**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Apr 12 02:59:57 2011 Apr 12 06:29:27 hi all.. i am making oe for atmel 9263ek board...i found the error "Parsing erros found"..wat could be the problem... Apr 12 07:25:24 good morning Apr 12 07:25:54 vicky__: would be better if you pastebin the whole error Apr 12 07:26:01 ~pastebin Apr 12 07:26:02 [~pastebin] A "pastebin" is a web-based service where you should paste anything over 3 lines so you don't flood the channel. Here are links to a few : http://www.pastebin.com , http://pastebin.ca , http://channels.debian.net/paste , http://paste.lisp.org , http://bin.cakephp.org/ , http://asterisk.pastey.net/ , or install pastebinit with yum or aptitude. Apr 12 07:28:22 Hi all Apr 12 07:28:32 I've updated the meta layer by getting http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/meta-openembedded/ Apr 12 07:28:36 mrAlmond: hi Apr 12 07:28:52 but I'm not able to use those recipes with poky from the master git Apr 12 07:29:08 I always get error about BBPATH referencing itself Apr 12 07:29:15 when I start bitbake Apr 12 07:29:28 mckoan: hi! Apr 12 07:47:40 no suggestions about that BBPATH issue? Apr 12 07:56:57 Guys...can someone explain me which is the difference between the git://git.pokylinux.org/poky.git repository and git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core ? Apr 12 07:58:25 and moreover...which are the differences between poky and openembedded? Apr 12 08:02:03 mrAlmond: poky is mostly oe-core + bitbake in same repo Apr 12 08:02:12 mrAlmond: check git diff to see exact diff Apr 12 08:03:11 JaMa|Wrk: My problem now is that I've pull poky from git://git.pokylinux.org/poky.git and also the meta-openembedded layer from the oe git Apr 12 08:03:23 but when I start bitbake I get the BBPATH error Apr 12 08:04:35 which are the right procedures to install meta-openembedded into poky or into oe-core...what do you suggest? Apr 12 08:04:58 mrAlmond: check what's in all conf/layer.conf included in your bblayers.conf Apr 12 08:05:55 normally you just checkout them side-by-side and create conf/bblayers.conf including both Apr 12 08:06:31 I've pull meta-openembedded and then I've renamed it to "meta" in poky Apr 12 08:06:36 so probably this is wrong... Apr 12 08:06:41 angstrom and shr have scripts/makefile to prepare such setup Apr 12 08:06:44 yes this is wrong Apr 12 08:07:16 so I've to copy meta-openembedded to the same level of "meta" and then I've to add as a new layer? Apr 12 08:09:55 to same level as poky Apr 12 08:10:00 or oe-core Apr 12 08:10:22 but even on same level of meta it should work with right conf/bblayers.conf afaik Apr 12 08:11:10 ok great...I'm trying right now Apr 12 08:11:45 mrAlmond: sorry, I never used poky nor tested yocto yet Apr 12 08:12:19 mckoan : no problem ;-) Apr 12 08:16:38 * XorA|gone would just use the scripts Apr 12 08:28:52 ok...compilation has started...finger crossed! Apr 12 08:45:50 sorry mckoan...my pastebin id is "http://pastebin.com/BQmc8B6V" when bitbake nano Apr 12 08:46:04 sorry mckoan...my pastebin id is "http://pastebin.com/BQmc8B6V" when "bitbake nano" Apr 12 08:46:56 03Martin Jansa  07master * r2ad80fb806 10openembedded.git/recipes/phonet-utils/phonet-utils_git.bb: Apr 12 08:46:56 phonet-utils: sync with meta-oe Apr 12 08:46:56 Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa Apr 12 09:03:53 compilation has stopped because task-poky-tools-debug requires "perf" and perf is unbuildable! Apr 12 09:04:11 but perf is not a deps of task-poky-tools-debug Apr 12 09:05:02 it should be a dep of task-poky-tools-profile Apr 12 09:05:21 and I've not included profile task in my build Apr 12 09:07:05 morning all Apr 12 09:14:45 bluelightning : hi! Apr 12 09:35:50 hello i have a question, is it possible to compile a kernel for the ea3250 thats not in openembedded by