**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Jun 15 02:59:59 2013 Jun 15 22:55:40 bluelightning, hi there. I've got this msg from Saul: Andrea, RP said that I should accept this, and that we need to consider a meta-filesystems approach Jun 15 22:56:07 ? Jun 15 22:56:11 hi Jun 15 22:56:12 so it shouldn't take so long to remove the stale,broken recipe from meta-oe Jun 15 22:56:23 WAS: cramfs Jun 15 22:56:28 "should" or "shouldn't" ? Jun 15 22:56:55 exactly like above Jun 15 22:56:57 then Jun 15 22:56:59 We are currently looking at the whole rootfs constuction with an eye to being able to untangle some of these types of dependencies Jun 15 22:58:15 I'm not sure I understood ;) Jun 15 22:58:57 so, there's some work going on to try to tidy up rootfs construction Jun 15 22:59:07 seems so, yes Jun 15 22:59:18 one of the goals is to make it easier to extend Jun 15 22:59:33 which would help in this situation I think Jun 15 23:00:16 although, it's not going to remove the dependency on meta-oe Jun 15 23:00:48 then we'll add it as mycramfs-native.bb in meta-hh Jun 15 23:01:05 wouldn't you just add it as cramfs-native ? Jun 15 23:01:45 it depends on what will happen to image_fstypes.bbclass Jun 15 23:02:39 otherwise we'd provide custom instructions Jun 15 23:03:38 see, I could better spend time trying to revive the MTD support for collie Jun 15 23:04:06 I have really no other reason for cramfs than a RO mtd as factory-delivered Jun 15 23:05:08 collie status is still poor w/out framebuffer :/ Jun 15 23:16:02 hmm :/ Jun 15 23:16:15 could we try to get thesing interested again? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Jun 16 02:59:58 2013