**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed Jan 17 03:00:01 2018 Jan 17 17:07:04 noc0lour, rburton what cmake library gave you a problem with ninja? Jan 17 17:07:55 I found this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/557992 Jan 17 17:08:31 ah Jan 17 17:08:34 useful Jan 17 17:08:48 There is some ML thread on gentoo-dev about this too Jan 17 17:10:09 noc0lour, thanks! Jan 17 17:14:08 ok, in the ML thread isn't more information Jan 17 17:14:32 probably it's best to try out to run with ninja only and then see if a package breaks due to incompatibilities Jan 17 17:22:16 noc0lour: the annoying thing is that cmake+make and cmake+ninja output their progress information differently, so its not just a matter of passing the right -G Jan 17 17:22:24 should be able to build a regex which matches both though Jan 17 17:22:28 then it can be an option Jan 17 17:23:25 rburton: right, but if there is no problem with a package, why use make anyway Jan 17 17:23:36 yeah, default to ninja Jan 17 17:23:50 this is why it was a rfc patch... Jan 17 17:25:09 noc0lour, the headache is there are many layers and it might be a while before we find one that fails Jan 17 17:25:36 if there is a need for an option, that's fine by me Jan 17 17:25:41 change default stuff breaks they deal with it Jan 17 17:25:48 yep Jan 17 17:26:18 I think having an option is nice for later and probably means less troubles for the switch Jan 17 17:27:08 yeah **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu Jan 18 03:00:01 2018