**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Mar 25 02:59:58 2015 Mar 25 10:22:50 is there a way to resolve a recipe name to its created package name? I would like to use that in another recipe Mar 25 10:28:59 jaeckel no Mar 25 10:31:34 hmm, okay thx Mar 25 10:32:13 jaeckel hm or I misunderstood what you are trying to achieve Mar 25 10:32:28 using a .inc in another directory? Mar 25 10:40:14 as I can require or recommend recipes by their PN, I would like to resolve a recipe by its PN to the package that is created Mar 25 10:42:35 basically I have a recipe that creates my archive that can be installed, now I would like to include one generated rpm from a specific recipe Mar 25 10:43:18 currently it just takes the images/foo.tar and repackages that as rpm Mar 25 10:45:06 you want to include a rpm inside another package? Mar 25 10:45:41 yes Mar 25 10:52:07 why not install the rpm directly? Mar 25 10:59:36 can I somehow modify the "gitr" of autorev packages? Mar 25 16:58:11 I just found that we've been using udev without permission rules Mar 25 17:07:40 otavio any idea when that happened? Mar 25 17:09:32 mario-goulart: can you provide fray's info? Mar 25 17:10:08 last time I looked at udev in OE, I swear it was working correctly.. but that may have been back in YP 1.5? or even 1.3 days Mar 25 17:10:46 fray: cbea4ae33f42c1553ed99a7d3bada00ce68ff9fd looks a bit messy. Not really sure it started at that commit, but it's weird to say the least. Mar 25 17:10:59 Yeah, it's old (~5y ago) Mar 25 17:11:33 (commit from poky) Mar 25 17:12:08 I see group ones in that commit.. I assume everything else is root:root? Mar 25 17:12:20 or is it something in the init script or configuration? Mar 25 17:12:38 fray: some files are referenced in SRC_URI but not installed. Mar 25 17:12:43 ok Mar 25 17:13:01 except for local.rules, all the other .rules files are not being installed. Mar 25 17:13:10 I thought that was intentional Mar 25 17:13:24 we didn't want to litter the system w/ lots of rules, but instead set some basic ones that people could add to Mar 25 17:13:31 So why are those files in SRC_URI? Mar 25 17:13:42 I don't know that.. I would expect if they're in the SRC_URI they'd be used Mar 25 17:14:15 Me too. :-) Mar 25 17:14:17 I just remember an early udev discussion where we decided to not just re-use the default udev rules.. Mar 25 17:14:36 and tell people they needed machine specific rules above and beyond the small "embedded focused" core set of things Mar 25 17:14:48 I have no idea if that is still the case though Mar 25 17:15:03 I see. Mar 25 17:15:36 (similarly, devices not in the confgiuration, shouldn't have been created 'automatically' either.. so if thats happening w/ bad perms.. thats definitely outside of the original design) Mar 25 18:59:29 has anyone done an OE build on a non-x86 system? Mar 25 19:08:03 yes Mar 25 19:08:19 armv5teb worked ~9 years ago Mar 25 19:08:42 ppc worked ~7 years ago Mar 25 19:09:01 and x86_64 has worked for some time ;) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Mar 26 02:59:58 2015