**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Dec 30 02:59:58 2010 Dec 30 06:54:04 03Chris Larson  07master * r5ec4ca7e45 10bitbake.git/lib/bb/process.py: Dec 30 06:54:05 process: fix handling of the input argument Dec 30 06:54:05 When using a logfile, we weren't sending input to the child process. Dec 30 06:54:05 Signed-off-by: Chris Larson Dec 30 07:35:24 gm Dec 30 08:26:56 good morning Dec 30 09:22:20 03Eric BENARD  07org.openembedded.dev * rdd31acda70 10openembedded.git/recipes/glib-2.0/glib-2.0_2.26.1.bb: (log message trimmed) Dec 30 09:22:20 glib 2.26.1: fix compilation failure Dec 30 09:22:20 during configure, pkgconfig detects dbus-1.pc which was installed Dec 30 09:22:20 by dbus-native and thus the compilation fails because it can't Dec 30 09:22:20 find dbus/dbus.h which is not yet installed for in the target's Dec 30 09:22:20 sysroot. Dec 30 09:22:20 This patch workaround this problem by not compiling the test program Dec 30 10:44:42 03Eric BENARD  07org.openembedded.dev * rae600202db 10openembedded.git/recipes/gnome/gnome-power-manager_2.30.0.bb: Dec 30 10:44:42 gnome-power-manager: fix compilation: `libtool: Command not found` Dec 30 10:44:42 * libtool is hardcoded in src/Makefile and leads to Dec 30 10:44:42 libtool: Command not found Dec 30 10:44:42 Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard Dec 30 10:44:42 Acked-by: Paul Menzel Dec 30 11:24:25 hi Dec 30 14:54:56 hi jconnolly Dec 30 14:56:59 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * red9aba2a30 10openembedded.git/recipes/linux/linux-nokia900_git.bb: Dec 30 14:57:00 linux-nokia900: set compatible machine Dec 30 14:57:00 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Dec 30 15:05:57 hi woglinde Dec 30 15:07:18 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * rb799d55a25 10openembedded.git/recipes/ti/ti-c6accel.inc: Dec 30 15:07:18 ti-c6accel: fix up linkerpaths a bit Dec 30 15:07:18 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Dec 30 15:07:19 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * rbe87b5c09b 10openembedded.git/recipes/ti/ti-xdctools_3.20.06.81.bb: ti-xdctools: add 3.20.06.81 Dec 30 16:47:03 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * r0d7150c3d3 10openembedded.git/recipes/ti/ (2 files in 2 dirs): Dec 30 16:47:03 ti-linuxutils 2.26.01.02: fix up the last BKL removal breakage Dec 30 16:47:03 Upstream fixed everything minus this one Dec 30 16:47:03 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Dec 30 16:55:24 hi hrw Dec 30 17:12:58 gm Dec 30 17:42:36 if I was going to develop an OE workshop of a local user group which branch, distro and target image should I start with? (for HW I will use a beagle board and an intel "devboard" ) Dec 30 17:43:06 hi effem Dec 30 17:44:40 What is the deference between the "tested_2010-12-10 tag and the release-2010.12 tags? Dec 30 17:46:32 mark97229: they are just different Dec 30 17:47:00 mark97229: according to your question you should use release tag Dec 30 17:47:34 distro and image depends.. Dec 30 17:48:05 try angstrom-2008.1 and x11-image as starting point e.g. Dec 30 17:49:35 I've been playing with the angstrom-2010.x but when I try it on x86 targets it has issues with building. Dec 30 17:49:46 I'll give 2008.1 a try. Dec 30 17:50:15 I'll use the release tag. Thanks! Dec 30 18:04:51 I keep running into multiple providers for gst plugins such as: NOTE: multiple providers are available for runtime gst-plugin-avi (gst-plugins-bad, gst-plugins-good, gst-plugins-base, gst-plugins-ugly) Dec 30 18:05:10 not clear to me how any of those packages are providers? Dec 30 18:05:10 uh Dec 30 18:05:32 hm maybee packages-dynamic comes in Dec 30 18:07:05 how does that work, is that from a class? Dec 30 18:08:00 thats for packaging so you dont need entries for each single modul Dec 30 18:08:34 right but where does that magic happen? Dec 30 18:08:57 perhaps I need to turn on some bitbake debugging to understand why it things there are multiple providers Dec 30 18:12:42 03Roman I Khimov  07org.openembedded.dev * r3a75ce4f55 10openembedded.git/recipes/perl/perl_5.10.1.bb: Dec 30 18:12:43 perl 5.10.1: fix archlib(exp) and privlib(exp) vars