**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Jun 29 02:59:56 2008 Jun 29 09:46:15 Hi, I have a problem with "#bitbake nano". Can any help me? Jun 29 09:46:53 are you building as root? Jun 29 09:47:53 No, bitbake works but it not find fakeroot_1.8.3.tar.gz and stop Jun 29 09:49:07 where can i indicate the actual version of fakeroot for bitbake download it automatically in "bitbake nano" command? Jun 29 09:51:14 ¿Alguien habla español? Jun 29 10:13:55 good afternoon Jun 29 10:14:09 I've built angstrom with 'bitbake x11-image' but there seems to be stuff missing (like bluez's 'pand' and even 'ipkg'). If I bitbake these things seperatly will it include them in the subseqent 'bitbake x11-image' and if not how do you add stuff to the image? Jun 29 10:14:23 * oxo has some trouble building madwifi-ng on arm/le: http://pastebin.ca/1058053 Jun 29 10:15:00 no it won't Jun 29 10:15:07 you could include those packages in MACHINE_ESSENTIAL_EXTRA_RDEPENDS Jun 29 10:16:27 I'm trying to build openembedded. I kept on hitting a problem with fakeroot_1.8.3.tar.gz not being found on the Debian mirros. Wll, it is obsolete and actual version is fakeroot_1.9.5.tar.gz. How can I change this? Jun 29 10:23:32 change SRC_URI to http://downloads.foonas.org/sources/fakeroot_1.8.3.tar.gz Jun 29 10:23:36 in the fakeroot.bb Jun 29 10:24:41 * oxo tried creating a 'newer' madwifi-ng .bb, but it fails because of this compiler warning too.. Jun 29 10:26:04 03steve 07org.oe.dev * r433ae59c... 10/ (1 conf/machine/beagleboard.conf conf/machine/omap3evm.conf): beagleboard, omap3evm: provide EXTRA_IMAGECMD_jffs2 to supress CLEANMARKER nodes since we are preparing images for nand Jun 29 10:47:30 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r0b810921... 10/ (5 files in 2 dirs): fakeroot[-native]: update to 1.9.5 Jun 29 10:58:54 Hi folks Jun 29 10:59:02 anyone got some time to help me debug ? Jun 29 10:59:19 Im trying to make an eseries bitbake recipie Jun 29 10:59:38 I've creates a machine config file (machine/eseries_pxa.conf Jun 29 10:59:41 Hi mickey, thanks for reply me. Where I can found fakeroot.bb? Jun 29 11:00:13 and I created a kernel .bb (packages/linux/linux-eseries-2.6_git.bb) Jun 29 11:00:45 I refer to the kernel in the machine config file and I refer to the machine conf file in the local.conf file Jun 29 11:01:01 it all works except it keeps failing because: Jun 29 11:01:11 NOTE: Nothing PROVIDES 'virtual/arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi-depmod-' (but '['/home/ian/projects/eseries/openembedded/org.openembedded.dev/packages/linux/linux-eseries-2.6_git.bb']' DEPENDS on or otherwise requires it) Jun 29 11:01:20 how do I fix this? Jun 29 11:01:24 mario_: should be in packages/fakeroot Jun 29 11:01:36 mario_: fwiw, i just updated org.oe.dev to fakeroot 1.9.5 Jun 29 11:01:44 so if you're on that tree, just pull and update Jun 29 11:02:25 Spyro: org.oe.dev? which DISTRO ? Jun 29 11:02:35 angstrom Jun 29 11:03:06 DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" Jun 29 11:08:41 mickeyl: ? Jun 29 11:08:58 mickey|ezxday: oops wrong nick :) Jun 29 11:09:45 hmm, i did not see this message for quite a while Jun 29 11:09:55 :) Jun 29 11:10:00 i'm afraid i don't know offhand how to fix that Jun 29 11:10:18 darn Jun 29 11:10:36 Ive seen lines like this in other machine defs Jun 29 11:10:53 fwiw, pastebin the machine and kernel Jun 29 11:10:57 perhaps i spot something Jun 29 11:10:57 PREFERRED_PROVIDERS += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod:module-init-tools-cross" Jun 29 11:11:20 I tried copying that because it seems to be covering the same problem Jun 29 11:11:23 but it didnt help Jun 29 11:13:28 http://pastebin.com/d3de758bb Jun 29 11:13:31 http://pastebin.com/m7c961310 Jun 29 11:16:08 Spyro: this looks like get_kernelmajorversion can't parse your recipe's version. did you make sure that PV starts with "2.6"? Jun 29 11:16:30 pH5: no. I'll try that Jun 29 11:17:06 * * OE Bug 4347 has been RESOLVED (FIXED) by Jun 29 11:17:08 * * fakeroot missing Jun 29 11:17:10 * * http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4347 Jun 29 11:17:24 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r27af07b2... 