**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Dec 10 02:59:57 2008 Dec 10 10:20:07 ls -lrt Dec 10 10:20:12 oops Dec 10 10:24:39 drwxr-xr-x 3 pablo pablo 4096 2008-09-29 18:38 patches/ Dec 10 10:24:39 drwxr-xr-x 3 pablo pablo 4096 2008-09-29 18:38 tests/ Dec 10 10:24:39 drwxr-xr-x 4 pablo pablo 4096 2008-09-29 18:38 doc/ Dec 10 10:24:53 rw-r--r-- 1 pablo pablo 6 2008-09-29 18:38 version Dec 10 10:24:53 -rw-r--r-- 1 pablo pablo 2181 2008-09-29 18:38 TODO Dec 10 10:24:53 -rw-r--r-- 1 pablo pablo 2763 2008-09-29 18:38 README Dec 10 10:24:53 -rw-r--r-- 1 pablo pablo 13783 2008-09-29 18:38 Makefile.am Dec 10 10:24:53 -rw-r--r-- 1 pablo pablo 3335 2008-09-29 18:38 configure.in Dec 10 10:24:55 drwxr-xr-x 7 pablo pablo 4096 2008-09-29 18:38 client/ Dec 10 10:25:24 rwhitby: stop doing that Dec 10 10:25:51 pablo_bz: did you see my reply about Optware? Dec 10 10:26:23 rwhitby: yes, i saw it Dec 10 10:26:59 rwhitby: it is exactly the same idea Dec 10 10:27:31 rwhitby: but i think it will be easier for the user and for the maintainer to just have tasks packages instead of .deb packages Dec 10 10:27:54 what are "tasks packages"? Dec 10 10:28:19 focused on the task done by the package, not the software on it Dec 10 10:28:32 like apt vs tasksel Dec 10 10:28:44 have you ever used "tasksel" Dec 10 10:28:50 saying "i want a mail server" Dec 10 10:28:55 "i want to see movies" Dec 10 10:28:59 "i want to..." Dec 10 10:29:15 and the underlying system install things for you Dec 10 10:29:52 so, emule-whatever.tgz, not amule-package1.ipkg dependence for amule.ipkg, etc Dec 10 10:30:30 see, usually packages in portable distribution go to further ends to achieve the maximum portability Dec 10 10:30:47 here that is not needed Dec 10 10:30:50 so Dec 10 10:30:55 again the GP2X paradox Dec 10 10:31:10 http://archive.gp2x.de/cgi-bin/cfiles.cgi Dec 10 10:31:49 no package system whatsoever, copy and run. of course, the only thing that prevent it from being a nightmare of non-working things Dec 10 10:31:59 is that all the gp2x are exactly the same Dec 10 10:32:24 tasksel can be done by a thin layer on top of ipkg. Dec 10 10:34:06 yes, but it is the developer audience wich is different in la fonera and nslug2 Dec 10 10:34:24 developers for nslug2 and for openwrt are more like debian maintainers Dec 10 10:34:37 absolutely not Dec 10 10:34:40 developers for lafonera2.0 outside there, or the ones i guess we can gather Dec 10 10:35:02 want more to be like gp2x ones, taking care of their packages and offering them to the enduser Dec 10 10:35:07 nslu2 optware users range from developers to people who cannot even begin to use a linux command line Dec 10 10:35:27 rwhitby: developers was i talking about Dec 10 10:35:37 "< pablo_bz> yes, but it is the developer audience wich is different" Dec 10 10:36:44 of course users are users Dec 10 10:39:33 we don't have a centralized developer base that can take care of the maintenance of a package repository proper Dec 10 10:39:50 as nslug does or openwrt Dec 10 10:40:24 so we can only release the firmware and make it easy for enthusiastic package makers to put all they need in the .tgz so the enduser gets it and have the feature running Dec 10 10:40:52 the small firmware team doing the gp2x software probably had the same problem Dec 10 10:41:13 and they lack any kind of package management, they don't even have a buildroot proper Dec 10 10:41:43 but look how many packages people make. as .zips uncompressed in an sd card, as whatever Dec 10 10:42:27 they just want to do it and be able to say, hey, i made this fancy emulator run in gp2x! of course visual feedback is