**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu May 17 03:00:00 2012 May 17 07:36:36 SHR: 03Martin.Jansa 07shr-makefile * rd11f92ea9f93 10/conf/shr-core/bblayers.conf: bblayers: add meta-systemd layer May 17 09:06:47 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * rffabaa48f5d6 10/packages/ (380 files in 380 dirs): packages: Build 201205171016 of shr 20120517 for machine om-gta02 on opmbuild May 17 09:49:54 it seems the autogen.sh of android in shr git May 17 09:50:06 it can't finish its work May 17 09:53:50 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * rf33f15765a53 10/packages/armv4t-oe-linux-gnueabi/ (23 files in 23 dirs): packages: Build 201205171135 of shr 20120517 for machine om-gta02 on opmbuild May 17 10:49:59 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * rd4f77b356e5a 10/packages/ (403 files in 403 dirs): packages: Build 201205171200 of shr 20120517 for machine nokia900 on opmbuild May 17 11:13:17 SHR: 03Martin.Jansa 07shr-makefile * r017dd32e150f 10/ (Makefile conf/shr-core/bblayers.conf): replace meta-mozilla and meta-chromium with meta-browser May 17 11:13:27 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * rcc7f4459b2b2 10/packages/om_gta04-oe-linux-gnueabi/shr-version/ (latest shr-version/latest): packages: Build 201205171257 of shr 20120517 for machine om-gta04 on opmbuild May 17 11:38:25 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * ra473cc70300a 10/packages/palmpre-oe-linux-gnueabi/shr-version/ (latest shr-version/latest): packages: Build 201205171323 of shr 20120517 for machine palmpre on opmbuild May 17 12:00:12 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * ra232a2c8273a 10/packages/palmpre2-oe-linux-gnueabi/shr-version/ (latest shr-version/latest): packages: Build 201205171345 of shr 20120517 for machine palmpre2 on opmbuild May 17 12:17:07 why the hell not only Sean-the-weirdo is silent but also our friends Roh and Gismo? May 17 12:19:28 looks like plan C :/ May 17 12:21:32 Hm, i've an idea. Can SHR issue a press-release to be aggregated on planet openmoko that states that the SHR team is rather unhappy with Sean being silent? May 17 12:22:59 I think he finally deserved some shame. :/ May 17 12:24:41 I don't have account on http://blog.shr-project.org/, but pespin was blogging there, we can ask him to update it May 17 12:24:53 well state of SHR team is also a bit shame :) May 17 12:30:14 SHR+FSO is still doing quite good. May 17 12:31:36 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * rb0d4f86b6171 10/images/om_gta02/eglibc/shr-image/ (5 files): images: Build 201205171406 of shr 20120517 for machine om-gta02 on opmbuild May 17 12:35:40 JaMa: I note there is some spam on the SHR blog too May 17 12:35:49 http://blog.shr-project.org/2011/02/free-platforms-go-on-despite-former-giants-nogo.html May 17 12:36:17 pabs3: yup :/ May 17 12:36:43 it seems the bootloader or second bootloader cause my problem, I do a test today May 17 12:38:07 A image with useable initramfs(from android), test A: let fastboot it , test B: let fastboot boot it with cmdline(root=/dev/mmcblk1p2 rootwait noinitrd) May 17 12:38:39 it shows different in screen( but test B failed as before) May 17 12:39:07 it seems the SPL load the initramfs, not the kernel May 17 13:04:02 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * r4ebbc45184f4 10/images/nokia900/eglibc/shr-image/ (5 files): images: Build 201205171439 of shr 20120517 for machine nokia900 on opmbuild May 17 13:26:15 Is there anyway to change SPL or bootloader, I can't compile lk_bootloader May 17 13:27:35 ayaka, don't touch the bootloader because: May 17 13:27:41 1) it can brick your device May 17 13:27:48 2) your problem is the kernel May 17 13:28:06 GNUtoo-desktop do you know today test May 17 13:28:10 unless you want to chainload a bootloader May 17 13:28:24 today test??? May 17 13:28:30 only when I said today test, you were not here May 17 13:28:54 my problem, I do a test today May 17 13:28:54 [20:40] A image with useable initramfs(from android), test A: let fastboot it , test B: let fastboot boot it with cmdline(root=/dev/mmcblk1p2 rootwait