10/ (5 files in 2 dirs): fakeroot: remove 1.2.13, switch 1.7.1 to a SRC_URI that has been stable for a while now Jun 29 11:18:17 pH5: test building with PV=2.6 Jun 29 11:18:41 "2.6" rather Jun 29 11:21:11 pH5: thats interesting Jun 29 11:21:31 its still broken but its broken in a different way Jun 29 11:22:05 pH5: it used to say NOTE: consider defining PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel after printing a list NOT including my kernel .bb Jun 29 11:22:12 now mine is in the list Jun 29 11:22:29 however I _have_ set PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel Jun 29 11:22:57 BB>> getvar PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel Jun 29 11:22:57 linux-eseries-2.6_git Jun 29 11:23:51 ahh, its dropped the _git Jun 29 11:23:59 why did it dothat ? Jun 29 11:25:10 setting PV="2.6" has the same effect as renaming the receipe file to linux-eseries-2.6_2.6.bb Jun 29 11:25:24 so _ has some special meaning? Jun 29 11:25:27 bitbake parses the file names as ${PROVIDER NAME (PN)}_${PV}.bb Jun 29 11:25:57 oh Jun 29 11:26:13 so you would set PREFERRED_PROVIDER to linux-eseries-2.6 (altough I'd suggest renaming that to just linux-eseries, as there is probably no eseries-2.4) Jun 29 11:26:29 thats more than slightly confusing :) Jun 29 11:26:41 but my kernel.bb is names linux-eseries_git Jun 29 11:26:48 named Jun 29 11:27:50 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * rbf48b6d6... 10/ (1 packages/fakeroot/fakeroot_1.7.1.bb): fakeroot 1.7.1 fix typo in premature commit Jun 29 11:28:15 pH5: should I rename it to just linux-eseries.bb ? Jun 29 11:29:15 no, linux-eseries_git.bb is fine. Jun 29 11:29:32 it would make sense to set PV to something like in linux-omap2_git.bb though, so the resulting packages will have a meaningful version. Jun 29 11:30:11 pH5: I just set it to "2.6" Jun 29 11:30:34 its afrom git so itd need a dynamic version setting I guess? Jun 29 11:31:31 yup not good, that way your 2.6.26-rc7+git4155... build will have the same package version "2.6" as 2.6.29+gitc064... etc. Jun 29 11:32:02 pH5: ok, so how does that work then Jun 29 11:32:16 I cant determine the kernel version until after its downloaded it Jun 29 11:32:37 and it wont do that until its running the kernels .bb which it wont do with PV unset Jun 29 11:33:39 oxo: that doesn't seem to help Jun 29 11:33:55 I think it build them but they don't seem to be in the rootfs dir Jun 29 11:34:17 pH5: thanks for your help btw, at least it builds now Jun 29 11:34:33 (well so far :) Jun 29 11:34:34 :) Jun 29 11:34:35 tracking floating heads is not recommended, you should select a tag/revision with $SRCREV and use that for the recipe. Jun 29 11:34:52 pH5: its more for my development right now :) Jun 29 11:35:12 darn, still failed... Jun 29 11:35:22 although there is this AUTOREV mechanism from the openmoko guys that does exactly what you need, it somehow looks at the repo, then sets SRCREV and only then starts the package build, but I don't know how it works exactly. Jun 29 11:35:50 NOTE: Creating tarball of git repository Jun 29 11:35:50 fatal: Not a valid object name eseries_release11 Jun 29 11:39:05 hm. it seems to be fetching the master branch Jun 29 11:40:50 found it I think *retrying* Jun 29 11:42:01 gah. how