**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu May 28 02:59:58 2009 May 28 06:54:29 Hi! Buongiorno! May 28 07:05:49 moin May 28 07:16:09 is this normal cpu load while downloading from rs.com ? http://up.mibbit.com/up/s1OzKa5q.jpg May 28 07:19:42 i think it is a hugh load ? http://up.mibbit.com/up/dWnjDJjB.jpg May 28 08:20:01 c_up: it is huge May 28 08:20:15 and I think it's not the download manager but lucittpd May 28 08:20:33 maybe thats why i can only download with 200kb/s? May 28 08:20:49 what is licittpd? interface? May 28 08:21:15 yes May 28 08:21:25 hmm May 28 08:22:19 running rc2, thought it would download faster but still ~200kb/s May 28 08:22:34 ntfs-3g /dev/sda1 /tmp/run/mountd/sda has 34% cpu load, i think that is too much May 28 08:24:22 c_up: rc2?? May 28 08:24:34 c_up: I would not use NTFS May 28 08:24:37 it's too slow May 28 08:25:14 got it from blogic, because rs.com DLs are so slow, thought rc2 would give me better performance May 28 08:25:26 whatg file system do you prefer ? May 28 08:25:53 takes too much load to use May 28 08:26:20 yeah, which file system does not? May 28 08:26:20 well, that's not rc2 May 28 08:26:27 morning May 28 08:26:35 moin May 28 08:26:37 it's a personalised image May 28 08:26:38 hi blogic May 28 08:26:50 c_up: ext2, ext3 and vfat don't May 28 08:27:01 load of 4-5 is normal on the ath2315 May 28 08:27:33 hm, but it is hard to access ext3 or so on windows ;) May 28 08:27:34 it's still high May 28 08:27:40 c_up: vfat May 28 08:27:44 fat32 May 28 08:28:18 anyway, blogic he's doing downloads + ntfs-3g this is one of the most consuming combinations May 28 08:28:23 c_up: i have no idea how come you only get 200k May 28 08:28:27 you thin fat32 gives better performance then ntfs on fonera? May 28 08:28:29 iurgi: i can read thx May 28 08:28:43 blogic: I thought you were blind May 28 08:28:47 ah ok May 28 08:29:06 blogic i think it is because cpu load is that high when accessing ntfs!? May 28 08:29:34 c_up: load is always that high May 28 08:29:40 damn May 28 08:33:59 i have no idea why i don't get full DL.speed, damn with rc1 i got ~160kb/s with rc2 ~200kb/s :/ May 28 08:34:01 c_up: load is highER because of ntfs-3g May 28 08:34:15 it is always high, but ntfs-3g makes it worse May 28 08:34:25 as for the speed, I find 200KB/s more than reasonable May 28 08:34:45 it's a low cost router, you can't expect it to download as fast as a PC May 28 08:36:50 yes, but i checked with blogic, he gets about 500kb/s, that would be great ;) maybe i test it with fat May 28 08:38:21 yes, test with fat, but it won't work much May 28 08:38:36 in any case, if you get 500KB/s, you won't be able to do other stuff in parallel May 28 08:47:44 hehe, have to overclock that littel cpu ;) May 28 09:07:25 is there a way to get may MS quickcam vx 1000 to work with fonera ? it is not in the supported list May 28 09:11:40 dunno May 28 09:11:45 depends on the chipset it has May 28 09:14:59 https://www.mibbit.com/pb/0RvwOZ maybe this help to identify the chipset? May 28 09:16:12 google for it May 28 09:30:08 hm found no info for chipsetm only, from a page: Driver : gspcav1, Bridge: sn9c105r, Sensor: OV7660, i think thats not enough!? May 28 09:33:06 got it from this site: http://mxhaard.free.fr/spca5xx.html May 28 09:43:34 good morning May 28 09:45:46 hi May 28 09:51:55 hi to all May 28 09:52:21 can you explain me how to enable redboot on my fonera 2202 May 28 09:53:04 thanks May 28 10:26:12 Is 2202 Fonera 2.0? May 28 10:32:30 yes May 28 10:32:35 ops he left May 28 10:50:41 eheh... May 28 10:56:28 iurgi: these guys have no patience.... May 28 10:56:33 :) May 28 10:56:35 yeah May 28 11:06:55 but i have ;) May 28 11:32:02 we must have patience May 28 12:42:36 post pictures tonight of the fonera with embedded 4 ports hub May 28 12:42:49 :) May 28 14:04:14 hi May 28 14:07:18 hi May 28 14:28:24 Is there any info about the firefox plugin wich is being developed? Sounds really good... May 28 14:30:01 Decodecoding: there is May 28 14:30:05 javiermon is doing it May 28 14:30:07 it's nice May 28 14:30:16 let's see if we can release something soon May 28 14:30:22 it will be definitely ready for the 2.2.6.0 May 28 14:32:21 So it is a Firefox plugin but part of it must be included in firmware? May 28 14:40:38 wy is firefox plugin???? May 28 14:41:04 Danicasti: why not? May 28 14:41:39 AFAIK is the only browser wich allows plugins... May 28 14:41:46 what is this? May 28 14:41:52 maybe I'm wrong... May 28 14:41:52 firefox? May 28 14:41:55 www.firefox.com May 28 14:42:12 firefox plugin for the F2? May 28 14:42:50 I lost something? May 28 14:43:37 Decodecoding: well, it is. considering flock, iceweasel and