**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jan 23 02:59:58 2006 Jan 23 03:00:21 pb_: git pull http://ewi546.ewi.utwente.nl/OE/other_scm/git/org.openembedded.oz354fam083 Jan 23 03:00:55 pb_: man git-checkout Jan 23 03:01:03 pb_: man git-branch could be interesting Jan 23 03:06:24 zecke: I've not tried cogito yet... Jan 23 03:06:57 zecke: We should really start the monotone -> git phrase book (plus some documentation of what git actually does) Jan 23 03:07:30 RP: and we should find documentation for synchronisation Jan 23 03:07:39 and merging Jan 23 03:09:07 http://kernel.mirror.nedlinux.nl/pub/software/scm/git/docs/merge-strategies.txt Jan 23 03:09:47 RP: yes but what about git-merge-index Jan 23 03:09:56 RP: it seems only git-merge-one-file is working there Jan 23 03:10:16 RP: which means... I have some fonflicts from uz354 to master I can not resolve :} Jan 23 03:11:33 hehe just 3000 more revs to replay to crofton's svn server Jan 23 03:14:37 zecke: You read http://kernel.mirror.nedlinux.nl/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-merge-index.html ? Jan 23 03:21:17 hi Jan 23 03:21:45 bugs.openembedded.org down ? Jan 23 03:27:54 zecke: oh, right Jan 23 03:27:57 okay, I'll try that soonest Jan 23 03:31:46 Greetings to all ! Jan 23 03:31:54 RP: leave pulling from ewi and merging to phil please ;) Jan 23 03:37:57 zecke: will do :) Jan 23 03:39:51 managed to get the epia going up to a point... Jan 23 03:40:03 task-bootstrap and kernel Jan 23 03:40:27 but now i have a problem with "bootstrap-image" Jan 23 03:40:41 * pb_ installing git now Jan 23 03:40:58 | /home/stelios/oe/build/tmp/work/epia-linux/bootstrap-image-1.0-r0/temp/run.do_rootfs.31465: line 206: bbimage: command not found Jan 23 03:40:58 NOTE: Task failed: /home/stelios/oe/build/tmp/work/epia-linux/bootstrap-image-1.0-r0/temp/log.do_rootfs.31465 Jan 23 03:41:13 bbimage is on the path... Jan 23 03:41:29 that is weird Jan 23 03:41:32 if i run it manual i get something like this... Jan 23 03:42:20 zecke: what does "fatal: Not a git repository: '.git' Jan 23 03:42:20 " mean? Jan 23 03:42:27 stelios@Athena:~/oe/build$ bbimage Jan 23 03:42:27 NOTE: Executing mkfs.jffs2 --root=/home/stelios/oe/build/tmp/rootfs --faketime --output=/home/stelios/oe/build/tmp/deploy/images/rootfs-epia-20060123103400.rootfs.jffs2 --pad --little-endian --eraseblock=0x40000 Jan 23 03:42:47 any ideas ? Jan 23 03:42:48 pb_: you suck? You need to clone first Jan 23 03:42:51 Ifaistos: that is a bit weird. touch local.conf and try again. Jan 23 03:42:52 zecke: oh, right Jan 23 03:43:11 pb_: yeah you need to clone first Jan 23 03:43:16 okay Jan 23 03:43:18 pb_: or do git db-init or such Jan 23 03:43:41 so you want me to clone from rpsys, right? Jan 23 03:43:45 pb_: yes Jan 23 03:44:02 okay Jan 23 03:44:09 is the url on the wiki page? Jan 23 03:44:10 pb_: git clone pb@oegit.rpsys.net:/home/oegit my-lovely-git Jan 23 03:44:11 * pb_ goes to look Jan 23 03:44:18 ah, very good Jan 23 03:44:31 okay, that seems to be doing its thing Jan 23 03:45:25 pb_: git checkout (co does not work...) 'REV' Jan 23 03:45:37 pb_: you can use any revnumber or tags or branch names Jan 23 03:45:46 righto Jan 23 03:45:52 this is all very exciting Jan 23 03:45:55 pb_: git checkout oz354fam083 Jan 23 03:46:03 will switch to that branch Jan 23 03:46:09 git branch will list all branches Jan 23 03:46:25 git branch -d master will piss us off Jan 23 03:46:34 excellent Jan 23 03:47:04 pb_: git checkout -f master will undo every change you have in your directory (uncomitted) Jan 23 03:48:34 svk has taken over my home directory Jan 23 03:48:46 cool Jan 23 03:50:27 pb_: fetch, pull, commit are the most important commands Jan 23 03:50:40 righto Jan 23 03:50:51 my clone is still "Packing 30495 objects" at the moment Jan 23 03:50:52 pb_: and merging is still some kind of mess with git. But you can plug any merging algorithm there Jan 23 03:51:05 ah, that doesn't sound too good Jan 23 03:51:45 and I know no-one who audited git... Jan 23 03:51:51 pb: That did the trick :) Jan 23 03:51:56 strange though.... Jan 23 03:52:29 jolly good Jan 23 03:52:47 pb_: On the other hand adding new git mergers is almost trivial Jan 23 03:53:17 zecke: yeah, auditing git sounds like a nightmare. presumably it's all written in eleet inline assembler or something. Jan 23 03:54:05 pb_: probably and it is obscured by #defines like A as #define B #define 1 _ a nightmare Jan 23 03:54:19 yeah, those crazy kernel guys Jan 23 03:54:23 so you write 11SB11 to introduce inline assembly Jan 23 03:54:31 AB even Jan 23 03:54:53 right Jan 23 03:54:53 fear Jan 23 03:56:41 okay I'm off to the lecture Jan 23 03:56:53 pb_: you can pull/merge plenty of objects Jan 23 03:57:06 pb_: http://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi Jan 23 04:03:07 commit diffs are borken - text files are taken as blobs ;( Jan 23 04:03:13 http://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=.git;a=commitdiff;h=61c7ca02f13d22055b799d14c8bab53c8b199ce6 Jan 23 04:07:15 hrw|work: The host might not actually have diff on it... Jan 23 04:07:48 ah. Jan 23 04:09:35 hrw|work: fixed :) Jan 23 04:10:11 RP: thx Jan 23 04:11:16 btw.. did we had soem weird changesets or its tailor fault? http://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=.git;a=commitdiff;h=b806c58824654a44f2437f7b304ce384c433b30e is a bit strange to me Jan 23 04:11:40 messed uclibc and osb-nrcore in one Jan 23 04:13:15 hrw|work: Looks like tailor messed up Jan 23 04:13:29 zecke: You'd better take a look at the above Jan 23 04:29:30 ~lastseen pH5 Jan 23 04:35:42 monotone: 2,3 M | 281,7 k | 1490 | 327 | 102 Jan 23 04:36:56 hardcore.. Jan 23 04:44:01 does the "default" kernel x86 provide MTD block emulation device ? Jan 23 04:47:16 Ifaistos: OE one? Jan 23 04:47:31 yes for x86/epia etc Jan 23 04:47:52 dont know Jan 23 05:31:41 !lastseen pH5 Jan 23 05:31:42 Laibsch: Don't know, don't care Jan 23 05:32:04 ~seen ph5 Jan 23 05:32:07 ph5 was last seen on IRC in channel #oe, 15h 51m 52s ago, saying: 'gremlin[it]: this sounds like it is an issue with bitbake, maybe you still have an old version without the explode_deps code?'