noinitrd) May 17 13:28:54 [20:41] it shows different in screen( but test B failed as before) May 17 13:28:54 [20:41] it seems the SPL load the initramfs, not the kernel May 17 13:28:54 [21:06] SHR: shr-devel buildhistory * r4ebbc45184f4 /images/nokia900/eglibc/shr-image/ (5 files): images: Build 201205171439 of shr 20120517 for machine nokia900 on opmbuild May 17 13:28:55 [21:28] Is there anyway to change SPL or bootloader, I can't compile lk_bootloader May 17 13:29:33 ok May 17 13:30:06 if spl loads the initramfs you must tell or teach the kernel not to use it May 17 13:30:16 sorry, i paste too much log May 17 13:31:53 in test A, i only see tux log, then only show a word--android(in fact I don't use the current roms' initrmafs, so don't boot in android) in test B, i saw the kernel message then restart auto May 17 13:32:19 but maybe the hboot in kernel part cause that problem May 17 13:32:38 did you remove the watchdog already? May 17 13:33:34 I can't remove it, if i disable it, I can't compile kernel, the same as ashmem May 17 13:33:52 in today test, i enable initramfs support May 17 13:33:53 remove it and fix your kernel build May 17 13:34:09 (for watchdog) May 17 13:34:32 GNUtoo-desktop it seems htc don't modify kernel src properly making me can't disable it May 17 13:34:52 as I said remove it and fix your kernel build May 17 13:34:59 that means you vim the sources May 17 13:35:03 you fix the error May 17 13:35:09 and you recompile it May 17 13:35:18 I see, I wish I have that ability May 17 13:35:30 you need that ability May 17 13:35:30 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * r574b9cdc3f96 10/images/om_gta04/eglibc/shr-image/ (5 files): images: Build 201205171511 of shr 20120517 for machine om-gta04 on opmbuild May 17 13:35:36 else you won't go far May 17 13:35:39 but why it is watchdog's problem May 17 13:35:49 watchdog makes the system reboot May 17 13:36:15 maybe you have to write to /dev/watchdog or something like that May 17 13:36:44 are you aware that htc android kernel and the standard linux kenrel are very different? May 17 13:37:04 for instance I'm not sure that you have alsa on your htc device May 17 13:37:10 i see I know the htc kernel is different May 17 13:37:15 which means no sound under debian unless you adapt a driver May 17 13:37:28 I have alsa on kernel, and android need alsa May 17 13:37:36 ok May 17 13:37:54 then it may not work properly under debian May 17 13:37:55 but it is not watchdog make reboot May 17 13:37:56 not sure May 17 13:38:03 ah? May 17 13:38:07 what is it then? May 17 13:38:36 Thread-68(parent:zygote): Restarting system with command 'bootloader'. May 17 13:38:49 zygote is an android program May 17 13:38:59 that's the case where you run android's init May 17 13:39:14 I meant about the log where it doesn't run android's init May 17 13:39:32 it restarted because of the msm_watchdog? right? May 17 13:39:49 but I also see zygote_oneshot=off in kernel cmdline May 17 13:40:01 don't bother about zygote May 17 13:40:18 it sound't run at all May 17 13:40:47 GNUtoo-desktop yes it run android init, but it is the case i met, once config_vt=y, the initramfs will be loaded, and the init in it will be runned May 17 13:40:53 it seems SPL do it May 17 13:41:04 spl just does that: May 17 13:41:10 it copy the initramfs in memory May 17 13:41:18 then it's up to the kernel to use it or not May 17 13:41:28 maybe it tells it to use it trough atags May 17 13:41:30 check that May 17 13:41:33 in the board config May 17 13:42:07 but it in today test, kernel has used noinitd, and it show different when without it May 17 13:43:10 let me look something May 17 13:45:18 do you have the working config May 17 13:45:34 the one that boots debian fine? May 17 13:45:48 which working config? kernel? May 17 13:46:00 the one that boots debian May 17 13:46:16 try again to boot debian May 17 13:46:18 booting debian fine means the one without config_vt? May 17 13:46:30 23_4 May 17 13:46:38 I guess so May 17 13:46:44 try to make debian boot May 17 13:46:48 yes May 17 13:47:49 the kernel config about 23_4 can be found in 20_4 May 17 13:48:13 can you