**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Tue May 17 02:59:58 2016
May 17 10:21:58 <antrik> rah: no, that really is the point. Matrix doesn't fulfull the outlined criteria, because of the missing fallback
May 17 10:23:04 <antrik> and he is wondering why nobody can come up with something that has this fallback making it a viable choice, *and* fulfills the other criteria too
May 17 10:32:46 <rahc> antrik: this is the entirety of Garrett's comment: "Nobody I know is using Matrix, which means it's really not convenient."
May 17 10:33:09 <rahc> antrik: as you can see, he does not mention anything to do with fallback functionality
May 17 10:37:41 <rahc> antrik: regardless, as I said, I was noting the fact that Garrett's response to a comment assumes a different question to the question in the article
May 17 10:38:47 <rahc> antrik: I'm pointing out that Garrett's thinking and writing is problematic
May 17 10:39:18 <rahc> antrik: you keep saying "no but really, the point is about $something" without addressing the fact that Garrett's thinking and writing is problematic
May 17 10:42:01 <rahc> antrik: you don't seem to have paid any attention to what I've actually said and just responded as though I'm talking about some particular content
May 17 19:15:42 <antrik> rahc: his followup comments explain his position well enough. and frankly, I'm not interested pointless semantic discussions.
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Wed May 18 02:59:58 2016