**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sun Dec 13 02:59:57 2009
Dec 13 05:41:23 <DocScrutinizer-8> DocScrutinizer51: ping
Dec 13 05:41:33 <DocScrutinizer-8> joerg
Dec 13 05:42:03 <DocScrutinizer-8> doc: test
Dec 13 09:00:20 <badcloud_> just booted the new shr-u. anyone get the keyboard working?
Dec 13 09:07:07 <soltys> you have to install it, it's missing in image or after upgrade from earlyer one ;)
Dec 13 09:11:13 <badcloud_> crap
Dec 13 09:15:14 <badcloud_> which one is the terminal keyboard ipk on shr buildhost?
Dec 13 09:16:29 <soltys> illume-keyboard-default-terminal
Dec 13 09:17:34 <badcloud_> thanks
Dec 13 09:17:43 <soltys> np
Dec 13 09:37:49 <badcloud_> soltys, I can't log in via usb
Dec 13 09:38:05 <badcloud_> tried a blank pass, 'root', 'admin'
Dec 13 09:38:07 <badcloud_> nothing
Dec 13 09:38:30 <badcloud_> I can't run passwd from the device because the kbd isn't installed
Dec 13 09:38:33 <badcloud_> what gives?
Dec 13 09:39:18 <badcloud_> what's the default root password?
Dec 13 09:42:20 <soltys> there is none
Dec 13 09:42:31 <badcloud_> well I can't log in
Dec 13 09:42:41 <soltys> only the openssh is configured not to allow login with blank pass....
Dec 13 09:43:06 <soltys> it's known buf (feature?)
Dec 13 09:43:07 <soltys> :)
Dec 13 09:43:13 <soltys> s/buf/bug/
Dec 13 09:47:02 <badcloud_> #%^&
Dec 13 09:48:16 <badcloud_> workaround?
Dec 13 09:49:44 <soltys> if you have image on uSD use publickey otherwise flash earlyer image ;)
Dec 13 09:57:19 <badcloud_> arrrg
Dec 13 10:04:40 <DocScrutinizer-8> lol
Dec 13 10:04:59 <DocScrutinizer-8> how to root your FR
Dec 13 10:06:31 <FxChiP> indeed
Dec 13 10:06:33 <FxChiP> step 1: open box
Dec 13 10:06:35 <FxChiP> step 2: profit
Dec 13 10:06:59 <FxChiP> oh and make sure it never runs out of battery 
Dec 13 10:07:02 <FxChiP> :P
Dec 13 10:10:19 <Kamping_Kaiser> hi all. any 'zomg broken' warnings on shr testing/unstable atm? i've 'broken' my install somehow, so i'm looking to re-image
Dec 13 10:15:03 <Hardy> After Update:
Dec 13 10:15:05 <Hardy> Collected errors:
Dec 13 10:15:05 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0
Dec 13 10:15:05 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:05 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisenc.so.2
Dec 13 10:15:07 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:10 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3
Dec 13 10:15:12 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:14 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0
Dec 13 10:15:17 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:21 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisenc.so.2
Dec 13 10:15:22 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:24 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3
Dec 13 10:15:27 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:30 <Hardy>  * ERROR: The following packages conflict with openssh:
Dec 13 10:15:32 <Hardy> 	 *  dropbear * 
Dec 13 10:15:35 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbis.so.0
Dec 13 10:15:37 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:40 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisenc.so.2
Dec 13 10:15:42 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:45 <Hardy>  * Package libvorbis0 wants to install file /usr/lib/libvorbisfile.so.3
Dec 13 10:15:47 <Hardy> 	But that file is already provided by package  * libvorbis
Dec 13 10:15:49 <Hardy>  * ERROR: The following packages conflict with fso-apm:
Dec 13 10:15:52 <Hardy> lol
Dec 13 10:31:29 <qkall> i'm a little afraid my moko is broken... i googled an error i get... was wondering if someone could help verify
Dec 13 10:31:43 <qkall> can't seem to flash it ... suing neotool on 9.10 ubuntu...
Dec 13 10:34:05 <Weiss> what's the error?
Dec 13 10:35:06 <qkall> unknown boot option 'g_ether.host_addr=00:f:11:1b:c9' : ignoring
Dec 13 10:35:14 <qkall> rcu dected cpu 0 stall
Dec 13 10:48:00 <Weiss> hmm.. you managed to flash the kernel though?
Dec 13 10:48:05 <Weiss> does it boot?
Dec 13 10:48:29 <qkall> i flash the kernel everytime... i have no clue whats the problem.. other than the probablity its broken :(
Dec 13 10:48:42 <qkall> unless i'm making a really stupid error
Dec 13 10:49:03 <qkall> like should i keep it connected to usb after it claims to be done (like maybe its still transfering shit?)
Dec 13 10:54:57 <DocScrutinizer-8> qkall: you triple checked the parameters for dfu-util? needs correct -a partiton name etc
Dec 13 10:55:17 <DocScrutinizer-8> it's different for rootfs and kernel
Dec 13 10:55:33 <qkall> ...hmm well considering i have no idea what your talking about it's a good chance i didn't
Dec 13 10:55:52 <qkall> i'm using neotool i don't remember seeing anything like that in the tutorial...
