**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Dec 09 02:59:58 2013 Dec 09 08:37:10 Hello Dec 09 08:37:49 Can anyone tell me how I can know the targets name to include enlightenment to my distro ? Dec 09 09:00:28 Hi Dec 09 09:00:45 how to solve WARNING: QA Issue: Files/directories were installed but not shipped Dec 09 09:00:52 this warning message Dec 09 09:00:59 ?? Dec 09 09:16:37 boost12: either don't install the files during do_install, or package them by adding them to a FILES_ variable Dec 09 09:17:20 thanks @erbo Dec 09 09:57:51 morning all Dec 09 10:06:43 morning Dec 09 10:08:33 hi pwgen Dec 09 10:09:36 pwgen: btw, meta-ouya still seems to have stuff under conf/machine/include that don't look like they should be there Dec 09 10:14:56 .. removed .. this was for my old (20 years) siemens pentium mmx 200 computer. Dec 09 10:16:22 .. and yes, there is a lot of stuff not correct , but yesterday i could sucessful kexecboot the ouya .... Dec 09 10:17:33 is 'tune-cortexa8.inc' the best setting for a tegra3 cpu ? Dec 09 10:21:13 I'm not sure, perhaps someone else can confirm Dec 09 10:24:00 yes, tegra3 has neon, for the coretexa8 one works Dec 09 10:50:44 why not using tune-cortexa9.inc ? Dec 09 10:55:16 that would work as well Dec 09 10:56:14 i will try it .. ( hmm this needs recompile for toolchain ) later Dec 09 11:15:41 evening all Dec 09 11:39:45 does someone know a recipe that creates android flashable ( fastboot) images with abootimg ? Dec 09 12:12:49 PACKAGECONFIG[xyz] = = "--enable-xyz,--disable-xyz,xyz" Dec 09 12:12:57 mean what ? Dec 09 12:13:11 can anybody explain plz Dec 09 12:13:19 adiga: http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html#var-PACKAGECONFIG Dec 09 12:14:37 does adding a layer does anyting to build ? Or does it just provide additionnal recipes ? Dec 09 12:15:23 *do anything Dec 09 12:16:09 oswin: a layer could provide a bbappend that adds itself to existing recipes or packagegroups. that isn't good practise though, and normally they just add extra stuff that could be built. Dec 09 12:16:35 (meta-oe being a famous example of a layer that does have an impact when it's just added) Dec 09 12:18:14 rburton, ok thanks, and how can I know easily what a layer provides (images, packages, packagegroups, self adding, ...) ? Dec 09 12:19:03 oswin: using find? :) i think bitbake-layers has options for that. Dec 09 12:26:34 rburton, that's the answer I didn't wanted to see :D Ok for bitbake-layers, but it doesn't provide available distros nor images, am I right ? Dec 09 12:26:49 images are just recipes that inherit image Dec 09 13:05:21 http://pastebin.com/qw1ueE5y Dec 09 13:05:24 grrr Dec 09 13:05:40 I can build this kernel outside oe, buy failing in linux-yocto-custom Dec 09 13:06:01 anyone see a pattern here? Dec 09 13:07:15 make 3.82 issues Dec 09 13:07:22 disable those firmware Dec 09 13:07:27 s Dec 09 13:07:40 and the WHITEHEAT one Dec 09 13:08:55 or disable parallel make install Dec 09 13:09:29 Thanks rburton i got to knw what PACKAGECONFIG is. But In bb files PACKAGECONFIG[xyz] = = "--enable-xyz,--disable-xyz,xyz" is there. and in bbappend am adding EXTRA_OECONF += "--enable-xyz". but it not reflecting . can u please help? Dec 09 13:09:45 am i adding it correctly? Dec 09 13:14:09 koen, thanks Dec 09 13:14:49 adiga: no, if there's a PACKAGECONFIG[xyz] defined, you should add xyz to the value of PACKAGECONFIG to enable it Dec 09 13:16:41 has anyone experienced slowness running oe on a btrfs partition ? Dec 09 13:22:40 okay bluelightning, I ll try it. How to add in bbappend ?? using PACKAGECONFIG_append right. Dec 09 13:28:01 thanks alot bluelightning. it is reflecting now. Dec 09 13:28:33 adiga: np Dec 09 13:40:47 is there an meta-efl dev around here ? Just experienced compilation bug due to freetype and want to know if it is already reported/fixed Dec 09 13:58:37 JaMa: you may not have written the code, but I just noticed that icecc.bbclass is using "in" to check whether a blacklisted/whitelisted item equals ${PN}... which I think means that partial names will match erroneously Dec 09 13:58:59 JaMa: also the term "package" has been used when what is meant is "recipe" :( Dec 09 14:19:51 bluelightning: isn't it using "in" only with python lists? Dec 09 14:20:22 bluelightning: both blacklists are changed from strings to lists with split() if we're looking at the same code Dec 09 14:20:38 JaMa: e.g. I mean "if black in package_tmp" Dec 09 14:20:52 package_tmp does not seem to be a list Dec 09 14:21:10 oswin: I haven't seen any report about freetype+efl Dec 09 14:21:52 bluelightning: ah you're right Dec 09 14:22:26 bluelightning: I've somehow read those 2 lines (for cycle and next in) as one