**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Jan 12 02:59:57 2008 Jan 12 03:46:46 03osas 07slugos-4.8-beta * r454 10slugos/openembedded/packages/meta/slugos-packages.bb: asterisk-*-sounds-en-*: promoted for slugos Jan 12 04:27:22 03bzhou * r7567 10optware/trunk/make/module-init-tools.mk: module-init-tools: CONFIG_NO_BACKWARDS_COMPAT if syno-x07 Jan 12 04:59:03 03bzhou * r7568 10optware/trunk/platforms/packages-syno-x07.mk: packages-syno-x07: demoted varnish Jan 12 06:00:32 03bzhou * r7569 10optware/trunk/make/asterisk14.mk: asterisk14: made net-snmp optional Jan 12 06:06:46 03bzhou * r7570 10optware/trunk/platforms/packages-syno-x07.mk: packages-syno-x07: promoted asterisk14 Jan 12 17:04:58 morning all Jan 12 17:05:38 has anybody tried getting Kryzsztof's ixp4xx network driver (ixp4xx_eth.c) to compile with 2.6.24~rcX? Jan 12 17:06:10 drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c: In function ‘eth_rx_irq’: Jan 12 17:06:10 drivers/net/arm/ixp4xx_eth.c:498: error: too few arguments to function ‘netif_rx_schedule’ Jan 12 17:07:05 Looks like the napi interface has changed (bea3348eef27e6044b6161fd04c3152215f96411) and I'm wondering if there is a simple way to update his driver Jan 12 19:21:04 03bzhou * r7571 10optware/trunk/make/squid.mk: squid: 2.6.17 -> 2.6.18 Jan 12 20:11:32 03bzhou * r7572 10optware/trunk/ (Makefile make/hgsvn.mk): added & promoted hgsvn Jan 12 20:24:13 03bzhou * r7573 10optware/trunk/make/varnish.mk: varnish: 1.1.1 -> 1.1.2 Jan 12 22:08:05 dumfrac: no simple way that I know - there were major changes in netdev Jan 12 22:08:15 (that's why we're sticking to 2.6.23, where it works fine Jan 12 22:30:51 I have added a prominent Linksys EraseAll tool warning on all slug-firmware.net pages. Jan 12 22:57:19 rwhitby: ok, is it possible to build monotone for ds101g with openembedded metadata ? Jan 12 22:57:42 monotone the package? Jan 12 22:57:54 rwhitby: in fact I only found ds101 related thing into optware, which use Makefile only Jan 12 22:58:06 * cyrilRomain tries to remember the buld problem Jan 12 22:58:22 rwhitby: yes Jan 12 22:58:32 we don't support ds101g with Unslung, SlugOS or Angstrom. Optware support is all we do for that machine. Jan 12 22:58:37 rwhitby: I need a recent version for my synology :) Jan 12 22:58:47 rwhitby: :-/ Jan 12 22:58:55 so update the optware recipe ... Jan 12 22:59:44 why anyone would want to run monotone on a NAS device is beyond me - I've tried building OE on devices like that before, and it is just a bad idea all around. Jan 12 23:03:17 rwhitby: it is actually not to build OE with it, but to share a repository, and I like monotone but I have a recent version to build OE on others machine Jan 12 23:17:44 then your two options are to update the version in Optware and build that, or to teach OE about the toolchain required for your Synology box. Jan 12 23:18:55 rwhitby: I was wondering if 2) just requires a new machine file Jan 12 23:19:10 or if it require many more work Jan 12 23:20:22 depends whether OE can build the toolchain you require for binaries that work on that machine Jan 12 23:23:32 rwhitby: hmm powerpc-603e-linux, i think OE does Jan 12 23:24:14 a toolchain configuration is far more complex than just that triplet. Jan 12 23:24:54 gcc version, glibc version, binutils version, linux headers version, vendor patches .... Jan 12 23:25:18 just ask eno :-) Jan 12 23:25:38 isn't it true that recently OE can support external toolchain? Jan 12 23:26:36 eno: in theory, yes. Jan 12 23:26:44 haven't tried it myself. Jan 12 23:27:05 but i agree with rwhitby, using monotone on NAS seems pointless Jan 12 23:27:28 well, not pointless, but just much like beating yourself with a cricket bat Jan 12 23:27:54 believe me, i've tried maybe two years ago Jan 12 23:28:11 do a "mtn pull" takes more than a day Jan 12 23:28:33 me too - with the same result :-) Jan 12 23:28:47 would depend on the size of your repo Jan 12 23:28:58 eno, rwhitby : what would you use to share a repository then (not a big one like OE) ? Jan 12 23:29:11 subversion or git Jan 12 23:29:13 let's say it improved ten-fold, still take about an hour Jan 12 23:29:22 well, I'm speaking about a 10M repository, not more Jan 12 23:29:22 or mercurial (hg) Jan 12 23:29:47 all of them available in optware Jan 12 23:30:03 arf, subversion is too centralized, maybe should I give git a try Jan 12 23:30:51 * cyrilRomain feels sick learning a new SCM each year .. Jan 12 23:31:17 from the usage perspective, hg is closer to svn Jan 12 23:31:53 eno: does hg support off-line commit ? Jan 12 23:31:59 yes Jan 12 23:32:05 eno: :) Jan 12 23:36:10 thanks Jan 12 23:41:50 rwhitby: thanks for the answer - I've decided to have a go at making the changes myself Jan 12 23:42:06 how badly can I break the NSLU2 :-) Jan 12 23:45:31 dumfrac: that would be cool - please check it into the patches/2.6.24 area if you get it to work. it was all napi changes as far as I could see, and you should be good at nappy changes by now ;-) Jan 12 23:47:21 :-) I'll let you know how it goes Jan 13 02:18:22 03osas 07slugos-4.8-beta * r455 10slugos/openembedded/packages/ (7 files in 4 dirs): monit: promoted for slugos Jan 13 02:50:51 03bzhou * r7574 10optware/trunk/platforms/packages-slugosle.mk: asterisk14{,-chan-capi}: promoted on slugosle **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Jan 13 02:59:57 2008