**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Aug 29 02:59:57 2011 Aug 29 03:12:08 it seems that the git fetcher is suddenly failing on all github repos...has anyone else seen this? i'm using bitbake 1.12.0. Aug 29 03:19:19 i can clone manually but setting autorev results in bitbake going into an infinite loop, setting a specific commit results in "fatal: unable to read tree xxx" Aug 29 03:56:07 nm, looks like a problem w/ permissions in my DL_DIR. Aug 29 05:39:14 hello! I'm trying to build an image based on console-image and I get errors trying to build ppp, because it cant find libnl1 Aug 29 05:40:21 I tryed cleaning libnl, rebuilding, rebuilding libnl1, etc.. the scripts say they suceed, but I can't get libnl.so.1 to appear anywhere Aug 29 05:41:07 any ideas? 10x! Aug 29 05:44:29 Another question - is there a better console image to start with, to avoid such a mess? Aug 29 06:23:06 motning eFfeM Aug 29 06:23:25 hey Noor, all, gm! Aug 29 06:24:06 eFfeM: how r u doing ... seen u after so long time Aug 29 06:24:12 Noor you seem get along quite well with the new recipes Aug 29 06:24:53 doing ok again, life has been quite rough for me recently, but things are more or less back on track Aug 29 06:25:07 and lotsa work (as usual) Aug 29 06:25:39 I have just one concern regarding the feedback ..... the newcommers does not get the feedback atonce ..... they have to recent the patches again and again Aug 29 06:26:54 I mean they should get all the feedback atonce so that they can rework them and resent the patches .... the problem which I face is that i got feedback i reworked it then I again got another feedback which can easily be given on my first patch Aug 29 06:27:03 :) Aug 29 06:27:22 Yeah, and the feedback is not always that friendly either (and there is still not too much info on the web on the workflow wrt patches in meta-oe) Aug 29 06:27:46 maybe talk with Tom about it Aug 29 06:28:23 hhmmmm will see ..... Aug 29 06:28:32 but nice to see u back Aug 29 06:29:45 I've mostly beeninto the channel ( eFfeM_work1 is also me), but I have been less active; too much RL things, too much work, less interest in working on the new oe etc) Aug 29 06:30:30 eFfeM: yeah I have seen that nick as well ..... just noticed the same that u were not that active Aug 29 06:31:56 as u have become active for a while I have one questuion regarding git ...... as now I have commit some changes and send the patch to community ..... not I got the feedback and want to update the commit which is lower in the sequence .... how can i do that? Aug 29 06:32:22 I'm still working with OE almost daily but we haven't moved to the new yocto-based stuff yet as our product is very near completion and we do not want to spent effort at this time on it; or risk introducing new problems) Aug 29 06:32:44 yeah Aug 29 06:33:03 lat minute changes create a lot of problem Aug 29 06:33:08 problems Aug 29 06:35:41 Noor: I'm not too good at git, maybe others can help; what I sometimes do is a git format-patch then unroll the patches (using git reset (warning: dangerous), then reapply the accepted patch and then the new stuff again; but guess there are better ways to do this Aug 29 06:36:26 things like that should really be documented but it seems not to have priority or interest Aug 29 06:36:42 eFfeM: hhhmmmm .... thanks ..... googling it Aug 29 06:36:53 but the lack of that info makes it tough for starters to start contributing Aug 29 06:41:45 my 2 cents; getting off my soapbox & back to work Aug 29 08:20:35 hi all Aug 29 08:24:07 is there somewhere a description how to add meta-openembedded to oe-core ? Aug 29 08:47:22 damm . gnu has removed binutils-2.21.1.tar.bz2 and renamed it to binutils-2.21.1a.tar.bz2. can someone update the oe-core binuti;s recipe ? Aug 29 09:00:32 I think there's someone on it Aug 29 09:44:34 hi bluelightning ... how r u doing? Aug 29 09:44:51 hi Noor, well thanks, and you? Aug 29 09:45:04 bluelightning: perfectly fit Aug 29 10:36:18 just wondering what is the benefit of sending pull request against sending the patches Aug 29 10:45:50 Noor: Please send that question to the list, so the question and answer is in the archive. I guess there are also some write ups on the Web. Aug 29 10:48:42 PaulePan1er: OK Aug 29 11:22:36 PaulePan1er: just another minor question regarding pull request .... if I havent used -i option while using creting-pull-request script the default ending commit is head Aug 29 11:23:19 so after sending my pull request can I commit my changes on top of head? ..... I assume that it will not break anything in pull request Aug 29 11:25:35 Noor: I am not sure and I do not know any policies regarding this. I guess in the end it does not matter, but I recommend to use (topic) branches checked out on top of `origin/master` Aug 29 11:26:04 Noor: … it does not matter … as long as there are not conflicts … Aug 29 11:39:00 I'm trying to change my rootfs to use linux-sakoman-pm_2.6.39 instead of linux-omap_2.6.39. I've set PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel_beagleboard = "linux-sakoman-pm" in the angstrom conf, and it builds my kernel, but includes "the other one" in the rootfs. Aug 29 11:51:07 is it just me or is xproto broken? Aug 29 12:54:02 03Joshua Lock  07master * r5e95098be1 10bitbake.git/lib/bb/ui/crumbs/tasklistmodel.py: Aug 29 12:54:02 ui/crumbs/tasklistmodel: don't add same item to binb column more than once Aug 29 12:54:02 Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock Aug 29 12:54:12 03Joshua Lock  07master * r419b52e832 10bitbake.git/lib/bb/ui/crumbs/runningbuild.py: Aug 29 12:54:12 