**** BEGIN LOGGING AT Fri Jan 05 02:59:59 2007 Jan 05 06:02:51 hi there Jan 05 15:51:25 hi there! Jan 05 15:55:07 <[g2]> hi Jan 05 15:55:28 nice, i found another slugger :) Jan 05 15:55:45 how are your nslug? Jan 05 15:57:58 is it running good? Jan 05 15:58:34 <[g2]> it's been a while, I've got my own hw Jan 05 15:58:45 k no problem Jan 05 15:59:03 <[g2]> similar but more expandable than the nslu2 Jan 05 15:59:13 iomega? Jan 05 15:59:34 <[g2]> no, I contracted a company to really build custom hw Jan 05 16:01:00 ah k, i know, like soekris Jan 05 16:01:26 you are evolved, insted i m at the begin of this way Jan 05 16:02:27 <[g2]> well I've do a couple things, maybe slightly more experienced in this area Jan 05 16:02:34 <[g2]> but not "evolved" Jan 05 16:03:25 [g2], more exandable? Have you more than 64MB RAM? Jan 05 16:04:05 <[g2]> Sinclair73de my boxes have 64MB, but the the vendor makes 128MB and even 256MB Jan 05 16:04:14 <[g2]> way more expandable Jan 05 16:05:08 k nice to meet you Jan 05 16:05:32 <[g2]> Sinclair73de I've just got a specific build of the GW2348 from Gateworks. http://www.gateworks.com/avila_gw2348_4.htm Jan 05 16:06:03 hmmm... my 128MB Slug is not running correctly, when using more than 64MB Jan 05 16:06:53 <[g2]> I run a couple 128MB units Jan 05 16:07:06 * [g2] reaches up an rubs one Jan 05 16:07:43 without problems? no problems on heavy pci load? Jan 05 16:08:34 seams a ixp4xx problem with dmabounce Jan 05 16:08:34 <[g2]> yeah that's mentioned on l-a-k Jan 05 16:09:05 <[g2]> I've run heavy load for a while (bonnie++) Jan 05 16:09:30 hey sinc, where did you get the ram expansion? Jan 05 16:09:31 <[g2]> not 24/7 heavy load Jan 05 16:10:34 selfmade Jan 05 16:11:20 <[g2]> Sinclair73de when did you make the really fat slug ? Jan 05 16:11:37 get chips from standard sdram module Jan 05 16:11:56 <[g2]> "when" ? Jan 05 16:12:40 k nice info Jan 05 16:12:50 when? really? I think a year ago, but its never get really stable Jan 05 16:13:23 <[g2]> Sinclair73de does 64MB run fine ? Jan 05 16:13:29 <[g2]> with the same chips Jan 05 16:13:44 <[g2]> a mem=64M on the kernel command line Jan 05 16:13:46 yes, with mem=64MB everything fine Jan 05 16:14:25 <[g2]> APEX for the boot loader ? Jan 05 16:14:37 yeah Jan 05 16:14:54 <[g2]> did you run memory tests ? Jan 05 16:15:18 not really Jan 05 16:15:28 <[g2]> really there's just one or two extra lines depending on your config Jan 05 16:15:52 <[g2]> i mean hw lines Jan 05 16:16:19 <[g2]> do you go to a 2 chip 16Mx16 ? Jan 05 16:16:55 i used a 4 chip 32Mx16 module, desolder the chips and used it for 2 Slugs Jan 05 16:17:15 both slugs have the same problems with >64MB Jan 05 16:21:45 [g2], what's the best way for memory-test? Jan 05 16:22:32 <[g2]> well the "best" in my mind is with JTAG :) Jan 05 16:22:43 <[g2]> but the easiest is with the memtest utility Jan 05 16:24:03 <[g2]> I think you can apt-get memtest Jan 05 16:24:15 <[g2]> you may be able to map in the upper memory and test if from linux Jan 05 16:24:28 <[g2]> the other option is set something up from the bootloader Jan 05 16:24:40 <[g2]> i.e. compile memtest for -elf Jan 05 16:24:48 <[g2]> all statically Jan 05 16:25:15 "easiest" way? ;-) Jan 05 16:27:44 . /msg NickServ IDENTIFY Jan 05 16:27:55 . /msg NickServ IDENTIFY P4ssw0rd Jan 05 16:28:00 duh Jan 05 16:28:03 shht Jan 05 16:36:11 <[g2]> well easy is a