**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Aug 31 02:59:57 2006 Aug 31 06:30:35 03bzhou * r3987 10optware/trunk/ (Makefile make/nginx.mk): added nginx as native package Aug 31 10:29:38 hi there Aug 31 10:29:51 got breakage on the development environment Aug 31 10:30:40 completely removed everything, started again and I'm getting errors whenever I try to build anything Aug 31 10:31:41 what errors? Aug 31 10:31:57 make[1]: *** [image] Killed is a good example Aug 31 10:32:32 NAiL, btw ... did you guys ever get the chance to commit my busybox changes to the oe-repo ? Aug 31 10:32:34 it gets to ./setup-enc; exec bitbake -k "InsertOSNamehere"-image Aug 31 10:32:36 and dies Aug 31 10:32:58 Caelian|work: not yet, I'm still trying to get everything to compile Aug 31 10:33:18 NAiL, no problem ... was just curious :) Aug 31 10:33:40 Caelian|work: remind me... did you send a patch somewhere? Aug 31 10:33:41 i am currently using it as a test-case on how to setup BBFILE Collections :)) Aug 31 10:33:54 NAiL, i provided an openslug specific defconfig file Aug 31 10:34:12 callisto.offis.uni-oldenburg.de:8080/defconfig Aug 31 10:34:40 i haven't gotten to actually provide an all out patch ... but that should be the core of it Aug 31 10:35:12 could you just mail that to nail @ nslu2-linux.org? That way it stays in my inbox until it's fixed ;-) Aug 31 10:35:18 will do Aug 31 10:35:48 thanks Aug 31 10:37:29 sent Aug 31 10:39:53 got it Aug 31 10:40:06 ok :) Aug 31 10:43:04 blaster8: how much ram/swap do you have? Aug 31 10:43:11 lots Aug 31 10:43:35 This is cross-compiling - 384MB RAM / 500MB Swap Aug 31 10:44:05 make setup goes nicely, then make openslug fails Aug 31 10:44:30 I was trying to update a previous working dev environment, hit this error Aug 31 10:44:44 so removed the dev environment directory, started again, and got the same error Aug 31 10:45:03 odd Aug 31 10:45:18 what leads up to the error? Aug 31 10:45:18 monotone 0.28 Aug 31 10:45:34 not a lot Aug 31 10:45:41 I have thought of something, actually Aug 31 10:45:49 compiler change may be causing trouble Aug 31 10:46:24 I'll swap to the old one, temporarily and get back to you Aug 31 10:53:25 hmm, didn't help Aug 31 10:56:01 http://pastebin.ca/155824 Aug 31 16:11:21 solved the build problem Aug 31 16:11:37 just built a whole load of security protections into my desktop linux system Aug 31 16:11:46 Pax/grsecurity Aug 31 16:12:19 they decided that they didn't like bitbake and killed the process - swapping out to a non-hardened kernel fixed the problem Aug 31 16:14:03 I'm going to have a dedicated headless OpenVZ server (with multiple virtualised linuxes) in a couple of weeks for jobs like this so temporary solutions are fine :) Aug 31 17:08:56 hmmmm ... anyone has any ideas how hard ti would be to build gcc's objective-c support for openslug ? Aug 31 17:09:24 so the objective-c compiler and the accompanying libobjc.so runtime ? Aug 31 17:29:22 OK, genuine bug this time Aug 31 17:29:30 building slugos-btu, aka ucslugc Aug 31 17:30:06 build failure whilst linking uClibc Aug 31 17:30:18 must have been introduced in the last week or so, because it built fine then Aug 31 17:32:41 http://pastebin.ca/156289 Aug 31 17:55:57 03gda * r3988 10optware/trunk/ (6 files in 3 dirs): amavisd-new: new package Aug 31 18:54:36 03bzhou * r3989 10optware/trunk/Makefile: promoted amavisd-new Aug 31 19:35:51 03pawsa * r3990 10optware/trunk/ (5 files in 2 dirs): sendmail: initial commit of the .mk and source files. Aug 31 19:36:41 pawsa: don't let us start a war, but what has sendmail that postfix has not? Aug 31 19:37:01 can be started by inetd, for one. Aug 31 19:37:33 this is not an advantage, another one? Aug 31 19:37:33 So one need no extra daemon hanging in the (precious) memory. Aug 31 19:37:45 so stop inetd Aug 31 19:38:57 OK, I need a server that runs rsync, smtp server, telnet and imap server. With inetd, there is just one process waiting. What's your alternative? Aug 31 19:39:43 s,rsync,rsyncd, Aug 31 19:40:01 as I told postfix and I use cyrus-imapd, amavisd-new, clamav, fetchmail, spamassassin Aug 31 19:41:42 ... and you have several postfix and cyrus processes sitting there and waiting. This may be good for a high througput environments but I do not think many people run them on NSLU2. Aug 31 19:42:29 I didn't know that sendmail has an imap server Aug 31 19:42:55 Anyway, if you think that running daemons off inetd is wrong, I think you should consider updating http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/Unslung/PackagingBestPractices which recommends that. Aug 31 19:43:21 sendmail is no imap deamon but UW-imap works with inetd. Aug 31 19:44:09 us doesn't allow mails and folder mixed, and it is too slow with my big filled folder Aug 31 19:44:12 s Aug 31 19:44:24 s/us/uw/ Aug 31 19:45:23 I agree, uw isn't perfect. Aug 31 19:45:50 But many its "features" are a matter of taste. Aug 31 19:46:22 to be honest, I don't use a nslu2, but a ds101g, it is a little bit faster Aug 31 19:46:28 I've been ever bothered by the lack "dual-function" folders. Aug 31 19:47:04 and I would not say that UW-imap is slower than cyrus as long as the mbx mailbox driver is used. Aug 31 19:47:54 but it's a matter of the underlying file system as well. Aug 31 19:49:26 I don't know how it is now, but I remember uw had a long history of bugs Aug 31 19:49:51 I know of security issues but not bugs per se. Aug 31 19:50:09 that was what I have meant Aug 31 20:51:39 n8 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Sep 01 02:59:56 2006