Dec 13 10:58:57 <qkall> perhaps if this doesn't work i'll try doing it using just the command 
Dec 13 10:59:07 <qkall> ...lol yeah i guess i'll try it came up with some error
Dec 13 10:59:11 <qkall> :?
Dec 13 10:59:16 <DocScrutinizer-8> neotool is just a script doing the dfu-util commands. I never thought neotool is any easier than the original method
Dec 13 10:59:22 <qkall> Some error occured while flashing kernel.
Dec 13 10:59:22 <qkall> Error message:
Dec 13 10:59:22 <qkall> No DFU capable USB device found
Dec 13 10:59:22 <qkall> Any other pending flashes will be aborted.
Dec 13 11:05:59 <mjr> the neo is in the u-boot prompt at the time, yes?
Dec 13 11:06:27 <qkall> yessir that hold aux and power button
Dec 13 11:07:02 <qkall> its really frustrating... i know i have to be doing something simple wrong...
Dec 13 11:07:05 <qkall> its always that way...
Dec 13 11:23:40 <qkall> hmm maybe this is another case why using gui sometimes is the worst option...
Dec 13 11:23:46 <qkall> seems to be working now...
Dec 13 11:24:02 <qkall> no errors yet...
Dec 13 12:04:35 <pbaxter> hi all
Dec 13 13:06:04 <DocScrutinizer51> raster: moin
Dec 13 13:12:33 <raster> DocScrutinizer51: pants
Dec 13 13:13:58 * SpeedEvil ponders putting on some.
Dec 13 13:42:04 <niclone> Hi, I need to reflash u-boot on my GTA01 (I had the bad idea to flash qi on it)
Dec 13 13:42:47 <niclone> actually, it is booted, and i tried this:
Dec 13 13:42:58 <niclone> root@om-gta01 ~ $ nandwrite -o /dev/mtd0 u-boot-gta01bv4-1.3.1\+gitr650149a53dbdd48bf6dfef90930c8ab182adb512-r1.bin 
Dec 13 13:42:58 <niclone> Input file is not page aligned
Dec 13 13:42:58 <niclone> Data was only partially written due to error
Dec 13 13:42:58 <niclone> : Success
Dec 13 13:43:32 <niclone> problem is that I don't really want to reboot now, until i'm sure that u-boot was flashed correctly
Dec 13 13:43:38 <niclone> (i don't have a debug board)
Dec 13 13:43:55 <niclone> but this nandwrite command don't seem to work
Dec 13 13:45:40 <niclone> oh.. seem that nandwrite -p is ok
Dec 13 13:47:25 * niclone reboot his neo now...
Dec 13 13:47:26 <lindi-> niclone: can you nandread the same data back?
Dec 13 13:47:55 <niclone> lindi-: via cat /dev/mtd0 yes
Dec 13 13:48:08 <lindi-> niclone: and is uboot_env ok?
Dec 13 13:48:16 <niclone> hmm :(
Dec 13 13:48:34 <niclone> did'nt had a look at uboot_env, and... my neo won't boot anymore :(
Dec 13 13:49:11 <niclone> ah, dfu is online :)
Dec 13 13:49:45 <niclone> i was thinking that qi didn't touch uboot_env
Dec 13 13:49:50 <niclone> maybe I was wrong?
Dec 13 13:52:51 <niclone> hmm.. that's weird
Dec 13 13:53:04 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=0, name="RAM 0x32000000"
Dec 13 13:53:04 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=1, name="undefined partition"
Dec 13 13:53:04 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=2, name="undefined partition"
Dec 13 13:53:04 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=3, name="undefined partition"
Dec 13 13:53:04 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=4, name="undefined partition"
Dec 13 13:53:06 <niclone> Found DFU: [0x1457:0x5119] devnum=32, cfg=0, intf=0, alt=5, name="undefined partition"
Dec 13 13:53:35 <niclone> but dfu is working
Dec 13 13:55:55 <niclone> hum, I flashed u-boot again via dfu-util, and now it work fine !
Dec 13 13:56:06 <niclone> thanks lindi- ;)
Dec 13 17:05:34 <PBeck> hi
Dec 13 17:08:39 <niclone> is there always people running debian on a gta01?
Dec 13 17:09:01 <niclone> or people running anything on a gta01 :)
Dec 13 17:10:50 <gonzoism> hi PBeck
Dec 13 17:15:33 <PBeck> hi gonzoism 
Dec 13 18:34:23 <PaulFertser> niclone: shr works on gta01
Dec 13 18:35:19 <niclone> PaulFertser: I didn't find any image of it
Dec 13 18:35:36 <niclone> PaulFertser: only kernel and modules
Dec 13 18:36:07 <PaulFertser> niclone: ask shr guys for details but supporting gta01 is for sure one of their targets.
Dec 13 18:36:31 <PaulFertser> niclone: also pyneo guys run pyneo/debian on gta01 for quite some time and that's a real priority for them.
Dec 13 18:37:33 <niclone> PaulFertser: ok, i'll look at pyneo
Dec 13 18:38:54 <PaulFertser> niclone: they're really really nice guys
Dec 13 18:57:05 <[Rui]_> it is playing
Dec 13 18:57:09 <[Rui]_> terrybly low, though
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Mon Dec 14 02:59:56 2009