. Jan 23 05:34:11 thanks hrw|work Jan 23 05:34:52 hrw|work: Do you happen to know anything about pH5 checking in some code either into a package anthy or nunome? Jan 23 05:34:52 np Jan 23 05:35:12 anthy is in bugtracker Jan 23 05:38:05 it was lacking depends last time when I looked at it Jan 23 05:38:22 40revs to go... Jan 23 05:48:53 just wanted to check the bugtracker. what happened to openembedded.org? Jan 23 05:49:01 dont know Jan 23 05:50:01 hrw|work: You say anthy is in bugtracker. I guess that is on openembedded.org? Anywhere else I can check? What depends were missing? Jan 23 05:50:24 BT is on http://bugs.openembedded.org/ Jan 23 05:50:35 anthy lack all deps in recipe Jan 23 05:51:02 but I dont know - maybe it does not need gtk or qt - plain libc? Jan 23 05:56:12 re zecke Jan 23 05:56:19 wb Jan 23 05:56:49 pb_: did you blow up anything yet? Jan 23 05:57:09 hrw|work: bugs.openembedded.org is down, too. Jan 23 05:58:04 I know Jan 23 05:58:21 RP: is gitweb down? Jan 23 05:58:26 Anybody contacted kergoth, yet? Jan 23 05:59:09 zecke: Works here for me... Jan 23 05:59:20 Laibsch: its treke machine not kergoth iirc Jan 23 05:59:48 pohttp://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi Jan 23 05:59:58 is that the right uri? Jan 23 06:00:32 zecke: s/pohttp/http/ and then yes Jan 23 06:01:44 well ;) Jan 23 06:02:06 i had typed po in my chat line before i pasted the uri Jan 23 06:02:17 zecke: I know ;-) Jan 23 06:02:26 Well, I thought you might Jan 23 06:02:38 It could have also been a genuine mistake... Jan 23 06:03:44 hmm oe.org expires on Jan 21 2007 Jan 23 06:05:32 hrw|work: But kergoth is the domain owner that is why I thought that as previously there was a domain expiry problem or DNS problem. Jan 23 06:05:43 I would guess DNS Jan 23 06:06:02 I remember seeing it would expire in Jan, so he has renewed it Jan 23 06:06:10 but if the domain expired on Jan 21, then it sounds like registry prob. Jan 23 06:06:11 I haven't sen him online since he moved Jan 23 06:06:51 * obergix[work] wonders if using sourceforge, savannah, gna or others wouldn't be an idea ;) Jan 23 06:06:59 sourceforge stinks Jan 23 06:07:13 especially for bugzilla Jan 23 06:07:24 he should move DNS to zoneedit :) Jan 23 06:07:27 you cannot send emails from sf.net Jan 23 06:08:17 zecke, svn working ok? Jan 23 06:09:40 Crofton: yes, may other people use the trac to register accounts?! Jan 23 06:09:49 yes Jan 23 06:10:02 just don't muck up the trac stuff :) Jan 23 06:10:54 they will need to let me know what their id is so I can giv them write access Jan 23 06:11:05 hmmm... seen the secu advisory for track on Debian Jan 23 06:11:58 Crofton: ah okay Jan 23 06:12:17 Crofton: I'm merging one ref after another. 1064 revs are already merged Jan 23 06:12:38 I just looked and it is up to 1076 I think Jan 23 06:12:50 no you are correct Jan 23 06:14:34 Crofton: what is your email address? Jan 23 06:16:16 philip at balister dot org Jan 23 06:18:54 Crofton: RP : it would be nice if we could collect a list of people with write access... Jan 23 06:19:09 morning Jan 23 06:21:39 anyone know why orinoco-modules-0.13e-r4 would not compile? Jan 23 06:21:59 zecke: koen posted a list a while back? Jan 23 06:22:16 LoDown: Against which kernel version? Jan 23 06:22:18 RP: to your repository ;) Jan 23 06:22:32 2.66 Jan 23 06:22:36 *2.6 Jan 23 06:22:38 zecke: Login and ls /home ;-) Jan 23 06:23:04 LoDown: Don't compile 0.13e against 2.6 Jan 23 06:23:17 LoDown: use the orinoco included with 2.6.15 Jan 23 06:23:17 I don't even need it...how do I skip it? Jan 23 06:23:32 LoDown: It should just skip it... Jan 23 06:23:43 LoDown: Did you set KERNEL_VERSION="2.6"? Jan 23 06:23:59 yes Jan 23 06:24:49 LoDown: It doesn Jan 23 06:25:00 LoDown: It doesn't do that here... Jan 23 06:25:43 RP, what should I set my distro as? Jan 23 06:26:00 LoDown: openzaurus-unstable Jan 23 06:26:09 LoDown: You are using .dev? Jan 23 06:26:14 RP, no Jan 23 06:26:34 LoDown: I have no idea about the status of the release branch. Jan 23 06:26:38 i am using familiar-0.8.3, because I have a h5500 Jan 23 06:26:38 LoDown: Which device? Jan 23 06:26:46 RP, thanks, I think that is the problem Jan 23 06:27:17 LoDown: kernel versions for 2.6 on the ipaq are handled differently - not KERNEL_VERSION but something else Jan 23 06:27:28 right...i have that set as well Jan 23 06:27:52 i think it is because of the file familiar-0.8.3..conf is forcing 13e for some reason Jan 23 06:28:01 LoDown: I fixed this for the zaurus models - I don't know how the ipaq kernels handle things Jan 23 06:28:23 RP, you've pointed me in the right direction though, thank you Jan 23 06:28:29 It could be the ipaq kernels are old enough to mostly work with 0.13e Jan 23 06:28:34 is there a url you can browse the metadata for oe? i know there used to be one, but not sure if it survived after the switch over Jan 23 06:29:02 LoDown: Try 0.15rc2 Jan 23 06:29:17 RP: will do Jan 23 06:29:39 prpplague: http://ewi546.ewi.utwente.nl/tmp/viewmtn/branch.psp?branch=org.openembedded.dev Jan 23 06:30:35 prpplague, there is a test subversion repo that is browsable Jan 23 06:30:43 oh yeah and that one :) Jan 23 06:31:42 zecke, how many revs total? Jan 23 06:31:55 thanks Jan 23 06:35:27 4000 roughly Jan 23 06:38:44 zecke: Did you see the possible tailor issue hrw mentioned? Jan 23 06:39:04 [11:16:39] btw.. did we had soem weird changesets or its tailor fault? http://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=.git;a=commitdiff;h=b806c58824654a44f2437f7b304ce384c433b30e is a bit strange to me Jan 23 06:39:05 [11:17:02] messed uclibc and osb-nrcore in one Jan 23 06:41:25 damn I'm firewalled... Jan 23 06:42:43 The link hosting oegit is probably going to be ighly contended for about 30mins due to data transfer :-/ Jan 23 06:43:10 03hrw 07org.oe.oz354fam083 * r089836c0... 