do I force it to rebuild a package? it seems stuck on stale data Jun 29 11:42:25 you can do bitbake -i and "clean blah" then "build blah" i think Jun 29 11:42:40 thats what i've been doing anyway Jun 29 11:43:26 oliford: cheers Jun 29 11:45:24 anone know how you find out what (actually) provides a binary? Jun 29 11:45:33 i'm looking for 'pand' for the bluetooth stuff Jun 29 11:45:54 oliford: whats 'blah' ? Jun 29 11:46:01 I tried the .bb filename and it failed Jun 29 11:46:07 whatever the package is called Jun 29 11:47:10 no, without the version or .bb, like my kernel is linux-hpipaq214_2.6.25-v3.bb and I can do "build linux hpipaq214" Jun 29 11:47:22 * "build linux-hpipaq214" Jun 29 11:47:48 damn. Jun 29 11:47:56 its convinced its already puilled from the repo Jun 29 11:48:02 even though it _has not_ Jun 29 11:48:26 oliford: pand is no more. it's part of bluetoothd now and is controlled via dbus. Jun 29 11:48:39 oh Jun 29 11:48:48 err, how do you connect out then? Jun 29 11:48:53 pH5: how can I convince bitbake to completely rebuild virtual/kernel ? Jun 29 11:49:02 explains why it was so hard to find Jun 29 11:49:14 -> wiki.bluez.org Jun 29 11:49:25 Spyro: bitbake -crebuild virtual/kernel should do the trick Jun 29 11:49:49 pH5: nope Jun 29 11:50:04 I think if it doesn't, it's a bug. Jun 29 11:50:06 pH5: its absolutelty convinced its downloade the repo OK (it hasnt) Jun 29 11:50:07 bitbake -cclean virtual/kernel && bitbake virtual/kernel Jun 29 11:50:24 nope Jun 29 11:50:57 so all it does it unpack the tarball it made Jun 29 11:51:01 and then fail Jun 29 11:51:35 so remove the tarball. I think the problem is your fixed 2.6 version, bitbake has no reason to believe that the tarball doesn't already contain what you want. Jun 29 11:52:01 pH5: ok Jun 29 11:52:14 (and if that fails, too, remove the git repo from sources/git for good measure) Jun 29 11:53:38 where is sources/git ? Jun 29 11:53:44 well that makes life unnecessarily complicated Jun 29 11:54:27 * pH5 agrees Jun 29 11:54:28 a backward-compatible pand script that executes the necessary dbus-send commands or something like that would have been nice Jun 29 11:55:42 pH5: aha found it, thanks Jun 29 11:55:50 has ipkg gone somewhere aswell then? Jun 29 11:55:58 s/i/o/ Jun 29 11:56:04 that doesnt seem to get included Jun 29 11:57:06 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Opkg Jun 29 11:58:19 heh, its like when you go to the supermarket and find they've reconfigured where everything is Jun 29 11:58:26 chrs pH5 Jun 29 11:59:41 hmm Jun 29 11:59:50 what's the deal with madwifi and arm/eabi anyway? Jun 29 12:00:13 is that a winning combination? I get ABI mismatch errors building for xscale/eabi Jun 29 12:04:13 pH5: is this the correct way to specify a branch from a git URL ? Jun 29 12:04:24 SRC_URI = "git://mnementh/linux-2.6-im.git;protocol=git;branch=eseries_release11" Jun 29 12:07:04 pH5: its like its cache the branch - its still pulling master Jun 29 12:07:09 *cached Jun 29 12:12:05 * * OE Bug 2058 has been RESOLVED (FIXED) by Jun 29 12:12:07 * * can't build dsniff (from bitbake gpe-image) Jun 29 12:12:09 * * http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=2058 Jun 29 12:14:59 pH5: argh! the problem seems to be its done something bizarre to src_ur Jun 29 12:15:01 i Jun 29 12:15:21 my SRC_URI = "git://mnementh/linux-2.6-im.git;protocol=git;branch=eseries_release11" Jun 29 12:15:40 its attempting to fetch a branch called '1' Jun 29 12:16:22 that's SRCREV defaulting to 1 Jun 29 12:16:34 pH5: why? Jun 29 12:16:43 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r9063d3a2... 10/ (1 packages/libnids/libnids_1.18.bb): libnids 1.18 explicitly DEPEND on libnet-1.0 Jun 29 12:16:43 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r9063d3a2... 