**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Mar 05 23:59:56 2005 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 11:20:55 2005 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 11:24:04 2005 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 11:30:27 2005 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 11:34:05 2005 Mar 06 12:15:07 i'm having a problem getting my nslu2 to format my disk... Mar 06 12:17:15 i talked to some linksys guy from india but he couldn't help me Mar 06 12:22:12 hey pTweety Mar 06 12:22:24 morning Mar 06 12:24:04 ... i just noticed that not one of my computers has the same time lol Mar 06 12:26:08 hey man, you have any idea why i can't format my disk on my nslu2? Mar 06 12:32:05 tjcoder, sorry that I can not help you. But have you already searched the wiki and the yahoo group? Mar 06 12:32:30 i've read a lot of it, yea... i'll keep looking. thanks Mar 06 13:52:23 anyone try to ugrade their slug to samba 3 using ipkg? Mar 06 13:53:10 i did the install via ipkg, and it appears to have installed, as all the files are there Mar 06 13:53:27 maybe not in here, but since it is a package, I'm sure that ppl are using it Mar 06 13:53:35 but it keeps running an older version Mar 06 13:53:52 there were a few guys on the yahoo group that did Mar 06 13:54:05 i think i'm missing something basic in the config Mar 06 13:54:22 oh, yeah, testparm likes my config Mar 06 13:55:05 I would think you need to change the diversion scripts to load up the daemons that you installed Mar 06 13:57:20 you mean the ones in /opt/etc/init.d? Mar 06 13:58:01 they appear to direct the slug to start the daemons i installed... Mar 06 13:58:16 ones that are in /opt.... Mar 06 13:58:17 ? Mar 06 13:59:59 i thought that the diversion scripts were located in /opt/etc/init.d Mar 06 14:00:01 hmmm Mar 06 14:00:30 i am unslung... Mar 06 14:00:44 well... the script that starts the linksys samba is in /etc/rc.d/rc.samba Mar 06 14:00:55 -in Mar 06 14:01:37 i need to alter that? Mar 06 14:01:50 hmmm... i thought those were located in flash... Mar 06 14:03:28 if you look at this page http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Info/BootSequencePage there is a bootseq.xls (excel sheet) that shows the boot sequence of a nslu2 Mar 06 14:04:02 reading Mar 06 14:06:42 is there anything in particular I should worry about compiling vim ? I'm running the compile on the slug, and so far it seems to be good (though slow) Mar 06 14:06:44 once all that's done, the slug runs the scripts in /opt/etc/init.d, right? Mar 06 14:07:34 on startup, yes, the scripts in that folder get run Mar 06 14:07:56 in my case it does stuff like start openssh, mt-daapd, and supposedly, it kills running samba processes and starts the ones i want Mar 06 14:09:43 there's a script that the samba ipkg installs that looks like this: Mar 06 14:09:44 seanslattery, you might need to check to see that the fully qualified name of the new samba 3 daemons are being invoked... Mar 06 14:09:57 if I had installed smb 3 here, I would tell you Mar 06 14:10:03 #!/bin/sh Mar 06 14:10:03 # please remove '#' to activate the start script. Mar 06 14:10:03 if [ -n "`pidof smbd`" ] ; then Mar 06 14:10:04 echo "Stopping smbd:" Mar 06 14:10:06 killall smbd Mar 06 14:10:08 fi Mar 06 14:10:13 if [ -n "`pidof nmbd`" ] ; then Mar 06 14:10:14 echo "Stopping nmbd:" Mar 06 14:10:16 killall nmbd Mar 06 14:10:18 fi Mar 06 14:10:23 #sleep 2 Mar 06 14:10:27 echo "Starting smbd:" Mar 06 14:10:30 /opt/sbin/smbd -D; Mar 06 14:10:32 echo "Starting nmbd:" Mar 06 14:10:35 /opt/sbin/nmbd -D; Mar 06 14:10:37 using ps, right Mar 06 14:10:38 whoops Mar 06 14:10:40 using ps Mar 06 14:13:00 looks like they are running from where they should be Mar 06 14:13:23 coming in late on the conversation.. what problem do you have, seanslattery ? Mar 06 14:13:25 you sure you're not running smb 3 then? Mar 06 14:13:41 trying to get smbd version 3 running Mar 06 14:13:54 well smbd -V returns 2.2x Mar 06 14:13:59 do you end up w/ no smbd processes ? Mar 06 14:14:17 on the system i'm sshing from the same thing returns 3.0.5 Mar 06 14:14:30 i'm getting the wrong ssh processes Mar 06 14:14:50 ? Mar 06 14:15:06 smbd -V returns 2.2x -- Mar 06 14:15:06 whoops, ah, i meant to say, i'm getting the wrong smbd processes Mar 06 14:15:10 have you switched you r PATH Mar 06 14:15:14 to putopt before bin ? Mar 06 14:15:26 ah, no... Mar 06 14:15:27 hmmm Mar 06 14:15:45 I bet you're just seeing the smbd