in target configs Dec 30 18:12:43 These vars can be used to derive build flags for perl modules and thus should Dec 30 18:12:43 point to build-time directories in staged configs. Dec 30 18:12:43 Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov Dec 30 18:12:43 Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks Dec 30 18:12:54 03Roman I Khimov  07org.openembedded.dev * rce11603e99 10openembedded.git/classes/cpan.bbclass: Dec 30 18:12:55 classes/cpan: fix bin/script/man1/man3 installation dirs Dec 30 18:12:55 Strange that it wasn't done before, but if some perl module wants to install Dec 30 18:12:55 man pages or some binaries or scripts they all were installed with wrong prefix. Dec 30 18:12:55 Signed-off-by: Roman I Khimov Dec 30 18:12:55 Acked-by: Frans Meulenbroeks Dec 30 18:18:45 how do I label the release I've tested if I'm testing latest 'testing-next' branch? Dec 30 18:22:28 refering to labeling it in the table in http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php?title=Testing Dec 30 18:22:37 tharvey: date of branching Dec 30 18:22:51 i.e. when testing-next was merged last time Dec 30 18:23:15 but testing-next doesn't get branched? Dec 30 18:23:33 seems like a moving target Dec 30 18:23:51 tharvey: yes, I was wrong first time :) Dec 30 18:23:55 date of merge Dec 30 18:24:44 so tested_2010-12-10 was tagged on 2010-12-17 - so any testing of testing-next should be labeled 'testing_2010-12-17'? that doesn't make sense Dec 30 18:25:31 2010-12-17 was next merge Dec 30 18:26:03 well.. better ask cbrake :) Dec 30 18:26:08 he is our manager :) Dec 30 18:26:44 I think there is no clear answer because testing-next can change between 2010-12-17 and whenever next tested_* gets tagged Dec 30 18:27:03 cbrake, what do you think makes sense for how we label what we tested in testing-next branch? Dec 30 18:32:42 looks like x264 is still failing on x86 Dec 30 18:33:18 eFfeM: have you opinion on tharvey's question? Dec 30 18:37:03 tharvey: Jay7 testing tag was made on dec 10, testing runs a week so after a week (on dec 17 the tag is made assuming the testing is ok. Dec 30 18:37:18 hope that answers the question Dec 30 18:37:44 and testing_next is supposed not to change inbetween, no one should push against that branch Dec 30 18:37:55 (and no opinion on x264) Dec 30 18:38:04 btw bitbake fails miserably on me Dec 30 18:39:00 wants to build the nios2 kernel for hawkboard Dec 30 18:40:15 03Eric BENARD  07org.openembedded.dev * r1a63cae8b4 10openembedded.git/ (15 files in 5 dirs): (log message trimmed) Dec 30 18:40:15 busybox: update 1.18.0 to 1.18.1 Dec 30 18:40:15 * 1.18.1 is considered as the latest stable version Dec 30 18:40:15 * add the lastest fixes from http://busybox.net/downloads/fixes-1.18.1/ Dec 30 18:40:15 * default 1.18.1 for SlugOS Dec 30 18:40:16 Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard Dec 30 18:40:16 Acked-by: Khem Raj Dec 30 19:20:36 eFfeM, so what goes in the testing table is 'testing_2010-12-10' only because a tag was not made on the 17th? sorry I'm still confused Dec 30 19:25:47 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * rb87f28f617 10openembedded.git/recipes/ti/ (ti-c6accel.inc ti-c6accel_1.01.00.03.bb): Dec 30 19:25:47 ti-c6accel: add 1.01.00.03 Dec 30 19:25:47 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Dec 30 19:25:56 03Koen Kooi  07org.openembedded.dev * r7993e4ca77 10openembedded.git/recipes/ti/ (ti-xdctools/arm-linker-hack.diff ti-xdctools_3.20.06.81.bb): Dec 30 19:25:56 ti-xdctools 3.20.06.81: hack linkerscript generator to make c6accel compile with the angstrom next toolchain Dec 30 19:25:56 Signed-off-by: Koen Kooi Dec 30 19:32:44 tharvey: don't understand your Q; but there is no testing-10-17 tag because that testing was a fail.the current running test is 10-24 or so, guess cliff will make a new tag today or tomorrow Dec 30 19:33:04 whats changed on the wiki? some anti-spam protection? trying to update the testing table shows 'Your edit includes new external links. To help protect against automated spam, please type the two words you see in the box below: Dec 30 19:33:04 Input error: Invalid referer' - I don't see any 'two