**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Sep 30 02:59:58 2014 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Sep 30 03:37:23 2014 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Sep 30 03:52:42 2014 **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Sep 30 04:01:58 2014 Sep 30 06:51:48 good morning Sep 30 08:34:19 morning all Sep 30 08:36:48 hi bluelightning Sep 30 08:36:54 hi mckoan Sep 30 08:41:42 gm bluelightning and mckoan Sep 30 08:41:50 hi woglinde Sep 30 09:31:27 does anything provide "host" in OE ? Sep 30 09:31:38 (apart from bind) Sep 30 09:33:03 I'd be surprised if busybox couldn't be made to if it doesn't already Sep 30 09:33:13 that's what I thought as well, but ... Sep 30 09:33:58 hmm, actually according to its docs, apparently it does not Sep 30 09:34:04 ;) Sep 30 09:34:05 or, cannot Sep 30 09:34:23 it has no dns resolution capabilities Sep 30 09:34:38 (apart from libc) Sep 30 09:35:38 ooh but there is good old nslookup in busybox Sep 30 10:23:09 I just realized that the way I add patches is completely wrong: Sep 30 10:23:21 I do a bitbake foo -c patch Sep 30 10:23:30 quilt new patch bar.patch Sep 30 10:23:36 quilt add somefile.c Sep 30 10:23:39 quilt refresh Sep 30 10:23:48 but then I get the following paths in the patch Sep 30 10:24:32 -- 1.0-r22.orig/repo/.../path/to/src/that/is/patched/somefile.c Sep 30 10:24:48 ++ 1.0-r22/repo/.../path/to/src/that/is/patched/somefile.c Sep 30 10:24:59 that PV & PR Sep 30 10:25:02 in the path Sep 30 10:25:05 what is that Sep 30 10:25:17 how could it ever work since those values change with each new build Sep 30 10:25:42 from where does bitbake expect the paths to be when you add patches Sep 30 10:25:45 from ${S}? Sep 30 10:26:05 or from ${WORKDIR} Sep 30 10:26:24 since the patches folder is located at ${WORKDIR}/patches Sep 30 10:27:04 in the previous example my ${S}="repo" Sep 30 10:27:08 one level above the source directory, since patches are effectively applied with -p1 by default Sep 30 10:27:58 can I add patches and specify -p1 somehow? Sep 30 10:28:28 for some reason it's locking in the folder above ${WORKDIR} even Sep 30 10:28:37 and that folder changes with each build Sep 30 10:28:49 or workdir changes Sep 30 10:28:58 I've not really used quilt much, I prefer the git-based workflow (which is covered in our manual) Sep 30 10:29:04 aah ok Sep 30 10:29:07 I will go read up on that Sep 30 10:29:12 I am adding my own patches though Sep 30 10:29:15 shit Sep 30 10:29:19 it's been wrong all this time Sep 30 10:29:26 no errors given Sep 30 10:29:37 I am scared to fix things now Sep 30 10:29:39 er Sep 30 10:29:48 all my patches contain custom workdirs Sep 30 10:29:52 I doubt you could have added a malformed patch without an error being given Sep 30 10:29:59 hold on a sec Sep 30 10:30:13 that 1.0-r22 Sep 30 10:30:23 being that we're applying effectively with -p1, the first directory of the path is ignored, it doesn't matter what it is Sep 30 10:30:25 it has since changed to something that looks like 1.0.1-r45 Sep 30 10:30:32 aah Sep 30 10:30:33 ok Sep 30 10:30:35 that helps Sep 30 10:30:38 don't panic ;) Sep 30 10:30:42 I'm panicing Sep 30 10:30:51 wow ok Sep 30 10:31:02 ok everything is cool then Sep 30 10:31:11 since my older patches to work Sep 30 10:31:20 ok i'm calm now Sep 30 10:32:02 aah thanks man Sep 30 10:32:08 I totally freaked out now Sep 30 10:53:44 3 Sep 30 11:42:33 is there any reason why we dont ship perl with Config_git.pl ? Sep 30 11:43:36 (Config_heavy.pl shipped with perl complains about it, dunno why it should bother) Sep 30 15:50:41 bluelightning ping Sep 30 16:00:34 woglinde: pong Sep 30 16:03:00 bl I would like to extend sdk_populate functions in an own layer where should I start Sep 30 16:06:22 woglinde: what kind of extensions are you making? Sep 30 16:08:19 bluelightning my customer sets TOOLCHAIN_OUTPUTNAME = "${SDK_NAME}-toolchain...