default? Apr 12 09:37:04 i would like to complile a 2.6.34 kernel for the ea3250 Apr 12 09:41:48 loekel: use a MACHINE=ea3250 and build your toolchain with bitbake meta-toolchain, than youse it to build your own kernel out of OE Apr 12 09:48:12 hi mickeyl Apr 12 09:58:43 morning woglinde Apr 12 10:03:07 Guys...I had to remove task-poky-tools-profile references from task-poky-tools.bb because it was compiling profiling tools also if I've not selected them Apr 12 10:03:27 and so was giving error because "perf" recipe is not available Apr 12 10:03:30 is this a bug? Apr 12 10:04:13 in my local.conf I have EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES = "tools-debug tools-testapps debug-tweaks" Apr 12 10:04:27 but it was trying to compile also tools-profile... Apr 12 10:07:01 hey. which mailing list should i send patches to? i suppose the only public mailing list is openembedded-users, though it's not clear from http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Mailing_lists which is best for patch submission Apr 12 10:08:41 CMoH-notebook: AFAIK I suggest openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Apr 12 10:09:19 mckoan, hmm... i got back a mail with "no permission" - i suppose i should subscribe to it first or? Apr 12 10:10:35 CMoH-notebook: you must subscribe of course Apr 12 10:10:44 i apologize - i'm a bit out of my normal today Apr 12 10:10:54 ofc i should... stupid me Apr 12 10:11:04 CMoH-notebook: np, yw Apr 12 11:08:08 03Anders Darander  07master * r849389a021 10openembedded.git/recipes/lowpan-tools/ (3 files in 2 dirs): (log message trimmed) Apr 12 11:08:08 lowpan-tools_0.2.2;: fix build with static libnl1 Apr 12 11:08:08 * add NL_CFLAGS to a few Makefiles.am (to find libnl header files) Apr 12 11:08:08 * add _GNU_SOURCE to a few Makefiles.am (to make struct ucread visible) Apr 12 11:08:08 * git version not fixed Apr 12 11:08:08 * build and runtime tested, although only in qemuarm Apr 12 11:08:09 Signed-off-by: Anders Darander Apr 12 11:58:30 hi risca Apr 12 11:58:41 hi woglinde =) Apr 12 11:59:01 I'm subscribed to the oe-dev ML now =) Apr 12 11:59:13 Did it yesterday Apr 12 11:59:41 No, the day before yesterday. Made my first post there as well =) Apr 12 12:19:55 risca all fine now? Apr 12 12:20:41 There is always something to do, something to fix. I should post more patches to the list Apr 12 12:20:51 yes Apr 12 12:20:53 good idea Apr 12 12:20:53 The not-so-ugly ones at least Apr 12 12:21:03 hehe Apr 12 12:21:49 I posted about a package that was prone to use host libraries. Apr 12 12:22:21 I however had no good solution. I described the problem at least, and a possible way of solving it Apr 12 13:08:28 I have a pretty basic question about oe and bitbake...\ Apr 12 13:08:42 and it doesn't seem like bitbake has its on irc... Apr 12 13:08:42 sure Apr 12 13:08:57 i am getting those annoying issues about the "do_unpack" failing... Apr 12 13:09:15 I was going to rewrite that section to fix the issue.. Apr 12 13:09:27 where can I find that in bitbake source code? Apr 12 13:09:36 I can't find the part that calls unpack Apr 12 13:09:43 http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/bitbake/ Apr 12 13:12:31 so its in the shell.py in lib... Apr 12 13:17:46 meg23: afaik, unpacking is defined in oe (oe/classes/base.bbclass) Apr 12 13:21:08 that def helps ... thanks... Apr 12 13:26:49 hi, I was updating emacs, using the patch found on the old patchwork as a start, but I ran into that error with emacs-x11: Apr 12 13:27:57 http://www.pastie.org/1786811 Apr 12 13:28:07 strangely emacs compile fine Apr 12 13:36:40 maybe there is a way to get rid of qemu? Apr 12 13:37:56 GNUtoo|laptop: same here and on shr buildhost for last few months Apr 12 13:40:49 ok Apr 12 13:41:02 maybe it's since qemu was upgraded? Apr 12 13:41:33 doesn't look like it, because