**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Mon Oct 01 03:00:03 2018 Oct 01 13:53:15 Hello All Oct 01 13:53:49 Can I remove recipe-multimedia, recipe-graphics, recipes-rt from default meta ? If yes then how ? Oct 01 13:55:35 SHW_: you can always delete them, if you so wish. but whats the point in that? Oct 01 13:56:20 LetoThe2nd: Well. I was thinking to create SDK/toolchain only with gcc,glibc,binutils Oct 01 13:57:11 This is for study purpose and for hands-on practice Oct 01 13:57:12 SHW_: ok, so why not just do that? recipes in the layers are more like "offerings". they can be built, if you so wish. but if nothing pulls them in, directly or indirectly, well then, they have no effect. Oct 01 13:58:02 Ok. I could have done that but preferred to ask here assuming that if I remove package then it might throw an error at later stage. Oct 01 13:58:03 and, what about core-image-minimal -c populate_sdk doesn't suit your needs? its pretty much what you just described Oct 01 13:58:35 I executed that but it failed somehow. So I firstly upgraded my host machine from 17.04 to 18.04 Oct 01 13:58:52 and now will execute that command again Oct 01 13:58:53 "it failed somehow" makes it pretty hard to help, TBH Oct 01 13:59:29 It says about missing deb pacakge on host. Hence I opted upgradation of Host OS Oct 01 13:59:43 (Don't remember exact error. Sorry) Oct 01 13:59:46 well, then.... Oct 01 14:00:32 Also, can I have some utility to enlist build-dependency ? Oct 01 14:00:57 build-dependency? Oct 01 14:01:47 e.g. Xorg depends upon xorg-lib and xorg-proto Oct 01 14:01:57 s/Xorg/xorg-server Oct 01 14:02:53 SHW_: bitbake -g $YOURTARGET gives your .dot files for task and package dependencies. Oct 01 14:02:59 those can be easily inspected. Oct 01 14:10:05 Ok. I will. Oct 01 14:10:56 It giving me a warning Oct 01 14:11:11 WARNING: Host distribution "ubuntu-18.04" has not been validated with this version of the build system; you may possibly experience unexpected failures. It is recommended that you use a tested distribution. Oct 01 14:13:36 are you using a specifically new or old version of OE or yocto? Oct 01 14:16:59 Latest version Oct 01 14:17:02 2.5.1 Oct 01 14:17:26 sumo Oct 01 14:18:47 ok. in your case the warning can probably ignored, its there as a reminder that this combination is not autobuilder tested AFAIK Oct 01 14:19:09 LetoThe2nd: Can I append "meta-poky/conf/local.conf.sample.extended" to build/conf/local.conf ? Oct 01 14:19:19 Just to enable multilib Oct 01 14:19:38 _/\_ Oct 01 14:19:51 not append it, copy over the bits and pieces you need. or replace it. Oct 01 14:21:11 OK Oct 01 21:09:51 khem, hello Oct 01 21:10:08 I was scrubbing your last buildlog (yoe ?) Oct 01 21:10:24 again .got.plt linker error on x86? argh ! Oct 01 21:11:14 klibc-static-utils again, it looks you did not have security enabled, trying to reproduce it with gcc/musl now Oct 01 21:11:25 just wondering about that yoe checkout... Oct 01 21:14:43 * armpit yoe-yoe-mah.. wonders what an error log would look like via musical notes Oct 01 21:15:21 YMCI ? Oct 01 21:16:25 if we played them backwords is would say "Armpit is the Devil" Oct 01 21:17:20 must be some evilish fork Oct 01 21:18:24 because it looked like he was using gcc and not clang ;) Oct 01 21:19:33 btw I never compared the binaries, are there net advantages with one or other? it was pretty the same not so long ago Oct 01 21:19:55 just build time could change in some cases Oct 01 21:24:19 ant_home: yes now we are left with x86/klibc errors similar to what we see on debian as well Oct 01 21:30:06 * armpit sigh... kernel merges... Oct 01 21:41:58 I have built it now w/out errors qemux86/musl...? Oct 01 21:43:13 both klibc-static-utils and klibc-utils Oct 01 22:16:20 ant_home: does it use security flags **** ENDING LOGGING AT Tue Oct 02 03:00:01 2018