others as derivatives of firefox May 28 14:44:10 That's what I was thinking. Those are forks due to legal stuff in some cases... May 28 14:44:40 I read Chrome will soon feature plugins too May 28 14:45:09 yeah, probably May 28 15:15:41 will your f2 plugin support xulrunner? Then it could be run standalone May 28 15:21:36 xMff: that's a plan for the future May 28 15:22:03 nice iurgi May 28 15:22:06 ideally it will become a fonera control panel on the pc May 28 15:22:17 so it just communicates with the fonera using RPCs May 28 15:22:37 and you can see the status of everything in the fonera, send torrents etc for download, videos for upload... May 28 15:22:41 imho xul (xml + js + css) is far easier to hack for the average person then C++, C# or Java May 28 15:22:44 ideally you can even drag and drop May 28 15:22:52 xMff: indeed! :) May 28 15:23:11 well, some time in the future :P May 28 15:23:17 hehe May 28 15:23:47 if we make a usable API, we might attrack some people that can write xul May 28 15:24:02 and make a nice application to control the fonera from the PC May 28 15:24:28 this plugin should be the first seed May 28 15:24:33 then we need to water it ;) May 28 15:25:22 :) May 28 15:29:48 xMff: but moving form a firefox extension to a xulrunner standalone application is not easy, right? May 28 15:30:03 I'm no expert, but I guess you'll miss lot's of the things firefox does for you know May 28 15:30:18 depends on the apis that are used May 28 15:30:22 for instance, I assume the plugin is using firefox' http stack to connect to the fonera May 28 15:31:47 https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XULRunner/What_XULRunner_Provides May 28 15:32:03 seems to be pretty feature-complete May 28 15:32:15 hmmm interesting May 28 15:32:16 yes May 28 15:37:29 hi all! May 28 15:37:46 hi May 28 15:38:03 ih! May 28 15:38:13 !ih May 28 15:38:21 h!i May 28 15:38:36 i!h May 28 15:39:24 task completed May 28 15:40:07 iurgi i've seen that you told cyrus that we were talking yesterday May 28 15:40:08 thanks May 28 15:40:31 no pronb May 28 15:40:36 it's my duty :) May 28 15:40:43 ;) May 28 15:51:58 anyone here works /worked at apple ? May 28 15:55:46 for what? May 28 16:42:34 hi May 28 16:42:55 has anyone tried to download ubuntu-torrent via la fonera May 28 16:43:03 yes May 28 16:43:29 everything worked like it should? May 28 16:43:40 no May 28 16:43:52 My fonera rebooted May 28 16:43:53 i have tried it today and after the check phase the download switched to pause May 28 16:44:17 Let's wait for new version May 28 16:44:25 i have read something about an error because of to many users in a peer May 28 16:45:06 other torrents worked without any problem, i think we have to wait for a more stable version May 28 16:45:19 sure May 28 16:46:57 I put my faith in that :-d May 28 17:00:44 have a nice evening May 28 18:43:09 hi all May 28 18:44:03 hi Kyros May 28 18:44:16 any news aobut your setup? May 28 18:44:57 * iurgi is leaving May 28 18:47:28 no - unfortunately I don't find out what to release in the windows firewall to make the service come through. May 28 18:47:51 but I'm here for another question. May 28 18:48:41 I'm currently putting my ics calendar files from thunderbird to the usb-stick via ftp. May 28 18:49:15 but it seems that only 2 simultaneous processes are allowed. May 28 18:49:35 which ftp setup value hat to be chaged for this? May 28 18:53:31 is it etc/config/pureftpd ??? May 28 18:53:53 I found there: May 28 18:54:12 config pureftpd pureftpd option port '21' option noanonymous '1' option chrooteveryone '1' option maxclientsperip '2' option maxclientsnumber '2' option peruserlimits '3:4' option umask '133:000' option authentication 'puredb:/etc/pureftpd.pdb' option enabled '1' option wan '0' May 28 18:54:49 change: option maxclientsperip '2' --> option maxclientsperip '8' ??? May 28 18:55:14 option maxclientsnumber '2' ---> option maxclientsnumber '8' May 28 18:55:51 once I tried to change them to 20 ftp didn't worked anymore after reboot. so I changed it back. May 28 18:55:56 any idea? May 28 19:24:40 Sorry - I was disconnected May 28 20:09:33 Hi guys!!! http://picasaweb.google.it/lh/photo/mgeBTeJGIVkD0s5P3rp3Fw?feat=directlink May 28 20:09:50 http://picasaweb.google.it/lh/photo/yCKOUUnxVpr5f6z9ams6Yw?feat=directlink May 28 20:10:03 http://picasaweb.google.it/lh/photo/ZV1X1c-5l_qPuab6VK6NCA?feat=directlink May 28 20:10:16 http://picasaweb.google.it/lh/photo/sz6gRORfYiiEOeWyU_4uGg?feat=directlink May 28 20:10:50 very nice mod May 28 20:11:02 cuts are clean May 28 20:11:53 cuts NOT are clean.... The time is small.... :( **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri May 29 02:59:57 2009