encouraging :) Dec 10 10:42:58 but that gives value to the gp2x without putting burden in the shoulders of gp2x firmware guys Dec 10 10:43:11 it is a directly-from-the-developer scheme Dec 10 10:43:46 i always wondered how it didn't go havoc, and as you told me yesterday Dec 10 10:44:09 the main difference is that the package can expect exactly the same architecture in all devices it is going to be installed in Dec 10 10:45:44 lo Dec 10 11:04:40 pablo_bz: fonosfera can create the developer base needed. Dec 10 11:05:25 for optware, the main thing was to make it easy for people to create a new makefile fragment, and to *push* svn commit access onto people. Dec 10 11:05:47 (and keep the package maintaners svn access separate from base firmware maintainers access) Dec 10 11:06:59 why do you assume fon2 developers want to be like gp2x developers instead of nslu2 or openwrt developers? I think it's all about what example the project leaders set. Dec 10 11:07:44 embrace the developers, bring them into the fold, give them resources and commit access immediately, let them edit wiki pages, give them praise on the mailing list when they add a package to the repository instead of maintaining it themselves. Dec 10 11:07:44 hello everybody Dec 10 11:07:57 hi Dec 10 11:08:02 rwhitby: i dont know :) it is just ranting Dec 10 11:08:03 when you see a separate repository, contact that developer and personally invite them to have svn access. Dec 10 11:08:05 someone have a documentation with all possible uci datatype ? Dec 10 11:08:21 it's all about building a community. Dec 10 11:08:41 rwhitby: I agree with that Dec 10 11:08:45 we're inviting communities Dec 10 11:08:59 but we don't either want just anyone to have write access Dec 10 11:09:04 this would mess things up Dec 10 11:09:05 make the feeds automatically build packages as soon as a developer checks in a new revision. Dec 10 11:09:20 francofon, freewlan, yourself... are invited to have access Dec 10 11:09:30 iurgi: that's wrong. you want *anyone* who has made the effort to write a package Makefile to have svn commit access. Dec 10 11:09:52 just that small a barrier is enough to keep the unwanted out. Dec 10 11:10:08 hmmm Dec 10 11:10:19 anyone who's made a package is not anyone Dec 10 11:10:30 that's what I mean Dec 10 11:10:40 anyone who has done something is elligible Dec 10 11:10:59 but not just anyone that shows up on IRC and says: I want to have access Dec 10 11:11:10 no, they have to send in a makefile first Dec 10 11:11:21 as soon as they do that, then you *push* svn access on them. Dec 10 11:11:39 yes of course. why open access on svn to all the world if all the world don't work on this project ? Dec 10 11:11:56 if you see someone create a package on another site, reach out to them and invite them to get svn access Dec 10 11:12:22 you want everyone in the world who takes the effort to write a package makefile for the fon2 to have svn access Dec 10 11:12:45 your developer base is too small to exclude anyone who makes that effort Dec 10 11:13:16 3 years of experience with nslu2 project has shown that not one developer who got svn access this way ever did anything wrong. Dec 10 11:13:50 sure, someone made an innocent mistake, and were gently educated on the packaging standards, and became an even better contributor after that cause they felt that the project cared about what they did. Dec 10 11:14:10 but never any malicious acts. Dec 10 11:14:36 I am not concerned that much about malicious acts Dec 10 11:14:44 I agree with you it's VERY unlikely to happen Dec 10 11:14:58 I'm 100% confident on the community behavior Dec 10 11:15:02 