ui/crumbs/runningbuild: add a 'Copy' item to the messages right-click menu Aug 29 12:54:12 Add another item to the right-click menu enabled for log messages to copy Aug 29 12:54:12 the message to the clipboard. Aug 29 12:54:13 Signed-off-by: Joshua Lock Aug 29 13:03:02 ShiftPlusOne: What is the problem exactly? Is the build broken? oe.dev or oe-core? Please follow up to the mailing list. Aug 29 13:03:05 there is a recipe in OE names iozone3 whoes package does not have any licnese file ...... in the recipe a self made copyright file is added SRC_URI = "http://www.iozone.org/src/current/iozone3_263.tar \ file://copyright.txt \ ..... but license check rule in meta-oe is not finding it Aug 29 13:03:47 is it wise to make a patch of coypright.txt file and apply to the sources Aug 29 13:03:49 ? Aug 29 13:03:55 ShiftPlusOne: It builds fine for me in oe.dev with `angstrom-2010.x`, `minimal{,-uclibc}` for `MACHINE = "beagleboard"`. Aug 29 13:05:47 PaulePan1er, sorry, I am new to OE, so I don't understand most of what you said, but here's the compile log http://pastebin.com/kbrF2d4z Aug 29 13:06:55 or is it correct to right LIC_FILES_CHKSUM like this LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://../../copyright.txt;md5=38b7874447023eaf8d8c422775336ee6" Aug 29 13:14:10 ShiftPlusOne: Sorry, I do not have any time to look into this. But I advise you to send such stuff to the list where more people are subscribed. Aug 29 13:15:40 PaulePan1er, ok, thanks Aug 29 13:15:51 Anyone? Where do I set which uImage is included in my image? Aug 29 13:16:00 in my rootfs, that is. Aug 29 13:17:47 03Dongxiao Xu  07master * r6555a77c19 10bitbake.git/lib/bb/data_smart.py: (log message trimmed) Aug 29 13:17:47 data_smart.py: make use of expand cache in getVar() Aug 29 13:17:47 Currently if passing expand=True to getVar() function, it will pass the Aug 29 13:17:47 handling to getVarFlag(), which doesn't get any benefit from the expand Aug 29 13:17:47 cache. Aug 29 13:17:47 Call the expand() function separately in getVar() to make use of the Aug 29 13:17:48 expand cache, which can decrease the parsing time by 40%. Aug 29 16:18:06 bluelightning: Maybe the reuploaded Binutils archives have to do with . Aug 29 16:36:22 Hmm, are meta-oe patches supposed to go to the oe-core or oe list? I thought it was the latter, but it looks like some send to one and some to the other Aug 29 16:36:30 (which is another example of the confusion about all this :\) Aug 29 16:37:25 kergoth: oe list Aug 29 16:37:41 I'm beginning to wonder how long we plan on keeping the lists separate Aug 29 16:37:53 surely the time when they should merge back together must be approaching Aug 29 16:39:04 bluelightning: I would like to see the lists merged. Aug 29 16:39:11 bluelightning: … too. Aug 29 17:24:54 if any body is working on mips board then kindly let me know ..... need to ask few questions reagrding u-boot Aug 29 17:45:56 bluelightning: me too Aug 29 17:46:18 kergoth: did you see my reply to RP_ message about the multi-repo usage? Aug 29 17:46:39 yep, no clue about that offhand, would have to dig into the code Aug 29 17:48:18 hi mickey|office Aug 29 17:57:34 does someone know where to get tzdata2011h.tar.gz ? i try to build core-image-sato. Aug 29 18:53:22 hi Aug 29 19:39:28 how do i change the target type of an image? Aug 29 19:39:35 err recipe Aug 29 19:39:53 all-poky-linux vs. x86_64-linux Aug 29 19:39:59 vs. arm vs. powerpc Aug 29 19:40:13 grep for PACKAGE_ARCH Aug 29 19:40:17 i want this recipe to be board specific Aug 29 19:40:19 k Aug 29 19:41:46 neat it worked =) Aug 29 20:30:34 were the host keys on oe.org changed recently? Aug 29 20:35:32 denix: I cannot remember that this should have happened. Aug 29 20:39:21 yes they changed about a week ago Aug 29 20:39:58 most people didn't notice because htey use github to pull from Aug 29 20:40:30 damn it, it only requires an earthquake and a hurricane to be a week late! :) Aug 29 20:40:48 yeah, my git pull/push complains about changed host keys... Aug 29 20:41:06 you should likely verify that.. I may be thinking longer then a week ago.. I've had my head burried in prelinker problems for 3 weeks Aug 29 20:41:22 I don't think we can push through github, can we? Aug 29 20:41:36 no only directly Aug 29 20:41:44 could be longer than a week - I was busy myself :) Aug 29 20:58:41 sorry to bother you, but does package_qa_hash_style in classes/insane.bbclass perform some critical checks? I can't pass this QA check for my recipe Aug 29 21:05:51 mike111: then INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "True" is your friend Aug 29 21:06:24 wow, great, thank you)) Aug 29 22:15:08 I'm writing some sdcard image creation scripts for OE Aug 29 22:15:50 currently what's troubling me is I'm running inside a fakeroot process for good reason, one of the stages is an mke2fs Aug 29 22:16:09 as mke2fs is running as (fake)root, the FS attributes created are all root Aug 29 22:16:37 so when the FS is mounted inside a fakeroot instance, I'm not able to write to it Aug 29 22:17:06 Is there a way to temporarily disable fakeroot, or run a command as a regular user (in this case mke2fs) Aug 29 22:17:31 *from inside a fakeroot instance Aug 29 22:29:16 Guess I'll just use genext2fs :) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Aug 30 02:15:47 2011 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Aug 30 02:16:14 2011 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Aug 30 02:18:15 2011 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Aug 30 02:20:15 2011 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Aug 30 02:59:57 2011