words' or place to enter them Dec 30 19:33:04 ask cbrake for details Dec 30 19:33:27 eFfeM, I'm merely trying to figure out how to describe what I tested by pulling the testing-next branch yesterday Dec 30 19:34:31 seems to me we should be putting a hash or something for 'last succesful build' column Dec 30 19:34:44 that column is misnamed anyway as we all seem to be listing failures there as well Dec 30 19:35:18 but I can't seem to edit the table anyway so perhaps I'll just give up Dec 30 19:35:42 tharvey: you in that case you have tested testing-2010-12-24 as that is the time of the last ocmmit Dec 30 19:36:18 ka6sox: did you add the captcha on the wiki page? It does not work for me either, there are no words (using firefox) Dec 30 19:36:34 no pictures? Dec 30 19:36:38 nor using chrome Dec 30 19:36:49 okay bummers...let me look @ it... Dec 30 19:36:55 hopefully that site isn't down. Dec 30 19:37:05 (the captcha one) Dec 30 19:37:54 eFfeM, ok I'll use the date of last commit when I pulled - that seems more reasonable than anything else Dec 30 19:38:15 eFfeM, tharvey are you guys logging in or editing? Dec 30 19:38:26 tharvey: there is a last successfui build column, and a current issues column, that last one is for reporting fails. I always add the nversion numbers on it Dec 30 19:38:30 I'm logged in, and editing Dec 30 19:39:02 ka6sox: I could log in, then wnated to make an edit with an external link, got the captcha but there are no words in the box Dec 30 19:39:22 note that I had issues logging in for some reason... was logged in when I loaded the testing page, but when I clicke don 'edit' it showed me as no longer logged in and had to re-login at that point Dec 30 19:39:35 interesting Dec 30 19:39:38 let me try that Dec 30 19:39:46 no box at all for me... just the input box for the text I was editing Dec 30 19:39:55 kk Dec 30 19:40:05 welcome to the wierdness of captcha :P Dec 30 19:40:25 ka6sox: did u change the css dir for wiki somehow Dec 30 19:40:32 in apache confs? Dec 30 19:40:39 that could cause it Dec 30 19:40:41 nope, I did not Dec 30 19:40:49 haven't even updated in like 5days Dec 30 19:41:02 so unless it broke 5days ago. Dec 30 19:42:01 hmmm wiki is working fine for me Dec 30 19:42:09 tharvey: what issue do u see Dec 30 19:43:21 khem captchas Dec 30 19:44:03 yup... captchas - don't see anything to edit, won't let me save page Dec 30 19:49:58 tharvey: just returned, trying to catch up on the testing branch discussion Dec 30 19:50:56 cbrake ^^ any reason you know for these problems? Dec 30 19:51:03 tharvey: I think eFfeM answered the question -- does that make snese? Dec 30 19:52:09 hi cbrake Dec 30 19:52:29 working on holidays :") Dec 30 19:52:42 khem: yup, you too? Dec 30 19:52:48 yeah Dec 30 19:53:13 someone from team needed to work Dec 30 19:53:16 and thats me Dec 30 19:53:26 and Japanese dont have vacations I did not know :) Dec 30 19:53:36 khem *g* Dec 30 19:53:44 khem: :-), well its probably quiet at the office Dec 30 19:53:49 japanese even worser than us german Dec 30 19:54:02 cbrake: yes quiet at office but hot on phone and email :) Dec 30 19:54:15 woglinde: Germans are better Dec 30 19:54:18 :) Dec 30 19:54:26 or should I say lazier than Japanese Dec 30 19:54:51 khem yes right Dec 30 19:55:03 we have more holidays than normal us citizen Dec 30 19:55:10 * khem is debugging a SIGILL Dec 30 19:55:26 for a Japanese customer Dec 30 19:56:12 ka6sox: I'm not sure what is going on Dec 30 19:56:36 ka6sox: who added the captcha to the wiki (which I think is a good thing) Dec 30 19:57:10 me, at the request of hrw Dec 30 19:57:11 cbrake: I think ka6sox added Dec 30 19:57:17 cool Dec 30 19:57:27 so we have confirm_edit coupled to captcha Dec 30 19:57:30 yes captcha is needed to void span Dec 30 19:57:33 spammmmm Dec 30 19:57:57 * khem remembers his son whenever 'm' does not work on this keyboard Dec 30 19:58:23 * ka6sox has keyboard with a / that doesn't work for same reason Dec 30 19:58:44 build problem with latest testing-next: http://tinderbox.openembedded.net/public/logs/task/15229751.txt Dec 30 19:59:29 ieehks hostlibs Dec 30 20:00:26 seems curl should use libgntuls-native Dec 30 20:00:32 