**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Feb 14 03:00:00 2013 Feb 14 08:20:42 good morning Feb 14 08:33:48 Goodmorning Feb 14 08:34:51 Do I need a (1000kB) libX11.so.6.3.0 in a core-image-minimal-mtdutils? Feb 14 08:36:48 xtrange Feb 14 08:37:47 tsjsieb: enable buildhistory and check what is pulling that to image Feb 14 08:40:52 JaMa: thanks for the suggestion, it's running now Feb 14 08:45:46 note that after the packaging split mtd-utils is very small now, you need to add -jffs2 and -ubifs separately Feb 14 08:46:23 JaMa: hello. Have you recently built uclibc ? Feb 14 08:51:15 ant_work: the ubifs and jffs2 tools seem to be standard available in the image though Feb 14 08:55:46 then you are pulling them from somewhere, machine.conf maybe Feb 14 08:57:25 ant_work: I never built uclibc Feb 14 08:58:22 me too since I'm using oe-core Feb 14 08:58:45 I'll fire a build to test that eabi/armv4 stuff Feb 14 09:02:23 80 libx11_6 -> libc6; Feb 14 09:02:25 81 libx11_6 -> libxau6; Feb 14 09:02:27 82 libx11_6 -> libxcb1; Feb 14 09:02:29 83 libx11_6 -> libxdmcp6; Feb 14 09:02:47 Is this what I'm looking for, or is this the wrong way around? Feb 14 09:03:02 (I guess the latest, if I try to think about it) Feb 14 09:03:37 yes later Feb 14 09:03:40 dbus_1 -> libx11_6; Feb 14 09:04:03 seems to be the cause Feb 14 09:04:09 yes Feb 14 09:04:23 there was dbus-x11 as separate package before Feb 14 09:04:43 I don't remember the reasons to merge it back to main dbus package Feb 14 09:08:03 This looks like where it got back in: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded-core/commit/?id=c02364f36e228835ea5d7fd4e1d347fd451f8544 Feb 14 09:10:04 tsjsieb: yes, it also explains what to do to create smaller image Feb 14 09:10:25 creating a custom distro, without x11? Feb 14 09:13:23 Y Feb 14 09:13:54 or just define DISTRO_FEATURES without x11 in local.conf Feb 14 09:20:19 nobody has problem updating busybox with opkg ? Feb 14 09:27:15 does anyone know where jalimo overlay is these days - jalimo.org seems gone Feb 14 11:21:22 What is the standard way to compile some home-brew software? I already have the bitbake files and added them to bblayer.conf. Is this the way it is suppose to be? Feb 14 11:21:42 I added them to BBFILES in bblayer.conf Feb 14 11:26:57 AppleJuice read the docu about layers Feb 14 11:27:02 and look at other layers Feb 14 11:55:22 I made my own layer now, and my recipes are being found. Thanks. Feb 14 12:14:16 What are layers anyway? And why are they needed? Feb 14 12:24:18 AppleJuice: layers are sets of configuration data that implement support for features or platforms that are not common to all systems. Feb 14 12:29:03 Do .bb files always belong to a layer? Feb 14 12:31:30 suihkulokki: www.openembedded.org -> layer index Feb 14 12:41:08 AppleJuice: yes Feb 14 13:14:35 pb_: you are building uclibc images, isn't? Feb 14 13:27:28 * stefan_schmidt_w hides Feb 14 13:29:27 ant_work: I made some earlier this week Feb 14 13:29:52 ah, ok. just TCLIBC = "uclibc" ? Feb 14 13:30:07 what about USE_NLS stuff? Feb 14 13:31:06 I just changed TCLIBC Feb 14 13:31:42 I see, thx Feb 14 13:31:55 but then I only built core-image-minimal plus some of my ptest packages Feb 14 13:32:31 so it wasn't a very comprehensive uclibc test Feb 14 13:34:41 np, I just need to build some armv4 binaries and