I was trying to rebuild it with all qemu changes reverted to point of previous successfull build Apr 12 13:42:27 which was Oct 24 07:53 Apr 12 13:43:34 ok Apr 12 13:43:36 hmmm Apr 12 13:44:00 I should investigate then Apr 12 13:44:07 I hope it's not too long Apr 12 13:45:03 to be clear: it was failing with the same qemu as was used on Oct 24 07:53 Apr 12 13:46:00 yes ok Apr 12 13:48:25 Assuming that I have the DISTRO set in the local.conf, what could be causing this? http://tinypaste.com/2277f the MACHINE is set in auto.conf, but it doesn't seem to matter where I put it... I get the same message. Apr 12 13:51:29 wrong assumption? Apr 12 13:51:52 DISTRO 'None' not found. Apr 12 13:52:26 DISTRO = "angstrom-2008.1" Apr 12 13:52:37 and OE HEAD? Apr 12 13:52:38 and this exists in the conf/distro directory Apr 12 13:52:50 it doesn't exist in OE master HEAD Apr 12 13:53:29 JaMa|Wrk, This is a checkout from the gumstix repository. I think they added some recipes/configurations. Apr 12 13:54:01 sorry I don't use gumstix.. so no idea what they added and/or forgot to add Apr 12 13:54:32 Oh, ok. Thanks. I was hoping it was a generic problem that I could easily fix. Thanks for the time. Apr 12 16:29:57 hm what was the recipe versioning variable from the bb-filename? Apr 12 16:32:31 ? Apr 12 16:32:35 PV... Apr 12 16:32:39 not seeing what you're asking Apr 12 16:32:58 the default PN, PV, and PR all come from the filename, or a default if not in the filename Apr 12 16:33:08 see bitbake.conf Apr 12 16:34:40 so when recipe is foo_2.9 PV is 2.9? Apr 12 16:36:13 hey. how often are patches in oe-devel mailing list processed? Apr 12 16:36:20 woglinde: yes Apr 12 16:36:25 okay thanks Apr 12 16:36:50 CMoH-notebook: not sure what you mean by processed. it's not an automatic thing. patch hits list, people review it, someone has spare time and applies it if appropriate. there's nothing formal Apr 12 16:37:04 ah, no :D Apr 12 16:37:20 hm ah stupid me Apr 12 16:37:26 i was rather asking on what's the usual time :) Apr 12 16:37:29 I have the line already in the .inc Apr 12 16:40:08 CMoH-notebook: there is no usual time. as i just said, "someone has spare time" Apr 12 16:40:27 ty Apr 12 16:40:30 which implies whenever someone gets to it, could be hours, could be a week, could be never (I've had plenty of patches that never got any response at all) Apr 12 16:40:41 i see Apr 12 16:40:43 if it goes a week or more i'd say resend Apr 12 16:40:55 alternatively, pester folk on irc Apr 12 16:41:31 I think there *may* be a process for after N weeks with no rejection its safe to apply, but you'd have to double check the processes in the wiki Apr 12 16:42:51 ty for your advices :) Apr 12 16:43:05 on another note, do bbappend recipes work in 1.12.0 ? Apr 12 16:43:07 bitbake Apr 12 16:43:54 cd bitbake; git co -b 1.12 origin/1.12; git log --grep='bbappend' Apr 12 16:44:37 yeah... another sound advice Apr 12 16:46:07 :) not everyone knows about log's -S and --grep options, figured you'd get your answer and also know git a bit better Apr 12 16:48:15 yeah - it's a too-powerful-to-be-well-known tool this git Apr 12 16:48:23 thanks Apr 12 17:03:04 anyone recall the name of the recipe to generate the feed Packages for the built ipks? Apr 12 17:03:12 i'm sure there was one, i just can't remember the name Apr 12 17:04:31 kergoth updating the index? Apr 12 17:04:35 yeah Apr 12 17:04:42 its in meta Apr 12 17:04:45 k, thanks Apr 12 17:04:45 mom Apr 12 17:05:12 package-index.bb# Apr 12 17:05:14 ;) Apr 12 17:05:17 :) Apr 12 17:07:15 I'm trying to add Nginx to OE. With a simple autotools recipe (just "inherit autotools"), configure fails with: configure: error: invalid option "--build=i686-linux". Is this Nginx's fault, or do I need to add more stuff to the recipe? Apr 12 17:07:57 pingswept seems Nginx isnt an autotools project