10/ (2 files in 2 dirs): Jan 23 06:43:10 openzaurus branding: new package 'openzaurus-version' contain /etc/openzaurus-version Jan 23 06:43:10 - support in gpe-conf/sysinfo is planned in 0.1.29 Jan 23 06:43:10 - support in opie/sysinfo is in CVS, will be backported Jan 23 06:44:05 RP: that is due tailor+monotone... Jan 23 06:44:18 RP: we travel the tree and apply the changes Jan 23 06:44:30 RP: at some point the trees are different Jan 23 06:44:41 RP: so this could be a merge of two tree or such... Jan 23 06:51:57 hrw|work: thx Jan 23 06:57:08 Is it normal during reorg of build system : ERROR: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-bootstrap: fuser alsa-utils-alsactl alsa-utils-alsamixer alsa-conf modutils-depmod ... etc. Jan 23 06:57:11 ? Jan 23 07:07:02 zecke: Ah, so there should be a changeset prior to that with the "correct" information in. I guess that makes sense, even if the output is a bit confusing... Jan 23 07:13:42 RP: we might need a special version of tailor for the actual switch Jan 23 07:28:50 <[lala]> hi Jan 23 07:29:05 <[lala]> hrw|work: ping Jan 23 07:31:47 <[lala]> RP: did you have time to look into the hciattach problem? if u haven't i would file a bug report for the kernel people today :) Jan 23 07:38:57 [lala]: pong Jan 23 07:39:23 <[lala]> hrw|work: do you know why qt/e is compiled w/o threads support? Jan 23 07:39:47 [lala]: thats question to zecke rather Jan 23 07:40:54 <[lala]> zecke: then i ask you :-) Jan 23 07:44:15 [lala]: to be Qtopia compatible Jan 23 07:44:57 [lala]: and Qt2 thread support is limited anyway Jan 23 07:46:18 I'm offline now Jan 23 07:51:54 [lala]: I haven't had a chance, sorry Jan 23 07:56:45 pb_: did you push anything yet? Jan 23 08:04:04 no, I am still grappling with angry customers Jan 23 08:04:17 I didn't get any further than cloning yet Jan 23 08:04:42 okay customers are more important Jan 23 08:06:04 yeah Jan 23 08:06:08 I hope to have them neutralised soon Jan 23 08:09:14 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=297788 <- lol Jan 23 08:09:23 how to win developers... Jan 23 08:12:22 just seen embedded issue of Linux Journal (Nokia 770, etc...)... will have to look for mentions of OE Jan 23 08:12:52 obergix[work]: I'm told I get a mention :) Jan 23 08:14:06 RP: you deserve it IMHO ;) Jan 23 08:15:12 obergix[work]: Just to be clear, the mention was 770 related, not OE... Jan 23 08:15:20 ok Jan 23 08:23:19 <[lala]> RP: no problem, i have submitted the bug to the kernel people (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5944) Jan 23 08:23:54 * chouimat is away: Gone voting Jan 23 08:26:17 [lala]: they're the best people to act on that one :) Jan 23 08:34:28 * chouimat is back. Jan 23 08:43:47 03hrw 07org.oe.oz354fam083 * rd9cb2796... 10/packages/libopie/ (libopie2-1.2.1/openzaurus-branding.patch libopie2_1.2.1.bb): Jan 23 08:43:47 libopie: openzaurus branding (CVS backport) Jan 23 08:43:47 taken from .dev Jan 23 08:43:52 03hrw 07org.oe.dev * r6fa36fe3... 10/ (2 files in 2 dirs): Jan 23 08:43:52 openzaurus branding: new package 'openzaurus-version' contain /etc/openzaurus-version Jan 23 08:43:52 - support in gpe-conf/sysinfo is planned in 0.1.29 Jan 23 08:43:52 - support in opie/sysinfo is in CVS, will be backported Jan 23 08:43:56 03hrw 07org.oe.dev * r5cce883a... 10/packages/libopie/ (libopie2-1.2.1/openzaurus-branding.patch libopie2_1.2.1.bb): libopie: openzaurus branding (CVS backport) Jan 23 09:33:05 hi Jan 23 09:34:13 hi CoreDump|home Jan 23 09:58:48 cu Jan 23 10:16:27 * chouimat is away: lunch Jan 23 10:19:15 hello, there Jan 23 10:22:21 when baking glib-2.0-native-2.6.5 , its still having trouble finding libiconv Jan 23 10:22:24 error: #error GNU libiconv not in use but included iconv.h is from libiconv Jan 23 10:22:40 I've added a: Jan 23 10:22:42 PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/libiconv=glibc Jan 23 10:22:54 but it still fails Jan 23 10:26:14 raduga, you building linux or uclibc? Jan 23 10:28:25 that error was fixed a long time ago for most systems Jan 23 10:30:25 er, bitbake target is opie-image. the bb it fails on is glib-2.0-native-2.6.5 Jan 23 10:33:52 any idea where it was fixed? (when it was fixed, if you say, a long time ago) Jan 23 10:34:10 trying to build OZ/opie for akita Jan 23 10:38:26 it was a gettext and glibc issue Jan 23 10:38:49 but if your building uclibc then its different Jan 23 10:42:50 hm. Jan 23 10:43:12 TARGET_OS is not defined. should I set that to "linux"? Jan 23 10:43:17 or is there a reason to use uclibc? Jan 23 10:43:28 smaller libraries Jan 23 10:43:39 shoudl default to linux tho i belive Jan 23 10:52:17 raduga: set DISTRO="openzaurus-unstable" Jan 23 11:00:15 hiho Jan 23 11:04:23 * chouimat is back. Jan 23 11:05:58 w00t, 1st Akita boot from USB storage Jan 23 11:06:04 hey mickeyl Jan 23 11:08:35 CoreDump|home: cool! Jan 23 11:09:57 RP: thanks. I'm using that already. Jan 23 11:24:58 03coredump 07org.oe.dev * re0cf1c32... 10/packages/altboot/ (7 files in 5 dirs): Jan 23 11:24:58 altboot: Jan 23 11:24:58 - Fixed a bug where the /media/ROM mountpoint wasn't moved into the new rootfs Jan 23 11:24:58 - Added support for booting off USB storage devices Jan 23 11:25:40 CoreDump|home: is your stuff limited to 2.4 or does it also work on the 2.6 kernel? Jan 23 11:26:13 currently altboot is 2.4 only Jan 23 11:27:16 with a little bit of luck, all that is needed for 2.6 is a reworked altboot.cfg tho Jan 23 11:32:06 stupid question: Are SD cards working with kernel 2.6? Jan 23 11:32:31 generally yes Jan 23 11:32:37 great Jan 23 11:32:37 for your particular gadget, I don't know Jan 23 11:33:06 we have 'em working everywhere but collie and poodle Jan 23 11:33:15 excellent! Jan 23 11:35:55 has anyone had success with 1.5gb SD cards? (assuming that any exist) Jan 23 11:36:53 1.5g? Jan 23 11:37:03 gb Jan 23 11:37:09 What an odd value Jan 23 11:37:11 I Jan 23 11:37:23 I've seen 1g, 2g and 4g cards though Jan 23 11:37:27 I've seen 1.5gb CF microdrives Jan 23 11:37:38 (not recently, mind you) Jan 23 11:40:01 