relative word Jan 05 16:37:00 im fukd up Jan 05 16:37:07 how to change it? Jan 05 16:37:28 not at all, it still a medium strong pwd Jan 05 16:44:23 HoStyle: use an irc proxy Jan 05 16:44:31 you will be all the time on line Jan 05 16:44:44 and the proxy will log all the messages for you Jan 05 16:45:07 k Jan 05 16:45:08 and you will no longer need to worry about identification ... Jan 05 16:45:21 check dircproxy Jan 05 16:45:36 but there is a way to change it, i hope Jan 05 16:45:41 mine is running on a slug for more that three-four months Jan 05 16:45:58 ./stats p Jan 05 16:46:14 are they comming really? Jan 05 16:47:46 but is a tool with two faces, the logs are against my privacy.. Jan 05 16:48:10 you will need to authenticate wuth your proxy Jan 05 16:48:22 read the manual :) Jan 05 16:49:17 http://dircproxy.securiweb.net/wiki/ManDircproxy Jan 05 16:52:06 Detachable brain proxy, kwel.. ive never seen it Jan 05 16:59:59 NickServ- Your password has been changed to ... Jan 05 17:00:02 fiuuu Jan 05 17:00:18 mission complete, trouble shooted in the head ;) Jan 05 17:01:44 do you gain something using this distro? Jan 05 17:02:25 im an obsd user, so the choice is natural but i dunno nothing of the slugga planet now Jan 05 17:06:30 like.. are there some mines on my way that can destroy my little slugga? (no counting for flash issue) Jan 05 17:08:27 osas ^^ Jan 05 17:08:46 I don't understand your question :( Jan 05 17:09:01 there are lots of users running the 3.10 openslug for a while Jan 05 17:09:21 no major issues reported (that I know) Jan 05 17:09:59 mmmhh... k Jan 05 17:10:55 i m going to project a persistent slugga friend on the net, so i need to move carefully.. Jan 05 17:11:12 ive allready flashed + update Jan 05 17:11:26 im installing blind for dns Jan 05 17:11:46 i scary about the energy wire Jan 05 17:12:16 this summer the temperature go high, maybe it will burn o.O Jan 05 17:12:38 mine is up for 97 days Jan 05 17:12:52 do somebody know horror story about killer overclokked slugga creatures? Jan 05 17:13:15 it is placed in a fresh room or a normal one? Jan 05 17:13:22 it is not overcloking (rather de-undercloking) Jan 05 17:13:38 normal room (under the table, on the floor) Jan 05 17:14:00 why? are dangerous 233mhz? Jan 05 17:14:12 233 is the normal speed Jan 05 17:14:12 :o Jan 05 17:14:16 check the wiki Jan 05 17:14:19 mmmhhh... Jan 05 17:14:29 and browse the mailing lists Jan 05 17:14:38 i watch my dmesg, cause ive allready overclokked before Jan 05 17:14:46 ;) Jan 05 17:18:18 i won Jan 05 17:18:39 the original is 133 and you could bring it to 266 like i did Jan 05 17:18:57 but the newer come out allready overclokked Jan 05 17:23:34 i need infos.. infos.. InFools... InFos... iNfOs... iNf05.... heheh Jan 05 17:23:50 what bout security? Jan 05 17:24:00 back doors on it Jan 05 17:24:11 vulnerability disclusure Jan 05 17:24:13 etc Jan 05 17:24:33 is there something i need to know? Jan 05 17:38:31 nah, original is 266, linksys put it down to 133. Jan 05 17:39:26 k, it's quite the same Jan 05 17:40:06 :) Jan 05 18:16:15 what about putting on a sshd, bind for a very little network, postfix, and some shell script and a light web server? Jan 05 18:16:34 my box will slow ? Jan 05 18:16:59 does somebody all ready make this combo? Jan 06 01:28:49 G'evening! anybody here? **** ENDING LOGGING AT Sat Jan 06 02:59:59 2007