Apr 12 17:08:10 a configure file is no proof for it Apr 12 17:08:27 No? It uses configure/make/make install? Apr 12 17:08:44 Ah, that would make some sense. I was jumping to conclusions. Apr 12 17:09:42 Is the right thing then to write a do_compile that replicates the recommended Nginx build process? Apr 12 17:16:55 Nginx didnt heard of it before Apr 12 17:17:02 lightty is okay Apr 12 17:18:20 woglinde: Nginx is better with uWSGI, I think. Lighttpd will be my backup if I can't get Nginx to build. Apr 12 17:18:57 If I were just serving static files, I'd just use lighttpd and be done with it. Apr 12 17:19:49 pingswept Nginx is better at fcgi? Apr 12 17:20:28 meh Apr 12 17:20:39 woglinde: Not fcgi, strictly speaking, no. uWSGI is a WSGI handler similar to FCGI. Apr 12 17:22:57 woglinde: Really, my preference for Nginx is because the Lighttpd folks have rejected uWSGI: "This module is the last developed but its inclusion in the official lighttpd distribution has been rejected, as the main author consider the uwsgi protocol a "reinventing the wheel" technology while suggesting a FastCGI approach." Apr 12 17:23:18 hmm.. Not a ringing endorsement for nginx when they release 1.0, and their site is down ;) Apr 12 17:23:24 dont get either whats uwsgi is for Apr 12 17:23:33 and whats doing better Apr 12 17:23:48 foerster: agreed. Apr 12 17:24:15 foerster seems to work here Apr 12 17:24:26 pingswept: it just came back here Apr 12 17:24:57 uWSGI is a fast, self-healing and developer/sysadmin-friendly application container server coded in pure C. Apr 12 17:25:02 muah Apr 12 17:25:25 woglinde: WSGI is a protocol; uWSGI is a server that implements the protocol. Apr 12 17:25:31 hmm Apr 12 17:25:36 yes sure Apr 12 17:25:44 but why I need it Apr 12 17:26:27 woglinde: Maybe you don't? I need it because I want to execute Python as a backend to a web server. Apr 12 17:27:04 pingswept because the other techniques are to slow? Apr 12 17:27:47 woglinde: No, FastCGI would also work, I believe. But it seems to be easiest to get web apps working with WSGI. Apr 12 17:28:12 o.O Apr 12 17:28:31 easiest would be using django Apr 12 17:28:38 Actually, I could just use an old version of Apache and mod_python. Apr 12 17:28:51 Django uses WSGI. Apr 12 17:28:58 (the protocol) Apr 12 17:28:58 ah okay Apr 12 17:29:09 than it makes some sense Apr 12 17:29:37 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1747266/is-there-a-speed-difference-between-wsgi-and-fcgi Apr 12 17:30:15 apples/oranges it seems Apr 12 17:30:21 foerster: That reveals my ignorance. Apr 12 17:30:45 Oranges/peels, maybe. Apr 12 17:31:12 right Apr 12 17:40:16 pingswept: back to your recipe question. Implement a do_configure to call their configure script, and do_install to call oe_runmake install . do_compile will already call make by default (from base.bbclass). Apr 12 17:42:33 foerster: do_configure is not called by default? Apr 12 17:43:03 pingswept you have to override the one from autotools Apr 12 17:43:12 he didn't say it wasn't.. just that you had to define it Apr 12 17:43:31 woglinde: inherit autotools, and then define do_configure ()? Apr 12 17:43:32 pingswept: it's empty by default. Apr 12 17:43:40 Ah, got it. Apr 12 17:43:46 if it doesn't use autotools, don't inherit autotools at all Apr 12 17:43:49 its misleading *at best* Apr 12 17:53:17 hello you all... I'm Gilby and I'm Italian, so sorry for my english :) ... I'm working on my thesis: a project which can permit finger recognition and i writed my program under ubuntu distro; now i have to port it on Angrstrom distribution and I have to use it over a BeagleBoard... few month ago I compiled Angrostrom and it worked fine, i added some recipes made by me and all worked; A weeks ago i had to format my ubuntu and i backupped Apr 12 17:54:11 your english is good. much better then some