-${DISTRO_VERSION}-${DATETIME} Sep 30 16:08:34 and wants me to set symlinks to ${SDK_NAME}-toolchain...-${DISTRO_VERSION} Sep 30 16:09:10 like images do Sep 30 16:09:27 so I need some hook into deploy_sdk-toolchain_something Sep 30 16:09:38 I do not want to copy the whole class Sep 30 16:09:50 but if nothing helps I have to Sep 30 16:09:53 ok let me have a look at the code Sep 30 16:10:39 thanks Sep 30 16:11:32 but I fear there is nothing which would load my snippet/fragment from the bsp layer Sep 30 16:14:12 hm ah okay Sep 30 16:14:26 there are some toolchain recipes in the bsp Sep 30 16:14:31 so I can hook into them Sep 30 16:22:49 woglinde: for the python side of things I don't think there is such a mechanism no Sep 30 16:23:08 but for something like this you might be able to do it via a postprocessing function Sep 30 16:26:03 bluelightning I think I will add an extra task make it similiar to the sdk_deploy_base_class Sep 30 16:26:12 looks promising so far Sep 30 16:26:43 it seems you could do do_populate_sdk_append() - that's a python function Sep 30 16:27:46 hm Sep 30 16:27:50 yes Sep 30 16:34:08 * kergoth runs across https://autotools.io/ Sep 30 16:35:01 * darknighte gets curious and opens kergoth's link Sep 30 16:38:12 kergoth hm good site Sep 30 16:38:27 seems like a nice alternative to digging through the official manuals Sep 30 16:38:31 kergoth: that doc came in handy when OE-core killed off binconfig scripts Sep 30 16:38:32 very helpful for autotools beginners Sep 30 16:38:47 ah, nice Sep 30 17:03:14 good works as expected Sep 30 17:34:49 khem, what prompted the libdivecomputer update? Sep 30 17:35:04 I really need to try running subsurface on an embedded board :) Sep 30 17:48:07 prolly glibc problems Sep 30 17:48:25 Crofton: didn't I show subsurface at ELC in 2012? Sep 30 17:48:54 tar: license-destdir/xz/generic_GPLv2: file changed as we read it in sstate_create_package. anyone else running into these? they keep breaking our jenkins builds Sep 30 17:55:12 koen, I think so Sep 30 17:55:25 I have much more interesting data for it now Sep 30 18:39:36 I'm seeing some host contamination using an sdk Sep 30 18:39:37 http://pastebin.com/ZGZ1PGm7 Sep 30 18:39:42 this ring a bell with anyone Sep 30 18:41:39 I've been pointed at this: https://github.com/archlinuxarm/PKGBUILDs/issues/255 Sep 30 18:44:25 Crofton: Fetch issues Sep 30 18:44:39 ah Sep 30 18:44:40 ok Sep 30 18:44:50 can you read the arch linux bug Sep 30 18:45:01 it looks like it is in our sdks Sep 30 18:45:15 just sont wondering if you had taken up diving Sep 30 18:50:20 hi Sep 30 18:51:11 Crofton: No heh, I am happy in swimming pools Sep 30 18:53:46 I had to link stubs-hard.h to stubs-soft.h (or vice versa) Sep 30 18:57:28 Crofton: thats wrong Sep 30 18:57:39 it means your build is defaulting to soft-float Sep 30 18:57:53 there might be bigger issues down the road even if it builds Sep 30 18:58:10 so make sure that CC has TOOLCHAIN_OPTIONS passed to component build systemd Sep 30 18:58:12 systemd Sep 30 18:58:16 urg good point Sep 30 18:58:18 heh Sep 30 18:58:30 I think the gnuradiop cmake is clubbing the CC var **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Oct 01 03:00:00 2014