try something clean May 17 13:48:18 just to be sure May 17 13:48:32 let me look May 17 13:49:34 you try to reproduce the debian boot May 17 13:49:37 and we go from here May 17 13:50:21 what shall I try May 17 13:51:12 boot debian without config_vt, like what i do in 23_4, and use an empty initramfs ? May 17 13:51:21 yes May 17 13:51:26 whatever makes debian boot May 17 13:53:01 ok, is there any added order? I have to do it tomorrow May 17 13:53:18 ah? May 17 13:53:25 if so: May 17 13:53:29 1)try to boot debian May 17 13:53:30 like kebrel based on config-1 20_4 May 17 13:53:37 kernel May 17 13:53:38 cp .config defconfig_debian May 17 13:53:45 then add CONFIG_VT May 17 13:53:51 and try to boot it again May 17 13:53:53 and then May 17 13:54:09 diff -u defconfig_debian .config May 17 13:55:29 ok, shall i use an empty initramfs or not, shall i enable initramfs in kernel or not May 17 13:56:11 no idea May 17 13:56:24 try to replicate the configuration where debian can boot May 17 13:56:31 I don't know what you did at the time May 17 13:58:42 before today test, all the initramfs i used is an empty initrmafs May 17 13:58:48 ok May 17 13:59:05 just try to replicate the setup when you had debian booting May 17 13:59:42 i see, without any special request ? May 17 13:59:59 no special things May 17 14:00:05 special things comes after..... May 17 14:00:21 the special things are: May 17 14:00:22 cp .config defconfig_debian May 17 14:00:25 then add CONFIG_VT May 17 14:00:28 and try to boot it again May 17 14:00:31 and then May 17 14:00:34 diff -u defconfig_debian .config May 17 14:01:10 I have seen it, i means except that , any others request ? May 17 14:02:50 not yet May 17 14:03:04 basically I want to be sure about the diff May 17 14:03:11 because usually you select an option May 17 14:03:21 and it causes other options to be selected automatically May 17 14:03:31 because they have default y in Kconfig May 17 14:03:58 I see, I will do that May 17 14:05:17 GNUtoo-desktop thank you very much May 17 14:05:25 np May 17 14:06:03 but I want to also know some avaliable bootloader, i will chainload they May 17 14:06:40 ok May 17 14:06:58 I don't know about chainloaded bootloaders on qualcomm devices sorry May 17 14:07:02 maybe ask #htc-linux May 17 14:07:12 or Alex[sp3dev] May 17 14:09:02 well, i think i can use normal bootloader to be chainloaded May 17 14:10:00 sadness, Alex[sp3dev] is not present May 17 14:11:25 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * r9ac998d8a38d 10/images/crespo/eglibc/ (8 files in 2 dirs): images: Build 201205171543 of shr 20120517 for machine crespo on opmbuild May 17 14:11:36 SHR: 03shr-devel 07buildhistory * r9891540cd07e 10/packages/crespo-oe-linux-gnueabi/shr-version/ (latest shr-version/latest): packages: Build 201205171543 of shr 20120517 for machine crespo on opmbuild May 17 14:19:39 GNUtoo-desktop shall i modify kernel first, or boot debian first May 17 14:19:59 ayaka, boot debian first May 17 14:20:12 ayaka, if you want to succeed we must do it the scientific way.... May 17 14:20:23 else no one will understand a thing anymore May 17 14:20:31 like if you change 10 things at once May 17 14:20:38 how do you know which one broke it May 17 14:20:40 etc... May 17 14:21:48 GNUtoo-desktop i see, thank you May 17 15:04:50 apparently Sean is "working with Harald Welte now on a solution" May 17 15:05:07 which will happen when it happens May 17 15:14:31 * rah is skeptical May 17 15:25:24 DocScrutinizer: nobody is going to remove /home files May 17 15:25:54 DocScrutinizer: nobody is going to be provided access to files that they shouldn't have access to May 17 15:26:08 DocScrutinizer: nobody is going to do silly things May 17 15:26:19 DocScrutinizer: nobody has proposed doing anything silly May 17 15:32:34 DocScrutinizer: acting in a way that is reasonable, responsible and sensible is implied in any discussion of change by rational and mature adults May 17 15:32:43 DocScrutinizer: you have nothing to fear May 17 15:57:45 Status quo is changing and that's something that should always be taken seriously. Especially when it's in the hands of Sean