and easy to spot and fix. Dec 10 11:15:16 (since the core developers will see the commit messages of every commit) Dec 10 11:15:17 in any case, it's a boring place to go f**ck people Dec 10 11:15:44 bbiab (family calls) Dec 10 11:16:29 blogic> do you have a documentation where i can find all the uci schema datatype ? Dec 10 11:16:47 SoukoussMan: let me see Dec 10 11:17:04 ok thanks Dec 10 11:17:23 http://dev.luci.freifunk-halle.net/docsrv/index.xml Dec 10 11:17:27 this is for stock luci Dec 10 11:17:32 we do not have it for fon yet Dec 10 11:17:47 ah wait Dec 10 11:17:54 i miss understood the question Dec 10 11:17:55 1 sec Dec 10 11:18:44 fon-ng-trunk/luci/libs/uvl/luasrc/uvl/datatypes.lua Dec 10 11:19:01 if you need new ones, just drop a new function in the file Dec 10 11:19:40 ok thanks Dec 10 11:20:04 the uvl files can be a bit of an arse to get going properly Dec 10 11:20:12 took me a while to get the hang of it Dec 10 11:20:39 also, there are still a few things that are not 100% and need work arounds, like defaults for fields with miltuiple deps dont work Dec 10 11:20:55 fon_inet has an example for the mtu and mtu2 fields Dec 10 11:21:23 although mut and mtu2 match to te same uci option i had to add 2 schemes for it to get defaults Dec 10 11:23:03 hi Dec 10 11:23:07 hi Dec 10 11:23:18 hi Dec 10 11:23:28 can I ask you for help? Dec 10 11:23:38 you're in the right place, probably Dec 10 11:23:39 I just tried to install alfred Dec 10 11:23:42 ask, and do not ask to ask ;) Dec 10 11:23:44 after installation Dec 10 11:23:56 the fonera does not boot up correctly Dec 10 11:24:00 ? Dec 10 11:24:04 what error do you get ? Dec 10 11:24:07 tried to get into redboot but cant login Dec 10 11:24:15 I am stuck at Dec 10 11:24:25 control c Dec 10 11:24:32 then nothing happens Dec 10 11:25:08 using telent or serial ? Dec 10 11:25:44 telnet over lan Dec 10 11:25:47 I mean wan Dec 10 11:25:53 i get to this point Dec 10 11:25:55 == Executing boot script in 1.920 seconds - enter ^C to abort Dec 10 11:26:12 I enter control C immeditely then nothing hapens Dec 10 11:26:21 mib_zdvnc1: use LAN, not WAN Dec 10 11:26:35 thats what I am doing Dec 10 11:26:47 I succeed to connect to 192.168.1.1 9000 Dec 10 11:26:50 which telnet client ? Dec 10 11:26:52 but cant get further Dec 10 11:26:58 terminal on mac os Dec 10 11:27:02 hmm Dec 10 11:27:11 do you have a linux box ? Dec 10 11:27:17 i am not a osx man Dec 10 11:27:21 no only mac and windows Dec 10 11:27:25 ok Dec 10 11:27:32 can you try using putty under windows ? Dec 10 11:27:37 i know putty works Dec 10 11:27:40 osx is based on linux and the terminal is quite powerful Dec 10 11:27:46 it has to do with the ctrl c thing Dec 10 11:27:52 well Dec 10 11:27:54 well I can try putty with the pc Dec 10 11:28:00 ok, great Dec 10 11:28:05 you think its ctrl c issue right ? Dec 10 11:28:06 otherwise tell me Dec 10 11:28:09 yes Dec 10 11:28:20 this is the common problem when using telent Dec 10 11:28:30 am I right to hit ctrl c immeditely after connect to 192.168.1.1 9000 ? Dec 10 11:28:44 yes Dec 10 11:28:46 == Executing boot script in 1.920 seconds - <--- when you see this message Dec 10 11:29:06 iurgi: i want to add a new madwifi patch Dec 10 11:29:07 this means I should push ctrl cwithin 1 point 920 seconds ? Dec 10 11:29:14 less then 2 seconds right ? Dec 10 11:29:17 it considerably improves the automatic channel selection Dec 10 11:29:23 yes Dec 10 11:29:31 mib_zdvnc1: yes Dec 10 11:29:32 okay understood Dec 10 11:29:49 well I will try with putty this afternoon and let you know if it worked out Dec 10 11:30:03 at least you will have the