**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Sep 16 02:59:57 2009 Sep 16 07:24:35 kvaks2: thanks. Ho hum. I pretty sure that it was much faster when I first set it up. Tinkering needed, perhaps. I'll try ftp, samba, rsync and see what sort of speeds I get. However, I'm sure that other people get better. It's later model (so overclocked outofbox) and running slugos 5.3 from usb stick Sep 16 11:35:49 it has been a while... when my openslug machine doesn't boot anymore from the usb disk after power failure, what file on that disk should I delete? Sep 16 11:41:08 don't know - how about this? http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/HowTo/RecoverFromCorruptBootDrive Sep 16 11:45:07 yes, already trying something similar (fsck from another slug), but I thought there was a file that indicated bad shutdown that should be deleted as well... Sep 16 19:16:05 hello Sep 16 19:20:22 I 've got massive hd performance issues with my slug. Sep 16 19:20:22 the results of hdparm -tT are looking good for me: Sep 16 19:20:22 /dev/sda1: Sep 16 19:20:22 Timing cached reads: 148 MB in 2.02 seconds = 73.42 MB/sec Sep 16 19:20:22 Timing buffered disk reads: 44 MB in 3.07 seconds = 14.35 MB/sec Sep 16 19:20:58 but either copy operations in a ssh shell are very slow. have a look at this: Sep 16 19:21:04 time dd if=/dev/zero of=test.dat bs=1024k count=128 Sep 16 19:21:04 128+0 records in Sep 16 19:21:04 128+0 records out Sep 16 19:21:04 134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 79.7828 s, 1.7 MB/s Sep 16 19:22:42 there's no difference between ntfs and ext2 systems. The dd operations was performed on a 8GB usb-stick. Does anyone have an idea, how i can grow up the performance? Sep 16 19:34:59 nobody an idea? :( Sep 16 20:34:06 help? Sep 16 21:45:04 schmiddi_: 2 MB/s sounds good for a slug. Sep 16 21:46:03 I got 3 with the default linksys firmware. I typically get less than 2 with samba @ Debian. Sep 16 21:46:27 And even less using rsync. Sep 16 21:46:30 for directly wirting on the hd? Sep 16 21:46:35 No. Sep 16 21:46:36 Ah. Sep 16 21:46:38 Sorry. Sep 16 21:46:42 I didn't see that. Sep 16 21:46:44 with samba, i got 750kb/s :( Sep 16 21:47:03 it is awful Sep 16 21:47:05 l Sep 16 21:48:01 I'm searching for a week to solve this problem Sep 16 21:48:11 but nobody knows Sep 16 21:50:16 Mine's not so much better: Sep 16 21:50:36 134217728 bytes (134 MB) copied, 44,5788 seconds, 3,0 MB/s Sep 16 21:51:12 Also on an USB memory stick Sep 16 21:51:23 got the same results on my hdd Sep 16 21:51:43 but why is samba so slow Sep 16 21:52:33 Dunno. I don't care any more. I've pretty much stopped using the slug to host files. Sep 16 21:53:06 filehosting is the only mission for my slug Sep 16 21:53:44 at reading files via samba it reaches 3,3mb/s, for wirting 0,7mb/s it is a mes Sep 16 21:53:44 s Sep 16 21:53:55 network checked with iperf Sep 16 21:54:05 nothing running (nfs, samba, cups) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Sep 17 02:59:57 2009