**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Jan 12 02:59:59 2014 Jan 12 18:52:39 hi, is there any possibility to skip checksum checking for a file downloading via src_uri? Jan 12 18:55:01 or at leasy get the checksum from server, instead of hardcoding it in the reicpe Jan 12 19:21:31 ccube, that sounds like a bad idea Jan 12 19:25:19 it is a binary, build by another buildhost Jan 12 19:25:36 kroon, and i need the most recent in my nightly build Jan 12 19:25:57 so any ideas making this another way are appreciated Jan 12 19:26:18 ccube, maybe use the source code repository instead, with auto inc. revision ? Jan 12 19:26:48 i would od so, if there were maven support for building, but i didnt find anything. Jan 12 19:27:02 or maybe its not accesible from svn/git/etc ? Jan 12 19:27:26 i can access it from git, but i need maven to build it Jan 12 19:31:51 sorry, i dont know much about maven Jan 12 19:31:58 kroon, I tried setting BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM to False, or 0, but this seems not to work Jan 12 19:32:42 and yes, I know ignoring it is a bad idea, but it should be possible, shouldnt it? Jan 12 19:33:14 ccube, even the option of allowing it sounds bad to me Jan 12 19:33:32 ccube, of course you can probably hack bitbake to skip the test Jan 12 19:35:07 did you still have a checksum in the recipe when you tried BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM ? Jan 12 19:35:35 maybe not, i am trying right now. do i have to? Jan 12 19:37:05 maybe with BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM=0 its only a warning if no checksum is present Jan 12 19:37:20 not really Jan 12 19:37:32 it is an error with no checksum present Jan 12 19:37:46 and an warning + an error with checksum present :/ Jan 12 19:38:22 aha Jan 12 19:38:35 weird Jan 12 19:38:42 should that be expected? Jan 12 19:39:01 makes sense to me Jan 12 19:39:35 not really in my opinion. so BB_STRICT_... option is useless. Jan 12 19:40:59 mmm yeah. that option seems a little strange Jan 12 19:42:09 it only toggles wether a recipe is required to have a checksum defined or not Jan 12 19:42:29 at least it looks like that to me Jan 12 19:42:32 not really Jan 12 19:42:54 setting it to false and deleting checksums also results in error message Jan 12 19:44:06 of course Jan 12 19:44:22 the checksum check is always there, and not affected by the STRICT option Jan 12 19:44:49 which makes the option kind of pointless it seems Jan 12 19:46:55 yea Jan 12 19:47:56 haha Jan 12 19:47:58 got it Jan 12 19:48:09 i have to unset the variable, instead of setting to false Jan 12 19:49:54 thx man! :) Jan 12 19:50:42 how did you type it ? Jan 12 20:49:02 kroon, BB_STRICT_CHECKSUM = "" Jan 12 20:55:18 ccube, aha Jan 12 22:36:51 what's the process for changes on master getting pulled back to release branches? prelink_git on dora needs src_uri to point to cross_prelink branch, which was done on master a month ago (https://github.com/openembedded/oe-core/commit/109166f1c0a84bcbbcd9d6adff7c16ddee08b08b#diff-a1c80db9bd549eb11f1c239c0f9c5440) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Jan 13 02:59:59 2014