**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Mar 26 02:59:59 2014 Mar 26 07:44:41 good morning Mar 26 08:03:51 morning Mar 26 08:06:24 The gstreamer 0.10.36 recipes in my wandboard and beagleboard trees are the same, but "bitbake gst-plugins-base" only gives me a glib plugin in the beagleboard tree. Mar 26 08:10:25 hm. NOTE: Not creating empty archive for gst-plugins-base-glib-0.10.36-r8 Mar 26 08:14:45 bah. the package is empty in my beagleboard build Mar 26 08:15:03 forget everything I said after "morning" Mar 26 08:50:46 mckoan, all, morning Mar 26 08:52:43 hi kroon Mar 26 09:15:50 morning everyone. Mar 26 09:16:08 Any python recipes expert in here? Mar 26 09:16:20 I wonder about the intention of bitbake always recreating a new image each time, even though no packages/metadata have been changed Mar 26 09:18:09 diego_r, probably lots of them Mar 26 09:18:18 diego_r, whats the problem ? Mar 26 09:20:52 hi kroon Mar 26 09:21:56 I have 2 question: 1) is it intended that python-twisted-core is not installed by the receipe python-twisted? Mar 26 09:22:22 2) I see receipes in http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/tree/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/python for python-autobahn and python-twisted are pretty outdated. Can I try updating to latest releases and submit patches, or is upgrading python receipes part of some bigger "monolitical" upgrade policy? Mar 26 09:26:57 diego_r, 1) from the look I had, yup it is intentionally split out into a separate package, but since I'm no expert on this I cant say wether or not python-twisted should have a RDEPENDS on python-twisted-core Mar 26 09:27:39 diego_r, 2) I think patches would be welcome Mar 26 09:28:35 koen: hi. Are you the author of this commit? http://git.openembedded.org/meta-openembedded/commit/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/python/python-twisted_10.2.0.bb?h=master-next&id=5c2d9841cd24561a8d2380c349c024cf43d9ba45 Mar 26 09:28:45 diego_r, for these type of questions I would also recommend you use the mailinglist for the meta-openembedded layer Mar 26 09:29:49 kroon: ok, thank you. Mar 26 10:23:26 if for "/usr/lib" I use ${libdir}, what should I use for "/usr/share"? Mar 26 10:23:54 are there documents explaining these kind of things? Mar 26 10:30:38 diego_r, at a first glance I couldn't find it in http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/ref-manual/ref-manual.html Mar 26 10:31:09 diego_r, but looking at other recipes I think its ${datadir} you want Mar 26 10:33:20 kroon: looking at other recipes I found out that too. Tried and it seems to work Mar 26 10:33:21 diego_r, which is set in bitbake.conf Mar 26 10:34:51 kroon: uuh. Thank you, that helps *a lot*. Mar 26 10:56:40 hi, iam using gitsm and it doesn't really work until i remove a line from gitsm.py Mar 26 10:57:12 if submodules: Mar 26 10:57:13 - runfetchcmd("cp -r " + ud.clonedir + "/modules " + ud.destdir + "/.git/", d) Mar 26 10:57:15 +# runfetchcmd("cp -r " + ud.clonedir + "/modules " + ud.destdir + "/.git/", d) Mar 26 10:57:16 runfetchcmd("git submodule init", d) Mar 26 10:58:00 what id this line for ? Mar 26 11:02:15 any ideas ? Mar 26 11:04:03 or is this the wrong plsce to ask questions regarding bitbake ? Mar 26 11:10:36 hmh, nobody here today ? Mar 26 14:08:42 Hi. Are github pull request allowed for meta-oe, or should I use "create-pull-request" script? Mar 26 14:25:33 create-pull-request is not creating cover letter it seems: http://pastebin.com/5qLU6asu Mar 26 14:25:50 Folder pull-14942 is empty Mar 26 15:00:54 RP: When you get some time, could you apply http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2014-March/090835.html ? Thanks. Mar 26 15:03:17 diego_r: no github pull requests, use the script or for smaller patchsets just git send-email (as README says) Mar 26 15:03:58 diego_r: you're probably missing -r and -b params Mar 26 15:04:50 diego_r: also try -r origin/master which is better because you don't need your local master branch first Mar 26 15:05:21 JaMa: thanks. that probably was it. Will try now Mar 26 15:06:24 joaohfreitas: its queued Mar 26 15:08:20 diego_r: so if these are my remotes, and my branches, and I worked and pushed "master" in github-fork, my create-pull-request should be: ../poky/scripts/create-pull-request -r github/master -u github-fork -p "meta-oe][PATCH" Mar 26 15:08:44 * diego_r mean to refer JaMa, not himself Mar 26 15:09:00 http://pastebin.com/ER9uC12t Mar 26 15:11:16 diego_r: -r is against which branch you're comparing Mar 26 15:11:43 so yes it looks ok Mar 26 15:12:47 using git log --oneline github/master..github-fork/master Mar 26 15:13:01 should confirm that it has the changes you plan to submit Mar 26 15:13:54 and it assumes that your local branch "master" is identical with github-fork/master Mar 26 15:18:16 JaMa: thanks for your help. Pull request sent. Mar 26 15:19:16 * diego_r swears. Forgot --signoff Mar 26 15:43:23 I would need to build u-boot when I create my image, i tried adding EXTRA_IMAGEDEPENDS += "u-boot" to my machine config but doesn't work, what is missing? Mar 26 21:04:45 what is the best way to add libraries to meta-toolchain-qt when generating a SDK? Mar 26 21:07:24 tried appending to RDEPENDS_${PN}, but that did not seem to do it Mar 26 21:16:02 cbrake: there are separate variables that control sdk generation in general, i expect that meta-toolchain-qt probably uses the same mechanisms as populate_sdk Mar 26 21:16:13 see the top of the populate sdk bbclass, iirc Mar 26 21:16:16 worth a shot, anyway Mar 26 21:41:56 kergoth: thanks, meta-toolchain-qt does inherit populate_sdk I think, so I'll check that out Mar 26 21:44:31 all meta-toolchain recipes should either disappear soon Mar 26 21:45:06 or be there just using populate_sdk task Mar 26 21:45:11 that's good news Mar 26 22:47:34 how annoyed would people be if I submit a patch to add a symlink in swig native-sdk to soft link swig2.0 to swig Mar 26 22:47:58 gnuradio's find swig hunts for the 2.0 version first, and finds one installed in "ubuntu" Mar 26 22:48:03 hilarity follows **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 27 02:59:58 2014