ka6sox: I was able to make a wiki change with an external link Dec 30 20:01:03 cbrake, its a privs issue then...let me create a new user and test Dec 30 20:01:06 ka6sox: without captchas -- maybe because I am a wiki admin ? Dec 30 20:01:21 ya, I'm thinking that Dec 30 20:01:29 creating new user and testing Dec 30 20:08:11 okay from a non-priveleged user with both chrome and firefox it let me add links at will Dec 30 20:08:20 scary stuff Dec 30 20:08:28 so its not quite working right Dec 30 20:08:41 cbrake, yes I believe the write label is the 'testing_' where date is the last commit from your pull - which means that during a week various testers will have different dates but that makes sense Dec 30 20:09:07 tharvey: testing-next only changes once per week Dec 30 20:09:21 tharvey: so if you check out testing-next, and do a git log, we should all see the same data Dec 30 20:09:25 *date Dec 30 20:09:52 hmmm... ok... then date of last commit is 12-23 (6c7c4f7d53ce2c6df84e9fc10cede928ee327ea3) right? Dec 30 20:13:11 tharvey: yes, that looks correct Dec 30 20:14:02 seems like the captcha is backwards then - lets non-users edit but not users with account? Dec 30 20:18:45 eFfeM tharvey try again please and I'll watch log Dec 30 20:20:09 ok, one sec Dec 30 20:20:28 just posted Dec 30 20:20:32 attempted I mean Dec 30 20:20:45 hmm... have to relogin Dec 30 20:21:24 ka6sox: about an hour before I got the captcha but no words in it, Dec 30 20:21:26 now I got Dec 30 20:21:45 ok, posted and failed Dec 30 20:21:48 Your edit includes new external links. To help protect against automated spam, please type the two words you see in the box below: var RecaptchaOptions = { tabindex : 1 }; Input error: Invalid referer Dec 30 20:22:15 seems about right... no box, no words Dec 30 20:22:18 actually the var part is hidden on the screen but got copied/pasted Dec 30 20:23:18 let me ask a mediawiki guy about this...thanks for the feedback. Dec 30 20:24:00 it might be when you guys wake up next Dec 30 20:32:48 eFfeM tharvey you guys are logged in right? Dec 30 20:33:02 yes Dec 30 20:33:24 seems like I have to keep logging in though Dec 30 20:33:44 ie, originally logged in, loaded testing page, hit 'edit' and got to edit page but was then logged out Dec 30 20:34:38 okay let me try that Dec 30 20:34:50 what url did you use for the "test" page. Dec 30 20:34:58 just so I do the same steps Dec 30 20:37:07 http://wiki.openembedded.net/index.php/Testing#Test_combinations Dec 30 20:39:07 ka6sox: yes (i don't think i get the edit button when I am not logged in) Dec 30 20:39:25 I also used the testing page, different section though Dec 30 20:39:36 so it turns out to be that customer recompiled one object secretly Dec 30 20:39:51 * khem should join CSI Dec 30 20:40:28 khem *g* Dec 30 20:41:04 usually if customers did not pay for my kids and family I would give them a kick in their rear Dec 30 20:42:08 ka6sox: note that tharvey and I were trying to add an external link Dec 30 20:43:27 yep, we are on it. Dec 30 20:43:38 I have my expert looking right now. Dec 30 20:54:52 eFfeM tharvey okay I see whats wrong and am investigating why thats happening Dec 30 20:55:13 the issue is an apache rewrite that isn't working correctly Dec 30 21:03:08 ok, thanks Dec 30 21:03:27 if you edit it on .org works, if you use .net fails (as expected) Dec 30 21:03:59 except its not rewriting Dec 30 21:07:38 ah ok, i indeed also used .net Dec 30 21:07:58 so use .org for the time being and it'll work Dec 30 21:08:16 tharvey, same with you please till I sort this forwarding/rewrite stuff. Dec 30 21:09:25 sure... np Dec 30 21:58:13 nite all Dec 30 23:40:51 Crofton Crofton|work pingu? Dec 30 23:40:55 pong Dec 30 23:41:36 need a wee bit of help... Dec 30 23:41:50 ok, I'll see what I can do Dec 30 23:46:45 * RP__ has just realised the client/server work in bitbake has effectively been removed without any discussion I'm aware of Dec 30 23:47:15 well, the remote part of it anyway which was a large part of why it was implemented the way it was :( Dec 30 23:50:48 rp__ slay kergoth Dec 30 23:50:50 *g* **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Dec 31 02:59:58 2010