anyway, 2g and 4g cards will work, sort of Jan 23 11:41:28 sortof? Jan 23 11:41:49 Linux uses the block size reported by the card Jan 23 11:41:55 I've heard (numerous) reports of not working at all. Jan 23 11:42:06 * raduga nods Jan 23 11:42:07 but most other devices (usb readers, windows etc) assumes a 512 byte sector Jan 23 11:42:25 so you have a compatability issue back and forth Jan 23 11:42:52 speaking of microdrives Jan 23 11:42:56 lol Jan 23 11:42:58 http://cgi.ebay.ca/Apple-iPod-MINI-Hitachi-4GB-Microdrive-Hard-Drive-PARTS_W0QQitemZ5856391678QQcategoryZ48680QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Jan 23 11:43:10 you think the tape is good sign :P Jan 23 11:44:05 emte: if it were duct tape, I'd buy one Jan 23 11:45:10 lol Jan 23 11:47:41 raduga, this might be more for you then Jan 23 11:47:43 http://cgi.ebay.ca/HITACHI-4GB-MICRODRIVE-COMPACT-FLASH-CARD-TYPE-II-NEW_W0QQitemZ7583320565QQcategoryZ50519QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem Jan 23 11:47:50 if you build a controller for it Jan 23 11:49:03 has anyone here tired to use bitbake on coLinux Jan 23 11:49:10 pb_: hey ;) Jan 23 11:49:16 ummmm, did anyone mess with task-opie-* in .dev? Looks like the tasks don't RDEPENT the packages in them any longer Jan 23 11:50:41 jatreon, its doubtful it will work Jan 23 11:50:52 there are issues with BSD, OSX, etc Jan 23 11:51:08 didn't kergoth get most of it working with colinux a while back? Jan 23 11:52:06 if he did i would have thought that bitbake/oe would work a bit better on the otehr full platforms before a hybrid ... Jan 23 11:52:12 other* Jan 23 11:52:18 especially BSD Jan 23 11:54:12 emte: well that glibc and want GNU binutils is not kergoth's issue ;) Jan 23 11:55:16 zecke, yeah i know Jan 23 11:55:58 but i would expect that for it to work in winodws that an "enviroment" would have to be used Jan 23 11:56:23 as opposed to an open hybrid system Jan 23 11:57:01 which reminds me( since i dont use windows) is that what cygwin provides? Jan 23 12:02:06 emte: it uses GNU utils and is POSIX compilant :} Jan 23 12:03:26 CoreDump|home: You're probably looking for meta-opie Jan 23 12:03:56 lol Jan 23 12:04:06 zecke, was that a yes to my question then? Jan 23 12:04:27 well, I'm not. bitbake opie-image failed because the tasks don't build all he apps anymore Jan 23 12:04:41 what is the name of the ipaq sleeves that look like a cross? not the compaq/hp type Jan 23 12:05:25 CoreDump|home: Did you update to the latest bitbake? Jan 23 12:05:37 yep, 2 minutes ago Jan 23 12:06:16 emte: if I didn't get the term hybrid system ;) Jan 23 12:06:17 CoreDump|home: opie-image RDEPENDS on the tasks in task-opie so that should work... Jan 23 12:06:52 the tasks are build fine. the RDEPENDS of these tasks however werent for some strange reason Jan 23 12:07:21 * CoreDump|home trashes cache Jan 23 12:08:08 mickey|dinner: poodle should have working SD btw Jan 23 12:08:35 wait, I've mixed up RDEPENDS and DEPENDS Jan 23 12:08:51 task-opie* doesen't depend on anything Jan 23 12:09:09 no wonder tha apps inside task* aren't compiled Jan 23 12:09:09 CoreDump|home: Which is correct after the recent changes to bitbake Jan 23 12:10:00 tell that opie-image please, having to build meta-opie just for a simple opie-image is a joke Jan 23 12:10:09 (IMO) Jan 23 12:10:15 CoreDump|home: I never said that Jan 23 12:10:22 RP: did pb_ pull yet? Jan 23 12:10:24 ok, how is it done now? Jan 23 12:10:31 CoreDump|home: If you build opie-image it will follow all the RDEPENDS Jan 23 12:10:36 RP: I wonder if I should provoke a merge conflict for him... Jan 23 12:10:43 right Jan 23 12:11:10 CoreDump|home: opie-image inherits a variable BUILD_ALL_DEPS which makes it do that Jan 23 12:11:18 huh Jan 23 12:11:18 (all images do) Jan 23 12:11:42 so I need to export BUILD_ALL_DEPS=1? Jan 23 12:12:01 CoreDump|home: no, image_ipk.bbclass already does that for you Jan 23 12:12:29 aha found it Jan 23 12:13:27 zecke: not yet Jan 23 12:13:39 bbl Jan 23 12:13:45 however, my customers are neutralised and my phone system is (mostly) working, so life is good Jan 23 12:13:48 * pb_ going home now Jan 23 12:13:54 I'll pull rp's tree after dinner Jan 23 12:14:15 pb_: take your time Jan 23 12:14:34 zecke: Creating a merge conflict would be evil :) Jan 23 12:15:02 RP: thanks, svn up + rebuilding cache seems to fix opie-image here Jan 23 12:16:40 CoreDump|home: That's a relief. I keep worrying people will find genuine problems with the RDEPENDS code Jan 23 12:17:05 may I ask what the motivation was behind this change? Jan 23 12:17:37 CoreDump|home: Have a look at the old meta-opie and compare it to the new one (and the added task-opie) Jan 23 12:17:51 will do Jan 23 12:18:59 CoreDump|home: Also look for (the lack of) BOOTSTRAP_EXTRA_DEPENDS Jan 23 12:19:30 is there an ipkg command to upgrade a single package (and its dependencies), rather than all packages? Jan 23 12:20:14 trust me I will since I have to rewrite my own bootstrap and -image files when I go to dev then Jan 23 12:22:09 good evening !!! Jan 23 12:22:23 hi gremlin[it] Jan 23 12:22:31 CoreDump|home: Its honestly not difficult. They'll work as is, or you can remove all references to DEPENDS and add BUILD_ALL_DEPS="1" instead Jan 23 12:24:09 If they inherit the image bbclass, you don't even need to add the BUILD_ALL_DEPS line... Jan 23 12:26:39 hi CoreDump|home Jan 23 12:27:02 RP: I'll see =) Jan 23 12:28:30 mhh doing a 'monotone diff' i notice i had modified a couple of files and so maybe they are old respect to database ... how i can force an overwrite from database to working copy ? Jan 23 12:32:48 gremlin[it]: mt revert blah Jan 23 12:34:10 CoreDump|home are u sure ... i mean there isn't 'revert' in the man of monotone :( Jan 23 12:34:31 works here =) Jan 23 12:34:38 very useful command Jan 23 12:35:57 CoreDump|home yes it work ... and 'info monotone' report it ... .... ticket to monotone guys ... update man pages other than info :) :) :) Jan 23 12:42:52 Anyone know what's the endianness