10/ (1 packages/libnids/libnids_1.18.bb): libnids 1.18 explicitly DEPEND on libnet-1.0 Jun 29 12:16:48 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r9063d3a2... 10/ (1 packages/libnids/libnids_1.18.bb): libnids 1.18 explicitly DEPEND on libnet-1.0 Jun 29 12:16:48 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r9063d3a2... 10/ (1 packages/libnids/libnids_1.18.bb): libnids 1.18 explicitly DEPEND on libnet-1.0 Jun 29 12:16:50 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r9063d3a2... 10/ (1 packages/libnids/libnids_1.18.bb): libnids 1.18 explicitly DEPEND on libnet-1.0 Jun 29 12:16:56 because we don't want floating SRCREVs unless explicitly required Jun 29 12:16:57 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r2c5d0d8b... 10/ (1 packages/dsniff/dsniff_2.3.bb): dsniff 2.3 needs to link against libresolv Jun 29 12:16:59 you have two options now Jun 29 12:17:02 a) fix an SRCREV Jun 29 12:17:07 or make it float Jun 29 12:17:26 a) is SRCREV_pn- = "" Jun 29 12:17:31 mickey|ezxday: whats a SRCREV and how does one make it float? Jun 29 12:17:43 b) would be SRC_REV_pn- = "${AUTOREV}" Jun 29 12:17:51 SRCREV is the source revision Jun 29 12:18:13 mickey|ezxday: what does that have to do with the branch its supposed to be pulling ? Jun 29 12:18:26 well Jun 29 12:18:47 git is an exception, but usually branches have independent revisions Jun 29 12:18:57 so in the recipe you chose the branch Jun 29 12:19:06 and in sane-srcrevs.inc you chose the revision Jun 29 12:19:10 or, like i said Jun 29 12:19:15 you want b) SRCREV_pn-linux-eseries = "${AUTOREV}" Jun 29 12:19:25 but this I'd put in local.conf Jun 29 12:19:38 mickeyl: how is AUTOREV determined? Jun 29 12:19:39 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * r7c12c95b... 10/ (1 packages/gstreamer/gst-plugins-base_0.10.17.bb): gst-plugins-base 0.10.17 DEPEND on libsm Jun 29 12:19:58 AUTOREV is determined by checking the tip of the selected branch, if you reparse a recipe Jun 29 12:20:56 mickey|ezxday: and it should definately be SRCREV_pn-linux-eseries and not SRCREV_pn-linux-eseries-2.6_git ? Jun 29 12:21:05 yes Jun 29 12:21:09 ok trying... Jun 29 12:21:13 well, it's Jun 29 12:21:16 pn-${PN} Jun 29 12:21:21 so whatever your recipe's name is Jun 29 12:21:26 without the version number Jun 29 12:21:48 how does bitbake determine what part of a .bb filename is the version number ? Jun 29 12:21:49 might be SRCREV-pn-linux-eseries-2.6, if that's the PN Jun 29 12:22:00 everything that comes after the underscore Jun 29 12:22:06 except if it's overriden inside the recipe Jun 29 12:22:13 so my PN is "git" ? Jun 29 12:22:19 no Jun 29 12:22:20 PV is git Jun 29 12:22:38 PN is the name Jun 29 12:22:43 but git is the only thing after my underscore Jun 29 12:22:46 yes Jun 29 12:22:55 git is the default PV Jun 29 12:23:01 sorry, got PV and PN muddled Jun 29 12:23:01 but surely you override it in the recipe, right? Jun 29 12:23:15 yes to "2.6" Jun 29 12:23:18 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r65ab1fbc... 10/ (3 files in 3 dirs): linux-neuros: update SRCREV and defconfig for the OSD2 Jun 29 12:23:20 right. Jun 29 12:23:29 although I have no idea why thats necessary Jun 29 12:23:29 that should be something like 2.6+git${SRCREV} though Jun 29 12:23:46 well Jun 29 12:23:51 you don't want your PV to be 'git' Jun 29 12:23:55 it's meaningless Jun 29 12:24:02 you want it to be a meaningful number Jun 29 12:24:12 so for easy upgrading you name the recipe 'git' Jun 29 12:24:21 and then override the PV to something meaningful in the recipe Jun 29 12:24:33 mickeyl: I dont really see why I need to care what PV is set to, other than the fact that depmod didnt build