information for other osx users Dec 10 11:30:25 thanx for now I am reconnecting for feedback Dec 10 11:30:30 thanks!! Dec 10 11:30:32 enjoy your day ;-) Dec 10 11:46:08 CyrusFF> i've test yesterday your modification, all i'ts ok now..thanks Dec 10 11:47:11 SoukoussMan: thats fine Dec 10 12:19:54 someone can explain me that's exacty the uci schema and his job ? Dec 10 12:33:58 it is the validation Dec 10 12:34:30 so, if you use a uci field inside a luci model, then you can get it to automatically check if the parameter given by the user is valid Dec 10 12:34:45 if not, you get a red highlighted bix in luci and the data is not accepted Dec 10 12:37:36 ok thanks blogic...I've other question, i've make my luci, this work great and this update the uci config...but in my module, i need add a redirect rule...can i add directly in my luci or not ? Dec 10 12:39:09 ?!? Dec 10 12:39:13 Hi all Dec 10 12:39:15 you mean firewall ? Dec 10 12:39:42 or a httpd redirect ? Dec 10 12:39:49 Hi TeigneuX Dec 10 12:40:04 yes i need to add a redirect rule in the firewall to redirect 80 to another server Dec 10 12:40:13 ok Dec 10 12:40:20 in that case, the cleanest way is .... Dec 10 12:40:28 Just in case I have made a little sh to make links from the usb to the filesystem Dec 10 12:40:38 So all things are installed on the usb unit Dec 10 12:40:40 /etc/firewall.fon ist started by the firewall after it has started Dec 10 12:40:45 and useable from the fonera Dec 10 12:40:48 so make a /etc/firewall.myruke Dec 10 12:40:59 and make a new include ? Dec 10 12:41:07 and add a call to /etc/config/firewall (use firewall.fon as an example) Dec 10 12:41:09 yes Dec 10 12:41:18 this way it stays nice and seperate as a plugin Dec 10 12:41:19 :) Dec 10 12:41:37 and inside your script you can check uci to see what you have to do Dec 10 12:41:40 etc Dec 10 12:41:44 this is how i would do it Dec 10 12:41:55 you could directly edit the uci firewall Dec 10 12:42:01 but a script seems cleaner Dec 10 12:43:09 ok...in the firewall.XXX i can make a sh script with many check ? Dec 10 12:43:14 look at fon/fonstated/files/etc/fonstated/Redirect Dec 10 12:43:24 you can put what you want in there Dec 10 12:43:36 however, port 80 is already redirected when the fonera is offline Dec 10 12:43:47 so we have to add some magic to not interfere Dec 10 12:45:19 ok i look in this...and how can i add dynamicly the include in firewall..in the lua with luci.model.uci ? Dec 10 12:46:14 yes Dec 10 12:46:17 ok, 1 sec Dec 10 12:46:44 ok thanks..i make a test Dec 10 14:17:43 blogic> to use a variable un lua, we use #. it's right ? Dec 10 14:18:05 ? Dec 10 14:18:09 ah Dec 10 14:18:11 # is the length operator Dec 10 14:18:13 local a = 1 Dec 10 14:18:24 local a = "1" is a string Dec 10 14:18:41 bad example Dec 10 14:18:46 a = "foobar"; print (#a) --will output 6 Dec 10 14:18:49 local a = "2" Dec 10 14:18:55 print(a) --> 2 Dec 10 14:19:07 print(#a) --> 1 its the length Dec 10 14:19:16 ah CyrusFF was faster :) Dec 10 14:19:37 and what is this : local a = {} ? Dec 10 14:19:45 empty array Dec 10 14:19:46 it creates an empty table Dec 10 14:19:49 ok Dec 10 14:20:04 to call a vaiable ? Dec 10 14:20:18 http://www.lua.org/pil/ Dec 10 14:20:44 you mean function? (call a variable) Dec 10 14:20:45 thanks Dec 10 14:21:01 no only use a variable Dec 10 14:21:08 ah, just use it's name Dec 10 14:21:31 yes to check it's content for example Dec 10 14:21:33 local a = 1; local b = a + 1; printb) -- 3 Dec 10 14:21:41 local a = 1; local b = a + 1; print(b) -- 3 Dec 10 14:21:51 2 lol Dec 10 14:22:24 i can do this : local a = 2 ; if a > 2 ; then .... Dec 10 14:22:26 ? Dec 