of a PXA270? Jan 23 12:46:03 little endian Jan 23 12:46:10 by default Jan 23 12:49:32 evening Jan 23 12:57:08 reenoo_: hi Jan 23 12:57:41 reenoo_: we have a git tree and svn up and running Jan 23 12:57:56 reenoo_: I'm currently svk smerging the to the server Jan 23 12:59:10 mreimer: ipkg upgrade is the closest to what you want, but I don't think it upgrades dependencies Jan 23 12:59:20 thanks pb_ Jan 23 13:01:55 hey zecke Jan 23 13:03:16 zecke: excellent. wished I had the time to help with the testing. instead I'm struggling with non-sensical assignments :/ Jan 23 13:03:30 is there a way to tell ipkg to keep its hands of certain packages, like 'kernel*'? Jan 23 13:03:41 reenoo_: hehe I need to program something as well... Jan 23 13:06:01 zecke: well. the problem with this course is that you're constantly fighting broken software (a piece of crap *shareware* prolog interpreter written in java this time). Jan 23 13:06:15 reenoo_: well you should at least get an account so you may cast your vote... Jan 23 13:06:18 NOTE: package libtool-native-1.5.10-r3: task do_compile: failed Jan 23 13:06:30 reenoo_: hehe Jan 23 13:06:32 | configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean" there first. Jan 23 13:06:57 zecke: good call. I'll install git tomorrow. who do I need to contact for git/svn accounts? Jan 23 13:07:21 reenoo_: http://oe.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/SvnScmTrial Jan 23 13:07:36 http://oe.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/GitScmTrial Jan 23 13:08:01 http://oe.handhelds.org/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/ScmVotingProcedures?action=show Jan 23 13:08:08 feel free to fix any errors you see Jan 23 13:08:58 once we have darcs, mercurial up for testing I will mail oe again Jan 23 13:09:43 ~lart t-offline for fscking up dns queries again Jan 23 13:09:43 * ibot executes killall -KILL t-offline for fscking up dns queries again Jan 23 13:10:44 ah, finally Jan 23 13:10:48 * reenoo_ reads Jan 23 13:11:28 mreimer: ipkg flag hold Jan 23 13:11:38 pb_: excellent! thank you Jan 23 13:20:33 * RP finishes his tax return :-/ Jan 23 13:23:11 RP: doh, I haven't even started mine yet Jan 23 13:24:10 pb__: You have 8 days :) Jan 23 13:24:26 yeah, it seems Jan 23 13:24:36 that's more than a week! seems like loads of time. Jan 23 13:24:44 heh Jan 23 13:42:09 is there an ipkg command to list ipkgs that are not up-to-date? Jan 23 13:43:05 no, but you could probably do something with "ipkg status", "ipkg list", and a bit of postprocessing Jan 23 13:43:13 ok, thanks pb_ Jan 23 13:43:39 * mreimer thinks ipkg might be quite a bit quicker on some operations if it stored its metadata in a sqllite db Jan 23 13:43:40 or, actually, "ipkg -noaction upgrade" would probably do it Jan 23 13:43:46 that's what I was just trying :-) Jan 23 13:44:07 ah, heh. I guess it didn't work then Jan 23 13:44:15 no, it's working Jan 23 13:54:24 [lala]: ping Jan 23 14:13:42 When building for a Mainstone should I be using the zaurus branch or the dev branch? Jan 23 14:14:05 jatreon: that depends Jan 23 14:14:21 jatreon: bot branches should be okay if you use a reasonable new bitbake binary Jan 23 14:14:43 I cannot get the dev brach to wook Jan 23 14:15:21 zecke: it fails on the bootstrap-image bb file Jan 23 14:15:29 jatreon: fail in what way? Jan 23 14:15:37 jatreon: do you have a current bitbake version? Jan 23 14:15:56 zecke: I have the currnet bitbake version Jan 23 14:16:16 jatreon: maybe use pastebin to paste your error? Jan 23 14:16:44 zecke: The first problem is it complian that the deploy/ipkg folders are not there (they are not) Jan 23 14:17:10 joshua_: do you have a INHERIT += "package_ipk" somewhere? Jan 23 14:17:33 local.conf or such Jan 23 14:18:07 zecke: Did you mean me or joshua_ Jan 23 14:18:14 jatreon: you sorry Jan 23 14:19:28 zecke: No, INHERIT += "package_ipk" is not in my local.conf Jan 23 14:20:15 jatreon: which DISTRO do you set Jan 23 14:20:24 jatreon: (some set that there) Jan 23 14:20:56 familiar-0.9.0 and familiar-0.8.3 both have the same error. Which shoul I use? Jan 23 14:21:13 jatreon: which error? Jan 23 14:22:13 zecke: No deploy directory Jan 23 14:22:36 jatreon: well do they have a INHERIT += package_ipk in them? Jan 23 14:24:06 jatreon: If you're using .dev, you want DISTRO="familiar-unstable" Jan 23 14:26:02 zecke: The only note or ipkg is on bitbake.conf and I have not altered that. Jan 23 14:26:16 jatreon: which note? Jan 23 14:27:19 zecke: i greped it. Let me read it before I say something I will regret. Jan 23 14:27:46 jatreon: OE create the packages when you ask it to create them Jan 23 14:28:01 jatreon: INHERIT += "package_ipk" will create ipackages Jan 23 14:28:07 jatreon: Start by setting DISTRO correctly... Jan 23 14:28:14 jatreon: and bootsrap-image needs ipk's... Jan 23 14:28:25 RP: Thnak you Jan 23 14:29:35 heh Jan 23 14:30:24 We really need to make bad DISTRO settings more verbose by default... Jan 23 14:31:17 The verbose message might not be too polite if I write it though ;-) Jan 23 14:31:37 RP: bootstrap-image should complain when package_ipk is not inherited Jan 23 14:32:25 zecke: So when I set package_rpm? Jan 23 14:32:39 RP: then image_ipk will not work? Jan 23 14:33:17 zecke: So you mean image_ipk should complain when package_ipk isn't inherited ;-) Jan 23 14:34:16 RP: you force me to look into the files again Jan 23 14:34:31 yeah, maybe. image_ipk doesn't actually need package_ipk itself, though, so that would be a bit funky. Jan 23 14:34:58 it might be better just to introduce the long-dreamed-of "include-or-die" keyword in bitbake. Jan 23 14:35:33 mmmm... "include-or-die" Jan 23 14:35:36 pb__: That would get complaints from people who expect not to have to set a DISTRO (like kergoth)... Jan 23 14:35:48 pb__: like require? Jan 23 14:35:58 pb__: (which is broken... in the bb files) Jan 23 14:36:05 pb__: A better plan would be to validate a distro if set... Jan 23 14:36:06 zecke: oh, did you implement require already? Jan 23 