people Apr 12 17:54:18 nowadays I can't compile because of few errors but i still have the backup of my OE directory but if I try to use it bitbake recompile all Apr 12 17:54:53 so... my question is... how I can use the OE backupped folder without recompile? Is it possible? Apr 12 17:54:54 probably missing depends from ubuntu for oe building Apr 12 17:55:15 maybe easy fix Apr 12 17:55:21 (thank you CcSsNET)... so i can't use it anyway? Apr 12 17:55:34 i dont see why you cant use it Apr 12 17:55:42 goto ubuntu, open terminal Apr 12 17:55:43 neither i do :) Apr 12 17:55:45 sudo su Apr 12 17:55:52 aptitude update Apr 12 17:55:58 aptitude dist-upgrade Apr 12 17:56:19 then install any missing packages it complains about from oe config errors Apr 12 17:56:28 with aptitude install somepackage Apr 12 17:56:29 Gilby85: Did you upgrade to Ubuntu 11.04? That will break OE. Apr 12 17:57:24 no pingswept... i had to format the whole system and I reinstalled Ubuntu 10.04 that is the same distro i had when i compiled Apr 12 17:57:35 Oh, OK. That's good. Apr 12 17:57:47 i think missing packages, thats all Apr 12 17:57:48 Do you need to recompile? Apr 12 17:58:27 Gilby85 what do you need to recompile? Apr 12 17:58:35 sorry but I'm not an expert on OE... I just have to use it because my thesis is about other arguments... yes i need to recompile because i have to compile other piece of my programs Apr 12 17:58:44 Gilby85 in the angtroem repos are lot of tons precompiled Apr 12 17:59:33 woglinde has a good point. Maybe you can just compile the new stuff you need as a packages, and install them to a stock Beagleboard. Apr 12 18:01:25 mmm... this could be a good idea, althoug in the end i have to create a "my-images.bb" that install the usual image+my program and i can't test it in this way... but probably i will do as you say Apr 12 18:01:54 Gilby85 there is now lot of changes in oe world Apr 12 18:02:08 i don't know why it need to recompile it all even if my oe dir is about 35 Gb Apr 12 18:06:42 thank you all... i want ask you the last thing: I'm trying now to compile a new image and now what I read is "package linux-omap-psp-2.6.32-r70+gitr7b8926aa626991fa087b00f6bbc1fb6b0e8269b0: task do_fetch: Started " ... i can read the same thing since 1 hour ago and i don't know what it's doing... It doesn't give me errors but it looks blocked, my CPU is working around 10% and the net looks doesn't download nothing... Apr 12 18:07:07 someone can tell me what's up? Apr 12 18:07:27 Gilby85 its just fetching Apr 12 18:07:36 look at the inet connections Apr 12 18:07:44 tail -f the log file, or interrupt it and re-run with -D to see the output Apr 12 18:08:01 we should really enable a build-wide full info log file at some point Apr 12 18:08:15 bitbake -D image Apr 12 18:08:17 ??? Apr 12 18:08:20 yes Apr 12 18:08:25 but it'll show a *lot* of info Apr 12 18:09:15 depending on the bitbake version you're using, -l Build may show the tasks running without spamming you with other debug info Apr 12 18:09:30 (that's lowercase L, not i) Apr 12 18:09:38 exactly the same... it write fastly something and then :"DEBUG: Executing task do_fetch NOTE: package linux-omap-psp-2.6.32-r70+gitr7b8926aa626991fa087b00f6bbc1fb6b0e8269b0: task do_fetch: Started " Apr 12 18:09:46 stop Apr 12 18:10:15 strange, debug should have enabled the display of output from the task. guess fetch isn't obeying it Apr 12 18:10:37 at any rate, its highly likely ist just fetching, as they said Apr 12 18:10:45 look at ps, you'll likely see a wget or git processing Apr 12 18:10:53 s/processing/process/ Apr 12 18:11:14 i guess it too... ok Apr 12 18:12:30 hi! is there any way of letting fsck do it's job when the amount of mount times an mmc has been reached? Apr 12 18:12:44 currently it only suggest the user to do it Apr 12 18:13:28 no wget neither git