**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri May 24 02:59:58 2013 May 24 04:10:10 HI May 24 04:10:22 i am trying to run opkg install soomepackage May 24 04:10:30 then its giving opkg_conf_load could not create lock file May 24 04:10:38 please can any one help me how can i install ipk May 24 04:10:48 using opkg May 24 04:10:59 i mounted rootfs into some temp folder May 24 04:11:09 its looking for /usr/lib/opkg actual system May 24 04:11:43 are you root? May 24 04:26:59 yes May 24 04:27:07 sudo i can May 24 04:59:12 kmd, what distro and version? May 24 05:45:47 Ka6sox: latest oe-core May 24 05:46:59 readonly filesystem is other thing that comes to mind May 24 05:48:53 means i didnt get May 24 07:14:55 Ka6sox please can u help May 24 07:16:01 kmd, I'm about to head off to sleep...after midnight here. but what you are describing is a permissions issue, either RO or not enough permissions to get the lock. May 24 07:19:08 k May 24 07:57:15 morning all May 24 08:12:17 morning all, hi bluelightning, all May 24 08:14:11 hi silvio_ May 24 08:50:29 some suggest on how to check IO on disk in the system? I m trybg with iotop nmon htop systat and lsof, but seams that only the journaled do something May 24 09:09:23 good morning all May 24 09:45:58 hi all May 24 09:48:32 hi pb_, mckoan May 24 10:51:11 bluelightning: good morning May 24 11:09:23 hi mckoan , pb_ May 24 11:31:02 anybody happen to have a recipe for libwebp on hand? May 24 11:31:08 oe-core doesn't have it and neither apparently does meta-oe May 24 11:37:17 have you tried layerindex? May 24 11:40:04 yes, "no matching recipes in database" May 24 11:42:44 ah well, I've created my own now. turns out to be fairly trivial. May 24 11:43:52 I have based my image on the angstrom console-base-image until now, but moving from denzil to The Future I want to get rid of stuff I don't need. What image is the best starting point for a non-X image? May 24 11:45:26 console-image-lsb, or core-image-base, perhaps? May 24 11:46:10 I doubt you want anything with "lsb" in the name. May 24 11:47:34 pb_: ok. I seem to recall using task-base-lsb (or something like that) in the past to get !busybox-variants of tools May 24 11:49:49 I think core-image-basic would give you that but without the extra lsb baggage. May 24 11:51:00 * pb_ -> lunch May 24 13:15:41 Hello friends, I am facing issue after executing bitbake command as "FATAL: No valid toolchain in PATH" . From the same shell, I can access the toolchain. May 24 13:17:18 Even the $PATH variable too contains the cross compile tool chain path May 24 13:18:20 good_day: reopen a new shell, write down each command you do, pastebin them please May 24 13:18:25 ~pastebin May 24 13:18:25 A "pastebin" is a web-based service where you should paste anything over 3 lines so you don't flood the channel. Here are links to a few: http://www.pastebin.com, http://pastebin.ca, http://channels.debian.net/paste, http://paste.lisp.org, http://bin.cakephp.org/; or install pastebinit with yum or aptitude. May 24 13:21:48 mckoan: Thanks for suggesting http://pastebin.com/gtg2f74w May 24 13:26:39 good_day: the proper way to setup a OE build sistem is ". ./oe-init-build-env" and to setup a OE toolchain is calling its environment setup like ". /opt/poky/1.4/environment-setup-armv5te-poky-linux-gnueabi" May 24 13:28:28 good_day: BTW seems you are using a custom/prebuilt external toolchain May 24 13:28:40 mckoan: okey. So you mean instead of #source setup command I have to execute as #. ./setup ? May 24 13:28:54 mckoan: Yes, I am using custom prebuild external toolchain May 24 13:29:18 good_day: I don't know the content of your setup file May 24 13:29:25 good_day: so use external toolchain support May 24 13:29:37 TCMODE = "external" or sth like that May 24 13:29:51 good_day: sorry, I see your setup May 24 13:31:22 mckoan: NP.. :-) May 24 13:32:57 good_day: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZpKbSHRJro May 24 13:33:11 looking May 24 13:43:56 mckoan: thanks for sharing.. Let me get it complete and share if I have any concern May 24 13:52:37 good_day: yw May 24 17:44:12 so, we have a concern about non-packagegroup-base-based images not including the bits needed to support the MACHINE_FEATURES, I wonder if there's a more flexible way of handling that **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat May 25 02:59:57 2013