until I set PV to 2.6 Jun 29 12:24:43 uhm Jun 29 12:24:47 like i said Jun 29 12:24:56 you don't want your kernel to be named Jun 29 12:25:01 zImage-git Jun 29 12:25:03 do you? Jun 29 12:25:08 and all the modules Jun 29 12:25:09 yes I see that but I dont see what use PV is at all... what uses it ? Jun 29 12:25:18 I see Jun 29 12:25:20 thanks Jun 29 12:25:27 opkg version comparison uses it Jun 29 12:25:31 recipe version comparison uses it Jun 29 12:25:46 you want to be able to have multiple recipes for your kernel Jun 29 12:25:49 so despite the fact that for some reason depmod doesnt like me not explicitly setting PV, I can set it to anything at all ? Jun 29 12:25:49 differing in version Jun 29 12:26:21 the kernel may be an exception, but usually you can name your PV what you want Jun 29 12:27:08 for instance we have a verison scheme for beta versions Jun 29 12:27:16 if you want to be able to upgrade you do something like Jun 29 12:27:22 PV = "2.3+2.4beta1" Jun 29 12:27:35 so that when 2.4 comes out, the version string is higher Jun 29 12:27:51 I see Jun 29 12:28:07 its still trying to use SRCREV=1 Jun 29 12:28:19 what's the name of your kernel recipe? Jun 29 12:28:32 linux-eseries-2.6_git Jun 29 12:28:36 good Jun 29 12:28:39 then you need Jun 29 12:28:47 SRCREV_pn-linux-eseries-2.6 = "${AUTOREV}" Jun 29 12:29:10 thanks (handt got the 2.6) Jun 29 12:29:34 LOL at stupid filename :) Jun 29 12:29:47 linux-eseries-2.6-2.6+git0+fc2e4d3f92ba773cca640429535a86644ef0a0ac-r0 Jun 29 12:31:45 I think I should rename my .bb to linux-eseries_git Jun 29 12:33:06 *nod* Jun 29 12:33:41 but not now, as I suspect doing thats going to make it rebuild half of creation... Jun 29 12:34:13 :) Jun 29 12:36:39 my god, its compiling the kernel... Jun 29 12:37:18 well, Im not hanging about for that, thanks for the help. Im going ice-skating :) Jun 29 12:46:01 hly shit it compiled :) Jun 29 12:46:06 :) Jun 29 12:46:10 :) Jun 29 12:59:10 gm Jun 29 13:00:48 morning likewise Jun 29 13:01:05 good morning mickey Jun 29 13:38:03 ~seen khem Jun 29 13:38:05 * * OE Bug 4394 has been created by likewise(AT)gmx.net Jun 29 13:38:06 khem was last seen on IRC in channel #oe, 3d 5h 43m 39s ago, saying: 'do u know'. Jun 29 13:38:08 * * HAVE_PROGRAM_INVOCATION_NAME not defined in eglibc Jun 29 13:38:10 * * http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4394 Jun 29 13:52:05 * * OE Bug 4395 has been created by treitmayr(AT)devbase.at Jun 29 13:52:07 * * subversion: Access via svnserve hangs due to lack of entropy in /dev/random Jun 29 13:52:10 * * http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=4395 Jun 29 16:10:41 Hi, anyone can help me with bitbake? Jun 29 16:10:48 depends Jun 29 16:13:33 ok, when i execute the command "bitbake nano", it start to download packets and install it, but when arrive nano-editor stop because it try download from www.nano-editor.org and no exist this URL Jun 29 16:14:24 any idea? Jun 29 16:19:19 or Where i can download nano-editor packet? Jun 29 16:20:24 google for the filename or look in a packaging system that provides mirrors Jun 29 16:20:25 sorr, I dont Jun 29 16:20:29 *sorry Jun 29 16:52:50 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r664e71d9... 