**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Dec 31 02:59:57 2011 Dec 31 04:47:58 hello all Dec 31 07:36:01 hello Dec 31 07:36:26 I m building x11-image for mini2440 using OS.... with uClibc... Dec 31 07:36:41 but I m getting errors while compiling udev Dec 31 08:07:09 gm Dec 31 10:45:14 morning all Dec 31 10:45:40 morning Dec 31 10:49:50 eFfeM morning. Just relased the patch for binutils error Dec 31 10:50:34 Spider-Pork: nice; did you reuse the code from master? master already was at 2.18a or whatever the number was Dec 31 10:51:31 nope. I am using 2011.03-maintanance Dec 31 10:51:52 As suggested here yesterday Dec 31 10:51:59 there is another error for panda Dec 31 10:52:13 always an error about md5 and sha256 Dec 31 10:52:25 i'll fix it now Dec 31 10:56:47 Spider-Pork: instead of creating a new patch it is probably better to peek at the solution in master and port that to the maintenance branch Dec 31 10:57:03 please mail patches to the list Dec 31 10:57:54 see http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/2011.03-maintenance Dec 31 10:59:55 ok I'll release new patch with 2011.03-maintenance and v2 tag Dec 31 11:00:07 I apologize for that Dec 31 11:32:37 Spider-Pork: no problem and no need to apologize, we all started at some point and made our mistakes. Dec 31 11:32:46 We're happy with contributions! Dec 31 11:53:10 eFfeM patchv2 is up. Is ok? Thank you in advance Dec 31 11:54:33 Spider-Pork: what distro are you building? Dec 31 11:54:58 angstrom 2010.x Dec 31 11:55:05 for my pandaboard Dec 31 11:58:55 03Frans Meulenbroeks  07master * r8e7ed36b56 10openembedded.git/recipes/u-boot/u-boot_2011.03.bb: Dec 31 11:58:55 u-boot_2011.03: made this default for mpc8313e-rds Dec 31 11:58:55 after using it for quite a while Dec 31 11:58:55 Signed-off-by: Frans Meulenbroeks Dec 31 11:59:27 Spider-Pork: I think so, will get back on this after lunch Dec 31 11:59:41 honestly: angstrom is not my preferred distro. It's more ugly than others and still have many problems with packages. But it's really customizable and with some work and patience can be the best choice for embedded Dec 31 12:30:39 I want to build an image using uclibc ,can some one tell me wht parameters i should i change in loca.conf ,so that the image builds sucessfully Dec 31 12:38:20 erwt, what distro ? Dec 31 12:38:43 Angstrom Dec 31 12:39:16 eFfeM, angstrom DISTRO = "angstrom" Dec 31 12:39:16 DISTRO_VERSION = "v2011.12" Dec 31 12:41:13 hm, no idea if this is possible with angstrom, my most recent uclibc build was with oe classic, 2011.03 maintenance branch; DISTRO = "minimal-uclibc"; LIBC = "uclibc"; at least if I recall correctly Dec 31 12:42:04 eFfeM, any suggestions Dec 31 12:43:02 eFfeM, oe classic is another oe version? Dec 31 12:43:30 erwt: oe classic is the git we used before oe-core was created Dec 31 12:43:53 it is mainly still alive for maintenance and existing projects Dec 31 12:44:00 eFfeM, will you provide a link Dec 31 12:44:06 uclibc builds for oe-core are also possible Dec 31 12:44:18 how do i Dec 31 12:44:21 use it Dec 31 12:44:56 oe-core? best is the yocto project doc Dec 31 12:45:16 do i need to create a seprate build envoirment for oe-classic Dec 31 12:45:46 yes (well technically it might be able to merge them but afaik no one has done that) Dec 31 12:45:50 oe classic git is at http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/ Dec 31 12:46:16 most of the docs for oe classic are at wiki.openembedded.org although there is also some oe-core stuff there Dec 31 12:46:37 most oe-core info is probably at www.yoctoproject.org Dec 31 12:46:50 and for angstrom specifics go to their website or to #angstrom Dec 31 12:46:58 btw there is also #yocto Dec 31 14:00:56 eFfeM maybe there is something that i can't understand. There is a maintenance version for 2011.03. The name suggest to me that maintain the 2011.03 version with patches uploaded with [2011.03-maintenance] tag (as suggested here http://www.openembedded.org/index.php/2011.03-maintenance. Why should I go to master, see the differences and bring them to my 2011.03-maintenance? Dec 31 14:31:55 Spider-Pork: the problem you encountered is fixed in master, but apparently did not make it into the maintenance branch Dec 31 14:32:34 but it is solved in the master branch, seems good to bring that patch to maintenance too Dec 31 14:33:20 maintenance branch does not (semi)automatically pick up patches made to master Dec 31 14:34:06 i've also replied in mailing list Dec 31 14:34:16 the problem is the version Dec 31 14:34:44 on 2011.03-maintenance there is 2.20.1 version Dec 31 14:34:55 on master (with the patch) there is 2.20.1a Dec 31 14:35:03 are different Dec 31 14:35:40 if 2011.03-maintenance has 2.20.1 why introduce 2.20.1a? Dec 31 14:35:56 the fist one is considered "stable" for 2011.03 Dec 31 14:36:01 *first Dec 31 14:36:42 imho on 2011.03-maintenance