**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Wed May 18 02:59:57 2011 May 18 14:59:19 denkenz: ping May 18 15:54:28 fdanis: pong May 18 16:30:31 denkenz: ping May 18 16:30:38 pnunes: pong May 18 16:31:23 denkenz: I'm actually implementing the read/write operations on the socket opened for BIP. May 18 16:31:44 denkenz: As you can see per the spec, UICC may provide an IPV6 destination address. May 18 16:32:05 denkenz: So, I'm wondering if we need to comply now to IPV6. May 18 16:32:26 denkenz: I mean, use AF_INET6 sockets, and connect/sendto to the ipv6 destination address? May 18 16:33:58 Well first of all the GPRS context must have been opened with IPv6 or dual-stack May 18 16:34:19 If you don't have that, then you're already screwed May 18 16:34:47 But yes, in theory if an IPv6 address is provided, then you need to use an IPV6 socket May 18 16:35:13 Whether you want to bother with this right now is another question May 18 16:35:18 I've yet to see a live IPv6 network May 18 16:41:42 denkenz: yes, it is complicating the implementation. And yes, so far, according 3GPP TS 31.111, the packet data protocol type is set to 02 (IP). All other values are reserved. May 18 16:42:19 denkenz: so, I'm never asking to create/activate an ipv6 PDP context. May 18 16:44:11 denkenz: Also, no GCF test is using IPv6 settings. May 18 16:44:28 So there's your answer ;) May 18 16:45:46 denkenz: yes, but it's better to confirm with you. Thanks. May 18 16:48:18 pnunes: Note that 8.52.3 of 31.111 does allow IPv6 contexts May 18 16:48:23 or any context type for that matter May 18 16:56:24 denkenz: so far, only the bearer type '02' is supported. The bearer description you mentioned (8.52.3) applies to bearer type '09'. I don't think we want to support also UTRAN packet service with extended parameters / HSDPA / E-UTRAN ? May 18 17:47:35 pnunes: If you ask me we don't want to support BIP at all ;) **** ENDING LOGGING AT Thu May 19 02:59:58 2011