Dec 09 14:22:56 bluelightning: I don't know why it's not "if package_tmp in user_package_whitelist:" etc Dec 09 14:23:10 JaMa: that would make more sense to me Dec 09 14:23:14 (also) Dec 09 14:23:28 looks like someone really wanted partial match Dec 09 14:23:40 maybe to match all gcc* with only gcc in system blacklist Dec 09 14:23:56 but I agree that it should be changed to exact match and blacklist extended as needed Dec 09 14:31:20 right, it just seems too error-prone otherwise Dec 09 14:36:16 JaMa: is that something you would be able to take care of? Dec 09 14:41:57 bluelightning: I'll add it to my todo list Dec 09 14:42:04 JaMa: thanks Dec 09 14:43:01 pity that there is no documentation of reasons why some packages are in blacklist Dec 09 14:43:29 it will be difficult to confirm that all recipes which should be blacklisted stay blacklisted after the change Dec 09 14:43:38 s/packages/recipes/g :) Dec 09 14:44:31 JaMa: it wouldn't be hard to go through the list of targets (e.g. from bitbake -s) for one of your builds and check which would have been matched... Dec 09 14:44:47 would only need a trivial python script Dec 09 14:49:16 HI all, I am getting: ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the elf binary Dec 09 14:49:28 pb_: is there a good guide somewhere on how to solve that? ^ Dec 09 14:49:51 (sounds like it might be something you would know about) Dec 09 14:51:03 bluelightning: I'll start with empty blacklist, I mean maybe the issues are no longer there and I don't want to automatically blacklist all matching Dec 09 14:51:24 drasko: your recipe does not pass or respect LDFLAGS configured in OE Dec 09 14:51:45 JaMa, how to fix this? Dec 09 14:52:40 drasko: so your OE LDFLAGS have --hash-style=gnu or --hash-style=both but your binary doesn't have GNU_HASH Dec 09 14:52:52 any hints on this fail? http://pastebin.com/Sy6t9YKd Dec 09 14:52:56 drasko: JaMa: isn't one usual hack to do this? TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" Dec 09 14:52:56 drasko: depends on the recipe, if you're calling gcc directly then pass LDFLAGS Dec 09 14:53:45 that reminds me that I have fix for this in makedevs Dec 09 14:54:21 JaMa, recipe calls oe_runmake Dec 09 14:54:32 JaMa: right, well I wouldn't have a clue about appropriate blacklists for icecc I'm afraid Dec 09 14:54:47 bluelightning, tried adding TARGET_CC_ARCH += "${LDFLAGS}" Dec 09 14:54:51 it does not work Dec 09 14:56:06 drasko: I guess that only works for the way some recipes build... you'll have to debug it by looking more closely at the options being used for linking as JaMa suggested Dec 09 14:56:25 drasko: is this an existing recipe that's failing or one you've created? Dec 09 14:56:36 bluelightning, actually, after cleanall it worked ;) Dec 09 14:57:33 btw: this QA warning is effectively hidden in many recipes by new GCC passing default hash-style now Dec 09 15:01:12 sysroots/x86_64-linux $ usr/bin/cortexa8-vfp-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-gcc -dumpspecs | grep style Dec 09 15:01:15 %{!r:--build-id} %{!static:--eh-frame-hdr} --hash-style=gnu %{mbig-endian:%{march=armv7-a|mcpu=cortex-a5 |mcpu=cortex-a7 Dec 09 15:03:19 or better shown in gcc -v (--with-linker-hash-style=gnu option) Dec 09 15:05:54 today I can't fetch from git://git.freescale.com using Yocto, doing it manually with git clone works. Any clue? Dec 09 15:44:05 hi how to undo the ./mcf --command update ? Dec 09 15:46:09 santu: sorry, can you give more context? Dec 09 15:46:56 ./mcf --commad update can fetch the latest merge of meta-* folders from the git Dec 09 15:47:12 i want to undo the fetch done Dec 09 15:50:35 santu: mcf tool is specific for webos, don't expect support here Dec 09 15:50:44 ah, right, that explains that Dec 09 15:50:47 santu: and you cannot undo it easily Dec 09 15:51:16 Oh ok thanks Dec 09 15:51:19 santu: but you can checkout older build-webos revision and run it again Dec 09 15:51:41 Yeah im thinking of the same.. :) Dec 09 16:12:50 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 balister balister 12 Dec 9 10:54 /home/balister/src/oe-core/build/tmp-eglibc/work/odroid_xu-oe-linux-gnueabi/linux-odroid-xu/3.4+gitAUTOINC+b4f47247f5-r0/package/usr/src/kernel/drivers/gpu/arm/mali400/ump/arch/arch-release -> arch-release Dec 09 16:12:55 way to ruin may day Dec 09 16:23:15 hi. when there is a recipe in 2 different layers, which one is being used? highest PV or highest priority? Dec 09 16:25:15 ndec: in the absence of PREFERRED_VERSION - priority first, then PV Dec 09 16:25:29 ok, thanks! Dec 09 22:58:52 morning all Dec 09 23:54:37 morning pb_ Dec 10 00:00:23 hi florian **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Dec 10 02:59:58 2013