**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jan 10 02:59:58 2020 Jan 10 10:16:24 hello, any wic expert on the room? Is it possible to create a partition with the content of two images? Eg / being host-image.bb and /export being target.image.bb, but both images on the same partiton (eg /dev/sda2) Jan 10 10:19:43 ribalda: don't even need wic, sounds like a classic case for multiconfig Jan 10 10:20:24 LetoThe2nd: I have already configured multiconfig to geneate target and host using differench MACHINE= Jan 10 10:20:35 my problem is when I want to deploy that to a disk Jan 10 10:21:07 I need a partition with both images, and seems that wic only support one partition per image Jan 10 10:21:39 ribalda: i think the key is to add a recipe to add the target payload into the hosts /export Jan 10 10:22:03 because payload inside the file system is clearly a job for bitbake, not wic Jan 10 10:22:26 LetoThe2nd: do you have any example of that? Jan 10 10:22:46 ribalda: none i can share, i'm afraid Jan 10 10:25:34 LetoThe2nd: so you have a .bb with the content of /export. At the end of the day, that will be converted into a package file? Jan 10 10:25:49 you have apackage file with all the filesystem of the target? Jan 10 10:26:40 ribalda: we have recipe that depends upon a muticonfig and consumes the rootfs artifact it produces. its not exactly our use case, but you could easily just extract it and do_install into /export Jan 10 10:27:21 but wouldnt do_deploy convent that afterwards into something like target-image.ipk ? Jan 10 10:27:30 ribalda: yeah so what? Jan 10 10:27:47 seems weird :), but if it works I have nothing to say Jan 10 10:27:50 I have to try it Jan 10 10:27:55 ribalda: wic consumes the finished rootfs, including whatever is in /export Jan 10 10:30:45 ribalda: make a recipe which will create image with content of both images and then use wic? Jan 10 10:31:18 yeah it could probably even integrated in the image recipe, good point Jan 10 10:31:53 hrw: Not sure if that will work with multiconfig. They have differench architectures Jan 10 10:32:30 ok Jan 10 13:57:22 Hi, are videos from Yocto Project Summit 2019 in Lyon available? I'm trying youtube and yocto website, but with no luck. Jan 10 14:36:34 I think Behen is behind on things. Jan 10 14:39:04 Crofton|road: ok, I thought so. No problem, thanks a lot. Jan 10 14:58:15 is there any way to resize the OE_TERMINAL (for devshell)? when i invoke bitbake from within screen, whether OE_TERMINAL is screen or tmux i seem to only be able to get an 80x24 session within my much larger, existing screen window Jan 10 18:10:19 RP, any issues with the bitbake 1.44 pull request? Jan 10 18:44:06 armpit: not known, need to check Jan 10 18:44:24 armpit: bbeen struggling to get the BA back Jan 10 18:46:29 RP, I suspected that my be a factor. Jan 10 18:47:52 just want to make sure I didn't miss some feedback on the request Jan 10 23:41:11 armpit: no, I'll probably sort those pull reqs over the weekend Jan 10 23:59:00 RP, that is unacceptable as I don't want you working over the weekend. I can wait Jan 11 00:00:37 * armpit wonders how hard it would be to replace the OE splash screen with "linus_nvidia_finger_lrg" **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jan 11 03:00:53 2020