project... it's strange because if i try to get "git clone git://arago-project.org/git/people/sriram/ti-psp-omap.git;protocol=git;branch=master \" that is the row of bb file i know it's fetching, it works Apr 12 18:15:25 lisandropm: I've seen cron jobs that do that before, but that's probably more of a general Linux question than an OpenEmbedded one. Apr 12 18:19:48 pingswept: the problem is that I did the normal stuff, and I think I am missing something OE related Apr 12 18:22:09 lisandropm: What do you mean by "the normal stuff"? Apr 12 18:22:44 setting the last two columns of fstab to 1, using tune2fs to set the number of mounts between filesystem checks Apr 12 18:23:26 but on mount, the system just warns me that the fs needs a check, but doesn't perform it Apr 12 18:23:52 afaiu, what I did is enough on a normal (ie, desktop) system Apr 12 18:24:12 You did this stuff after copying your filesystem out of OE and onto some embedded board? Apr 12 18:29:43 pingswept: I did it from within OE in the board Apr 12 18:30:36 lisandropm: Ah, I think that may be where the problem is. OE is just a system for building code. Once you put the code on the board, it's like any other Linux system. Apr 12 18:31:30 What board are you using, BTW? Apr 12 18:41:34 (Still working on compiling Nginx) How can I pass a path to the crosscompiler to Nginx's configure script? It seems to have the right binary name, but it can't find it. Apr 12 18:43:20 Should it be using the copy in tmp/sysroots/i686-linux/usr/armv5te/bin? Apr 12 19:02:48 an esom270 based board Apr 12 19:33:49 what is angstrom-version *? Apr 12 19:34:32 as in, Apr 12 19:34:32 | * satisfy_dependencies_for: Cannot satisfy the following dependencies for task-base-extended: Apr 12 19:34:32 | * angstrom-version * Apr 12 19:43:47 hm, is it possible to modify SRC_URI according to the content of the IMAGE_BASENAME variable? Apr 12 19:44:20 I would like to add some patch if the name of image is ABCD and different one if it's DEFG Apr 12 19:44:39 and I don't want to create special recipe just for this case Apr 12 19:45:18 in python, sure Apr 12 19:45:22 via overrides, no Apr 12 19:45:34 you can do it based on recipe name, but not IMAGE_BASENAME (overrides) Apr 12 19:47:20 well the recipe name of the image is actually different also, it's not now, but it will be in the future Apr 12 19:47:53 * kergoth nods Apr 12 19:48:09 thats why i mentioned it, if thats the case that'd get the job done, otherwise you could use a snippet of python Apr 12 19:49:10 do you know offhand about any example or string I could grep for (it's still all black magic to me :)) Apr 12 19:51:44 for what? Apr 12 19:53:18 hm, maybe I just don't get what are you saying :) it's possible to do SRC_URI_append_name-of-the-image ? Apr 12 19:53:41 bitbake -e | grep OVERRIDES= Apr 12 19:53:53 anything in that list can be used to conditionally append like that. Apr 12 19:53:59 the one you're looking for is pn-${PN} Apr 12 19:54:04 ah, thanks a lot Apr 12 19:54:05 so SRC_URI_append_pn-foo = .. Apr 12 19:54:18 easy :p Apr 13 00:16:21 hi , I'll install OpenEmbedded from git but first i'll install linux on my PC , which linux is best for latest OE ? Apr 13 00:21:08 JDuke128, just pick something recent Apr 13 00:21:27 you can look at what has been tested recently on the testing page of the wiki Apr 13 00:22:21 ubuntu 10.10 x64 edition ? Apr 13 00:22:39 http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/Testing shows lots of redhat and ubuntu Apr 13 00:23:24 i use slackware without problems, others use gentoo, debian, suse Apr 13 00:23:37 really, just choose what you're most comfortable with Apr 13 02:59:11 Hi, I'm writting a makefile, how to convert UPPER charactors to LOWER ? example UpAndLower -> upandlower **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Apr 13 02:59:57 2011