**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Apr 15 02:59:58 2015 Apr 15 07:18:54 good morning Apr 15 07:34:48 morning Apr 15 08:02:58 morning all Apr 15 08:19:38 monin Apr 15 08:25:57 mornin Jin^eLD Apr 15 09:27:55 after having used bitbake -f on a fetch command bitbake always complains about being tainted. so what does this tainted flag actually mean exactly, and how to "clean" it? Apr 15 09:46:25 LetoThe2nd: the assumption is that if you forced a task, it is possible that a rebuild from scratch would not include whatever changes you made (e.g. if you modified the source in the workdir and did bitbake -c compile -f) Apr 15 09:46:35 LetoThe2nd: bitbake -c clean on the recipe will get rid of the taint Apr 15 09:46:45 LetoThe2nd: the question is why did you feel the need to force the fetch task? Apr 15 09:48:49 bluelightning: its a work-in-progress library thats meant to follow git HEAD. coworker just wanted to continue debugging without rebuilding tmp from scratch now Apr 15 09:49:56 bluelightning: um, can you give me a short rundown of clean vs. cleansstate then? Apr 15 09:55:02 cleansstate is just clean + also deleting the sstate cache for the recipe's tasks Apr 15 09:56:29 if the recipe is building from git and not rebuilding when changes are pushed it sounds like you need to set SRCREV = "${AUTOREV}" and also have ${SRCPV} in PV Apr 15 09:56:45 that would mean that it would re-fetch and rebuild automatically Apr 15 09:57:17 bluelightning: yeah he said he uses autorev, but something he changed in upstream caused it to hiccup. we're not concerned about reproductiblity here as it's heavily WIP anyways. Apr 15 09:57:30 bluelightning: so clean < cleansstate? Apr 15 09:58:43 yes Apr 15 09:58:55 I'm not quite sure what "hiccup" means Apr 15 09:59:14 bluelightning: spew out a lot of warnings about falling back to default tasks. Apr 15 09:59:42 but then i wonder why cleansstate on the recipe doesn't remove the taint Apr 15 10:02:43 (bbl, lünch) Apr 15 10:02:53 it absolutely should... Apr 15 10:09:17 hi, all! Apr 15 10:10:21 if the recipe does do_patch[noexec] = "1", can I unset it somehow from .bbappend? Apr 15 10:10:40 RP: Apr 15 10:13:00 slapin_: anonymous python d.delVarFlag('do_patch, 'noexec') Apr 15 10:32:59 RP: thanks a lot! obviously that meant python __anonymous () { ... } construct (just for reference). Apr 15 11:21:07 bluelightning: hmhm Apr 15 11:21:20 bluelightning: well its of no big concern to us, i just wanted to check Apr 15 11:24:02 hi all. is there anyone who knows a bit about HDCP support on device outputs (DisplayPort or HDMI)? Apr 15 11:24:32 anyone worked on such a device? Apr 15 11:34:57 i have not, but still it sounds like an x-y-question. (you want to know x, and think that y is a starting point for asking. so you ask about y. why not just ask about x directly?) Apr 15 14:02:54 slapin_: __anonymous is unnecessary. python () { ... } Apr 15 14:11:52 kergoth: thanks! **** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Apr 16 00:33:47 2015 **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Apr 16 02:59:59 2015