10/ (1 conf/machine/beagleboard.conf conf/machine/omap3evm.conf): beagleboard, omap3evm: attempt to remove \r Jun 29 17:04:41 hi Jun 29 18:52:57 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r30fe9b8d... 10/ (6 files in 3 dirs): dsplink: add dsplink 1.51 Jun 29 19:04:37 Hi all. Jun 29 19:04:41 silly question Jun 29 19:04:49 now my build is finished... where is the image ? Jun 29 19:05:15 tmp/deploy/glibc/images/$MACHINE/ Jun 29 19:05:24 ty :) Jun 29 19:05:45 hm. no its not... Jun 29 19:05:46 np Jun 29 19:06:04 Are you sure it build? :) Jun 29 19:06:13 I got no errors AFAICT... Jun 29 19:06:47 The $MACHINE dir exists? Jun 29 19:06:53 no Jun 29 19:07:13 hmm, but the above dirs do? Jun 29 19:07:28 ad far as glibc, yes Jun 29 19:07:41 no image dir? Jun 29 19:07:45 nope Jun 29 19:08:10 That make me wonder. Jun 29 19:08:12 Im just rerunning the build and it has decied to rebuild just one task, do_rootfs Jun 29 19:08:15 Never happened to me Jun 29 19:17:15 NOTE: Tasks Summary: Attempted 4051 tasks of which 4049 didn't need to be rerun and 0 failed. Jun 29 19:17:51 hmm, then I don't know why images does not exist. Sorry. Jun 29 19:17:55 but no output... Jun 29 19:18:17 oh nevermind Jun 29 19:18:20 found it Jun 29 19:18:39 Wrong dir? Jun 29 19:18:55 I forgot I moved tmp to a bigger partition and didnt delete the old one Jun 29 19:19:16 ah, always a nice problem. :) Jun 29 19:19:33 :) Jun 29 19:19:36 thanks :) Jun 29 19:19:41 np Jun 29 19:19:49 Have fun with your image Jun 29 19:20:26 I will :) Jun 29 19:20:39 although all I really needed from it was stty with line support ;-) Jun 29 19:21:19 Spyro: You are the Ian posting eseries patches on ALKML? Jun 29 19:21:25 yes Jun 29 19:21:44 * stefan_schmidt makes another nick <-> real name mapping Jun 29 19:21:48 and stirring up a hornets nest over clocklib ;-) Jun 29 19:21:57 yeah, read it. Jun 29 19:22:20 Im hoping Dmitrys clocklib stuff goes into mainline (although I think my idea for the API was neater) Jun 29 19:22:31 it'll allow e-series to take a huge jump ahead Jun 29 19:23:07 I need to check clocklib as well later. Preparing patches for the Motorola EZX mobile phones for a mainline merge Jun 29 19:23:19 cool Jun 29 19:23:44 I got PCMCIA working on e740 last night Jun 29 19:23:52 can ping (briefly) with its wifi. Jun 29 19:24:03 sadly the wifi driver isnt reliable and tanks after a few packets. Jun 29 19:24:29 They joy of wifi :) Jun 29 19:24:33 Which driver is it? Jun 29 19:25:12 intersil prism I on hermes Jun 29 19:25:30 oh, an old one. Jun 29 19:25:34 very Jun 29 19:25:59 I still have such a card around though. Even if I never use it. :) Jun 29 19:26:09 is it a CF one ? Jun 29 19:26:19 No, PCMCIA Jun 29 19:26:24 darn Jun 29 19:26:30 Have to go. cu later Jun 29 19:26:33 * mwester kept one of those about "just in case", but threw a whole lot of them in the trash -- can't do WPA :( Jun 29 19:26:34 ok ttyl Jun 29 19:28:56 mwester you sure they cant use wpasupplicant ? Jun 29 19:30:31 I couldn't get it to work right; apparently the driver lacked some specific support. Jun 29 19:31:00 My memory is vague at this point, I'm afraid. :( Jun 29 19:32:58 bummer Jun 29 19:36:15 :) It wasn't that bad -- I kept working on it more out of sheer stubbornness than any practical reason; I picked up three Intel miniPCI cards (2200) for $12 each -- faster, and fully supported in Linux -- much better solution in the end ;) Jun 29 19:36:53 unfortunately, not a solution for e-series. its built in wifi has a non standard connector Jun 29 19:44:39 woot! my distro boots with the kernel it built! Jun 29 19:45:40 and it got to GPE login. Jun 29 19:45:44 awesome! Jun 29 19:45:54 spyro hehe Jun 29 19:46:14 LOL and then turned the backlight off. I suppose I should fix that bug :) Jun 29 20:16:34 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r7adef246... 10/ (3 files in 3 dirs): dsplink: more sed magic Jun 29 21:47:25 03koen 07org.oe.dev * r707ad036... 10/ (1 packages/dsplink/dsplink-1.51/prcs-fix-include.patch): dsplink: update patch for omap3 support Jun 29 22:31:02 03mickeyl 07org.oe.dev * ra066601e... 10/ (3 files in 2 dirs): python-pygobject-native: fix SRC_URI to make it build **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Jun 30 02:59:56 2008