14:36:11 * pb__ worships zecke Jan 23 14:36:17 RP: neither familiar-0.8.3.conf nor familiar-0.9.0.conf exist, which is the most common reason for this type of breakage. Jan 23 14:36:31 pb__: well it works in local.conf/bitbake.conf but not in a .bb file :} Jan 23 14:36:35 reenoo_: Exactly, hence my comments about validating it Jan 23 14:36:37 03rpurdie 07org.oe.dev * r98cdac3b... 10/packages/libxine/ (libxine-1.1.0/configure.patch libxine_1.1.0.bb): libxine 1.1.0: Stop it from seeing the host system's Wand-config and getting confused. Jan 23 14:37:08 zecke: Why not in a .bb file? Jan 23 14:37:13 zecke: ah. in that case I do not worship you. Jan 23 14:37:26 pb__: drat Jan 23 14:37:40 RP: it doesn't find the required file ;) Jan 23 14:40:50 we could create a INVALID.conf in distro so kergoth doesn't notice it Jan 23 14:42:08 zecke: That would be a good step to solve the unset DISTRO case Jan 23 14:42:23 and then require that fiƶe Jan 23 14:42:47 zecke: You have me convinced :) Jan 23 14:44:08 zecke: The default INVALID.conf can trigger an error. Anyone like kergoth can just create a null copy in their local conf dirs to override Jan 23 14:45:47 zecke: Are you going to do this or should I? :) Jan 23 14:45:58 you may Jan 23 14:46:27 I need to create a Dijkstra implementation... to get my Mafi I credits... Jan 23 14:47:23 Actually, we don't need an INVALID.conf. Anyone wanting to run without DISTRO set can just create one... Jan 23 14:47:26 RP: (require will work on that scope) Jan 23 14:49:23 Crofton: wb Jan 23 14:49:31 Crofton: I'm still merging Jan 23 14:51:10 Hmm. DISTRO isn't set to INVALID by default... Jan 23 14:54:07 zecke: and require doesn't acutally work Jan 23 14:54:27 RP: what? it worked in that scope :} Jan 23 14:54:33 damn Jan 23 14:54:47 zecke: I think its confused about the two sets of conf/ directories Jan 23 14:55:08 RP: it uses the same code as include Jan 23 14:55:33 I have tested require whit changing bitbake.conf, so it should work :} Jan 23 14:55:42 ~lart STRIPS Jan 23 14:55:42 * ibot whips out a shotgun, trudges over to STRIPS, and goes postal Jan 23 14:55:53 maybe you need a XNU kernel for it to work Jan 23 14:56:02 zecke: It errors when I have a require. It works fine when I have it as an include... Jan 23 14:56:28 zecke: I was using DISTRO="openzaurus-unstable" which exists... Jan 23 14:56:45 hmm how long will you be around? Jan 23 14:57:14 zecke: probably a while. Its not urgent - I'm just noting it ;-) Jan 23 14:58:17 RP: well I hate when my code doesn't work ;) I plan to invest another hour on this math stuff Jan 23 15:04:18 * reenoo_ 's eyes hurt Jan 23 15:04:53 reviewing a FOL clause that fills an entire A4 page :/ Jan 23 15:06:53 zecke: You've missed a return out ;-) Jan 23 15:07:23 RP: I certainly did not miss an return, I do not do any mistakes Jan 23 15:08:22 lol Jan 23 15:08:33 zecke: :) Jan 23 15:08:50 RP: obviously I have not copied 2 out four lines Jan 23 15:08:56 RP: where one line was important Jan 23 15:09:28 RP: I would like to have found that issue myself Jan 23 15:09:43 zecke: sorry :) Jan 23 15:10:01 zecke: I won't tell anyone ;-) Jan 23 15:10:29 anyway if pb_ doesn't notice he will worship me Jan 23 15:11:25 (where will I place the 'r' out of {'P','u','r','d','i','e'} this time Jan 23 15:12:03 RP: commited a change Jan 23 15:12:35 zecke: Where would you like to place the 'r'? (and thanks) Jan 23 15:12:57 RP: I switch between urdie and rudie Jan 23 15:13:22 as you might have noticed Jan 23 15:14:02 On the long tem, what are things that I can do to support the Mainstone machine type for Open Embedded Jan 23 15:14:36 jatreon: send patches, you are the only one I know with a true mainstone board Jan 23 15:16:23 ~seen ph5 Jan 23 15:16:27 ph5 was last seen on IRC in channel #oe, 1d 1h 36m 11s ago, saying: 'gremlin[it]: this sounds like it is an issue with bitbake, maybe you still have an old version without the explode_deps code?'. Jan 23 15:16:28 zecke: would it be a problem if I used the 2.6.14 kernel. I have a touchscreen patch fo rthat release and the patch should be included in the 2.6.17 release Jan 23 15:18:39 zecke: I'd not noticed the typo - you should have kept quiet :) Jan 23 15:18:55 jatreon: do we have mainstone support in OE already? Jan 23 15:19:16 jatreon: It should be no problem at all to use a different kernel if you add it to OE Jan 23 15:19:17 RP: I love to spell things right... Jan 23 15:19:39 zecke: My spelling is ok. My typing is awful though ;-) Jan 23 15:20:36 zecke: That is what http://bec-systems.com/collab/index.php/PXA270_Mainstone_Linux says, but the site wnt down this weekend. Google has it cached. Jan 23 15:21:47 jatreon: how much is a mainstone board nowadays? Jan 23 15:22:02 jatreon: I know of at least one other user who has used mainstone images out of OE. He compiled his kernel elsewhere iirc though Jan 23 15:22:04 * zecke is looking for cheap PXA270 hw, with IDE and or ethernet Jan 23 15:22:31 I assume the same, 3000 USD, but there are other ways to get them. Jan 23 15:24:51 zecke: When you say IDE do you mean a hard drive (I work in flash) Jan 23 15:25:11 jatreon: I would like to have some board with hard drive attached Jan 23 15:26:25 does anyone know if udev can be used to deliver arbitrary events to userspace, such as AC on/off, battery door open/closed, etc? I.e. events that aren't exactly device present/absent? Jan 23 15:26:50 zecke: Intel only makes one develpment kit with PXA270 and harddrive, it has the ATI graphics acelerator Jan 23 15:27:26 jatreon: well I do not like the intel prices ;) Jan 23 15:28:33 zecke: Tell me more about what you want to do with it. Ypu may be able to get a PeperPad for under $900. Jan 23 15:29:28 zecke: heh, I guess you should buy an hx4700 and a cf/ide adapter. Jan 23 15:30:52 I just want something stationary with a sane bootloader so I can easily deploy iwmmx binaries on it Jan 23 15:31:05 well something like the shark with newer cpu and more ram ;) Jan 23 15:31:07 zecke: Do you want a