**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Feb 15 02:59:59 2016 Feb 15 08:25:37 good morning Feb 15 08:30:12 morning. Feb 15 08:32:07 Is there a nightly build for Jetson TK1 somewhere? I think it is broken in 2.0 (angstrom-manifest) Feb 15 08:42:40 no... I created a bbappend and forgot some of the patches. Feb 15 12:36:08 I'm seeing a bunch of these with meta-qt5 Feb 15 12:36:10 ERROR: QA Issue: Qt5Widgets.pc failed sanity test (tmpdir) in path /home/balister/src/oe-core/build/tmp-glibc/work/armv7ahf-neon-oe-linux-gnueabi/qtbase/5.5.99+5.6.0-alpha1+gitAUTOINC+f7f4dde80e-r0/sysroot-destdir//usr/lib/pkgconfig [pkgconfig] Feb 15 12:52:33 Crofton|work: [insert stupid joke about At5 and sanity ;-)] Feb 15 12:52:39 s/At5/Qt5/ Feb 15 12:53:12 yeah Feb 15 12:53:27 prefix=/home/balister/src/oe-core/build/tmp-glibc/sysroots/ettus-e3xx-sg1/usr Feb 15 12:53:27 exec_prefix=${prefix} Feb 15 13:51:00 koen: couldn't make a 64bits kernel boot or display anything on the serial port beyond 'Starting the kernel' :/ Feb 15 13:51:22 there should be no problem with loading a x86_64 kernel from a i686 uboot? Feb 15 14:04:42 funman: dunno Feb 15 14:05:01 funman: I know that is a problem when using UFI Feb 15 14:05:04 ehm Feb 15 14:05:06 EFI Feb 15 14:05:55 i should try u-boot x64 first maybe, not sure how i can recover from a bad u-boot though Feb 15 14:06:21 the board maybe switches between the 2 u-boot partitions with a watchdog Feb 15 15:04:38 random question: does anything in the arm world still use apmd? Feb 15 15:45:40 ndec, any idea about rburton's question? Feb 15 18:50:26 ok, I sent in the cmake update Feb 15 18:50:47 Yes, I do read the update/testing emails to see if there is something I care about Feb 15 19:22:37 crap, my patch lacked the oe-core stuff, need to fiddle with git/config Feb 15 19:22:53 * Crofton|work grumbles about not being able to cut/paste the proper incantation from the README Feb 15 20:03:39 Crofton|work: missing what stuff? Feb 15 20:10:35 rburton, missing [oe-core] in email Feb 15 20:10:48 normally I cut/paste a line from the layer README :) Feb 15 20:13:09 Crofton|work: pretty sure the list adds that prefix, as the list is already oe-core. not like meta-oe, where you have to add the prefix, as the list isn't only for meta-oe Feb 15 20:13:28 if you use gmail or so, it'll de-dupe and so you'll never see the prefixed version come back to your inbox, but you'll see it if you look at gmane Feb 15 20:14:03 gmm, better check Feb 15 20:14:26 oh, no, guess i'm incorrect. regardless, it's not something you need to add, it's a given for that list Feb 15 20:14:33 see http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded.core/76214 Feb 15 20:15:01 ok, at least it is consistent :) Feb 15 20:15:11 mainly worried about pw missin git Feb 15 20:16:15 yeah oe-core adds the [oe-core] bit for you Feb 15 20:16:54 "[OE-core] [PATCH] cmake: Update to 3.4.3." is whats in my inbox Feb 15 20:17:07 maybe I worry too much Feb 15 20:17:30 ah, thought so. wonder why gmane doesn't include the prefix, interesting Feb 15 20:24:09 Has anyone investigated traceability from individual source files to individual binary files in the output? I'm sure you could use the debug info for c/c++ compiled bits **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Feb 16 02:59:59 2016