**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue May 28 03:00:00 2013 May 28 04:55:19 #quit May 28 08:05:57 morning all May 28 08:17:39 morning May 28 08:24:36 bluelightning: can you take a look at http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/50451/ patch? May 28 08:25:09 hrw: looks fine to me May 28 09:04:39 morning all May 28 09:04:57 JaMa: ^^ May 28 09:13:12 morning May 28 09:13:20 hi JaMa phdeswer May 28 09:13:21 hrw: it's in in-test queue for jenkins May 28 09:13:43 JaMa: cool, thanks May 28 09:14:07 hi hrw! May 28 09:15:47 ericben: I've 2 commits for dylan, do you prefer commit ids like otavio is sending or normal pull request? May 28 09:18:13 it is OE_BUILD_TMPDIR that should decide where my tmpdir is placed, isn't it? May 28 09:18:53 In my env I have src/angstrom-setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_v2013_06, but when I build it puts it in src/angstrom-setup-scripts/build/tmp-angstrom_v2012_12 May 28 09:19:17 though nothing in my environment mentions _v2012_12 May 28 09:30:35 hi JaMa May 28 09:30:55 JaMa: either commit ids or pull request are fine May 28 09:31:09 did someone here tried to build target gcc with libunwind? May 28 09:31:28 JaMa: thanks for merging qt5 patches fast. If I follow I only need to rework the font patch now ? May 28 09:32:12 hrw: not here May 28 09:33:27 aha, a leftover in site.conf May 28 09:38:36 ericben: yes only font one May 28 09:38:54 ericben: and if it's not in qt5 directory then ARCHDATA variable is not the right one May 28 09:40:27 someone use mailx, msmtp or sendmail on OE? May 28 10:58:55 ericben: dylan branch created (with revision before today's changes so we can test them more in master) May 28 10:59:13 ericben: and check that pull-request, I've updated it with 5.0.1/5.0.0 drop and smaller changes May 28 12:42:20 hi all May 28 12:53:07 JaMa: pull request seems fine for me May 28 13:01:41 ericben: for some reason 0001-Fix-hardfloat-detection.patch fails to apply in 5.0.2 now, I'm checking it now May 28 13:03:16 ericben: it looks like resolved in 5.0.2 May 28 13:03:19 JaMa: v2 for font patch sent May 28 13:04:47 JaMa: strange I'm building 5.0.2 with that May 28 13:05:28 commit cbd9ec0defc2558d32ddfd44fe22c1af9c7a36e7 May 28 13:05:28 Author: Sergio Martins May 28 13:05:28 Date: Wed Feb 20 22:34:46 2013 +0000 May 28 13:05:40 this is included in 5.0.2 May 28 13:06:09 I don't understand why this worked until now May 28 13:08:05 and QT_QMAKE_PATH variable wasn't used in fonts v2 patch May 28 13:08:28 hi pb_ May 28 13:08:48 ericben: I'll update it locally, because I want to start another _git build now May 28 13:09:44 JaMa: here is my log.do_patch http://pastebin.com/AMvbGazT May 28 13:10:10 JaMa: QT_QMAKE_PATH for what ? seems I missed something :-( May 28 13:13:43 ericben: for FILES variables and do_install_append May 28 13:13:58 JaMa: OK so I missed that request May 28 13:14:06 are you sure it was 5.0.2 build? May 28 13:14:20 I'll update it.. I've already started May 28 13:14:51 JaMa: yes but before that was fetching qtjsbackend-opensource-src-5.0.2.tar.xz and now you fetch from git May 28 13:15:39 I had that : 5.0.2-r0.0/ now thats : 5.0.2+gitAUTOINC+c97afb08eb28ce36f726fe427556622790a287c1-r0.0/ May 28 13:16:18 mmm strange seems I'm on git now sorry I'm tired. I try again ;-) May 28 13:17:28 in your patchset now bot git and 5.0.2 have DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" : is that expected ? May 28 13:19:20 JaMa: so hardfloat patch is not needed for git that's sure May 28 13:24:09 ericben: qt5-version.inc sets PREFERRED_VERSION, so 5.0.2 should be used, but you're right, I'll drop D_P now May 28 13:24:14 JaMa: 2 patches sent and I confirm hardfloat patch applies on 5.0.2 fine. May 28 13:24:30 ericben: I've updated that pull-request with fonts v3 May 28 13:24:37 JaMa: true but in my case I'm not using qt5-version.inc ;-) May 28 13:25:54 JaMa: OK now that I see the patch I understand what you mean with OE_QMAKE_PATH_LIBS should sleep more and drink less coffee ;-) May 28 13:26:34 pull-request updated and D_P dropped, thanks for reporting it May 28 13:26:49 JaMa: and you will also need this one "qtjsbackend: hardfloat patch is only needed for 5.0.2" May 28 13:27:00 else git will fail May 28 13:27:26 I'm going to rebuild it again but do_patch fails here on this patch for BOTH 5.0.2 and probably git May 28 13:28:38 ah sorry, now I need more coffee or sleep :) May 28 13:29:14 ~curse libunwind May 28 13:29:14 May you be reincarnated as a Windows XP administrator, libunwind ! May 28 13:30:45 that's harsh May 28 13:30:52 JaMa: I'm currently rebuilding it with 5.0.2 and it works. also I checked in jsbackend's git and : http://pastebin.com/K6hYAXYR May 28 13:31:13 JaMa: OK fine ;-) May 28 13:32:53 ericben: for some reason I had "2766d05 [V8] Cleanup hardfp ABI detection. This work was triggered by issue 2140." in my local 5.0.2 branch **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue May 28 14:16:22 2013 May 28 16:20:27 which mailing list is the correct one for mentioning that php is being built without support for dlopen May 28 16:25:13 gchiii: openembedded-devel May 28 16:25:24 gchiii: is this standalone php or modphp? May 28 16:26:22 standalone May 28 16:27:22 ok May 28 16:29:18 I have hacked it so that the PHP_CHECK_FUNC(dlopen is skipped and ac_cv_func_dlopen is set to yes, which seems to work, but i'm not even sure if that is the right way to handle it May 28 16:50:14 gchiii: can you set ac_cv_func_dlopen in a site config file to avoid the check? May 28 16:50:51 i.e. site/* May 28 16:51:01 that's typically how we handle such things May 28 16:51:04 bb all May 28 16:57:32 bluelightning: it seems like a patch would still be needed, because the PHP_CHECK_FUNC is called before the test for ac_cv_func_dlopen May 28 16:59:53 bluelightning: should I be creating a site config file in my own layer, or do I modify an existing one in another layer? May 28 17:02:29 gchiii: it's probably not worth bothering with the site config if a patch is needed anyway I would say May 28 17:03:38 but typically you would add a line to the appropriate site config in OE-Core even if the recipe in question is in another layer (AFAIK) May 28 17:05:46 bluelightning: thanks May 28 17:15:15 does oe classic deal with git submodules? May 28 19:24:29 awozniak: do you mean, does bitbake handles submodules? May 28 19:24:38 awozniak: http://patches.openembedded.org/patch/46703/ May 28 19:26:42 wmat: yes **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed May 29 02:59:58 2013