must be utilized 2.20.1 Dec 31 14:37:34 Spider-Pork: if I look at the md5 sums the ones in your patch are for .1a, not for .1 Dec 31 14:37:49 so the solution is probably to move the recipe from .1 to .1a Dec 31 14:38:30 mine patch is for ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 Dec 31 14:38:31 btw i'm not a binutils wiz Dec 31 14:38:38 yeah just read the mail Dec 31 14:38:44 that no has a inside the name Dec 31 14:39:24 hm, true, let me check Dec 31 14:40:09 I haven't 2.20.1a bb inside my binutils dir Dec 31 14:40:12 ls | grep 2.20.1 Dec 31 14:40:12 binutils-2.20.1 Dec 31 14:40:13 binutils_2.20.1.bb Dec 31 14:40:13 binutils-cross_2.20.1.bb Dec 31 14:40:13 binutils-cross-sdk_2.20.1.bb Dec 31 14:40:21 no a version Dec 31 14:42:46 do a git checkout master and look again Dec 31 14:44:03 if I look at the gnu ftp site I see: Dec 31 14:44:18 binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 09/01/2011 08:40:00 binutils-2.20.1a.tar.bz2 17180 KB 08/26/2011 07:56:00 AM Dec 31 14:44:58 actaully that are two lines, there is no size for the 2.20.1 version and it is in italic, I guess this is because it is a symlink and they actually moved the version to 1a Dec 31 14:46:18 try this wget ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 Dec 31 14:46:39 yeah, I know it exists Dec 31 14:47:30 I'm a newbie about patches and linux. Now I have just a bit of confusion in my head Dec 31 14:47:51 If i can download it means that works correctly? Dec 31 14:48:09 And, of course, anyone can use it? Dec 31 14:48:27 what I think has happened is that there was a 2.20.1.tar.bz2 file, they updated this to become 2.20.1a.tar.bz2 and to make sure everyone fetching 2.20.1 would still get the code, they made a link from 2.20.1 to 2.20.1a Dec 31 14:48:46 I fetched both of them and they are identical Dec 31 14:48:47 2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764 binutils-2.20.1a.tar.bz2 Dec 31 14:48:47 2b9dc8f2b7dbd5ec5992c6e29de0b764 binutils-2.20.1.tar.bz2 Dec 31 14:48:52 md5sum Dec 31 14:48:52 wow Dec 31 14:49:43 afair there was a non technical (licensing?) issue in upstream binutils; they released the *a version and removed the non-a version from download section. the mentioned symlinks were created much later Dec 31 14:49:57 So they've changed binutils package and still lets people to download old unsopported one? Dec 31 14:50:06 now as some have the old 2.20.1 version somewhere it is better to explicitly move to .1a that is also what http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/diff/recipes/binutils/binutils_2.20.1.bb?id=262f9eb0f046cd77d041a9dcb055700c5ab6601b does Dec 31 14:50:25 no, they changed binutils and if people use the old link they will get the new one anyhow Dec 31 14:51:08 whitout advising that they are using a version Dec 31 14:51:15 cool Dec 31 14:51:47 tell that to the gnu people Dec 31 14:52:04 that is I call confusion Dec 31 14:52:31 yes Dec 31 14:52:57 Thank you eFfeM Dec 31 14:53:15 i'll drop a followup email Dec 31 14:53:21 now my confusion is decreased Dec 31 14:54:22 Now should I remove my patch? Dec 31 14:55:59 if you can, yes, otherwise leave it as is Dec 31 14:59:17 No i'll remove it. Now in the future Tom Rini will release the a patch to 2011.03-maintenance true? Dec 31 14:59:39 and I'll be able to use it with a rebase or by manually applying the patch Dec 31 15:00:32 removed Dec 31 15:01:04 thank you for your patience Dec 31 15:01:22 reboot Dec 31 15:08:09 Spider-Pork: yes, I hope so, I've asked Tom to apply the patch Dec 31 15:08:34 he'll get back to it but probably at this time he is asleep and maybe also he has a few days off Dec 31 15:12:43 eFfeM no problem :) temporarily i'm using sha and md5 modified. Thank you again for your patience Dec 31 15:12:50 yw Dec 31 15:13:03 you could also patch the recipe locally Dec 31 15:13:13 I'm really newbie about patching system and his "netiquette" Dec 31 15:13:28 Maybe i'll do it tomorrow Dec 31 15:13:41 Now we are preparing home for new year party :) Dec 31 15:17:09 the air smells of pork sausage and lentils Dec 31 15:17:23 here in Italy is a traditional recipe for the new year Dec 31 15:17:46 the legend says that lentils will bring some money Dec 31 15:17:58 for now i got only fat Dec 31 15:22:25 If we will not see in the next hours I wish you n happy new year Dec 31 15:22:28 Spider-Pork how was your christmas bingo/lottery Dec 31 15:22:28 bye Dec 31 15:22:38 I forgot what italian plays Dec 31 15:22:40 no win Dec 31 15:22:41 but it was something Dec 31 15:22:48 superenalotto Dec 31 15:22:57 I meant inside the family Dec 31 15:22:58 6 numbers Dec 31 15:23:02 ah lol Dec 31 15:23:05 tombola Dec 31 15:23:09 ah right Dec 31 15:24:13 few euro Dec 31 15:24:15 no more Dec 31 15:24:18 bye Dec 31 15:34:01 hi gnutoo Dec 31 15:45:57 hi woglinde **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Jan 01 02:59:57 2012