**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Mar 20 02:59:58 2012 Mar 20 04:21:26 hi Mar 20 04:29:00 any tips on how to tell oe to build 2.6.32 instead of 3.0.17? Mar 20 06:01:41 PREFERRED_VERSION doesn't work? Mar 20 06:23:43 any udc driver experts out there? Mar 20 08:00:04 good morning Mar 20 08:04:59 is there a solution for the pseudo-native-1.2-r5 32-bit gcc incompatibility issue on amd64 machines? Mar 20 08:45:01 hi! in oe-core: is the value of PACKAGE_ARCH important for the proper build or can I set it to my own values in the package? Mar 20 08:46:00 can I use it to distinguish devices rather than architectures? (the architecture is the same for all my packages) Mar 20 08:47:20 and second question, can I prevent OE from building empty *-{dev,dbg} packages? Mar 20 09:38:18 Is there someway to make OE look at a local directory as a mirror? like specifying a sources-directory in MIRRORS_append? Mar 20 09:42:39 jonasdn: sure, PREMIRRORS_prepend: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/latest/poky-ref-manual/poky-ref-manual.html#id1292386 Mar 20 09:42:56 thank you! Mar 20 10:03:28 Zagor: does it work with oe-classic too? Mar 20 10:03:55 mckoan: I don't know Mar 20 10:04:37 Zagor: np, I'll give it a try Mar 20 10:06:11 Zagor: looks like only conf/distro/include/oplinux.inc uses it but should work then Mar 20 10:12:37 morning all Mar 20 10:13:37 bluelightning: hi Mar 20 10:17:11 Hi, it looks like the newly added bdwgc recipe (the Hans Boehm garbage collector which is needed by guile) uses a version of libatomic that will fail when building in ARM Thumb mode Mar 20 10:18:52 interesting the pulseaudio/libatomics-ops_1.2.bb has: ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET = "arm" Mar 20 12:04:44 anyone with deep knowledge on bitbake here, i have some question regarding the cooker class and its configuration Mar 20 12:19:57 you may just ask, or otherwise post on a mailing list instead Mar 20 12:20:25 not many people with deep bitbake knowledge, but one might be enough for your question. (not me though...) **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Mar 20 12:29:04 2012 Mar 20 12:30:15 : i am ( planning/working) on a django based web interface to bitbake. Mar 20 12:32:18 my qeustion is: make it sense to set the configuration for the cooker and the call the cooker to do bitbake stuff, or will it be more handy to execute a bitbake task as a process that s getting its configuration from files Mar 20 12:33:20 whe i use the files based way my frontend has to create them and then execute this task, otherwise i will create the cooker config aout of some django settings and execut it from the django interface .. Mar 20 13:02:11 pwgen: FYI bitbake is now capable of running as a server Mar 20 13:02:45 . zes i have seen this xmlrpc stuff and its looking very interesing. Mar 20 13:02:48 pwgen: also, there is a 'web hob' project currently going on within the yocto project which I believe is going to be a django-based bitbake frontend Mar 20 13:03:01 so you may be working on the same thing... Mar 20 13:03:34 my idea is ( after i now have a fast root server ) of haveing an webinterface wher you can configure a build an leet it run Mar 20 13:04:37 paul Eggleton mentioned this Mar 20 13:04:55 that he would like to have an interface Mar 20 13:12:14 seem that nothing happend since december regarding web hob . Mar 20 13:16:04 : did you allready used the xmlrpc interface ? Mar 20 13:16:26 pwgen: Paul Eggleton is me ;) Mar 20 13:16:53 *FG*. sorry how coud i know ... Mar 20 13:17:02 no worries ;) Mar 20 13:17:25 pwgen: I'm not sure what the progress on web hob is, you might want to ask Shane Wang who is heading up the team working on it Mar 20 13:17:28 pwgen, thats the long haired guy that was at fosdem beside you Mar 20 13:17:59 pwgen: ah, hi! nice to match nicks to faces :) Mar 20 13:18:07 zes .. Mar 20 13:19:33 re the xmlrpc interface, no I only really know it exists... probably the best examples of how to build a UI will be in the existing non-web hob code Mar 20 13:20:08 but it would be great if you could check with Shane, maybe you can work together.... Mar 20 13:37:19 : which oe-core based MACHINE target comes nearest to a intel Celeron Mobile ( eepc900 ) ? Mar 20 13:39:30 pwgen: hmm, I thought eeepcs were all atom-based... I'm definitely no expert Mar 20 13:41:00 pwgen: I'm not sure we have one but creating a generic x86 MACHINE probably would be fairly easy Mar 20 15:45:47 is anyone aware of issues that exist or where fixed where a toolchain tarball doesn't work and the exact same toolchain (supposedly) works within the yocto build environment? Mar 20 15:45:59 were* fixed Mar 20 17:43:34 is there a way to use oe with qt-creator? Mar 20 17:49:12 JViz: we can build it... Mar 20 17:49:23 JViz: AFAIK nobody has worked on the other way around though (i.e. integration) Mar 20 17:49:39 which is I suspect what you were asking about Mar 20 17:49:52 ah Mar 20 17:50:25 yeah Mar 20 18:58:47 reposting my previous questions (in case the other half of the planet is already awake) Mar 20 18:58:50 -<09:46>- Nyoxi>> hi! in oe-core: is the value of PACKAGE_ARCH important for the proper build or can I set it to my own values in the package? Mar 20 18:58:53 -<09:47>- Nyoxi>> can I use it to distinguish devices rather than architectures? (the architecture is the same for all my packages) Mar 20 18:58:57 -<09:48>- Nyoxi>> and second question, can I prevent OE from building empty *-{dev,dbg} packages? Mar 20 18:59:21 and I have another one, that is quite stupid actually but has been bugging me a lot Mar 20 19:00:24 why do I have to specify LIC_FILES_CHKSUM if I use a common license? (by common I mean one from meta/files/common-licenses/ Mar 20 19:16:15 whats the different between cross crosssdk and runtime? Mar 20 19:17:55 do we built an x86 compiler to compile the toolchain for meta-toolchain? Mar 20 19:40:51 Nyoxi: you have to specify LIC_FILES_CHKSUM because it's independent of what LICENSE you're using - it's a tool to detect if the upstream license changes Mar 20 19:52:48 bluelightning: yes, but it makes sense only if the upstream package contains license, which isn't necessarily the true in my case Mar 20 19:52:57 contains license file Mar 20 19:53:19 Nyoxi: they have no license statement at all? what about at the top of a source file, or in a readme? Mar 20 19:53:46 I realise this does occur, and there are ways to handle it if that's the case Mar 20 19:54:01 but 80% of the time there's some kind of notice you can checksum Mar 20 20:02:01 bbl Mar 20 21:57:06 @florian: I remember you once said you got Qt 4.8.0 working with oe classic? Mar 20 22:30:21 Building my kernel. sakoman.com is down. "task do_fetch" fails. What sorts of options do I have? Mar 20 22:31:42 awozniak: wait for the server to come back up? :-) Mar 20 22:32:03 working on that now :-) Mar 20 22:32:29 Thank you so much, for everything. Btw, any progress on that RAM issue? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Mar 21 02:59:58 2012