10 14:23:08 yes Dec 10 14:23:33 ok thanks Dec 10 15:22:29 hi Dec 10 15:22:52 anyone here ? Dec 10 15:23:08 hi mib_9wyvgb Dec 10 15:23:59 i am here Dec 10 15:24:00 hello Dec 10 15:24:04 hi mib_9wyvgb Dec 10 15:24:05 can you help me ? Dec 10 15:24:17 i hope, depends on the problem really :) Dec 10 15:25:43 I try to redboot Dec 10 15:25:51 and I am stuck at the level of the loader Dec 10 15:25:51 yes Dec 10 15:25:55 ok Dec 10 15:25:58 telnet ? Dec 10 15:26:00 or serial ? Dec 10 15:26:09 i get the message tftp time out operation timed out Dec 10 15:26:16 telnet over wan Dec 10 15:26:16 ah ok Dec 10 15:26:20 ok Dec 10 15:26:34 "tftp time out operation timed out" means your tftp is not running Dec 10 15:26:38 which os are you using ? Dec 10 15:26:48 windows xp Dec 10 15:26:54 putty and tftp Dec 10 15:27:31 hmm Dec 10 15:27:35 ip set correctly ? Dec 10 15:28:00 I set 192.168.1.254 in tftp Dec 10 15:28:16 and the xp has 192.168.1.254 aswell ? Dec 10 15:28:45 my network card has 192.168.1.254 and I am connected to the fonera under redboot Dec 10 15:28:58 but stuck at the level of the loader Dec 10 15:29:07 do I need to start the tftp someow ? Dec 10 15:29:39 the tftp server needs to run Dec 10 15:29:45 do you have a firewall iunstalled on the xp ? Dec 10 15:30:04 no firewal but how can I start tftp then ? Dec 10 15:30:19 hmm Dec 10 15:30:26 i have never used windows Dec 10 15:30:27 1 sec Dec 10 15:30:29 iurgi: ? Dec 10 15:30:41 ok thnx Dec 10 15:30:51 hi Dec 10 15:30:53 what? Dec 10 15:31:07 iurgi: can you help mib_9wyvgb i have no idea how flashing from windows works Dec 10 15:31:07 hi Dec 10 15:31:29 or send a mail to inouk ? Dec 10 15:31:36 I have no idea either, but inuok does Dec 10 15:31:41 inouk Dec 10 15:32:00 yes? Dec 10 15:32:07 hello Dec 10 15:32:12 hi Dec 10 15:32:18 can you help me out flasing under windows ? Dec 10 15:32:20 hi inouk Dec 10 15:33:21 well I don't know much of the window tool but I tryied once with the one advised on the wiki Dec 10 15:33:30 I cant get the loader to be loaded ... operation timeout Dec 10 15:33:44 seems that my tftp server is not well configured Dec 10 15:34:32 do you use the tftp server advised on wiki? Dec 10 15:34:57 tftp32 by PH Jounin Dec 10 15:35:04 is that the right one ? Dec 10 15:35:34 http://tftpd32.jounin.net/ Dec 10 15:35:35 not sure, the one on wiki... Dec 10 15:35:44 ok I ll check Dec 10 15:35:46 yes its the one on the wiki Dec 10 15:35:51 yes Dec 10 15:36:20 OK did you put the loader.bin in the right folder? Dec 10 15:36:40 yes thats ok under c: folder fonera Dec 10 15:36:41 done Dec 10 15:36:56 ip address 192.168.1.254 Dec 10 15:37:27 OK and you pointed out that folder in tftpd32? Dec 10 15:37:57 tftp servers tend to use c:\tftpboot Dec 10 15:38:30 I can chage it ti tftpboot Dec 10 15:38:49 this one you can set a folder Dec 10 15:39:05 then it appear in a drop down menu at the top Dec 10 15:39:13 of the main window Dec 10 15:40:13 i search the prerouting_rule on F2 and i don't find..this table don't exist ? Dec 10 15:45:23 I have done it but still the problem remains .... Dec 10 15:45:40 SoukoussMan: 1 sec Dec 10 15:45:58 ok Dec 10 15:47:53 SoukoussMan: http://trac.fonosfera.org/fon-ng/browser/trunk/fon/fonstate/files/etc/fonstated/Redirect Dec 10 15:49:36 blogic> yes but i want include it in the /etc/firewall.proxy Dec 10 15:54:00 blogic> sorry, it's a error of me Dec 10 15:54:02 i've find Dec 10 15:54:54 ok Dec 10 15:56:26 hi all Dec 10 15:58:11 hi pm2036 Dec 10 15:58:57 the public_dhcp_lan is staticly define ? Dec 10 15:59:03 hi Soukoussman :) Dec 10 16:00:13 hi all Dec 10 16:00:15 lol Dec 10 16:00:58 hi iurgi! Dec 