32 <trex005> Do you think people would pay 99¢ to play any of the classics?
Oct 01 18:53:32 <trex005> How about something like simon, but the colors shuffle every round?
Oct 01 18:55:36 <sugardave> trex005: people paid $1.43 for a shitty animated .gif of a fireplace
Oct 01 18:55:56 <sugardave> enough people that it paid for my first 2 years of contract under Sprint for me Pre- :D
Oct 01 18:55:58 * GodGinrai high-fives sugardave 
Oct 01 19:00:27 <trex005> How about "Simon... you lead" Where you get to decide the pattern, but you have to keep adding one to it without messing up, and the computer follows you.
Oct 01 19:01:39 * sugardave chooses red, red, red, red.  "I am the greatest reverse Simon player in the universe!"
Oct 01 19:01:48 <chall> lol
Oct 01 19:01:51 <trex005> Maybe buttons would randomly not be available.
Oct 01 19:01:57 <chall> sugardave, that's actually not a terrible idea
Oct 01 19:02:09 <trex005> so it'd only let you choose 1/2 of the field at a given time
Oct 01 19:03:28 <trex005> or, it has 6 buttons, and only lets you pick from 2
Oct 01 19:29:21 <GodGinrai> Simon+Memory
Oct 01 19:29:31 <GodGinrai> Colors get shuffled around face down
Oct 01 19:42:44 <trex005> Simon + Puzzle.... you get the pattern, then the pieces shift into one of those slide puzzles that you have to solve before you can play the pattern back
Oct 01 20:19:52 <chall> hey enyoers
Oct 01 20:19:54 <chall> I have a question
Oct 01 20:20:05 <chall> can someone explain why I end up with two records here: http://jsfiddle.net/uavydrqr/
Oct 01 20:23:59 <chall> further testing shows that merge works if you have a primaryKey
Oct 01 20:24:06 <chall> but the mergeKeys don't seem to be working
Oct 01 20:24:46 <trex005> chall: merge merges the object into collection, no?
Oct 01 20:24:48 <sugardave> hmm, never used mergeKeys before.  It might be broken
Oct 01 20:24:58 <chall> trex005, yes
Oct 01 20:24:59 <trex005> Shouldn't that then give you 2 objects in the collection?
Oct 01 20:25:03 <chall> no
Oct 01 20:25:10 <chall> that's add
Oct 01 20:25:42 <chall> merge takes a model/object or an array of them and merges them with the existing set such that no two entries are duplicated
Oct 01 20:26:19 <trex005> "Any records passed to this method that cannot be merged with existing records will be added to the collection at the end."
Oct 01 20:26:26 <chall> yes
Oct 01 20:26:48 <trex005> so because "name" is "test" you are saying it should cause it to be unique?
Oct 01 20:26:52 <sugardave> but mergeKeys would seem to imply that you merge records with those matching keys
Oct 01 20:27:01 <chall> yes
Oct 01 20:27:11 <chall> sugardave
Oct 01 20:27:18 <sugardave> however, if you set primaryKey: "name" it works, right?
Oct 01 20:27:39 <chall> I actually tried it with an 'id' field in addition to the merge keys
Oct 01 20:27:41 <chall> that worked
Oct 01 20:27:47 <chall> let me try that
Oct 01 20:28:30 <chall> sugardave, setting primaryKey to name does not work
Oct 01 20:28:35 <sugardave> interesting
Oct 01 20:28:54 <chall> http://jsfiddle.net/uavydrqr/1/
Oct 01 20:29:19 <sugardave> I just tried in the first fiddle and it fails spectacularly
Oct 01 20:29:35 <sugardave> Uncaught enyo.Store.addRecord: duplicate record added to store for kind `TestModel` with primaryKey set to `name` and the same value of `test` which cannot coexist for the kind without the `ignoreDuplicates` flag of the store set to `true`
Oct 01 20:29:53 <sugardave> that's why it's supposed to merge :/
Oct 01 20:31:00 <chall> yeah, I actually had to write my own store to get around that in the project I'm working on
Oct 01 20:31:12 <chall> which is what alerted me to this issue with Collection#merge
Oct 01 20:31:33 <chall> actually....
Oct 01 20:31:35 <trex005> interesting, even if you merge m1 it still has 2 records
Oct 01 20:31:53 <sugardave> nightly doesn't fail, but still ends with 2 records
Oct 01 20:32:35 <chall> I think I have another reason why my implementation won't work, but it's only partially related
Oct 01 20:32:37 <sugardave> I'm wrong, nightly fails differently, I was doing two adds
Oct 01 20:33:09 <sugardave> I guess there is no Collection.merge in nightly...
Oct 01 20:34:22 <sugardave> dmanderson: over to you :)
Oct 01 20:34:39 * dmanderson reads some scroll back :D
Oct 01 20:42:20 <chall> so
Oct 01 20:42:24 <chall> I think I might have figured it out
Oct 01 20:42:44 <chall> it's a bit of a facepalm moment
Oct 01 20:43:01 <sugardave> uh oh
Oct 01 20:43:15 <chall> so
Oct 01 20:43:23 <chall> in the merge code on the collection
Oct 01 20:43:36 <chall> to get the merge keys you do: this.model.prototype.mergeKeys
Oct 01 20:43:57 <chall> the collection in my fiddle does not have a model set
Oct 01 20:44:06 <chall> so, it's using enyo.Model
Oct 01 20:44:16 <chall> which has a primaryKey of 'id' and no mergeKeys
Oct 01 20:44:34 <chall> if you add the model property, it works just fine
Oct 01 20:44:42 * chall facepalms
Oct 01 20:44:55 <dmanderson> :) Good ups on working it out yourself :D
Oct 01 20:45:47 <chall> indeed
Oct 01 20:46:12 <chall> so glad that's all sorted
Oct 01 20:46:43 <sugardave> ah, nice
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Oct 02 03:00:00 2014