**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jan 10 03:00:02 2018 Jan 10 10:01:30 The imx6 has an internal RTC, but my evalboard also has an external RTC. What are plausible reasons for not making do with an internal one? Jan 10 10:04:00 tasslehoff: concerning evalboards: showing off Jan 10 10:04:28 LetoThe2nd: haha. Jan 10 10:05:10 tasslehoff: sometimes the internal RTCs have drawbacks, but generally its just that on eval boards: connect something to each and everything. and for i2c, the usual suspects are some 24c eeprom and a rtc. i'm not kidding. Jan 10 10:07:35 LetoThe2nd: I see you point. The internal RTC works for what we need, so that's fine then :) Jan 10 10:18:40 tasslehoff: probably, yes. Jan 10 14:03:06 otavio: what is the main diff between linux-fslc branch 4.X-imx and 4.X-fslc ? Jan 10 16:43:16 mckoan: the 4.9-1.0.x is NXP BSP plus stable plus bugfixes; 4.9.x+fslc is mainline + bugfixes + stable Jan 10 16:43:33 mckoan: if possible, use 4.14.x as it is LTS kernel and mainline Jan 10 17:01:55 otavio: thank you Jan 10 17:03:25 otavio: the 4.9-1.0.x-imx can safely replace 4.1-2.0.x-imx from SABRESD point of view? Jan 10 17:03:53 otavio: I mean the graphics driver is the same for example? Jan 10 17:09:57 otavio: I mean CONFIG_DRM_VIVANTE, and is still present. thx Jan 10 17:18:05 mckoan|away: it should; it however comes with the new Vivante driver. **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jan 11 03:00:01 2018