command from the root then Mar 06 14:15:46 i'm not much of a linux guy, so a lot of this is new to me Mar 06 14:15:52 yes Mar 06 14:16:34 where would i find that path to alter it? in which file? Mar 06 14:16:49 well 1) /etc/profile (right?) Mar 06 14:17:01 just try the /opt/sbin/smbd -V Mar 06 14:17:05 you can manually run /opt/sbin/smbd -V Mar 06 14:17:11 but tghat won't tell you what version is Running Mar 06 14:17:25 since that is the one that is that is invoked in the init.d scripts Mar 06 14:17:41 yeah... Mar 06 14:17:48 simple tst Mar 06 14:17:49 test Mar 06 14:17:53 ps -ef | grep smbd Mar 06 14:17:55 what path ? Mar 06 14:18:30 PATH=/opt/bin:${PATH} Mar 06 14:18:36 is the only line in my profile Mar 06 14:18:51 I wouldn't change that unless you have to Mar 06 14:19:02 I think you probably have the right samba running, probably Mar 06 14:19:07 jsut the wrong command to test the versions Mar 06 14:19:20 yep Mar 06 14:19:20 smbd -V? Mar 06 14:19:23 if you look at the ps list you should be able to see the full path of the running samba Mar 06 14:19:32 no, /opt/sbin/smbd -V Mar 06 14:19:56 yeah. i'm seeing /opt/sbin/smbd Mar 06 14:20:02 ah! Mar 06 14:20:04 cool! Mar 06 14:20:37 i AM running the right version Mar 06 14:20:39 doh! Mar 06 14:21:14 i've been beating my head against a wall for a while wondering what i messed up Mar 06 14:21:40 the whole "two versions of packages" thing can get wacky Mar 06 14:21:44 helloooo better reliability Mar 06 14:21:45 yeah Mar 06 14:22:16 i did a python upgrade recently on a little iMac that didn't take until i'd altered a few things Mar 06 14:22:35 another system where it's easy to get multiple versions of the same packages Mar 06 14:22:50 install went where it was supposed to, but had to change a few things to get the system to use the newer stuff Mar 06 14:22:52 yeah Mar 06 14:23:18 onto the next big thing... anyone out there tried the unslung-able package? Mar 06 14:23:53 and thank you! Mar 06 14:24:21 lots of interest in OpenSlug now... Mar 06 14:24:30 um, yeah Mar 06 14:24:34 Linux distro.... Mar 06 14:24:47 compiling sorta frightens me, so binaries are the thing Mar 06 14:25:01 though i'd love to run netatalk here. Mar 06 14:25:20 well, there's a licensing issue with some Intel code that we are waiting on resolution Mar 06 14:25:31 for openslug? Mar 06 14:25:58 to be able to allow binary downloads, yes Mar 06 14:25:58 they're not real useful that way, from what i normally see on /. Mar 06 14:26:21 so OpenSlug is fairly stable, then? Mar 06 14:26:43 we should be ok - according to what Intel has published, but we want to be absolutely sure Mar 06 14:27:01 my "FrankenSlug" is still running OpenSlug 1.3 Mar 06 14:27:13 yeah. nothing like getting a large chip manufacturer mad at you to make your day... Mar 06 14:27:25 how hard is the compile? Mar 06 14:27:36 follow the instructions.... Mar 06 14:27:53 you need a linux box (I've got a debian setup here) Mar 06 14:28:00 or run coLinux Mar 06 14:28:02 throw me an RTFM? Mar 06 14:28:11 bsd variants? Mar 06 14:28:14 OS X? Mar 06 14:28:28 with OS X, you also need fink Mar 06 14:28:41 got fink Mar 06 14:29:23 search the wiki... good instructions there... Mar 06 14:29:30 okiedoke Mar 06 14:29:46 has anyone played with netatalk? Mar 06 14:30:03 ByronT: looks like the template.mk uses make install tricks to find out what files are being generated by the package--so I dont' need to list all of vim's doc ? Mar 06 14:33:09 I could have told him that I just use NFS and CUPS for my iMac G5 Mar 06 14:34:00 ByronT: any issues on NFS server w/ os x ? Mar 06 14:34:04 I'm goign there next. Mar 06 14:34:13 os x as a client Mar 06 14:34:35 except for those stupid .DS_store files that the iMac spews over everywhere Mar 06 14:34:53 I use the nfs-utils (kernel level nfs server) Mar 06 14:35:29 even the default exports file worked right off the bat Mar 06 14:42:25 meaning that you need to explicitly state every dependency - such that your package can be installed by itself **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 21:56:37 2005 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 22:26:04 2005 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 23:18:05 2005 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 23:24:04 2005 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 23:30:23 2005 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 15:40:05 2005 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 06 23:59:56 2005