10 16:01:14 (i've decided to say "hi" to everybody^^) Dec 10 16:01:48 mib_9wyvgb, please send a mail to the mailinglist with a full log of what you have done on redboot Dec 10 16:02:16 and a screenshot of the conf of the tftpd Dec 10 16:02:24 and main window Dec 10 16:02:37 you can host it on imageshak.us Dec 10 16:02:50 *imageshack.us Dec 10 16:02:58 mib_9wyvgb: are you sure, when you connect your fonera directly to your computer that your ethernet interface is up? Dec 10 16:03:16 I look at every settings and reply today Dec 10 16:03:37 this chat stuff is unproductive Dec 10 16:04:34 hello again Dec 10 16:04:38 sorry for the delay Dec 10 16:04:43 inouk;: bad day :p Dec 10 16:04:46 I tried another tftp server Dec 10 16:05:04 seems to be the same problem Dec 10 16:05:18 pm2036, no why? Dec 10 16:05:19 yes all other configs are ok because I am already under redboot Dec 10 16:05:40 inou: nothing ;) Dec 10 16:05:43 but I can't succeed to load the bootloader Dec 10 16:05:55 getting to operation time out message Dec 10 16:06:10 mib_9wyvgb: ping -h 192.168.1.254 Dec 10 16:06:15 after 10 secons Dec 10 16:06:20 CTL^C Dec 10 16:06:25 and see if there's any reply Dec 10 16:06:27 this should work Dec 10 16:06:31 since you're using telnet Dec 10 16:06:34 but just in case ;) Dec 10 16:06:49 if so, to me, it's 100% sure that your tftp program is not running properly Dec 10 16:07:05 either not listenning on the correct port or on no port at all Dec 10 16:08:09 yes seems so Dec 10 16:08:20 I do not have a lot of experience with tftp servrs Dec 10 16:08:39 I understund it should be liteing to address 192.168 .1.254 right ? Dec 10 16:08:47 port ?? Dec 10 16:10:01 port 63 right ? Dec 10 16:10:26 m tftp server says connected to local host and I have a redboot command line Dec 10 16:10:27 69 Dec 10 16:11:22 does your computer reply to pings? Dec 10 16:13:11 yes it does Dec 10 16:13:28 and redboot available without any problems Dec 10 16:15:45 iurgi, he can connect to redboot the problem is with the tftp server Dec 10 16:16:03 inouk, you couldn't tell that only by using telnet Dec 10 16:16:04 imho Dec 10 16:16:15 <_bluetouff> hey iurgi :) Dec 10 16:16:17 reboot accepts connections from any valid IP Dec 10 16:16:25 mib_9wyvgb, did the tftp server came with default port 63? Dec 10 16:16:32 but will only connect to the correct tftp sserver Dec 10 16:16:35 no with 69 Dec 10 16:16:38 I checked it Dec 10 16:16:40 it is ok Dec 10 16:17:02 so, mib_9wyvgb did you try what I told you? Dec 10 16:17:05 the ping? Dec 10 16:17:09 yes Dec 10 16:17:16 what was the outpu? Dec 10 16:17:17 t? Dec 10 16:17:54 mib_9wyvgb, check this out http://tftpd32.jounin.net/ Dec 10 16:18:35 ping received 0 of 10 expected ?? Dec 10 16:18:36 where the guy got D:/... you have to have the path of the loader Dec 10 16:18:42 and firmware Dec 10 16:19:10 yes the path is correct put the loader and the firmware unde c:/fonra Dec 10 16:19:14 in "server interface" you need 192.168.1.254 Dec 10 16:19:20 mib_9wyvgb: so the ping didn't work Dec 10 16:19:34 inouk: did you see the "received 0" ? ;) Dec 10 16:19:35 no ping did not work Dec 10 16:19:42 so, your IP is incorrect Dec 10 16:19:50 server interface set to 192.168.1.254 Dec 10 16:20:06 which IP Dec 10 16:20:13 the one of the network card ? Dec 10 16:20:14 the one on your PC Dec 10 16:20:17 yes Dec 10 16:20:18 iurgi, no :( Dec 10 16:20:25 inouk: why? Dec 10 16:20:29 mib_9wyvgb: yes Dec 10 16:20:30 ;) Dec 10 16:21:04 my network card ip is 192.168.1.254 Dec 10 16:21:09 mask 255.255.255.0 Dec 10 16:21:12 hmmm Dec 10 16:21:14 default gateway Dec 10 16:21:16 192.168.1.1 Dec 10 16:21:24