development kit or a product on the market? Jan 23 15:31:37 jatreon: the pepper pad is already too fancy ;) Jan 23 15:33:48 zecke: none of my ideas have a "sane" bootloader Jan 23 15:34:09 jatreon: I like the OpenFirmware on my Shark Jan 23 15:34:53 jatreon: I can do DHCP in the bootloader, boot from disk, it has ethernet, keyboard and monitor Jan 23 15:37:01 zecke: Why not use NFS? Jan 23 15:37:46 jatreon: this would work if the device has true ethernet (100mbit)+tftp support Jan 23 15:37:51 mreimer: I guess that'd be a job for some hal/dbus magic but I haven't got around to looking into that in detail yet Jan 23 15:52:34 okay i've mostly decided that the WCF54G isnt an Agere card but i do have an issue ... Jan 23 15:53:01 its a known issue with the card :( Jan 23 15:54:06 you can arbirarily set the MAC, the problem is that the MAC is showing up as 0's and the scripts dont like that Jan 23 15:54:25 any ideas? Jan 23 15:55:41 btw it likes the wavelan_cs driver Jan 23 16:03:12 * emte guesses everyone went to sleep Jan 23 16:04:43 or they don't care about wireless... :) Jan 23 16:04:54 perhaps Jan 23 16:05:12 i need to figure out why rtc is messed on the h36 again ... :( Jan 23 16:07:50 mreimer: The input system is about as close as you get... Jan 23 16:12:10 RP: do you mean to use the input system, or to use udev the way the input system does? Jan 23 16:22:48 mreimer: I mean to use the input system. Really the input system could become a generic events handler Jan 23 16:23:21 RP: are you reporting this kind of event to userspace (hinge events, etc.?)? Jan 23 16:23:31 ioctl ... Jan 23 16:23:32 mreimer: but it is obviously the input system atm and therefore isn't ideally suited... Jan 23 16:23:49 mreimer: I use it for hinge (switch) events, yet Jan 23 16:23:54 yes... Jan 23 16:24:36 RP: if you want a generic events handler, isn't that basically what kobject_uevent is? Jan 23 16:25:15 I think there's been some work on bridging generic uevents to D-BUS, which seems like the right kind of way to handle the demultiplexing for cases like mreimer is talking about. Jan 23 16:25:41 pb__: can you point me to an example of emitting a generic uevent? Jan 23 16:25:46 I presume uevents go to udevd? Jan 23 16:25:57 pb__: It sounds about right, yes Jan 23 16:25:59 yeah, udevd is the main consumer, but I think everybody can listen to them Jan 23 16:26:24 iirc, the kernel-side interface is in linux/lib/kobject_uevent.c or some file with a similarly obvious name Jan 23 16:26:40 ok, thanks Jan 23 16:27:14 grepping for calls to kobject_uevent() would probably turn up some examples of its use Jan 23 16:28:41 mreimer: might also be worth checking with the dudes from project utopia, since I think this is one of the areas they're interested in Jan 23 16:28:45 pb__: I think it only supports a small fixed number of event types though Jan 23 16:28:57 pb__: thanks, I'll check that out Jan 23 16:28:57 (having just looked at the file) Jan 23 16:29:48 pb__: did you merge yet? Jan 23 16:29:53 I'm off to bed! cya Jan 23 16:30:10 'night zecke Jan 23 16:30:14 RP: fundamentally, I think it's just sending strings through netlink, so there isn't any real reason it couldn't support arbitrarily complicated things Jan 23 16:30:19 zecke: er, no, not actually Jan 23 16:30:25 remind me what the url to pull was again? Jan 23 16:30:52 pb__: http://ewi546.ewi.utwente.nl/OE/other_scms/git/org.openembedded.oz354fam083 Jan 23 16:30:58 pb__: or .dev Jan 23 16:31:00 rock Jan 23 16:31:10 okay, I'll make that my mission for the near future Jan 23 16:31:48 pb__: fundamentally no. In practice, I think there might be objections to certain kinds of alterations in mainline. Who knows though... Jan 23 16:32:03 doh Jan 23 16:32:06 /usr/bin/git-fetch: line 259: curl: command not found Jan 23 16:32:09 * pb__ stabs git Jan 23 16:32:31 a good start :) Jan 23 16:32:38 I had that as well Jan 23 16:32:46 yeah, seems that the debian git packages suck Jan 23 16:32:57 pb__: ubuntu packages had the same issue Jan 23 16:32:58 I guess the maintainer has only a hazy grasp of dependencies Jan 23 16:33:55 whoa, I have millions of conflicts Jan 23 16:34:05 CONFLICT (add/add): File packages/gtk-webcore/osb-nrcit_20050430.bb added non-identically in both branches. Adding as packages/gtk-webcore/osb-nrcit_20050430.bb~HEAD and packages/gtk-webcore/osb-nrcit_20050430.bb~e5b3d2eb431a6c9037c162205bdf2572046b2093 instead. Jan 23 16:34:30 "Automatic merge failed; fix up by hand Jan 23 16:34:30 " Jan 23 16:34:33 :-} Jan 23 16:35:45 pb__: from what branch did you merge? Jan 23 16:35:52 git branch Jan 23 16:36:15 oz354fam083 Jan 23 16:36:23 I'm not sure which one I cloned originally though Jan 23 16:36:36 where did you pull from? Jan 23 16:36:43 ewi Jan 23 16:36:51 which tree? Jan 23 16:37:21 * pb__ looks blank Jan 23 16:37:26 I guess I am not clever enough for git after all Jan 23 16:37:28 hehe Jan 23 16:37:42 pb__: you get used to it, quickly... Jan 23 16:38:02 I think we should all use RCS. Jan 23 16:38:34 lol Jan 23 16:38:42 oh well Jan 23 16:38:44 I think my cherry-pick is guilty for that one Jan 23 16:38:45 I try again tomorrow Jan 23 16:38:50 pb__, then we would all have to be one person Jan 23 16:39:02 and i know everyone would hate to be me Jan 23 16:39:07 merged it here without an issue Jan 23 16:39:16 zecke: I think I probably just did something dumb. Jan 23 16:39:48 http://pastebin.com/519914 Jan 23 16:39:58 unfortunately I did half the commands at the office, and I can't see the history in that window from here, so I'm not entirely sure what particular dumb thing it was. Jan 23 16:40:24 git co -f oz354fam083 Jan 23 16:40:47 * emte is curious why your using git ... Jan 23 16:41:20 zecke: ah, very good Jan 23 16:41:23 emte: because we do tests? Jan 23 16:41:24 * pb__ worships zecke again Jan 23 16:41:29 i cant say i've heard anything good about it besides that Linus is writting it ... Jan 23 16:41:40 ah Jan 23 16:42:14 RP: is your ssh server down? Jan 23 16:42:37 My OE is not building again. It