**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Aug 28 02:59:58 2015 Aug 28 08:06:16 morning all Aug 28 08:22:10 morning bluelightning Aug 28 08:22:44 hi nrossi Aug 28 12:09:32 i All. I need a 64 bit build so I used MACHINE = "intel-corei7-64" in local conf. But one QT application is needing sse4.1 and my processor does not have it. Aug 28 12:09:32 Where can i find a intel-corei5-64 that does not have the sse4.1 enabled. Or should I use the genericx86-64 machine ? will this one work ? Aug 28 12:31:23 armv7at2hf-vfp-neon-angstrom-linux-gnueabi Aug 28 12:31:23 cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-angstrom-linux-gnueabi Aug 28 12:31:24 cortexa9hf-vfp-neon-mx6qdl-angstrom-linux-gnueabi Aug 28 12:31:24 cortexa9t2hf-vfp-neon-angstrom-linux-gnueabi Aug 28 12:31:29 why do those keep on changing Aug 28 12:31:54 confusing the crap out of me Aug 28 12:36:37 depends on what the tune settings are for the MACHINE you have set Aug 28 12:36:52 aah ok, thanks let me lock that down. Aug 28 12:37:16 my package sources keep on not functioning Aug 28 13:18:47 Is there anyway to override a do_install_append() done in a .bb from a .bbappend or if you want to remove something are you forced into creating a new recipe? Aug 28 13:24:26 It might append to the existing append Aug 28 13:24:33 but I forget the order Aug 28 13:27:17 From what I've read so far (https://www.mail-archive.com/openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org/msg23911.html) it just appends to the existing append Aug 28 13:53:54 georgem: I'm afraid not, other than simply undoing what that append has done Aug 28 13:54:05 georgem: _appends/_prepends stack up Aug 28 13:55:01 georgem: sometimes this highlights a deficiency in the original _append that should be addressed there rather than trying to hack around it Aug 28 13:55:26 i.e. consider talking to whoever wrote that or sending a patch, depending on the situation Aug 28 13:56:32 bluelightning: yeah, if that's the case it should be dealt with properly. I'm mainly referring to cases where I want/need something different for my use case. Aug 28 13:57:08 bradfa: ^^ Aug 28 13:57:40 in that case you probably just need to undo what the original _append has done and re-do it the way you want (or move/rename/delete files to get the same result) Aug 28 13:59:21 bluelightning: Sounds reasonable, thanks for the advise. Aug 28 14:03:58 georgem, it does seem like the install could be imporved Aug 28 14:40:20 khem: do you remember what the gmp problems were on arm? I'm building qemuarm64 to see what happens so maybe I'll just find out Aug 28 15:11:06 georgem, thanks! :) Aug 28 15:34:09 shift change? Aug 28 15:52:42 so i'm assuming the hackerspace liked the yocto crash course, since next time we're gonna try making a trimslice BSP layer... Aug 28 15:56:47 anyone done an octave recipe? Aug 28 15:59:14 Crofton: you know I could have sworn I remembered something about that, and it was this: https://github.com/thesignal/octave-openembedded-recipe Aug 28 15:59:45 Crofton: IIRC I tried to get the author to submit it for meta-oe, I don't know if they did or not Aug 28 16:00:01 I'm gettting asked Aug 28 16:01:09 looks like that is based on the oe-classic one Aug 28 16:01:46 and newer version Aug 28 18:07:20 no octave recipe? Aug 28 18:12:01 do it ! Aug 28 18:12:14 love to have it too ;-) Aug 28 19:22:34 next week I think Aug 28 21:24:04 any idea which version? Aug 28 21:24:34 as in what deps are there now, will it support 4.0.0, etc... Aug 28 21:26:40 https://bpaste.net/raw/78ec2cd7ccb2 <= this is what 4.0.0 wants for fresh install on my desktop Aug 28 21:27:47 with those default use flags yada yada Aug 28 21:28:07 * nerdboy trying to ballpark effort required Aug 28 21:31:56 nothing freaky .. i am willing to jump in on that too next week Aug 28 21:32:21 collegues started to use octave, so it would be nie too have Aug 28 21:34:36 although i wonder what the --static-libs is needed for Aug 28 21:46:53 rob_w: it "depends" Aug 28 21:46:58 heh Aug 28 21:56:41 plus gentoo default is shared/no-static unless you enable it Aug 28 21:56:53 most packages default to both Aug 28 22:04:15 one static to rule em all Aug 28 22:04:59 yeah, image oe with all the tweakables exposed to every user Aug 28 22:05:15 "you're supposed to customize it!" Aug 28 22:05:25 "wtf?!?" Aug 28 22:05:34 *imagine even Aug 28 22:06:06 well , if oe handles it , then it can be seen as "served" Aug 28 22:06:32 apparently we expect the user "handle" it Aug 28 22:07:11 its a "new" package, someone has to Aug 28 22:07:28 * nerdboy mostly out of loop now, on the fringes pushing to gentoo-arm... Aug 28 22:08:15 what servers u best Aug 28 22:09:48 kinda like my own personal portage... Aug 28 22:10:31 i guess its approach is compareable to oe .. it was at least last time i checked **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Aug 29 02:59:59 2015