**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Jan 21 02:59:56 2010 Jan 21 14:54:04 hello^^ Jan 21 14:54:33 hey Mysterious Jan 21 14:54:46 any luck with your slug? Jan 21 14:54:58 well.... not really Jan 21 14:55:04 :( Jan 21 14:55:07 the hardware might be damages Jan 21 14:55:09 *d Jan 21 14:55:29 My slug was manufactured in 12/2007 Jan 21 14:55:38 save up your pennies and buy a sheevaplug! ;) Jan 21 14:55:44 xD Jan 21 14:56:07 well i already save but it will be a intel atom server^^ Jan 21 14:56:20 nice Jan 21 14:56:35 i hope the mainboard will be cheap enough soon Jan 21 14:56:59 it only takes 15-20 watts^^ that is the main point for buying Jan 21 14:57:32 but back to the slug x) Jan 21 14:58:09 the newer slugs (like mine) were already overclocked, weren't they? Jan 21 14:59:05 no, Jan 21 14:59:14 its not that they are overclocked, Jan 21 14:59:24 its more like they arent "underclocked" Jan 21 14:59:33 or to put it another way, Jan 21 14:59:48 the hardware was always capable of doing the speeds of the new slugs, Jan 21 15:00:09 but for reasons that i doubt anyone can fully understand, linksys /underclocked/ the older ones. Jan 21 15:00:24 so instead of thinking of a runner taking steroids, Jan 21 15:00:48 think of him untying his shoelaces which were tied to the other shoe. Jan 21 15:01:48 ok^^ Jan 21 15:03:02 but do the newer de-"underclocked" slugs have the R83(or whatever;)) resistor like the underclocked ones? Jan 21 15:03:30 im not familiar with the details of the circuit board, i never opened any of my slugs up. Jan 21 15:03:59 all i know is that i believe that the "underclocking" process involved linksys putting a resistor somewhere Jan 21 15:04:19 (because the hardware hack to reverse that involved removing that resistor - i think) Jan 21 15:04:57 what the situation with the new slugs is, i couldnt say, but i guess it might not be too crazy to assume that they lack that resistor. Jan 21 15:05:22 hm Jan 21 15:07:03 i tought maybe linksys changed something else though that the resistor at the position(of the R83 in older slugs) must stay there now.... Jan 21 15:07:39 im honestly not sure what the hardware is like in detail. Jan 21 15:07:47 :( Jan 21 15:07:57 as i say, i never attempted any hardware hacks, or opened my slugs. Jan 21 15:08:25 infact, when i got my two new slugs, i was initially surprised they were quicker, before i remembered what i had read before about the underclocking. Jan 21 15:08:53 ^^ Jan 21 15:09:50 could you tell me who is more in hardware things of the slug? Jan 21 15:10:49 not by name, but im pretty sure everything that is known is somewhere on nslu2-linux.org Jan 21 15:11:37 i guess my special case isn't mentioned there Jan 21 15:11:52 heh Jan 21 15:12:08 one thing you might look in to is possible bootloader issues. Jan 21 15:12:21 it could be that which is giving you problems. Jan 21 15:12:34 that might help^^ Jan 21 15:13:46 i got a friend's slug and his father seemed to have removed the resistor in the 12/07 slug :S Jan 21 15:13:46 just to mention that^^ Jan 21 15:14:25 well from what ive read, its a fairly safe hack. Jan 21 15:14:45 unless you suspect it was not done properly i wouldnt necessarily assume its the problem. Jan 21 15:16:33 the place of the removed resistor look a bit scratched :S but i think that wouldn't be so bad Jan 21 15:17:52 by the way: how important is the battery (for time etc) in the slug? Is it neccessary for booting? :/ Jan 21 15:28:26 i dont know Jan 21 15:28:45 it might cause problems with fsck'ing the disk Jan 21 15:29:08 if the slug unplugs and the date goes back to 1970 so the filesystem date is newer than the slug date. Jan 21 15:36:57 then i'll try to change the battery^^ Jan 21 17:05:16 yay Jan 21 17:05:43 one problem less. i just killed the slug^^. now i can smash it with a hammer :D Jan 21 17:10:42 :o Jan 21 17:13:07 perhaps i should test what happens when i use the -c command in upslug2 xD Jan 21 17:28:13 how to build a jtag cable x( **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Jan 22 02:59:57 2010