**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jun 19 02:59:58 2013 Jun 19 03:04:03 if multiple .bbappend file are there in multiple layers then which ine will be appended to original .bb file?? Jun 19 03:04:18 all of them Jun 19 04:31:38 if multiple .bbappend file are there in multiple layers then which ine will be appended to original .bb file?? Jun 19 04:40:52 Sj__ all of them Jun 19 04:41:41 ohh ok.. thnq fray Jun 19 07:32:40 good morning Jun 19 08:11:05 good morning mckoan and all Jun 19 08:13:10 hi silviof, mckoan, all Jun 19 08:13:32 Hello guys Jun 19 08:16:55 Hi Jun 19 08:17:08 n non-existent task do_packagedata Jun 19 08:17:16 gcc-runtime_4.7.bb depends upon non-existent task do_packagedata Jun 19 08:17:29 wht its depending on toolchain? Jun 19 08:17:45 did any changes need to do in toolchain to resolve this Jun 19 08:18:00 i think do_packagedata recently added Jun 19 08:18:13 can any one help how i can resolve this issue? Jun 19 08:19:17 kj: er... that is a strange error - do_packagedata is defined in package.bbclass so it should be available for every recipe Jun 19 08:20:02 yes.. i checked the class its there definition Jun 19 08:20:10 but still i am getting error Jun 19 08:20:46 Task do_package_write_ipk in /gcc/gcc-runtime_4.7.bb depends upon non-existent task do_packagedata in external-rpi-toolchain.bb Jun 19 08:21:00 this is my actual error Jun 19 08:21:06 sorry Jun 19 08:21:13 ya Jun 19 08:22:14 kj: well.. if you're defining your own external toolchain, you may be on your own Jun 19 08:23:17 means for externel tool chain do i need to change any thing? Jun 19 08:25:13 please can tell me like if i use externel tool chain what is dependency for package class Jun 19 08:25:24 hi all, I have a little confusion about Yocto 1.4 and systemd layer. There was a discussion on going about future of systemd layer. Can someone please share more helpful information? Jun 19 08:25:46 I guess with Yocto 1.4 we still need systemd layer, correct? Jun 19 08:27:56 mshakeel: ask in #yocto Jun 19 08:31:42 mshakeel: required for some images/layers but not others Jun 19 08:32:21 don't know about "future plans" but i'm building without it now Jun 19 09:04:36 morning everybody! Any patchwork administrator in here? Jun 19 09:04:43 Don't know exactly why; probably because I've sent a first patch with wrong email name, but I'm getting just my first name instead of my full name in patchwork, although patch in the ml is correct Jun 19 09:04:59 example. Patch: http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-devel/2013-June/091109.html Patchwork: http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/51921/ Jun 19 09:06:15 kj: honestly it is not an area I'm familiar with Jun 19 09:07:08 mshakeel: it shouldn't be necessary unless you need to support the package upgrade path from the old package names provided by meta-systemd Jun 19 09:56:02 Hey ho Jun 19 09:56:35 someone ever tried chromium 29 to compile and run for/on armv7a? Jun 19 09:57:43 bluelightning: we noticed that some recipes still has systemd support in meta-systemd like lighttpd, rpcbind and busybox Jun 19 09:58:04 if we send the updated patch will that be included in dyln branch Jun 19 10:00:43 Noor: there's a bug open related to evaluating what's left there - https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4420 Jun 19 10:01:15 Noor: patches welcome, but they need to go into master first, then we can evaluate whether they are suitable for dylan Jun 19 10:02:22 bluelightning: OK ... we will work on that .... we are using dyln so probably we need those patches on dyln as well ... we will communicate that in the patches. Jun 19 10:02:42 and thaks for bugzilla entry Jun 19 10:19:16 morning all Jun 19 10:29:30 hi pb_ Jun 19 10:44:57 hi bluelightnign Jun 19 10:45:02 bluelightning, also Jun 19 11:13:14 anyone here who have testet meta-qt5 on a !X/!Wayland system? Jun 19 11:59:20 HI Jun 19 11:59:33 Task do_package_write_ipk in /gcc/gcc-runtime_4.7.bb depends upon non-existent task do_packagedata in in my externel toolchain Jun 19 11:59:59 do_packagedata is it added recently? Jun 19 12:00:34 can any one sujjest wht all changes needed for externel tool chain with respct to above mentioned error with do_packagedata Jun 19 13:20:27 bluelightning: ping Jun 19 13:20:35 wmat: pong Jun 19 13:21:14 bluelightning: was wondering if you've had a chance to look at the new manual layout that's in the wmat branch of bitbake? Jun 19 13:21:33 wmat: not yet, but I will try to do so today Jun 19 13:21:48 bluelightning: I was hoping to get your opinion on the layout of the metadata chapter in particular Jun 19 13:22:17 bluelightning: I can see it growing to the point where it may need to be split into separate chapters Jun 19 13:23:56 bluelightning: note that it's not complete yet, but the outline is there Jun 19 13:25:28 bluelightning: also, i have questions around hello world examples, but I'll do that via bitbake-devel Jun 19 13:29:50 wmat: ok, I'll concentrate on the metadata chapter Jun 19 13:30:01 bluelightning: thx Jun 19 13:30:27 and yes bitbake-devel would be a good place for specific questions Jun 19 13:30:35 bluelightning: also, I'm going to ping you weekly from now on for reviews as the writing is beginning to flow Jun 19 13:30:51 wmat: ok, sounds good Jun 19 14:21:18 bluelightning: does a BitBake architecture diagram exist? Jun 19 14:21:56 wmat: I don't think there is such a diagram, no Jun 19 14:22:18 didn't think so, thx Jun 19 14:25:07 bluelightning: is the yoctoproject generating html for the documentation? E.g. a more current link than this http://pokylinux.org/doc/poky-handbook.html#platdev-appdev-external-sdk would be nice. :) Jun 19 16:51:34 moin Jun 19 17:12:56 hi all! i copied qemuarm.conf in qemubeaglebone.conf, now i would like to edit it in order to get a beaglexm machine when running 'runqemu' (default is versatilepb), can anyone help me please? thank you very much! Jun 19 17:31:30 no one? Jun 20 01:23:50 hii Jun 20 01:24:10 How to list all package names using bitbake? any command ? Jun 20 01:24:38 i need only names.. i have used bitbake --show-versions but it is showing version info which i don;t want Jun 20 02:08:33 sorry for the newbie question, but what does the .= operator mean in a configuration file? Ex: BBPATH .= ":${LAYERDIR}" Jun 20 02:08:49 from that example I read it as appending to the end of BBPATH, but that would be =+ Jun 20 02:42:09 jayemar, I believe a space is inserted with the .= forms Jun 20 02:47:21 Crofton, thanks. I think maybe =. is also a pure string append whereis += will expand any regular expressions before appending Jun 20 02:47:45 or so that's the conclusion I came to by looking up those operators on symbolhound, and it seems to make sense given the context **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jun 20 02:59:59 2013