who apparently behaves like an asshole now :/ May 17 17:04:08 freesmartphone.org: 03GNUtoo 07cornucopia * rd3d9fbdec591 10/tools/mterm2/src/terminal.vala: May 17 17:04:08 freesmartphone.org: mterm2: adjust for recent changes to libfsotransport about delegate handling May 17 17:04:08 freesmartphone.org: Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli May 17 20:06:58 Hello May 17 20:07:26 hi May 17 20:07:37 I like vala, but im struggling with my "ide" May 17 20:08:31 I haven't found any reason yet to like vala May 17 20:09:02 i have a git remote repoitory stored local, my make is bitbake but i have alter bitbake recipe scrrev at every commit May 17 20:09:11 why you dont like it? May 17 20:09:41 see last post May 17 20:10:00 it is fast.. May 17 20:10:05 my post or yours? May 17 20:12:20 jo4n: you can use AUTOREV feature to always build the latest commit. May 17 20:13:24 nice, thx ill try that May 17 20:16:33 a reason could be: garbage collection ;) May 17 20:18:56 * DocScrutinizer hates the concept of garbage collection May 17 20:20:01 that's what ~destructors are for, no matter in which language you implement them May 17 20:21:14 garbage collection vastly introduces indeterministic behavour to processes May 17 20:21:59 or rather, unpredictable behaviour - given a CPU should always be a deterministic machine May 17 20:27:18 i thought vala carbage collection is deterministic, but i might be wrong. May 17 20:27:30 I dunno May 17 20:28:13 I managed to avoid vala mostly, toldya I haven't found any reason yet to like or love or even use it May 17 20:29:24 since I lost track with counting the languages I had to use in my life, it's not even for the guinness book of records I'd consider looking into yet another one May 17 20:30:12 i like object oriented static typed compiles to c May 17 20:30:29 2158 reinventions of the wheel May 17 20:32:35 and heck, I used the wording >>~destructors, no matter in which language you implement them<< by a reason. I coded OO in assembler, years before stroustrup(?) invented C++ May 17 20:34:20 there arent c++ bindings to elementary.. May 17 20:41:40 I know there are people who learn new (natural) languages just for the fun of it - even exotic shit like Latin or Esperanto. I guess a similar mindset will make some developers try another new coding language every 3 months. I'm not one of that crowd however, I think I can code whatver I need to, with 3 or 4 languages. Only amateurs need a huge toolbox, the real professional is happy with a small set of really good tools he knows May 17 20:41:41 each nasty detail of and can do amazing things with them May 17 20:43:19 every 3 months seems to be too fast May 17 20:44:04 you are a pro. I want a support if i look at shr i can "easy" use c, valla May 17 20:44:09 or python May 17 20:45:42 sure, since Mickey introduced it in FSO, vala is a core component of SHR May 17 20:46:10 so nothing wrong with learning it, if you're interested in SHR May 17 20:46:43 I'm not using SHR on a regular basis anymore (and no, not really because of vala) May 17 20:47:24 there is nothing else May 17 20:47:45 a pity though is I wasn't able to push FSO e.g. into mer, mainly because everybody frowned at vala May 17 20:49:55 so that's the downside of picking an 'exotic' language for your foss project May 17 20:50:49 esp when this languge isn't only exotic but also so new that you have to wait for language devels to implement stuff you need for your project May 17 20:50:55 my motivation:i like to have smartphone to do my stuff for me thats mostly email and calendar May 17 20:51:06 AIUI FSO/SHR played guinea pig for vala May 17 20:51:17 vala is late in my opinion May 17 20:56:06 email and calendar isnot good on any platform i have looked at yet May 17 22:20:34 jo4n, hi, I'm reading what you said May 17 22:21:11 ok May 17 22:21:19 jo4n, where are you stuck? May 17 22:21:23 hi, i said to much May 17 22:21:54 it's ok May 17 22:22:03 i got help already: autorev works May 17 22:22:07 ok May 17 22:22:14 nice May 17 22:22:43 you guys are great **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri May 18 02:59:58 2012