**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue Feb 11 02:59:58 2020 Feb 11 10:08:17 tlwoerner: oops sorry, messed up the (c) and missed the whitespace, will resend Feb 11 10:47:03 tlwoerner: sent out a v2, I hope I got the sending right with those reply headers and stuff, to be honest I did not work with git send-mail a lot Feb 11 12:01:52 tlwoerner: I'll add a 3rd patch, imho WKS_FILE setting in each machine.conf should be ?= if you don't mind Feb 11 12:02:11 for instance, I need to override it now, because I am using a different layout Feb 11 12:06:25 actually I see that rock-pi-4.conf already uses WKS_FILE ?= while others don't Feb 11 12:07:05 oh hmm I guess I'll have to wait for you to merge the first series before I can submit the next one Feb 11 12:39:44 RP, kergoth, can I ask for your comments on http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/bitbake-devel/2020-January/020851.html ? Feb 11 13:39:58 kroon: I wanted to try and fix up the example and sort more testcases in the test suite Feb 11 13:40:17 kroon: you said you didn't have time and I wanted to remember to do it Feb 11 13:41:32 RP, ok, I guess I could fix the examples, but I got the feeling it was undecided wether or not bitbake should changed to behave in the same way as make Feb 11 13:42:00 kroon: I think there would be worlds of pain if we tried that, it has many implications for the metadata Feb 11 13:42:23 I'm not sure we like our currently behaviour but it is how the system was written Feb 11 13:43:57 RP, yeah Feb 11 15:22:26 Jin^eLD: prefect thank you! applied Feb 11 15:22:41 cool, thanks for all the pointers along the way Feb 11 15:22:59 so I'll follow up with a ?= change for all WKS_FILE settings in machine confs if thats OK witih you? Feb 11 15:30:12 yes, sound good Feb 11 15:50:14 ok Feb 11 16:13:03 Jin^eLD: oops! no SOB Feb 11 16:13:15 i.e. you're missing the SOB in your patch Feb 11 16:13:47 damn, I mess up every single one it seems.. I need to add that to my globacl git config Feb 11 16:14:08 lol, practice practice practice :-) Feb 11 16:17:19 ok, v2 is out :P Feb 11 16:18:29 still struggling with my custom layout... tinker is weird; for some reason its now "Trying to boot from MMC2" although it can't have an mmc2 at all.... and I did not change any u-boot configs.. Feb 11 16:18:38 I want to get rid of the separate vfat boot partition or is that not possible? Feb 11 16:18:50 i.e. plan to have the kernel image directly in the rootfs Feb 11 16:25:06 Jin^eLD: thanks! applied Feb 11 16:25:11 thank you! Feb 11 16:28:38 JPEW: did you play around with alternative partitioning on your tinker board? Feb 11 17:14:02 Jin^eLD: No I haven't Feb 11 17:32:18 JPEW: I am still a bit confused regarding the boot process (studying the rockchip wiki), some changes I make result in behaviour which I did not expect Feb 11 17:32:30 I guess I need to fully understand this u-boot chaining Feb 11 17:45:14 Jin^eLD: git will add the SoB line automatically for you if you specify "-s" to "git commit" Feb 11 17:45:42 tlwoerner: thanks for the hint! Feb 11 18:21:05 JPEW: did you see anything like that on your tinekrs yet? phy error stack trace https://paste.ee/p/FwzbN Feb 11 18:21:27 I think I more or less figured out how to boot directly from the root partition, just seems that the original "boot" part has to be there even if not used Feb 11 19:23:48 Jin^eLD: Your paste isn't loading for me for some reason Feb 11 21:00:52 JPEW: uhm thats weird, works here... I can upload it as text to my webserver Feb 11 21:02:20 JPEW: i see it okay Feb 11 21:43:08 tlwoerner, Jin^eLD: Weird, shows up now **** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed Feb 12 03:00:33 2020