**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Nov 26 02:59:58 2013 Nov 26 04:36:17 hi all, looks like the gmane.org mailing list archive is broken? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core Nov 26 10:11:08 morning all Nov 26 10:29:01 koen: after the DEFAULTTUNE fixes in meta-angstrom I get this compile error on libgles-omap3. http://pastebin.com/gG6atVXW. Nov 26 10:29:58 don't know if it is because of something wrong with my MACHINE, or if it's broken for others as well Nov 26 10:35:00 tasslehoff: you need to get the new gles binaries Nov 26 10:35:04 different ABI used Nov 26 10:40:52 koen: ah. is there a bitbake command to clean out downloads for a recipe? Nov 26 10:41:30 force and fetch, maybe Nov 26 10:42:13 it's a different version, no point in cleaning downloads Nov 26 10:46:44 tasslehoff: cleanall Nov 26 10:47:07 (bitbake -c cleanall) Nov 26 10:48:29 ensc|w: thanks Nov 26 10:50:22 koen: do I have to change a url? Nov 26 10:51:06 or is there no new gles binary for Graphics_SDK_setuplinux_4_05_00_03.bin for us living in the past Nov 26 10:51:56 tasslehoff: http://tigraphics.blogspot.nl/2013/11/4q-2013-linux-graphics-sdk-release.html Nov 26 11:30:40 koen: I should be able to use that one for omap3530? Nov 26 11:37:47 haven't tried it yet Nov 26 11:42:01 koen: ok. I don't thing I have chosen 4.05.00.03 by myself, so that perhaps means that this is a breakage that should be fixed upstream? Nov 26 11:43:29 dunno Nov 26 13:26:44 Hi Nov 26 13:27:48 is it ok to skip rpaths, INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = 'rpaths" Nov 26 13:28:05 does it affect the image i built? Nov 26 18:32:42 JaMa: any more comments on qt5 sdk patches? Nov 26 18:42:04 denix: no not yet, but I haven't tested them or reviewed them properly yet Nov 26 18:43:52 JaMa: ok. ping me if you have any questions. like I said, it has been tested for weeks and should be quite stable... Nov 26 18:58:55 denix: ok, I'm very busy now and will be for next few days maybe weeks, so I hope that at least few people from https://github.com/meta-qt5/meta-qt5/wiki/SDK will comment, have you tried 5.2.0-beta1 already? That's also something I won't be able to work on now.. Nov 26 18:59:19 I mean the jansa/5.2.0-beta1 branch, it should build OK (except webkit-examples iirc) Nov 26 19:00:23 JaMa: 5.2-beta was the next thing I was going to look at Nov 26 19:05:58 JaMa: we are all busy :) from what I can see on SDK wiki page - there were people who was interested in SDK, but not many who did work (except one pull request). Nov 26 19:06:52 JaMa: unfortunately, I don't have time to monitor irc, github or anything else. I barely have time for the mailing list - if there are any comments, I'll try to address them. Nov 26 19:07:04 * mr_science makes a mental note to look at that wiki page... Nov 26 19:14:44 if there's someone not extremely busy I'd appreciate some newbie pointers about meta-qt5 layer.... AIUI there's no "cross-qmake" (meta-toolchain-qt5) available, and my target doesn't seem to have a qmake on it either (for native builds).... is there a way of actually building qt applications againt the version built by the layer or do I need to not use meta-qt5 and build qt5 on my own if I need a quick and dirty solution? Nov 26 19:17:00 fatal: that's what we are talking here - qt5 sdk. I submitted patches yesterday to oe-devel list for that Nov 26 19:17:07 it's amazing how often that questio is coming up Nov 26 19:17:08 denix: nice Nov 26 19:18:50 kergoth: thanks. hopefully those people who ever asked about it would be able to comment on the patches... :) Nov 26 19:19:36 hehe, indeed Nov 26 19:19:45 denix: yes few people said that they are almost done, but you and that pull-request are only 2 who actually sent something, thanks for that Nov 26 19:20:16 * JaMa is stuck with 5.0.0 version and no need for SDK :) Nov 26 19:20:54 JaMa: 5.0.0 :) I'm waiting for 5.2 to be released... Nov 26 19:21:52 JaMa: how do you use it without sdk? Nov 26 19:22:42 fatal: build all qt apps from oe/yocto Nov 26 19:24:10 denix: spotted your 2 patches (that's all?) ... will look at them more tomorrow, but I guess they are too cutting edge for me... I'm also using ancient versions (toradex has 3.1 kernel etc.) Nov 26 19:24:29 denix: btw: I've just noticed warning about missing PREFERRED_PROVIDER in world builds, is meta-oe/recipes-devtools/ltp-ddt/ltp-ddt_0.0.4.bb really replacement for normal ltp (as it has ltp in PROVIDES)? Nov 26 19:25:04 denix: ok, so if I write proper recepies I'll be able to build the qt apps... thanks for the hint. Nov 26 19:25:23 fatal: 2 patches are the first set of nativesdk tools. I'll submit the meta-toolchain recipe separately soon Nov 26 19:26:15 denix: I haven't seen anything with build time dependency on ltp in meta-oe/oe-core repos, maybe the PROVIDES isn't needed at all Nov 26 19:26:21 JaMa: yes, it is a fork of ltp with the addition of device-driver testing. although, it's need updating, as the one in meta-oe is quite old. we have newer in meta-arago... Nov 26 19:26:55 huh, ltp-ddt sounds interesting Nov 26 19:32:23 kergoth, JaMa: http://arago-project.org/git/projects/?p=test-automation/ltp-ddt.git;a=blob;f=README-DDT Nov 26 20:56:25 what is the status of systemd and OE? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Nov 27 03:00:00 2013