**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Dec 03 03:01:14 2015 Dec 03 11:01:20 Dec 03 14:17:54 belen1, stands are up Dec 03 14:18:49 Crofton | work: is the oe one in? Dec 03 14:19:55 Yes :) Dec 03 14:20:11 Crofton | work: where are they? I am looking at the website and can't find them? Dec 03 14:21:28 https://fosdem.org/2016/stands/ Dec 03 14:24:44 Crofton | work: great. I have no idea what happens now, so if you need me to do anything, let me know Dec 03 14:27:06 * Crofton|work laughs Dec 03 14:27:24 Well, we should check if florian is coming and has the box of stuff Dec 03 14:28:25 We should line up some working systems with matching toaster data Dec 03 14:28:37 so we can show build system stuff Dec 03 14:29:00 and find people to help staff the stand Dec 03 14:29:48 Crofton | work: sounds doable. So, what happens if florian is not coming? Dec 03 14:30:16 We need to see what is in the box Dec 03 14:31:23 bluelightning probably knows. Dec 03 14:31:38 yeah and he is asleep :) Dec 03 14:32:12 florian, ping Dec 03 14:32:30 Crofton|work: I'll be talking to him later today Dec 03 14:32:45 hopefully he'll be awake by then ... Dec 03 14:33:00 Looks like your devroom os coming together Dec 03 14:33:17 Crofton|work: we'll see ;) Dec 03 15:19:34 Crofton|work: pong! Dec 03 15:19:48 Crofton|work: I guess I will be there... Dec 03 15:21:42 florian, can you remind belen1 what is in the box Dec 03 15:22:17 Didn't we have a wiki with all this stuff? Dec 03 15:22:28 I'm not sure :) Dec 03 15:22:40 Probably, also I think the box has the table cloth now Dec 03 15:23:33 belen1, http://openembedded.org/wiki/OE_event_box Dec 03 15:23:56 Crofton|work, florian: handy :) Dec 03 15:24:09 florian, do you mind checking the inventory and updating the date checked? currently says 2012 Dec 03 15:24:17 we should add a photo of the 'sturdy carry case' Dec 03 15:27:30 Good point... Dec 03 15:29:16 belen1: The last two times we used a smaller case and the box of the TFT. This is easier to handle... Dec 03 15:29:56 florian: sounds reasonable. Whatever is easier Dec 03 15:32:17 We should collect some photos of what we have at FOSDEM Dec 03 16:02:58 belen1, less assembly required Dec 03 16:03:00 https://picasaweb.google.com/103261587477257884420/FosdemVideoCase095HttpsLusisEu?feat=directlink# Dec 03 16:06:10 Crofton|work: is this for the devroom recording? Dec 03 16:06:27 yes Dec 03 16:06:35 no more assembling the bits and pieces :) Dec 03 16:06:40 \0/ Dec 03 16:07:50 that box looks quite something Dec 03 16:09:01 https://plus.google.com/103261587477257884420/posts Dec 03 16:09:10 Hopefully it makes things easier for us Dec 03 16:14:54 if they were to build the distro with OE, we could use the box as a stand demo ;) Dec 03 16:14:56 Crofton|work: but does it ŸÖÅ? Dec 03 16:18:39 that reminds me, we need to work on a strategy to get more OE builds onto these popular dev borads Dec 03 20:14:43 +1 Dec 03 22:13:56 hmm, how can I force it to rerun a task Dec 03 22:14:05 just hand edited the source and need to rerun configure Dec 03 22:15:20 *cough*devtool*cough* Dec 03 22:15:37 rofl Dec 03 22:15:40 although to be fair that doesn't properly handle reconfigure right now Dec 03 22:15:43 I'm not that smart Dec 03 22:15:59 bitbake -c configure -f ? (or bitbake -C configure) Dec 03 22:16:00 gm btw Dec 03 22:16:05 morning :) Dec 03 22:16:53 that didi it Dec 03 22:16:56 fighting cmake Dec 03 23:24:23 my bitbake build has been interrupted and the .o of the tasks that were building are corrupted, is there a way to clean those tasks and not the entire target? (so that I don't waste three hours of compilations) Dec 03 23:25:11 I've tried bitbake -e task_name -c clean, no luck though Dec 03 23:25:50 ? Dec 03 23:25:55 -e is used to examine the metadata Dec 03 23:25:58 it has nothing to do with builds Dec 03 23:26:06 bitbake -c clean Dec 03 23:26:07 done Dec 03 23:29:22 lerela: which recipe is failing btw? a core one or one of your own? Dec 03 23:30:01 it's been a very long time since I've seen this kind of issue; not to say it's not there, just I thought we'd mostly addressed it by now Dec 03 23:30:35 indeed the -e was stupid, clean worked but the build is still failing though, maybe there's an other problem then Dec 03 23:30:44 bluelightning, this is a core recipe Dec 03 23:30:59 which one? Dec 03 23:32:35 I misunderstood your question, not oe core, I meant official layers Dec 03 23:33:10 ti-llvm3.3 of meta-arago and external-linaro-toolchain of meta-linaro Dec 03 23:34:07 ah, ok Dec 03 23:34:31 in that case I'm not sure, that's not something I've personally tried building Dec 03 23:35:17 error is "xx.o: file not recognized: File truncated", that definitely sounds like an interrupted build so I should be able to clean it somehow Dec 03 23:37:10 I'll clean everything, it won't finish today anyway, thank you both Dec 03 23:39:16 i think you're confused Dec 03 23:39:23 clean will only clean the one recipe, not its dependencies Dec 03 23:39:30 if building one recipe takes you all day, you've got bigger problems Dec 03 23:39:57 no the whole build takes me all day, hopefully not a single recipe Dec 03 23:40:08 again, clean only operates against the specified recipe. Dec 03 23:40:12 -c clean therecipename Dec 03 23:40:21 that one recipe will then re-unpack/patch/compile Dec 03 23:40:48 well in that case I must be mistargeting it Dec 03 23:41:01 -c clean the recipe that's failing, not the image or something Dec 03 23:51:45 any ideas on trying to debrick a MT7620-based system? CON1 appears to be connected to a maintex 24BYJ stepper.. does that exclude any chance of it having a Uboot console? Dec 04 01:41:25 kergoth: around ? Dec 04 02:13:36 khem`: am now, at least for a little while. whats up Dec 04 02:14:15 Whats your opinion on http://patchwork.openembedded.org/patch/106637/ Dec 04 02:14:40 kergoth: this would make meta-browser shed 30% of its code in chromium related recipes Dec 04 02:14:59 and we can use the normal gclient based workflow using externalsrc Dec 04 02:15:07 lot of chromium app devs then can use OE Dec 04 02:15:51 it seems reasonable to me, though its worth noting that you can add such a fetcher programmatically from the metadata. e.g. how https://github.com/imyller/bitbake-npm/blob/1.26/classes/npm-fetch.bbclass does it Dec 04 02:16:06 so could always do that until/if it gets merged by RP to bitbake Dec 04 02:18:37 Can you add your reviews Dec 04 02:18:43 sure Dec 04 02:19:32 I think having it would benefit in general for all gclient kind of cases **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Dec 04 03:00:40 2015