**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Mar 24 02:59:59 2012 Mar 24 20:10:06 um, where does bitbake put the actual images? Mar 24 20:10:22 like, the completed, bootable rootfs, kernel, etc? Mar 24 20:21:50 also, where could i view/edit the sources of the kernel, AFTER all the patches are applied? it doesn't seem to exist anywhere, just the compiled ko's is all i can find Mar 24 21:03:35 muhoo: output is in tmp/deploy/ Mar 24 21:03:36 thanks! Mar 24 21:03:37 muhoo: also, you can find the workdir of anything that gets built in tmp/work/*/ Mar 24 21:04:41 where can i find a list of available targets? Mar 24 21:04:56 bitbake bare with no args doesn't give me a list of valid targets. Mar 24 21:06:28 hmm, bitbake -s will list available recipes and their preferred versions Mar 24 21:06:55 that's most but not necessarily all targets I think Mar 24 21:06:58 the question is what are you looking for exactly? Mar 24 21:06:59 thanks Mar 24 21:07:21 finally, where can i find the source of the kernel WITH all of the patches applied? Mar 24 21:07:25 it's not in work Mar 24 21:07:37 it will be in work Mar 24 21:07:42 only the ko objects are there Mar 24 21:08:40 example: find . -name ti_tscadc.c ... produces.... nothing! Mar 24 21:08:41 are you using rm_work by any chance? Mar 24 21:08:41 yet, that driver was compiled and is present in the kernel. and i can find the .ko file of it. Mar 24 21:09:00 i'm not explicitly giving rm_work as a target to bitbake, no. Mar 24 21:09:08 maybe something else is? Mar 24 21:09:40 it would be fairly obvious, each time something finishes building there will be a do_rm_work task executed at the end Mar 24 21:10:44 so what do you have in work/ ? Mar 24 21:12:24 this: https://refheap.com/paste/1347 Mar 24 21:13:21 ok, kernel ought to be in beaglebone-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/ Mar 24 21:13:23 under it anyway Mar 24 21:14:31 linux-ti33x-psp-3.2-r5a+gitr09e9651bcf2ee8d86685f2a8075bc6557b1d3b91 Mar 24 21:14:52 sounds like it Mar 24 21:14:52 and... no source files :-( Mar 24 21:14:58 just the headers and the ko/s Mar 24 21:15:01 what is in it? Mar 24 21:15:01 ko's Mar 24 21:15:05 https://refheap.com/paste/1348 Mar 24 21:15:12 git id empty Mar 24 21:15:15 what's in the "temp" dir? Mar 24 21:15:15 git is empty Mar 24 21:15:37 97 files Mar 24 21:15:37 should be a bunch of log.* and run.* Mar 24 21:15:44 mustly run.do, log.do, etc Mar 24 21:15:50 right, could you pastebin that list? Mar 24 21:15:54 ahahah! run.do_rm_work.6123* Mar 24 21:19:05 right, so that's why you have no sources Mar 24 21:19:06 so i have to remove that? Mar 24 21:19:06 they've been deleted after building was complete Mar 24 21:19:08 if you can find where it's been added, yes Mar 24 21:19:08 :-( Mar 24 21:19:08 how would i even find that? Mar 24 21:19:09 i must admit, i'm used to the buildroot system, this bitbake is a bit like going through the looking glass Mar 24 21:19:09 conf/local.conf Mar 24 21:19:09 oh! ok Mar 24 21:19:09 comment out INHERIT += "rm_work" Mar 24 21:19:10 unfortunately angstrom hides a bunch of things behind a single script Mar 24 21:19:10 but it's all there ultimately Mar 24 21:19:10 neat! Mar 24 21:19:23 one more dumb question if i might: i have noticed that bitbake is very, very unhappy on a machine with 1GB RAM . is there any tweak i could do to make it run properly? Mar 24 21:20:52 well, looking at angstrom's default conf/local.conf it seems that BB_NUMBER_THREADS is 2 and PARALLEL_MAKE is -j2 Mar 24 21:21:02 i saw that, that's why i asked Mar 24 21:21:07 it could be that for a host machine with limited RAM that's too much Mar 24 21:21:18 ok, i'll try reducing those to 1 Mar 24 21:21:33 it's a single-core machine. bitbake runs very well on my 2-core machine with 2gb ram tho Mar 24 21:21:45 prolly because of that -j2 Mar 24 21:23:07 hello everybody Mar 24 21:23:29 bluelightning: that seems to fix it! thanks!! Mar 24 21:23:37 muhoo: no problem Mar 24 21:24:44 zoumpis: hi Mar 24 21:25:28 i face a problem while using bitbake command Mar 24 21:25:44 zoumpis: what's the problem? Mar 24 21:26:39 here is my local.conf file http://piratepad.net/5xMskuYqRg Mar 24 21:27:26 also i did follow the instruction (to write my first recipe ) according to the official documentation Mar 24 21:27:27 http://docs.openembedded.org/usermanual/usermanual.html#recipes_helloworld_example Mar 24 21:28:34 Finally i submit here the errors which i face during compiling my recipe Mar 24 21:28:36 http://piratepad.net/ooaxcRkmvx Mar 24 21:28:47 please help me. thanks Mar 24 21:30:01 right, so you've used -b Mar 24 21:30:08 -b does not build any dependencies Mar 24 21:30:23 in this case, one of the dependencies that did not get build was the cross-compiler Mar 24 21:30:49 the best course of action is not to use -b Mar 24 21:31:15 ok hold a sec to use bitbake without -b Mar 24 21:31:41 in which case you should not specify the full path either Mar 24 21:31:46 i.e. just bitbake helloworld Mar 24 21:35:53 haha, even with -j1 and such, it's still unhappy, but at least it doesn't lock up the machine: https://refheap.com/paste/1350 Mar 24 21:36:09 ka6sox: hi, fyi Cannot resolve hostname (logs.nslu2-linux.org) Mar 24 22:02:31 hi **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Mar 25 02:59:58 2012