**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Sep 04 03:00:00 2017
Sep 04 07:07:47 <mckoan> good morning
Sep 04 07:54:33 <tasslehoff> in The Old Days (1.4), is there a way to enable creation of rootfs/sdk manifests?
Sep 04 09:14:17 <tasslehoff> koen: is ti-dmai-dev sufficient in my toolchain-target sdk recipe to develop apps that use the dsp?
Sep 04 09:15:24 <koen> no idea, I haven't touched DSP stuff in over 5 years now
Sep 04 09:20:53 <tasslehoff> koen: oh how good that must be :)
Sep 04 09:22:19 <tasslehoff> I'm working with pyro these days, but occasionally something needs to be done on our legacy product.
Sep 04 09:22:32 <tasslehoff> hurts every time :)
Sep 04 09:23:50 <koen> I know the feeling :)
Sep 04 09:42:19 <tasslehoff> this is from that old build, but perhaps someone remembers what fixes this: https://pastebin.com/G8vjdStk
Sep 04 09:49:03 <bluelightning> tasslehoff: is that actually enabled as a module in the kernel?
Sep 04 09:49:47 <bluelightning> tasslehoff: that error will happen any time a kernel module is in RDEPENDS (or IMAGE_INSTALL) and no such module is enabled, since the kernel claims it provides kernel-module-*
Sep 04 09:50:29 <bluelightning> is "dsplinkk" a typo?
Sep 04 09:53:57 <tasslehoff> bluelightning: not a typo. I think perhaps it is because an empty package is not created
Sep 04 09:55:02 <bluelightning> tasslehoff: another possibility occurred to me - is that an external kernel module that is being "satisfied" by the kernel and therefore the real recipe isn't being built?
Sep 04 09:56:28 <tasslehoff> bluelightning: it is indeed an external module. the recipe is built I think, but I get "Not creating empty archive for kernel-module-dsplinkk"
Sep 04 09:56:40 <bluelightning> ah ok
Sep 04 09:56:50 <tasslehoff> If I can just manage to enable the empty archives, I hope all will be well :)
Sep 04 10:54:36 <tasslehoff> I added ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} and ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN}-dev in the recipe. Is that correct? It still does not create the empty archive.
Sep 04 11:05:04 <rburton> assign to "1"?
Sep 04 11:14:37 <tasslehoff> rburton: I did that, but I (ofc) had to write ALLOW_EMPTY_kernel-modules-dsplinkk instead
Sep 04 11:15:05 <rburton> yeah you need to specify the exact package that you want to be allowed empty
Sep 04 11:15:59 <tasslehoff> rburton: yeah. at first I thought it would affect all packages created by that recipe, but that would not have been very flexible :)
Sep 04 11:41:18 <daro_> Hey! How would I go about setting a recipe local variable from a (python) task so that it can be used from within a later task? Is it even possible with the way variables are scoped?
Sep 04 11:41:31 <daro_> Specifically what I would like to do is add a couple of things to the SYSTEMD_SERVICE_${PN} from an earlier task.
Sep 05 02:16:08 <texel> Question: if I wanted to instrument some of the code being built by bitbake (say, a library like musl), is there a way to alter the code in-situ without redownloading it from the source?
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Sep 05 03:00:00 2017