**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Thu Apr 06 09:59:56 2006 Apr 06 15:28:46 good morning everybody. Apr 06 15:29:01 morning Apr 06 15:29:21 is anybody at the embedded conference in san jose? Apr 06 15:31:19 i'm again seeing the "ERROR: nothing provides runtime dependency " for both libgdbm3 and libperl5. is this a bitbake problem? Apr 06 15:31:47 dunno about it this time Apr 06 15:31:53 i just did a fresh everything last night - still got it. BB 1.3.3.4 Apr 06 15:31:53 what runtime dep? Apr 06 15:32:36 running it "-k", it looks like slugos-native wants runtime dep libperl5. Apr 06 15:33:15 and also that ipkg-utils wants runtime dep python. Apr 06 15:33:46 should i ask over in OE? Apr 06 15:41:02 not a bad idea Apr 06 18:26:14 kami22: are you seeing my replies ? Apr 06 18:39:19 kami22: you there? Apr 07 00:56:26 anybody know how the kernel build works in oe? i've got a couple of questions. Apr 07 00:56:56 depends Apr 07 00:58:01 i'm just trying to figure how it fits together. i've got two "problems". one is that my usb devices disappeared between 2.6.16-git something and 2.6.16-r1. i can see the .config diffs, but nothing looks wrong... Apr 07 00:58:18 secondly, i'm trying to add a PPC kernel into OE. Apr 07 00:58:30 but maybe i should just read more of these .bb files (-; Apr 07 00:59:28 got any advice NAiiL? Apr 07 01:00:08 well, the kernel was modularized Apr 07 01:00:47 right. tons of modules are made now. Apr 07 01:02:27 what's the relationship between the ixp4xx-kernel and nslu2-kernel? is it that the ixp4xx includes the intel code, and is the newer version? Apr 07 01:03:40 nslu2-kernel was the old kernel Apr 07 01:03:50 okay, got that right (-; Apr 07 01:04:07 the ixp4xx-kernel is a more generic kernel for the nslu2/ds101/nas 100d/dsm600g Apr 07 01:04:17 and loft Apr 07 01:04:21 excellent. Apr 07 01:05:09 It'll stay modularised in OE I think. It'll be de-modularised for the release though Apr 07 01:07:42 so if i'm porting to a new arch, i should write a base 83xx-kernel.inc, and include that in a 83xx-kernel_2.6.whatever.bb file. would that be the recommended philosophy? Apr 07 01:08:24 That doesn't sound like a bad way to do it Apr 07 01:08:40 IIRC, most of that stuff was done by jbowler Apr 07 01:08:45 but he's been away for some time Apr 07 01:08:58 if you've got another sec. for a philosophy question... Apr 07 01:09:15 np Apr 07 01:09:23 waiting for kernel compile anyway ;) Apr 07 01:09:27 :-) Apr 07 01:09:29 thanks. Apr 07 01:10:07 i'm porting to ppc for a specific app (a simple file server). so i'll have my own packages, initrd particuluars, etc. Apr 07 01:10:14 should i make a "distro" for this? Apr 07 01:10:40 Does sound like the way to go, yes Apr 07 01:10:49 make a machine, distro and kernl Apr 07 01:10:54 "kernel" Apr 07 01:11:35 next question (hoping for a large kernel... :-) the dir. structure doesn't really matter, in the sense that if my distro lives in slug/openslug/... this is okay? Apr 07 01:12:23 well, not if you commit it that way ;) Apr 07 01:12:38 I'm hoping for a <1024kb kernel Apr 07 01:12:50 i meant in time... Apr 07 01:13:13 i'm neither slug or openslug, so, i was a bit concerned about this. Apr 07 01:14:11 That is changed in the distro conf I think Apr 07 01:14:27 i'll check that out. Apr 07 01:17:14 confusiing... well, not confusing. complicated. Apr 07 01:17:25 thanks for your pointers! appreciate it. Apr 07 01:18:49 np Apr 07 01:29:41 any idea on the USB drives? i see them come up as scsi0 and 1 in dmesg, but /sys/block doesn't contain them. Apr 07 01:29:50 this worked in the 2.6.16-git4 kernel. Apr 07 01:30:25 i'm trying to downrev kernel to 2.6.15 and see what happens. Apr 07 01:30:31 do you have sd_mod loaded? Apr 07 01:30:46 i'm not sure if sd_mod was loaded... lemme check. Apr 07 01:31:00 partitions should show up then Apr 07 01:31:07 (after usb-storage has been loaded) Apr 07 01:31:15 i have usb_storage, scsi, and raid1 okay, but let me check on sd_mod Apr 07 01:39:12 hi there Apr 07 01:40:00 does any1 know the right IPtable rule (on my router) to make samba work (on the slug) from outside ? Apr 07 01:40:21 or maybe i have to add the outside network to authorized samba networks ? Apr 07 01:40:35 you'll probably need both. Apr 07 01:40:38 i just added a port forwad rule on port 139 Apr 07 01:41:02 okay, and you probably are also doing masquerading, so that should be fine. Apr 07 01:41:15 yup Apr 07 01:41:43 i've never tried samba through a firewall... Apr 07 01:42:05 seems port 445 is also used.... Apr 07 01:42:12 will forward it also Apr 07 01:45:13 NAiL, adding sd_mod did the trick. thanks! shouldn't this a dependency of usb-storage or something? Apr 07 01:46:08 HopsNBarley: maybe, dunno Apr 07 01:46:09 Jah_, there is something i barely remember about broadcast and file shares. i don't think you will be able to browse for your share across a firewall. you'll have to add the mapping by hand. Apr 07 01:46:47 hmmm Apr 07 01:47:44 use the public firewall address for the host name. Apr 07 02:20:53 ok, the demodularised kernel works Apr 07 02:21:03 * NAiL will commit it tomorrow Apr 07 02:21:18 thank you NAiL! Apr 07 02:23:20 np **** ENDING LOGGING AT Fri Apr 07 09:59:56 2006