test "export CC_armv4_linux-uclibceabi" Feb 14 13:42:50 Does anyone know how to remove the Linux kernel uImage from a core-image-minimal? Feb 14 13:44:03 (as a kernel is not very usefull in a initramfs, wich I want to embed in my kernel) Feb 14 13:47:03 tsjsieb: easie to define your image.bb for the cpio Feb 14 13:49:32 ant_work: you mean by defining an image.bb in INITRAMFS_IMAGE? Feb 14 13:50:01 yes Feb 14 13:50:15 and populate it as you like Feb 14 13:50:45 but why wont that still fill in the /boot/uImage*? Feb 14 13:51:12 or will the kernel.bbclass strip that out of the used cpio? Feb 14 13:51:49 no Feb 14 13:52:29 check this out (cpio is 70KiB) Feb 14 13:52:30 http://cgit.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-initramfs/recipes-bsp/images/initramfs-kexecboot-image.bb Feb 14 13:53:30 the image is 'almost' empty, some empty dirs are still slipping in Feb 14 13:57:58 btw I'm wondering whether RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "" would help Feb 14 13:58:51 long ago we forced the kernel in /boot doing RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "kernel-image" Feb 14 13:59:25 afaik it's superseded now Feb 14 13:59:48 ant_work: right Feb 14 14:00:27 hello pb_ Feb 14 14:07:30 the comment still seems to exist: Feb 14 14:07:32 255 RDEPENDS_kernel = "kernel-base" Feb 14 14:07:34 256 # Allow machines to override this dependency if kernel image files are Feb 14 14:07:36 257 # not wanted in images as standard Feb 14 14:07:38 258 RDEPENDS_kernel-base ?= "kernel-image" Feb 14 14:37:55 but RDEPENDS_kernel-base = "" doesn't seem to prevent it indeed Feb 14 14:57:48 gm all Feb 14 15:00:29 hi likewise Feb 14 20:22:57 hello, i am a newbie starting to play around with embedded linux. I got a few short questions. 1) i need different compilers/settings for arm with linux and arm without linux? Feb 14 20:24:00 eg. arm-none-gnueabi-gcc and arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc ? Feb 14 20:31:58 wuwu its only name Feb 14 20:32:09 what matters how it was configured and compiled Feb 14 21:01:01 I installed libudev-dev on an image thinking it would also install libudev Feb 14 21:01:08 but, it did not .... Feb 14 21:10:38 hm Feb 14 21:35:16 khem: ouch..uclibc fails badly on armv4 Feb 14 21:35:49 gen_unwindbuf.c:1:0: warning: target CPU does not support THUMB instructions [enabled by default] Feb 14 21:36:02 ./include/bits/arm_asm.h:31:4: error: #error Use of BX was requested, but is not available on the target processor. Feb 14 21:43:23 ant hm maybee its wrong configured Feb 14 21:44:41 hm.. it starts with ./include/bits/arm_asm.h:31:4: error: #error Use of BX was requested Feb 14 21:45:37 seems uclibc has different linker flags Feb 14 21:47:24 woglinde: I was so happy eglibc and klibc are producing valid bins :p Feb 14 22:02:17 ant_home: you need to choose the right CPU Feb 14 22:02:40 if its 920T or 926T Feb 14 22:02:54 it's strongarm, no thumbs Feb 14 22:02:54 and USE_BX config option Feb 14 22:03:04 ok hmm Feb 14 22:03:14 it could be one of those untested combos Feb 14 22:03:18 for eabi, just interworking Feb 14 22:04:53 hm, in configmangle Feb 14 22:04:56 ${@["","s,.*COMPILE_IN_THUMB_MODE.*,COMPILE_IN_THUMB_MODE=y,;"][d.getVar("ARM_INSTRUCTION_SET", True) != "arm"]} \ **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Feb 15 02:59:58 2013