used to work, bitbake and OE are fairly up to date via daily cron and openembedded.org "Getting Started" being down does not help. Still, I get an error "no files Jan 23 16:42:48 okay before i go messing with drivers .... is there a way i can set a MAC with the availible commands in familiar? Jan 23 16:42:56 to build" and "nothing provides dependency nano" Jan 23 16:42:57 Laibsch: well the site is likely to not be down Jan 23 16:43:05 zecke: UML appears to have locked up :-/ Jan 23 16:43:11 Laibsch: is your BBPATH wrong again? Jan 23 16:43:14 zecke: You are right. You know the IP? Jan 23 16:43:22 no Jan 23 16:43:23 zecke: ;-) Jan 23 16:43:32 ~nslookup oe.handhelds.org Jan 23 16:43:36 oe.handhelds.org is 128.31.0.25 Jan 23 16:43:52 OK. That should help. Jan 23 16:44:00 pb__: it might be your pulled org.oe.dev instead of the branch?! Jan 23 16:44:26 yeah, that's possible Jan 23 16:45:03 zecke: I've reset it - it segfaulted when I tried to probe it :-} Jan 23 16:45:16 Anyways. I did check my chat logs before I asked. It was the same problem. But now I cannot remember what I did on my other computer to fix it. I did try to add a line to BBPATH to have it include the bitbake directory but that only switched the error from "cannot find conf/bitbake.conf" to the current one. Jan 23 16:47:10 What's the actual value that you have for BBPATH now? Jan 23 16:48:03 Your current error sounds like it can't find conf/local.conf, and/or that your local.conf contains a wrong BBFILES. Jan 23 16:48:10 http://oegit.rpsys.net:8000/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=.git;a=commit;h=8d0f449314f9bffe3e02a246946a00e6890eb984 Jan 23 16:48:39 pb__: /mnt/pfaffe/src/openembedded/build:/mnt/pfaffe/src/openembedded/org.openembedded.dev Jan 23 16:50:24 BBFILES := "${PATH2OE}/org.openembedded.dev/packages/*/*.bb" Jan 23 16:51:04 Laibsch: you might consider writing the Laibsch bot ;) Jan 23 16:51:13 export PATH2OE=/mnt/pfaffe/src/openembedded Jan 23 16:51:16 ;-) Jan 23 16:51:19 good nite Jan 23 16:51:25 if you do "bitbake -c showdata -b ", what does it say for BBFILES? Jan 23 16:51:50 night Jan 23 16:57:42 pb__: "Unable to open conf/bitbake.conf". If I add /mnt/pfaffe/src/openembedded/bitbake/ to $BBPATH I get http://rafb.net/paste/results/AOG3wK72.html Jan 23 16:59:37 Laibsch, your writting anthy? Jan 23 16:59:58 or just trying to compile? Jan 23 17:01:56 just trying to compile. ph5 did the work that I could not accomplish. Are you interested in Japanese on OZ/Opie/OE as well? Jan 23 17:04:00 no, just wondering if its a recipe error, hard to tell with that much debugging active where it actually failed Jan 23 17:05:21 emte: I can try a different bb file. Jan 23 17:05:57 Laibsch, why is this not set? TARGET_ARCH="${BUILD_ARCH}" Jan 23 17:06:41 it has no idea what you want to build for Jan 23 17:07:06 that is my guess , what your issue might be Jan 23 17:07:20 emte: sounds reasonable. Jan 23 17:07:44 is your conf valid? Jan 23 17:08:00 It used to be. Jan 23 17:08:24 My local.conf tells me I should rather use $MACHINE and that is set to collie. Jan 23 17:08:44 and what is your distro? Jan 23 17:08:50 DISTRO is set to openzaurus-unstable. Jan 23 17:09:41 is that what it tells you when you first run bitbake after the parsing ? Jan 23 17:12:31 emte: ? Jan 23 17:12:52 I don't think it even gets to parsing. Jan 23 17:13:12 OE exits right away. Jan 23 17:23:50 Where are the distributions known to OE listed? Jan 23 17:26:25 conf/local.conf talks about the conf directory but build/conf/ and bitbake/conf/ both do not seem to have any relevant files. Jan 23 17:29:03 I guess you're looking for openembedded/conf/distro Jan 23 17:29:04 ../org.openembedded.dev/conf/ Jan 23 17:29:18 from build Jan 23 17:31:53 Laibsch, it should look like this when you first run bitbake http://oe.pastebin.com/519958 Jan 23 17:31:55 emte and reenoo_: Thanks. For some reason there is only a contrib dir in org.openembedded.dev Jan 23 17:32:16 heh. that would be a problem Jan 23 17:32:34 yeah Jan 23 17:32:50 Well, there are other dirs, I should clarify. But none of them start with con* Jan 23 17:33:03 I'll do a pull and an update Jan 23 17:39:02 See you guys tomorrow Jan 23 17:39:04 Nite Jan 23 17:39:23 :( Jan 23 17:39:40 this is one time i wish debian was a bit more liek redhat ... Jan 23 17:39:44 like* Jan 23 17:40:55 * AMDPenguin avoids the flames and goes home Jan 23 17:45:25 hm. so. CVS_TARBALL_STASH should be /source/current/ or /source/ on oesources? Jan 23 17:46:25 i.e. is /source/ current now? Jan 23 17:55:40 hm... looks ancient. Jan 23 17:55:45 is there any other mirror? Jan 23 18:09:26 'night all Jan 23 18:48:39 hmmm, did someone say my name? Jan 23 18:49:07 great Jan 23 18:49:15 stupid thing lockedup again Jan 23 18:52:49 there must be someway to assign a MAC to a device in debain ... Jan 23 18:53:17 debian* **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Jan 23 18:53:52 2006 Jan 23 19:09:10 aha Jan 23 19:12:40 hmm Jan 23 19:12:49 time to make a gpe request i suppose ... Jan 23 19:14:00 now i just wish i had an active wireless network to test it on :( Jan 23 19:16:20 i dont supopse anyone else has a WCF56G card handy Jan 23 19:29:12 hmm Jan 23 19:29:28 openembedded.org down? Jan 23 19:47:44 urg ... following gpe is confusing ... Jan 23 19:59:09 hmm Jan 23 19:59:34 perhaps i wont try to add my chnages to the wifi screen :( Jan 23 21:49:33 moo Jan 23 21:49:44 openembedded.org back up yet? Jan 23 22:06:25 ugh ... no oe ... guess its mailing list ... Jan 23 22:19:21 there Jan 23 22:19:27 a new toy for you guys Jan 23 22:19:36 works extreamly well too Jan 23 22:33:19 now if only i could figure out where the code for the gpe wifi panel actually exists ... Jan 24 00:23:18 hello Jan 24 00:23:40 oi Jan 24 00:49:50 goodmorning to all ! Jan 24 01:03:10 morning happy Ifaistos Jan 24 01:56:47 morning Jan 24 02:05:35 morning all Jan 24 02:06:11 hi RP Jan 24 02:14:47 hi zecke **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Jan 24 03:00:00 2006