**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Oct 05 02:59:58 2013
**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Sat Oct 05 13:52:30 2013
Oct 05 20:44:53 <DocScrutinizer05> dos1: beware! seems the term "free" isn't free anymore ;-)
Oct 05 20:46:36 <DocScrutinizer05> freedom nazis (SIC!) trying to seize the term's definition and determine what may get tagged free and what not
Oct 05 20:46:43 <dos1> let's free free as in freedom!
Oct 05 20:46:49 <DocScrutinizer05> and even worse, the defined free==open
Oct 05 20:46:56 <DocScrutinizer05> they*
Oct 05 20:48:39 <dos1> are we free to use free?
Oct 05 20:48:51 <PBeck> let's free as in free beer! :D
Oct 05 20:49:15 <dos1> free hardware... looks good for me :)
Oct 05 20:49:15 <PBeck> anarchy :D
Oct 05 20:49:16 <DocScrutinizer05> "I'm FREEEEE!"  --  "NO you're NOT! I didn't allow you to use that term, since you're not free in my definition"
Oct 05 20:51:26 <DocScrutinizer05> "we are the guys who approve all entities that are not needing approval by us. <*STAMP*> You're now approved to be not approved"
Oct 05 20:54:27 * DocScrutinizer05 just reviews and corrects and augments Nikolaus' 20p Neo900-feasibility-study
Oct 05 20:55:20 * DocScrutinizer05 needs a break
Oct 05 21:19:48 <dos1> DocScrutinizer05: so how does it look like? any worrying stuff so far?
Oct 05 21:44:56 <DocScrutinizer05> yeah, we don't cram in the modem
Oct 05 21:45:27 <DocScrutinizer05> too high, too long, too wide
Oct 05 21:45:47 <DocScrutinizer05> even the 601
Oct 05 21:46:29 <DocScrutinizer05> radical desparate measures needed
Oct 05 21:47:24 <DocScrutinizer05> e.g. kicking the main cam :-o
Oct 05 22:10:19 <DocScrutinizer05> but I'm not yet willing to give up
Oct 05 22:10:55 <DocScrutinizer05> I mean until now it been a walk in the park, now it just starts to get tough
Oct 05 22:31:42 <dos1> sure
Oct 05 22:32:45 <dos1> sad that 801 won't make it
Oct 05 22:32:59 <dos1> hopefully 601 will somehow
**** ENDING LOGGING AT Sun Oct 06 02:59:58 2013