**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Feb 10 02:59:59 2016
Feb 10 10:49:31 <ant_work> bluelightning:hello
Feb 10 10:56:46 <VartiWork> hi ant
Feb 10 10:56:57 <ant_work> hi VartiWork
Feb 10 11:42:48 <bluelightning> hi ant_work
Feb 10 12:01:08 <ant_work> bluelightning: I have some doubts about the INSANE_SKIP_ syntax
Feb 10 12:01:42 <bluelightning> ant_work: what's the confusion?
Feb 10 12:01:59 <ant_work> grepping in oe-core there are cases where it is appended += and set =
Feb 10 12:02:12 <ant_work> the Yocto manual 2.0 gives following ex.  INSANE_SKIP_${PN} += "dev-so"
Feb 10 12:02:37 <ant_work> is there supposedly a previous setting in local.conf or distro?
Feb 10 12:03:29 <ant_work> apart this, reading the insane.bbclass I understaand it goes by pn/packagename
Feb 10 12:03:59 <ant_work> but strangely I have had the need to use it based on recipe name...
Feb 10 12:04:35 <ant_work> otherwise it did'n silence the warning
Feb 10 12:05:31 <ant_work> my example is th eklibc recipe in meta-initramfs
Feb 10 12:05:56 <ant_work> I've sent a patch curing both warning and error
Feb 10 12:05:58 <ant_work> +INSANE_SKIP_klibc += "already-stripped"
Feb 10 12:05:58 <ant_work> +INSANE_SKIP_libklibc-dev += "dev-elf"
Feb 10 12:07:31 <ant_work> _klibc is not a package, just a build target
Feb 10 12:07:33 <ant_work> PACKAGES = "libklibc libklibc-staticdev libklibc-dev"
Feb 10 12:32:10 <bluelightning> I think people just use += just in case there is some previous value, but there's unlikely to be one
Feb 10 12:32:54 <bluelightning> for INSANE_SKIP to work the override has to be the package name in which the issue is going to be found
Feb 10 12:37:38 <ant_work> at first I couldn't solve the warning about already stripped, it went away after seeing in bitbake verbose logs that somehow do_package_qa was about 'klibc'
Feb 10 12:38:34 <ant_work> I'm tempted to resend the patch, split in two parts, one for the warnign and one for the error, both using = operator
Feb 10 12:38:57 <ant_work> or I can fix that in upcoming klibc 2.0.5...
Feb 10 12:40:13 <bluelightning> rather than INSANE_SKIP wouldn't it be better to just fix the issues?
Feb 10 12:40:36 <ant_work> well, the strip issue maybe yes
Feb 10 12:40:46 <ant_work> the packaging one is different...
Feb 10 12:40:54 <ant_work> debian does that as well
Feb 10 12:41:02 <bluelightning> -dev packages shouldn't have .so binaries in them, hence the test...
Feb 10 12:41:14 <ant_work> even, the -staticdev is included in the -dev
Feb 10 12:41:39 <ant_work> similar things are done for libc and musl
Feb 10 12:41:46 <bluelightning> hmm
Feb 10 12:42:11 <bluelightning> if that's the case then fine I guess, but it still doesn't sound right at face value
Feb 10 12:42:14 <bluelightning> I'm afraid it's 1:40 and I have to get up before 8 tomorrow... gotta go
Feb 10 12:42:14 <ant_work> and klibc is also different meaning you have to link to that specific klibc
Feb 10 12:42:37 <ant_work> ah ,where are you?
Feb 10 12:42:45 <ant_work> NZ?
Feb 10 12:42:57 <bluelightning> yeah
Feb 10 12:43:06 <ant_work> ouch, take a good sleep :)
Feb 10 12:44:03 <bluelightning> thanks - goodnight :)
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Feb 11 02:59:58 2016