**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jun 08 02:59:59 2012 Jun 08 07:11:35 are there any plans on making OE work on mac? Jun 08 07:23:40 can anyone knows how to encrypt root filesystem of a NANDflash in embedded devices? Jun 08 07:26:58 someone probably can Jun 08 07:40:09 good morning Jun 08 10:19:45 morning all Jun 08 10:22:08 pb_: hi Jun 08 10:22:19 hello Jun 08 10:50:40 good afternoon Jun 08 11:37:34 I have added a layer that I only want one recipe from. Is there a sane way to control that? Jun 08 12:40:17 tasslehoff: I'm not aware of a simple way to do that, but what might be a workaround is to create your own layer and symlink to the dir that contains the package you want from that layer; that way you would get updates if the containing layer is updated Jun 08 12:41:06 eFfeM_work: good tip. thanks. Jun 08 12:41:27 yw Jun 08 13:19:18 eFfeM_work: are you sure that a symlink would work when you launch bitbake? Jun 08 13:25:13 mckoan: I suspect it will, but not 100% sure, that is why I wrote "might" Jun 08 17:16:31 oe-classic, I've got a MACHINE=foo and a do_install_append_foo(). Seems like do_install_append_foo() might not be getting called. Is this the right way to do this? Or is there some other way? Jun 08 20:19:25 How I can I try to find a illegal instruction fault? Jun 08 20:26:42 khem: around? Jun 08 20:41:15 otavio: use gdb? Jun 08 20:53:41 Do someone know if qemu-arm is arm5 or what? Jun 08 20:53:53 it seems my problem is with arm5 only Jun 08 20:57:21 I think it supports up to v7, depending on what system type you ask for on the command line. Jun 08 20:57:58 I'd like to avoid to play with gdb for now but will give it a try Jun 08 21:00:57 Well, if you have an illegal instruction trap then gdb is almost certainly the easiest way to find out what is causing it. There are a bunch of other ways but they are generally less convenient. Jun 08 21:04:29 Dunno if it will work; I have 64mb of ram only (in target) Jun 08 21:09:39 You can use gdbserver on the target and run gdb itself on another host. Jun 08 21:14:38 hi guys! i have a little problem with bitbake: the sanity checker reports long filename error. (Failed to create a file with a long name in XYZ. Please use a filesystem that does not unreasonably limit filename length) Jun 08 21:15:08 could I ignore it or should I solve it somehow? Jun 08 21:21:02 nobody? I wonder why is here so many people without any real activity.. what's the point in that? Jun 08 21:21:39 I mean why are you here? I've never seen any conversations here. Jun 08 21:22:18 You can ignore the sanity checker warnings if you like. Jun 08 21:36:07 i think i'm here because my parents mated Jun 08 21:36:16 i could be wrong of course... Jun 08 21:36:47 mr_science: you forgot about test tubes and labs Jun 08 21:37:01 adoptions and science Jun 08 21:38:49 daniel___: i know why your here: --> | daniel___ (515dc830@gateway/web/freenode/ip.81.93.200.48) has joined #oe Jun 08 21:38:50 21:14:36 daniel___ | hi guys! i have a little problem with bitbake: the sanity checker reports long filename error. (Failed to create a file with a long name in XYZ. Please use a filesystem that Jun 08 21:38:52 | does not unreasonably limit filename length) Jun 08 21:38:54 21:15:07 daniel___ | could I ignore it or should I solve it somehow? Jun 08 21:39:35 well i will asume you are doing this on an fat32 formated drive? Jun 08 21:39:54 try ext2 or 3 or 4 Jun 08 21:41:45 not Jun 08 21:41:54 hm actually its ext4 Jun 08 21:42:06 its a fresh ubuntu Jun 08 21:43:00 how could I ignore it by the way? my sanity.conf don't say too much about that :( Jun 08 21:48:20 oh, okay, its late tonight, sanity.conf has been documented exactly as needed. touching a new sanity.conf ignores this annoying break Jun 08 21:48:57 I still wonder why can't make long files on my system Jun 09 01:46:16 pb_: around? Jun 09 01:46:29 any idea about this disassembly? http://paste.debian.net/173593/ Jun 09 01:46:41 this is the invalid instruction **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jun 09 02:59:59 2012